The Structure of Time
Language, meaning and temporal cognition
| University of Sussex
One of the most enigmatic aspects of experience concerns time. Since pre-Socratic times scholars have speculated about the nature of time, asking questions such as: What is time? Where does it come from? Where does it go? The central proposal of The Structure of Time is that time, at base, constitutes a phenomenologically real experience. Drawing on findings in psychology, neuroscience, and utilising the perspective of cognitive linguistics, this work argues that our experience of time may ultimately derive from perceptual processes, which in turn enable us to perceive events. As such, temporal experience is a pre-requisite for abilities such as event perception and comparison, rather than an abstraction based on such phenomena. The book represents an examination of the nature of temporal cognition, with two foci: (i) an investigation into (pre-conceptual) temporal experience, and (ii) an analysis of temporal structure at the conceptual level (which derives from temporal experience).
[Human Cognitive Processing, 12] 2004. x, 286 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
Acknowledgements
|
ix
|
|
I. Orientation
|
|
|
1. The problem of time
|
3–11
|
|
2. The phenomenology of time
|
13–32
|
|
3. The elaboration of temporal concepts
|
33–37
|
|
4. The nature of meaning
|
39–56
|
|
5. The conceptual metaphor approach to time
|
57–77
|
|
6. A theory of word-meaning: Principled polysemy
|
79–104
|
|
II. Concepts for time
|
|
|
7. The Duration Sense
|
107–121
|
|
8. The Moment Sense
|
123–130
|
|
9. The Instance Sense
|
131–134
|
|
10. The Event Sense
|
135–140
|
|
11. The Matrix Sense
|
141–157
|
|
12. The Agentive Sense
|
159–167
|
|
13. The Measurement-system Sense
|
169–176
|
|
14. The Commodity Sense
|
177–183
|
|
15. The Present, Past and Future
|
185–198
|
|
III. Models for time
|
|
|
16. Time, motion and agency
|
201–210
|
|
17. Two complex cognitive models of temporality
|
211–226
|
|
18. A third complex model of temporality
|
227–236
|
|
19. Time in modern physics
|
237–249
|
|
20. The structure of time
|
251–254
|
|
Notes
|
255
|
|
References
|
269
|
|
Index
|
277
|
“[...] thought provoking and inspiring. It is a valuable interdisciplinary source for insight in several domains, including lexical semantics, conceptual metaphor theory, and cognitive science in the area of time.”
Thora Tenbrink, University of Bremen, Germany, on Linguist List 15-2430 (2004)
“Time belongs to the bedrock of human cognition. Beginning before birth and remaining for the most part below the horizon of consciousness, temporal cognition is a mystery not easily penetrated. The Structure of Time is an indispensable investigation, rich in theory and examples, into the phenomenology and the linguistics of the way we think about time.”
Mark Turner, Institute Professor, Case Western Reserve University
“With this work, Cognitive Linguistics finally turns its attention from Space to Time.”
Jordan Zlatev, Lund University, Sweden
“This work is interesting, creative, thought-provoking, and timely (no pun intended)”
Wallace Chafe, University of California at Santa Barbara
“In general, the style of the book is very accessible, especially in view of the fact that so many different fields are touched upon. The conclusions at the end of each chapter additionally contribute to the reader's comprehension. The book is therefore accessible not only to linguistics and cognitive scientists but to researchers from any field interested in the phenomenon of time.”
Nadja Nesselhauf, Univeristy of Heidelberg, in Anglistik 16(1), 2005
Cited by
Cited by other publications
No author info given
2014.
In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45],
No author info given
2018.
In Event Structure Metaphors through the Body [Figurative Thought and Language, 4],
No author info given
2018.
In The Poetics of Time – Metaphors and Blends in Language and Literature [Figurative Thought and Language, 3],
Baranyiné Kóczy, Judit
2018.
In Nature, Metaphor, Culture [Cultural Linguistics, ],
► pp. 43 ff.
Baranyiné Kóczy, Judit
2018.
In Nature, Metaphor, Culture [Cultural Linguistics, ],
► pp. 159 ff.
Bolisani, Ettore & Constantin Bratianu
2018.
In Emergent Knowledge Strategies [Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning, 4],
► pp. 73 ff.
Bondarenko, Ievgeniia
2019.
In Perspectives on Abstract Concepts [Human Cognitive Processing, 65],
► pp. 287 ff.
Burns, Patrick, Teresa McCormack, Agnieszka J. Jaroslawska, Patrick A. O'Connor & Eugene M. Caruso
2019. Time Points: A Gestural Study of the Development of Space–Time Mappings.
Cognitive Science 43:12
Casasanto, Daniel
2016.
In Conceptualizations of Time [Human Cognitive Processing, 52],
► pp. 67 ff.
Casasanto, Daniel & Roberto Bottini
2010.
In Spatial Cognition VII [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6222],
► pp. 335 ff.
Casasanto, Daniel, Olga Fotakopoulou & Lera Boroditsky
2010. Space and Time in the Child’s Mind: Evidence for a Cross-Dimensional Asymmetry.
Cognitive Science 34:3 ► pp. 387 ff.
Dabbagh, Ali & Mahdi Noshadi
2015. An Interpretation of the Significance of ‘Time’: The Case of English and Persian Proverbs.
Theory and Practice in Language Studies 5:12 ► pp. 2581 ff.
de la Fuente, Juanma, Julio Santiago, Antonio Román, Cristina Dumitrache & Daniel Casasanto
2014. When You Think About It, Your Past Is in Front of You.
Psychological Science 25:9 ► pp. 1682 ff.
Deckert, Mikołaj & Marek Molenda
2018. Temporal-magnitudinal construal coding.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 16:1 ► pp. 128 ff.
Dobrić, Nikola & Franzisca Weder
2016. Media conceptualizing illnesses – the case of the flu.
Continuum 30:1 ► pp. 126 ff.
Duffy, Sarah E.
2014. The Role of Cultural Artifacts in the Interpretation of Metaphorical Expressions About Time.
Metaphor and Symbol 29:2 ► pp. 94 ff.
DUFFY, SARAH E. & VYVYAN EVANS
2017. The top trumps of time: factors motivating the resolution of temporal ambiguity.
Language and Cognition 9:2 ► pp. 293 ff.
Duffy, Sarah E., Michele I. Feist & Steven McCarthy
2014. Moving Through Time: The Role of Personality in Three Real-Life Contexts.
Cognitive Science 38:8 ► pp. 1662 ff.
Eikmeier, Verena, Simone Alex-Ruf, Claudia Maienborn, Hannes Schröter & Rolf Ulrich
2016.
In Conceptualizations of Time [Human Cognitive Processing, 52],
► pp. 103 ff.
Evangelopoulos, Nicholas E.
2013. Latent semantic analysis.
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 4:6 ► pp. 683 ff.
Evans, Vyvyan
2008. Simulation Semantics and the Linguistics of Time. Commentary on Zwaan.
Language Learning 58 ► pp. 27 ff.
Evans, Vyvyan
2009. Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. Pp. xxx+1334..
Journal of Linguistics 45:2 ► pp. 461 ff.
Evans, Vyvyan
2012. Cognitive linguistics.
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 3:2 ► pp. 129 ff.
FEIST, MICHELE I. & SARAH E. DUFFY
2020. On the path of time: temporal motion in typological perspective.
Language and Cognition ► pp. 1 ff.
Franco, Ludovico
2013. Beforestrikesback.
Acta Linguistica Hungarica 60:3 ► pp. 265 ff.
Güell, Pedro, Macarena Orchard, Martina Yopo & Álvaro Jiménez-Molina
2015. Time Perspectives and Subjective Wellbeing in Chile.
Social Indicators Research 123:1 ► pp. 127 ff.
Hillert, Dieter
2014.
In The Nature of Language,
► pp. 89 ff.
Hillert, Dieter
2018.
In Die Natur der Sprache,
► pp. 127 ff.
HUUMO, TUOMAS
2018. Moving along paths in space and time.
Journal of Linguistics 54:4 ► pp. 721 ff.
ISHIKAWA, KIYOSHI
2005. Temporal Cognition and Activities by Situated Agents (P. Ludlow, Semantics, Tense and Time: An Essay in the Metaphysics of Natural Language).
ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 22:2 ► pp. 443 ff.
Jang, Jung Min & Eun Young Park
2019. Location does matter: the effect of display locations of regular price and sale price on consumers’ responses in comparative price advertising.
International Journal of Advertising ► pp. 1 ff.
Johansson Falck, Marlene
2014. Temporal prepositions explained.
Cognitive Linguistic Studies 1:2 ► pp. 271 ff.
Johansson Falck, Marlene
2016. What trajectors reveal about TIME metaphors: Analysis of English and Swedish.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 28 ff.
Kelly, Ashley Rose, Meagan Kittle Autry & Brad Mehlenbacher
2014.
In Digital Rhetoric and Global Literacies [Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies, ],
► pp. 227 ff.
Kerevičienė, Jurgita & Natalija Zaiceva
2015. Conceptual structure of pain in Lithuanian and English.
Coactivity: Philology, Educology 23:1 ► pp. 38 ff.
Knight, Chris & Jerome Lewis
2017. Wild Voices: Mimicry, Reversal, Metaphor, and the Emergence of Language.
Current Anthropology 58:4 ► pp. 435 ff.
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara
2016.
In Conceptualizations of Time [Human Cognitive Processing, 52],
► pp. ix ff.
Li, Heng
2017. Time on hands.
Gesture 16:3 ► pp. 396 ff.
Li, Heng
2018. A future-minded lark in the morning: The influence of time-of-day and chronotype on metaphorical associations between space and time.
Metaphor and Symbol 33:1 ► pp. 48 ff.
Li, Heng, Van Quynh Bui & Yu Cao
2018. One country, two cultures: Implicit space-time mappings in Southern and Northern Vietnamese.
European Journal of Social Psychology 48:4 ► pp. 560 ff.
Li, Heng & Yu Cao
2018. Karma or Immortality: Can Religion Influence Space-Time Mappings?.
Cognitive Science 42:3 ► pp. 1041 ff.
Li, Heng & Yu Cao
2019. Moving at the Speed of Life: How Life Pace Influences Temporal Reasoning.
Metaphor and Symbol 34:3 ► pp. 158 ff.
Limon, Jerzy
2014.
In Performance Studies,
► pp. 215 ff.
Lu, Wei-lun
2015. Conceptual autonomy and dependence in Chinese lexical semantic analysis.
Chinese Language and Discourse 6:2 ► pp. 162 ff.
Lu, Wei-lun
2017.
In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56],
► pp. 232 ff.
Luraghi, Silvia
2014.
In Perspectives on Semantic Roles [Typological Studies in Language, 106],
► pp. 99 ff.
Mahpeykar, Narges
2018.
In Language Learning, Discourse and Cognition [Human Cognitive Processing, 64],
► pp. 111 ff.
Marchetti, Giorgio
2009. Studies on time: a proposal on how to get out of circularity.
Cognitive Processing 10:1 ► pp. 7 ff.
Marchetti, Giorgio
2014. Attention and working memory: two basic mechanisms for constructing temporal experiences.
Frontiers in Psychology 5
Marcos, Encarni & Aldo Genovesio
2017. Interference between Space and Time Estimations: From Behavior to Neurons.
Frontiers in Neuroscience 11
Matlock, Teenie, Spencer C. Castro, Morgan Fleming, Timothy M. Gann & Paul P. Maglio
2014. Spatial Metaphors of Web Use.
Spatial Cognition & Computation 14:4 ► pp. 306 ff.
Matlock, Teenie, Kevin J. Holmes, Mahesh Srinivasan & Michael Ramscar
2011. Even Abstract Motion Influences the Understanding of Time.
Metaphor and Symbol 26:4 ► pp. 260 ff.
Mehlenbacher, Brad
2012.
In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning,
► pp. 1181 ff.
Morras, Javier & Antonio Barcelona
2019. Conceptual structuring of the English prepositions between, among, and amid, and their Spanish equivalent entre.
Cognitive Linguistic Studies 6:1 ► pp. 103 ff.
Nesset, Tore
2016. “Cyclic” time in the history of Russian.
Studies in Language 40:3 ► pp. 591 ff.
Nyíri, Kristóf
2009. Film, metaphor, and the reality of time1.
New Review of Film and Television Studies 7:2 ► pp. 109 ff.
Agnieszka Piskorska
2020.
In Relevance Theory, Figuration, and Continuity in Pragmatics [Figurative Thought and Language, 8],
Ramscar, Michael, Teenie Matlock & Melody Dye
2010. Running down the clock: The role of expectation in our understanding of time and motion.
Language and Cognitive Processes 25:5 ► pp. 589 ff.
Reagan, Timothy
2019.
In Linguistic Legitimacy and Social Justice,
► pp. 77 ff.
Rodríguez, Lydia
2016. From Discourse to Thought: An Ethnopoetic Analysis of a Chol Mayan Folktale.
Signs and Society 4:2 ► pp. 278 ff.
Romero-Jódar, Andrés
2012. “When the Life Giver Dies, All Around Is Laid Waste.” Structural Trauma and the Splitting of Time inSignal to Noise, a Graphic Novel.
The Journal of Popular Culture 45:5 ► pp. 1000 ff.
Schulz, Ruth, Gordon Wyeth & Janet Wiles
2011. Are We There Yet? Grounding Temporal Concepts in Shared Journeys.
IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development 3:2 ► pp. 163 ff.
Shinzato, Rumiko
2014.
In Usage-based Approaches to Japanese Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 156],
► pp. 85 ff.
Sinha, Chris, Vera da Silva Sinha, Jörg Zinken & Wany Sampaio
2016.
In Conceptualizations of Time [Human Cognitive Processing, 52],
► pp. 151 ff.
Sinha, Chris, Vera Da Silva Sinha, Jörg Zinken & Wany Sampaio
2011. When time is not space: The social and linguistic construction of time intervals and temporal event relations in an Amazonian culture.
Language and Cognition 3:1 ► pp. 137 ff.
STITES, LAUREN J. & ŞEYDA ÖZÇALIŞKAN
2013. Developmental changes in children's comprehension and explanation of spatial metaphors for time.
Journal of Child Language 40:5 ► pp. 1123 ff.
Tao, Yingshi & Ronghua Wang
2015. Language and Time: A Cognitive Linguistics Approach.
Australian Journal of Linguistics 35:4 ► pp. 429 ff.
Tillman, Katharine A., Nestor Tulagan, Eren Fukuda & David Barner
2018. The mental timeline is gradually constructed in childhood.
Developmental Science 21:6 ► pp. e12679 ff.
Tripathi, Rama Charan & Yoganand Sinha
2009. The Ways of ‘Being’ and ‘Becoming’ Human.
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science 43:4 ► pp. 311 ff.
TYLER, ANDREA & HANA JAN
2017. Be going to and will: talking about the future using embodied experience.
Language and Cognition 9:3 ► pp. 412 ff.
VIIMARANTA, JOHANNA
2014. The Russian prefix pod- from the viewpoint of lexical concepts.
Language and Cognition 6:4 ► pp. 462 ff.
Walker, Esther J. & Rafael Núñez
2016.
In Conceptualizations of Time [Human Cognitive Processing, 52],
► pp. 43 ff.
Wang, Ben Pin-Yun & Lily I-wen Su
2015. On the principled polysemy of-kaiin Chinese resultative verbs.
Chinese Language and Discourse 6:1 ► pp. 2 ff.
Westby, Carol
2014. Comprehending Spatial Metaphors.
Word of Mouth 26:2 ► pp. 8 ff.
Wiśniewska-Kin, Monika
2017. Dziecięce zmagania z czasem. Wyzwalanie rozumienia pojęcia czas przez dzieci 9–10-letnie w kulturze szkoły polskiej.
Problemy Wczesnej Edukacji 37:2 ► pp. 28 ff.
Wong, Man Ho Ivy, Helen Zhao & Brian MacWhinney
2018. A Cognitive Linguistics Application for Second Language Pedagogy: The English Preposition Tutor.
Language Learning 68:2 ► pp. 438 ff.
Zanker, Andreas T.
2019.
In Metaphor in Homer,
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 june 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Philosophy
Psychology
BIC Subject: JM – Psychology
BISAC Subject: PSY000000 – PSYCHOLOGY / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number: 2003062997