Article published in:
Researching and Applying Metaphor in the Real WorldEdited by Graham Low, Zazie Todd, Alice Deignan and Lynne Cameron
[Human Cognitive Processing 26] 2010
► pp. 185–208
10. Mapping principles for conceptual metaphors
Issues surrounding novel metaphor comprehension are not well understood. In order to address this problem, this paper proposes the Conceptual Mapping Model, which puts forward the idea that examining the linguistic mappings found in a particular source-target domain pairing allows hypotheses to be formulated regarding the underlying reason for this conceptual pairing. These hypotheses are formulated as Mapping Principles and allow for predictions regarding novel metaphor usage to be made. Four experimental studies on native Mandarin Chinese speakers demonstrate that novel metaphors that follow Mapping Principles receive significantly lower acceptability and interpretability ratings than conventional metaphors, as well as longer listening times when making these judgments. In addition, novel metaphors that do not follow Mapping Principles receive significantly lower acceptability and interpretability ratings than novel metaphors that do follow Mapping Principles, as well as longer listening times. In sum, the Conceptual Mapping Model proposes that a contrastive linguistic analysis of conventional conceptual metaphors can increase our understanding as to why conceptual domains are linked, which in turn will facilitate our ability to predict and model how conceptual metaphors are processed in both conventional and novel usages.
Keywords: Conceptual Mapping Model, conceptual metaphors, Mapping Principles, metaphor processing, ratings tasks, reaction time studies
Published online: 13 October 2010
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.26.12ahr
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.26.12ahr
Cited by
Cited by 13 other publications
Ahrens, Kathleen
Ahrens, Kathleen & Shu-Ping Gong
Burgers, Christian & Ahrens, Kathleen
Chung, Siaw-Fong
Emile, Renu, Russell W. Belk & John R. Clammer
Gao, Xuefeng, Chu-Ren Huang & Sophia Yat-Mei Lee
Lu, Louis Wei-Lun & Kathleen Ahrens
Oleg, Kalinin & Dmitry Yu. Gruzdev
Thonus, Terese & Beth L. Hewett
Tsai, Yi Ting
Xiong, Jiajuan & Chu-Ren Huang
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 june 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.