The English present

Temporal coincidence vs. epistemic immediacy

Ronald W. Langacker | University of California at San Diego

Two accounts of the English present are outlined and compared: one that treats it as tense, indicating coincidence with the time of speaking; and one that treats it as modality, indicating epistemic immediacy. Well-known problems with a time-based account are overcome in a conceptual semantic description that makes explicit the mental constructions invoked in non-present uses. With a modal account, the problem is to make the notion of epistemic immediacy sufficiently clear and precise for explicit analysis and comparison to be possible. There is no doubt that the modal account is more general, but for a wide range of central uses the two are effectively equivalent, temporal coincidence providing the basis for epistemic immediacy. The former can be seen as the category prototype, the latter as a schematic (fully general) characterization.

Published online: 28 July 2011
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.29.06lan

Cited by

Cited by 14 other publications

Aerts, Simon

2018. Tense, Aspect and Aktionsart in Classical Latin: Towards a New Approach. Symbolae Osloenses 92:1 ► pp. 107 ff.

DE WIT, ASTRID

2016. The relation between aspect and inversion in English. English Language and Linguistics 20:1 ► pp. 107 ff.

De Wit, Astrid

2018. The semantics of the simple tenses and full-verb inversion in English. Constructions and Frames 10:2 ► pp. 210 ff.

DE WIT, ASTRID & FRANK BRISARD

2014. A Cognitive Grammar account of the semantics of the English present progressive. Journal of Linguistics 50:1 ► pp. 49 ff.

DE WIT, ASTRID, FRANK BRISARD & MICHAEL MEEUWIS

2018. The epistemic import of aspectual constructions: the case of performatives. Language and Cognition 10:2 ► pp. 234 ff.

DE WIT, ASTRID, PETER PETRÉ & FRANK BRISARD

2020. Standing out with the progressive. Journal of Linguistics 56:3 ► pp. 479 ff.

Dudley, Amber & Roumyana Slabakova

2020. In Formal Linguistics and Language Education [Educational Linguistics, 43], ► pp. 133 ff.

Dudley, Amber & Roumyana Slabakova

2020. Aspectual contrasts in the Englishpresent tense revisited. Pedagogical Linguistics 1:1 ► pp. 66 ff.

Nijk, Arjan A.

2016. Re-experiencing the Past . Philologus 160:2 ► pp. 217 ff.

Nijk, Arjan A.

2019. Bridging the gap between the near and the far: Displacement and representation . Cognitive Linguistics 30:2 ► pp. 327 ff.

Rodríguez Rosique, Susana

2018. In Perspectives on Evidentiality in Spanish [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 290], ► pp. 223 ff.

Romain, Laurence, Adnane Ez-zizi, Petar Milin & Dagmar Divjak

2022. What makes the past perfect and the future progressive? Experiential coordinates for a learnable, context-based model of tense and aspect. Cognitive Linguistics 33:2 ► pp. 251 ff.

Torres Soler, Julio

2021. Susana Rodríguez Rosique (2019): El futuro en español. Tiempo, conocimiento, interacción. Berna: Peter Lang, 259 páginas.. Verba: Anuario Galego de Filoloxía 48

Zeman, Sonja

2018. In Linguistic Foundations of Narration in Spoken and Sign Languages [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 247], ► pp. 173 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 june 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.