Part of
Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a consensus view
Edited by Réka Benczes, Antonio Barcelona and Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez
[Human Cognitive Processing 28] 2011
► pp. 89102
Cited by

Cited by 9 other publications

Franceschi, Daniele
2014. Licensing and blocking factors in the use of BEGIN verbs. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12:2  pp. 304 ff. DOI logo
Park, Chongwon
2022. Metonymy in the Korean internally headed relative clause construction. Linguistics Vanguard 8:1  pp. 355 ff. DOI logo
Park, Chongwon
2022. Korean Relative Clauses: Metonymy, Zone Activation, and Reference Point*. Studia Linguistica 76:2  pp. 275 ff. DOI logo
PARK, CHONGWON & DANIEL TURNER
2017. When Richard met CG: reference-point and English copy-raising. Language and Cognition 9:3  pp. 473 ff. DOI logo
Park, Chongwon & Jaehoon Yeon
2023. The Factive, IHRC, and Cleft constructions in Korean. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 21:1  pp. 140 ff. DOI logo
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José & Alicia Galera Masegosa
2020. The metonymic exploitation of descriptive, attitudinal, and regulatory scenarios in meaning making. In Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language [Figurative Thought and Language, 9],  pp. 284 ff. DOI logo
Snoek, Conor
2022. From ‘clubs’ to ‘clocks’: lexical semantic extensions in Dene languages. Cognitive Linguistics 33:1  pp. 193 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.