Iconicity in different types of gestures

Isabella Poggi | Università Roma Tre

The paper presents a framework for classifying gestures in terms of different parameters, and shows that the parameter of iconicity cuts across that of cognitive construction, which distinguishes codified gestures — those represented in memory as stable signal–meaning pairs — from creative ones — those invented on the spot on the basis of a few generative rules. While creative gestures are necessarily iconic, because they can be understood only thanks to their iconicity, codified gestures can be iconic too. A model for the generation of iconic gestures is presented, according to which, to create a new gesture, people select the features of the meaning to imitate in terms of their distinctiveness, ease of representation and ontological type. Finally, some principles for measuring the iconicity of gestures of Hearers and Signs of the Deaf are illustrated, thus outlining the continuity of iconic devices between creative and codified gestures.

Keywords: gestures, generation of iconic gestures, iconicity

Published online: 20 May 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.8.1.05pog

Cited by

Cited by 16 other publications

Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed

2020. Do political cartoons and illustrations have their own specialized forms for warnings, threats, and the like? Speech acts in the nonverbal mode. Social Semiotics ► pp. 1 ff.

Billot-Vasquez, Kiana, Zhongwen Lian, Yukari Hirata & Spencer D. Kelly

2020. Emblem Gestures Improve Perception and Evaluation of Non-native Speech. Frontiers in Psychology 11

Kok, Kasper

2016. The grammatical potential of co-speech gesture. Functions of Language 23:2 ► pp. 149 ff.

Kong, Anthony Pak-Hin, Sam-Po Law, Watson Ka-Chun Wat & Christy Lai

2015. Co-verbal gestures among speakers with aphasia: Influence of aphasia severity, linguistic and semantic skills, and hemiplegia on gesture employment in oral discourse. Journal of Communication Disorders 56 ► pp. 88 ff.

Maricchiolo, Fridanna, Augusto Gnisci & Marino Bonaiuto

2012. In Cognitive Behavioural Systems [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7403], ► pp. 405 ff.

Mehler, Alexander, Tim vor der Brück & Andy Lücking

2014. In Human-Computer Interaction. Advanced Interaction Modalities and Techniques [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8511], ► pp. 81 ff.

Navas Medrano, Samuel, Max Pfeiffer & Christian Kray

2017. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, ► pp. 1 ff.

Oh, Seon-Ju, Hyun-Ju Park & Eun-Ju Lee

2015. Characteristics of Iconic Gesture Comprehension and Production in Late-Talkers. Communication Sciences & Disorders 20:2 ► pp. 266 ff.

Ousterhout, Thomas & Costanza Navarretta

2015. In 2015 6th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom), ► pp. 499 ff.

Poggi, Isabella, Francesca D’Errico & Alessandro Ansani

2021. The conductor’s intensity gestures. Psychology of Music 49:6 ► pp. 1478 ff.

Rojas-Munoz, Edgar & Juan Wachs

2021. Assessing Collaborative Physical Tasks Via Gestural Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 51:2 ► pp. 152 ff.

Rojas-Munoz, Edgar & Juan P. Wachs

2019. In 2019 14th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition (FG 2019), ► pp. 1 ff.

Yang, Ping

2017. In Intercultural Responsiveness in the Second Language Learning Classroom [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ], ► pp. 127 ff.

Yang, Ping

2020. In Language Learning and Literacy, ► pp. 339 ff.

Yang, Ping

2020. In Multicultural Instructional Design, ► pp. 902 ff.

Östling, Robert, Carl Börstell & Servane Courtaux

2018. Visual Iconicity Across Sign Languages: Large-Scale Automated Video Analysis of Iconic Articulators and Locations. Frontiers in Psychology 9

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.