Despite the growing body of research concerned with talk and interaction in institutional settings, the ways in which complex forms of organisational activity are accomplished in and through gesture remain relatively neglected. In this paper, we consider auctions of fine art and antiques and examine the ways in which auctioneers deploy an organisation that creates competition and enables the price of goods to be rapidly escalated in a systematic and transparent manner. We explore the ways in which gesture and other forms of bodily conduct are used, with and within talk, to elicit, juxtapose and publicly reveal the actions of potential buyers and enable participants to have a sense of the source and integrity of the various contributions. We consider how the gesturing hands serve to engender specific actions and how they are transformed in the course of their articulation to respond to the contribution, or absence of contribution, of bidders. In various ways therefore, the paper is concerned with addressing how gesture and other forms of bodily conduct are interactionally articulated with talk so as to accomplish a highly specialised and contingent form of organisational activity; an activity that enables price to be rapidly escalated and the sale of goods to be witnessed by an audience on the fall of a hammer.
2014. Revisiting Significant Action and Gesture Categorization. Australian Journal of Linguistics 34:2 ► pp. 216 ff.
Ginzburg, Jonathan & Kwong-Cheong Wong
2024. Language games and their types. Linguistics and Philosophy 47:1 ► pp. 149 ff.
Hauser, Eric
2014. Book review: Christian Heath, The Dynamics of Auction: Social Interaction and the Sale of Fine Art and Antiques. Discourse Studies 16:5 ► pp. 688 ff.
Hazel, Spencer & Jan Svennevig
2018. Multilingual workplaces – Interactional dynamics of the contemporary international workforce. Journal of Pragmatics 126 ► pp. 1 ff.
Herrero, Marta
2010. Auctions, Rituals and Emotions in the Art Market. Thesis Eleven 103:1 ► pp. 97 ff.
Kell, Clare & John Sweet
2017. Widening possibilities of interpretation when observing learning and teaching through the use of a dynamic visual notation. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 54:2 ► pp. 162 ff.
Konecki, Krzysztof T.
2012. Wizualna teoria ugruntowana. Podstawowe zasady i procedury. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej 8:1 ► pp. 12 ff.
Luff, Paul & Christian Heath
2012. Some ‘technical challenges’ of video analysis: social actions, objects, material realities and the problems of perspective. Qualitative Research 12:3 ► pp. 255 ff.
Pan, Mingwei
2016. Literature Review. In Nonverbal Delivery in Speaking Assessment, ► pp. 9 ff.
Poizat, Germain, Jérôme Bourbousson, Jacques Saury & Carole Sève
2012. Understanding team coordination in doubles table tennis: Joint analysis of first- and third-person data. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 13:5 ► pp. 630 ff.
Rossi, Giovanni & Tanya Stivers
2021. Category-Sensitive Actions in Interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 84:1 ► pp. 49 ff.
Sorsa, Virpi, Pekka Pälli & Piia Mikkola
2014. Appropriating the Words of Strategy in Performance Appraisal Interviews. Management Communication Quarterly 28:1 ► pp. 56 ff.
[no author supplied]
2011. 7 Literaturverzeichnis. In Imagination und Animation, ► pp. 439 ff.
[no author supplied]
2012. References. In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ► pp. 741 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.