Two accounts of the English present are outlined and compared: one that treats it as tense, indicating coincidence with the time of speaking; and one that treats it as modality, indicating epistemic immediacy. Well-known problems with a time-based account are overcome in a conceptual semantic description that makes explicit the mental constructions invoked in non-present uses. With a modal account, the problem is to make the notion of epistemic immediacy sufficiently clear and precise for explicit analysis and comparison to be possible. There is no doubt that the modal account is more general, but for a wide range of central uses the two are effectively equivalent, temporal coincidence providing the basis for epistemic immediacy. The former can be seen as the category prototype, the latter as a schematic (fully general) characterization.
Astrid De Wit, Frank Brisard, Carol Madden-Lombardi, Michael Meeuwis & Adeline Patard
2024. Beyond Aspectual Semantics,
Xu, Zhao & Zheng Wu
2023. Divergence and Convergence in Tense and Aspect Meanings of “guo” and “le”. In Chinese Lexical Semantics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13495], ► pp. 3 ff.
Ng, Chi Wui
2022. Systemic Theoretical Instruction and Cognitive Grammar: Acquisition of the English Tense System. In Challenges Encountered by Chinese ESL Learners, ► pp. 59 ff.
Romain, Laurence, Adnane Ez-zizi, Petar Milin & Dagmar Divjak
2022. What makes the past perfect and the future progressive? Experiential coordinates for a learnable, context-based model of tense and aspect. Cognitive Linguistics 33:2 ► pp. 251 ff.
Salman, Muhammad Barjes & Omaima Ismaeel Salih
2022. Mood of Verbs in both Arabic and English Languages: A Contrastive study. Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities 29:10, 2 ► pp. 39 ff.
Torres Soler, Julio
2021. Susana Rodríguez Rosique (2019): El futuro en español. Tiempo, conocimiento, interacción. Berna: Peter Lang, 259 páginas.. Verba: Anuario Galego de Filoloxía 48
DE WIT, ASTRID, PETER PETRÉ & FRANK BRISARD
2020. Standing out with the progressive. Journal of Linguistics 56:3 ► pp. 479 ff.
2016. Re-experiencing the Past. Philologus 160:2 ► pp. 217 ff.
Nijk, Arjan A.
2019. Bridging the gap between the near and the far: Displacement and representation. Cognitive Linguistics 30:2 ► pp. 327 ff.
DE WIT, ASTRID & FRANK BRISARD
2014. A Cognitive Grammar account of the semantics of the English present progressive. Journal of Linguistics 50:1 ► pp. 49 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.