Part of
Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a consensus view
Edited by Réka Benczes, Antonio Barcelona and Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez
[Human Cognitive Processing 28] 2011
► pp. 89102
Cited by (11)

Cited by 11 other publications

Park, Chongwon & Jaehoon Yeon
2023. The Factive, IHRC, and Cleft constructions in Korean. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 21:1  pp. 140 ff. DOI logo
Park, Chongwon
2022. Metonymy in the Korean internally headed relative clause construction. Linguistics Vanguard 8:1  pp. 355 ff. DOI logo
Park, Chongwon
2022. Korean Relative Clauses: Metonymy, Zone Activation, and Reference Point*. Studia Linguistica 76:2  pp. 275 ff. DOI logo
Snoek, Conor
2022. From ‘clubs’ to ‘clocks’: lexical semantic extensions in Dene languages. Cognitive Linguistics 33:1  pp. 193 ff. DOI logo
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José & Alicia Galera Masegosa
2020. The metonymic exploitation of descriptive, attitudinal, and regulatory scenarios in meaning making. In Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language [Figurative Thought and Language, 9],  pp. 283 ff. DOI logo
Barcelona, Antonio
2024. Trends in cognitive-linguistic research on metonymy. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 11:1  pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
PARK, CHONGWON & DANIEL TURNER
2017. When Richard met CG: reference-point and English copy-raising. Language and Cognition 9:3  pp. 473 ff. DOI logo
Franceschi, Daniele
2014. Licensing and blocking factors in the use of BEGIN verbs. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12:2  pp. 304 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.