Genre between the humanities and the sciences

Gerard J. Steen

This chapter outlines an approach to genre as the driving force behind language, cognition, and communication. Genre can and has been studied in the humanities as well as the cognitive and social sciences, but the present chapter presents a theoretical integration of these approaches and offers a model that can be empirically investigated by various methods across the board of these disciplines. The model itself is based in cognitive psychology, and a number of possibilities and implications for text analysis are illustrated. Both the role of language itself as well as the connection with literature are included in the discussion in order to suggest how a complete picture can be achieved of the bi-directional traffic between cognitive science and the humanities.

Keywords: empirical approach, relationship of language, literature, and cognition, text analysis

Published online: 13 July 2011
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.30.03ste

Cited by

Cited by 20 other publications

No author info given

2021. In The Politics of Person Reference [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 320],

Auken, Sune

2015. In Genre Theory in Information Studies [Studies in Information, 11], ► pp. 155 ff.

Baicchi, Annalisa & Aneider Iza Erviti

2018. Genre as cognitive construction. Pragmatics & Cognition 25:3 ► pp. 576 ff.

Beger, Anke

2015. In Metaphor in Specialist Discourse [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 4], ► pp. 53 ff.

Bertuccelli Papi, Marcella

2018. Satire as a genre. Pragmatics & Cognition 25:3 ► pp. 459 ff.

Cienki, Alan

2015. Insights into coordination, collaboration, and cooperation from the behavioral and cognitive sciences. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 16:3 ► pp. 553 ff.

Cienki, Alan

2020. In Drawing Attention to Metaphor [Figurative Thought and Language, 5], ► pp. 63 ff.

Creed, Allison & Peter McIlveen

2019. In Management and Marketing of Wine Tourism Business, ► pp. 25 ff.

Finsen, Andreas Bilstrup, Gerard J. Steen & Jean H. M. Wagemans

2019. An argumentative reconstruction of the computer metaphor of the brain. Journal of Argumentation in Context 8:3 ► pp. 317 ff.

McIntyre, Dan

2012. The year’s work in stylistics 2011. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 21:4 ► pp. 402 ff.

Nijhof, Annabel D., Roel M. Willems & Sonja Kotz

2015. Simulating Fiction: Individual Differences in Literature Comprehension Revealed with fMRI. PLOS ONE 10:2 ► pp. e0116492 ff.

Nikiforidou, Kiki

2015. Grammatical constructions and cross-text generalizations. Constructions and Frames 7:2 ► pp. 181 ff.

Nikiforidou, Kiki

2018. Genre and constructional analysis. Pragmatics & Cognition 25:3 ► pp. 543 ff.

Perrez, Julien & Min Reuchamps

2015. Special issue on the political impact of metaphors. Metaphor and the Social World 5:2 ► pp. 165 ff.

Sanders, Ted J.M. & Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul

2019. In Empirical Studies of the Construction of Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 305], ► pp. 273 ff.

Spooren, Wilbert

2018. In Visual Metaphor [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 18], ► pp. 1 ff.

Tseng, Ming-Yu

2018. genre as struggle . Pragmatics & Cognition 25:3 ► pp. 483 ff.

Vergaro, Carla

2018. A cognitive framework for understanding genre. Pragmatics & Cognition 25:3 ► pp. 430 ff.

Vergaro, Carla

2018. Introduction. Pragmatics & Cognition 25:3 ► pp. 417 ff.

Versluis, Christine & Lou-Ann Kleppa

2016. In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55], ► pp. 323 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 july 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.