Among children’s earliest spatial words are topological forms like ‘in’ and ‘on’. Although these forms name spatial relationships, they also presuppose a classification of ground objects into entities such as “containers” and “surfaces”; hence their relevance for a volume on “spatial entities”. Traditionally, researchers have assumed that semantic categories of space are universal, reflecting a human way of nonlinguistically perceiving and cognizing space. But, as this chapter discusses, spatial categories in fact differ strikingly across languages, and children begin to home in on language-specific classifications extremely early, before age two. Learners do not, it seems, draw only on purely nonlinguistic spatial concepts; they can also actively construct spatial categories on the basis of the linguistic input. Evidence is drawn primarily from research on children learning Korean vs. English.
2008. Learning to talk and gesture about motion in French. First Language 28:2 ► pp. 200 ff.
Hickmann, Maya
2015. Discourse of Children. In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, ► pp. 1 ff.
HICKMANN, MAYA, PIERRE TARANNE & PHILIPPE BONNET
2009. Motion in first language acquisition: Manner and Path in French and English child language*. Journal of Child Language 36:4 ► pp. 705 ff.
Klippel, Alexander
2012. Spatial Information Theory Meets Spatial Thinking: Is Topology the Rosetta Stone of Spatio-temporal Cognition?. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 102:6 ► pp. 1310 ff.
2011. Universality, Language-Variability and Individuality: Defining Linguistic Building Blocks for Spatial Relations. In Spatial Information Theory [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6899], ► pp. 391 ff.
Tyler, Andrea
2012. Spatial Language, Polysemy, and Cross-Linguistic Semantic Mismatches: Cognitive Linguistics Insights into Challenges for Second Language Learners. Spatial Cognition & Computation 12:4 ► pp. 305 ff.
Yun, Hongoak & Soonja Choi
2018. Spatial Semantics, Cognition, and Their Interaction: A Comparative Study of Spatial Categorization in English and Korean. Cognitive Science 42:6 ► pp. 1736 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.