On the subject of impersonals

Langacker, Ronald W.

doi:10.1075/hcp.32.12lan

Article published in:

Cognitive Linguistics: Convergence and Expansion
Edited by Mario Brdar, Stefan Th. Gries and Milena Žic Fuchs
[Human Cognitive Processing 32] 2011
► pp. 179–218

On the subject of impersonals

Ronald W. Langacker | University of California, San Diego

In accordance with basic principles of Cognitive Grammar, impersonal it (e.g. It’s obvious that he’s angry) is claimed to be meaningful. Three avenues of approach are followed in the characterization of it and the constructions it appears in: a comparison with related constructions; a comparison to other pronouns; and examination of a basic cognitive model called the “control cycle”. This broad perspective leads to a unified account in which the meaning of impersonal it is a special case of the general semantic value of this pronoun.

Published online: 10 November 2011
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.32.12lan

Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

No author info given

2019. In Reference Point and Case [Human Cognitive Processing, 68],

Heath, Jeffrey & Vadim Dyachkov

2022. Dogon pseudo-subjects with or without true subjects. Studies in Language

Park, Chongwon

2013. Setting and location. Constructions and Frames 5:2 ► pp. 192 ff.

PARK, CHONGWON & DANIEL TURNER

2017. When Richard met CG: reference-point and English copy-raising. Language and Cognition 9:3 ► pp. 473 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.