A first empirical turn in cognitive linguistics (CL) occurred in the mid–1990s, when researchers began to apply psycholinguistic methods to CL research questions, which quickly gained widespread acceptance in the field. More recently, a number of CL researchers have turned to corpus-linguistic methods, but these are not yet widely accepted. This is surprising, given the strong commitment in the CL community to ‘usage-based’ models of language. In this paper, I take up a number of ideas from construction grammar and cognitive linguistics and confront them with corpus data and corpus methods in order to show how such data may be used to address cognitive linguistic research issues that are difficult or impossible to address in other ways.
2024. (Im)personalization in German and English Negative Online Reviews: Contrasts, Comparisons, and Cognitive Implications. International Journal of Business Communication 61:1 ► pp. 39 ff.
Proroković, Jakov & Frane Malenica
2023. Language corpora and first language acquisition—A case study of the ditransitive construction. Applied Corpus Linguistics 3:1 ► pp. 100041 ff.
Alduais, Ahmed, Ammar Al-Khawlani, Shrouq Almaghlouth & Hind Alfadda
2022. Cognitive Linguistics: Analysis of Mapping Knowledge Domains. Journal of Intelligence 10:4 ► pp. 93 ff.
Schweinberger, Martin
2021. Ongoing change in the Australian English amplifier system. Australian Journal of Linguistics 41:2 ► pp. 166 ff.
Zehentner, Eva
2021. Alternations emerge and disappear: the network of dispossession constructions in the history of English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 17:3 ► pp. 525 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.