It has been asserted by a number of writers from a range of disciplines that metaphors have evaluative and persuasive properties. In the Conceptual Metaphor Theory literature, it is widely agreed that metaphor is evaluative, persuasive and therefore potentially ideological. Outside the cognitive literature, metaphor’s persuasive qualities have been studied by researchers in fields from Critical Discourse Analysis to consumer research. This chapter reviews the mechanisms through which evaluation seems to be carried out, discussing a number of studies. Four themes are identified: metaphors as stories, with entailments, metaphors which map evaluative connotations from source to target domain, the deliberate choice of a source domain which resonates with particular groups of language users, and the use of metaphorical scenarios. I investigate these mechanisms in a small number of metaphorical expressions, using corpus techniques, with a focus on detailed analysis of form as well as meaning. I find that the evaluations conveyed by the expressions that I investigate seem most consistent with Musolff’s scenarios model (2006). However the evaluative meaning expressed is often even more specific, contextually and pragmatically, than his theory would predict. I also argue that the characteristic form of evaluative metaphorical expressions raises challenges for our current categories of linguistic description.
2022. Multimodal metaphors and sexism in Arabic cartoons depicting gender and gender relations during COVID-19. Multimodal Communication 11:3 ► pp. 235 ff.
Alkhammash, Reem
2023. Bibliometric, network, and thematic mapping analyses of metaphor and discourse in COVID-19 publications from 2020 to 2022. Frontiers in Psychology 13
2023. Code Red for Humanity: Multimodal Metaphor and Metonymy in Noncommercial Advertisements on Environmental Awareness and Activism. Metaphor and Symbol 38:3 ► pp. 231 ff.
Hidalgo-Downing, Laura & Paula Pérez-Sobrino
2024. Developing an annotation protocol for evaluative stance and metaphor in discourse: theoretical and methodological considerations. Text & Talk 44:2 ► pp. 197 ff.
Hidalgo-Downing, Laura, Paula Pérez-Sobrino, Laura Filardo-Llamas, Carmen Maíz-Arévalo, Begoña Núñez-Perucha, Alfonso Sánchez-Moya & Julia T. Williams Camus
2020. Gender, Ideology and Conceptual Metaphors: Women and the Source Domain of the Hunt. Complutense Journal of English Studies 28 ► pp. 203 ff.
McIntyre, Dan
2011. The year’s work in stylistics 2010. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 20:4 ► pp. 347 ff.
Musolff, Andreas
2017. Analiza scenariuszy metaforycznych w ramach lingwistyki kulturowej. In Lingwistyka kulturowa i międzykulturowa. Antologia,
Musolff, Andreas
2020. Metaphors for the Nation: Conceptualization of Its BODY and/or PERSON. In Cultural Conceptualizations in Language and Communication [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 3 ff.
Musolff, Andreas
2021. Figurative Conceptualisations of the Nation(-State). In National Conceptualisations of the Body Politic [Cultural Linguistics, ], ► pp. 1 ff.
Musolff, Andreas
2022. Universality and/or Cultural Specificity of Metaphors and Analogies? NATIONS as BODIES/PERSONS. In Metaphors and Analogies in Sciences and Humanities [Synthese Library, 453], ► pp. 401 ff.
Rossi, Maria Grazia, Fabrizio Macagno & Sarah Bigi
2022. Dialogical functions of metaphors in medical interactions. Text & Talk 42:1 ► pp. 77 ff.
Syarifuddin, Syarifuddin & Marwah Yusuf
2017. Dramaturgy Budget Policy Formulation: Intuitive Response of Politics and Power. GATR Accounting and Finance Review 2:3 ► pp. 46 ff.
Xu, Qingshu
2023. Comparing COVID-19 metaphors in Chinese and English social media with critical metaphor analysis. Frontiers in Psychology 14
Yu, Yating
2021. Metaphorical representations of “leftover women”: between traditional patriarchy and modern egalitarianism. Social Semiotics 31:2 ► pp. 248 ff.
Yuan, Guorong & Yi Sun
2023. A bibliometric study of metaphor research and its implications (2010–2020). Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 41:3 ► pp. 227 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.