Towards a Theory of Metonymy

Cited by 169 other publications

No author info given

2014.  In The (Ir)reversibility of English Binomials [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 64],

No author info given

2018.  In Event Structure Metaphors through the Body [Figurative Thought and Language, 4],

No author info given

2019.  In Reference Point and Case [Human Cognitive Processing, 68],

No author info given

2019.  In Representing Wine – Sensory Perceptions, Communication and Cultures [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 21],

No author info given

2020. Cognitive pragmatics of American presidential debates: a case for economic metaphors. Cognition, Communication, Discourse :21

No author info given

2022.  In Introduction to Cognitive Pragmatics [Cognitive Linguistics in Practice, 4],

No author info given

2022.  In Pejorative Suffixes and Combining Forms in English [Studies in Language Companion Series, 222],

Ahmadgoli, Kamran & Morteza Yazdanjoo

2020. Multimodal representation of social discourses in Asghar Farhadi’s A Separation: a social semiotic study. Social Semiotics 30:5 ► pp. 699 ff.

Apresjan, Valentina, Anastasiya Lopukhina & Maria Zarifyan

2021. Representation of Different Types of Adjectival Polysemy in the Mental Lexicon. Frontiers in Psychology 12

Athanasiadou, Angeliki

2017.  In Irony in Language Use and Communication [Figurative Thought and Language, 1], ► pp. 201 ff.

Athanasiadou, Angeliki

2017.  In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56], ► pp. 2 ff.

Baicchi, Annalisa

2007. Review of Günter, Köpcke, Berg & Siemund (2007): Aspects of Meaning Construction. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 5 ► pp. 307 ff.

Barnden, John

2018.  In Conceptual Metonymy [Human Cognitive Processing, 60], ► pp. 97 ff.

Bello, Umar

2022. Metaphors we are robbed by: a critical discourse analysis of ‘the national cake’ and Nigeria’s prebendal elite. Text & Talk 0:0

Benczes, Réka

2015. “Cognitive Linguistics is fun”. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:2 ► pp. 479 ff.

Bierwiaczonek, Bogusław

2018.  In Conceptual Metonymy [Human Cognitive Processing, 60], ► pp. 185 ff.

Bierwiaczonek, Bogusław

2020.  In Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language [Figurative Thought and Language, 9], ► pp. 226 ff.

Blanco Carrión, Olga

2018.  In Conceptual Metonymy [Human Cognitive Processing, 60], ► pp. 55 ff.

Borbely, Antal F.

2004. Toward a Psychodynamic Understanding of Metaphor and Metonymy: Their Role in Awareness and Defense. Metaphor and Symbol 19:2 ► pp. 91 ff.

Brdar, Mario

2019. On the regularity of metonymy across languages (exemplified on some metonymies in medical discourse). ExELL 7:1 ► pp. 52 ff.

Brdar, Mario & Rita Brdar-Szabó

2017. On constructional blocking of metonymies. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15:1 ► pp. 183 ff.

Brdar-Szabó, Rita & Mario Brdar

2021.  In Figurative Language – Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11], ► pp. 175 ff.

Caballero, Rosario

2019.  In Perception Metaphors [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 19], ► pp. 127 ff.

Catalano, Theresa & John W. Creswell

2013. Understanding the Language of the Occupy Movement. Qualitative Inquiry 19:9 ► pp. 664 ff.

Celle, Agnès, Anne Jugnet, Laure Lansari & Emilie L’Hôte

2018.  In Surprise: An Emotion? [Contributions To Phenomenology, 97], ► pp. 163 ff.

Chaplin, Evgenii Vladimirovich

2019. HYPOTHETICAL-DEDUCTIVE METHOD TO DESCRIBE METONYMY IN THE SPHERE OF VERBS OF SPEAKING. Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice :11 ► pp. 381 ff.

Chen, Xianglan, Fang Li, Yachao Duan & Yahui Duan

2019. The length of preceding context influences metonymy processing. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 17:1 ► pp. 243 ff.

Chen, Yi-chen

2019. Teaching figurative language to EFL learners: an evaluation of metaphoric mapping instruction. The Language Learning Journal 47:1 ► pp. 49 ff.

Chen, Yi-chen & Huei-ling Lai

2012. EFL learners’ awareness of metonymy–metaphor continuum in figurative expressions. Language Awareness 21:3 ► pp. 235 ff.

Chen, Yi-chen & Huei-ling Lai

2014. The influence of cultural universality and specificity on EFL learners' comprehension of metaphor and metonymy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 24:3 ► pp. 312 ff.

Cho, Hye-Jin

2017. A Study on the Cognitive Structure and the Extension of Meaning of Spanish Phraseological Units of BOCA. Iberoamérica 19:2 ► pp. 33 ff.

Cienki, Alan

2013. Bringing concepts from cognitive linguistics into the analysis of policies and the political. Journal of International Relations and Development 16:2 ► pp. 294 ff.

Coschignano, Serena

2021. The semantic network of temperature . Review of Cognitive Linguistics 19:1 ► pp. 232 ff.

Crespo-Fernández, Eliecer

2022. Euphemism in laxative TV commercials: at the crossroads between politeness and persuasion. Journal of Politeness Research 18:1 ► pp. 11 ff.

Cuadrado-Fernandez, Antonio

2015.  In Cultural Essentialism in Intercultural Relations, ► pp. 99 ff.

Dai, Xin

2022. Estudio cognitivo e intercultural del eufemismo chino y español de muerte. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics

Denroche, Charles

2021. The Three Grammars and the sign. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 19:1 ► pp. 206 ff.

Devylder, Simon

2019.  In Metaphor and Metonymy in the Digital Age [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 8], ► pp. 199 ff.

Digonnet, Rémi

2018.  In Sensory Perceptions in Language, Embodiment and Epistemology [Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, 42], ► pp. 177 ff.

Ding, Fangfang

2015. Rethinking the Cognitive Study of Metonymy. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 5:9 ► pp. 1836 ff.

Drożdż, Grzegorz

2016.  In Studies in Lexicogrammar [Human Cognitive Processing, 54], ► pp. 95 ff.

Dziedzic-Rawska, Alicja

2017.  In Multiculturalism, Multilingualism and the Self [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 63 ff.

Dąbrowska, Dorota

2016. A multimodal perspective on metaphors and metonymies in art: A case study of the artwork Agora by Magdalena Abakanowicz. Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies :13(2) ► pp. 4 ff.

Eubanks, Philip

2005. Globalization, "Corporate Rule," and Blended Worlds: A Conceptual-Rhetorical Analysis of Metaphor, Metonymy, and Conceptual Blending. Metaphor and Symbol 20:3 ► pp. 173 ff.

Eubanks, Philip

2008. An Analysis ofCorporate Rulein Globalization Discourse: Why We Need Rhetoric to Explain Conceptual Figures. Rhetoric Review 27:3 ► pp. 236 ff.

FALKUM, INGRID L., MARTA RECASENS & EVE V. CLARK

2017. “The moustache sits down first”: on the acquisition of metonymy. Journal of Child Language 44:1 ► pp. 87 ff.

Feng, Mei

2021. Towards a cultural model of qi in TCM. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 19:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Feng, William Dezheng

2017. Metonymy and visual representation: towards a social semiotic framework of visual metonymy. Visual Communication 16:4 ► pp. 441 ff.

Ferrerós Pagès, Carla

2021. Significats metafòrics i metonímics del mot polisèmic per a ‘cor’ en català (cor) i en francès (cœur). Revista de Filología Románica 38 ► pp. 133 ff.

Fisher, Harwood

2003. Metonymy as concept: A metaphor for rhetoric, not for thought. Semiotica 2003:147

Fougner Rydning, Atin

2005. The Return of Sense on the Scene of Translation Studies in the Light of the Cognitive Blending Theory. Meta 50:2 ► pp. 392 ff.

Eric Fredua-Kwarteng

2015. How Prospective Teachers Conceptualized Mathematics: Implications for Teaching. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 10:2 ► pp. 77 ff.

Ghafel, Banafsheh & Akbar Mirzaie

2014. Colours in Everyday Metaphoric Language of Persian Speakers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 136 ► pp. 133 ff.

Glaz, Adam

2016.  In Studies in Lexicogrammar [Human Cognitive Processing, 54], ► pp. 75 ff.

Glebkin, Vladimir

2014. Cultural-historical psychology and the cognitive view of metonymy and metaphor. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12:2 ► pp. 288 ff.

Glotova, Elena

2014. The Suffering Minds: Cognitive Stylistic Approach to Characterization in “The Child-Who-Was-Tired” by Katherine Mansfield and “Sleepy” by Anton Chekhov. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 4:12

GÖKÇE, Sevgi

2021. Metaphorical and Metonymical Heart in Turkish: Kalp and Yürek. Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları/Journal of Language and Literature Studies

Halverson, Sandra L. & Jan Oskar Engene

2010. Domains and Dimensions in Metonymy: A Corpus-Based Study ofSchengenandMaastricht. Metaphor and Symbol 25:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Hapchenko, Оlena

2016. The cognitive aspects of metonymy. Ukrainian Linguistics :46 ► pp. 53 ff.

Herrero-Ruiz, Javier

2020. On Some Pragmatic Effects of Event Metonymies. Metaphor and Symbol 35:4 ► pp. 266 ff.

Herrero-Ruiz, Javier

2021. Interpretations based on delayed-domain (dis)appearance in printed advertising. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 19:2 ► pp. 299 ff.

Hsu, Yen, Chia-Jung Lee & Pei-Ying Yang

2019.  In HCI International 2019 – Late Breaking Papers [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11786], ► pp. 28 ff.

Häcker, Martina

2020. ‘A pointing stocke to euery one that passeth vp and downe’: Metonymy in Late Medieval and Early Modern English Terms of Ridicule. Neophilologus 104:1 ► pp. 131 ff.

Ilchuk, O.

2019. KONZEPTUELLE UND LEXIKALISCHE METONYMISCHE MODELLE DER ABGELEITETEN SUFFIXALEN SUBSTANTIVE DER MODERNEN DEUTSCHEN SPRACHE. Studia Philologica :12 ► pp. 56 ff.

Imamović, Adisa & Anela Mulahmetović Ibrišimović

2015. Some conceptual and grammatical properties of body part metonymies in English and Bosnian. ExELL 3:1 ► pp. 26 ff.

Ioannou, Georgios

2017. A corpus-based analysis of the verb pleróo in Ancient Greek. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15:1 ► pp. 253 ff.

Janowicz, Krzysztof

2005.  In GeoSpatial Semantics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3799], ► pp. 137 ff.

Jugnet, Anne & Emilie Lhôte

2019.  In Surprise at the Intersection of Phenomenology and Linguistics [Consciousness & Emotion Book Series, 11], ► pp. 140 ff.

Jurewicz, Joanna

2019. Polysemy and cognitive linguistics. The case of vána . Lingua Posnaniensis 61:2 ► pp. 61 ff.

Kashanizadeh, Zahra & Charles Forceville

2020. Visual and multimodal interaction of metaphor and metonymy. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 7:1 ► pp. 78 ff.

Kawaletz, Lea & Ingo Plag

2015.  In Semantics of Complex Words [Studies in Morphology, 3], ► pp. 289 ff.

Kim, Subin, Subin Kim, HyunJu Lee & HyunJu Lee

2021. A Metaphor-based Approach to Pain Pictogram Design . Archives of Design Research 34:1 ► pp. 157 ff.

Komatsubara, Tetsuta

2019. Cognitive principles underlying predicational metonymy. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 6:2 ► pp. 247 ff.

Kosecki, Krzysztof

2007. On Multiple Metonymies within Indirect Speech Acts . Research in Language 5 ► pp. 213 ff.

Kosecki, Krzysztof

2016.  In Conceptualizations of Time [Human Cognitive Processing, 52], ► pp. 85 ff.

Kosecki, Krzysztof

2019.  In Contacts and Contrasts in Cultures and Languages [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 65 ff.

Kosecki, Krzysztof

2020.  In Cultural Conceptualizations in Language and Communication [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 43 ff.

Kowalewski, Hubert

2019. Metonymic construal and vehicle selection. Pragmatics & Cognition 26:2-3 ► pp. 267 ff.

Krishnan, Madhu

2012. Abjection and the fetish: Reconsidering the construction of the postcolonial exotic in Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’sHalf of a Yellow Sun. Journal of Postcolonial Writing 48:1 ► pp. 26 ff.

Kuczok, Marcin

2016.  In Studies in Lexicogrammar [Human Cognitive Processing, 54], ► pp. 193 ff.

Kuczok, Marcin

2020. The Interplay of Metaphor and Metonymy in Christian Symbols. Metaphor and Symbol 35:4 ► pp. 236 ff.

Kujawiak, Aleksandra

2019. Metonimiczne użycie onimu Bruksela w dyskursie prasowym (na materiale tygodnika „Polityka”). Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Linguistica 53 ► pp. 47 ff.

Kwon, Iksoo & Eunsong Kim

2021. (Meta-)Ground Viewpoint Space and structurally-framed irony: A case study of the mobile game Liyla and the Shadows of War . Cognitive Linguistics 32:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Kövecses, Zoltán

2013. The Metaphor–Metonymy Relationship: Correlation Metaphors Are Based on Metonymy. Metaphor and Symbol 28:2 ► pp. 75 ff.

KÖVECSES, ZOLTÁN

2017. The Hungarian rootes-in language and cognition. Language and Cognition 9:1 ► pp. 121 ff.

Kövecses, Zoltán

2020.  In Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory,

Kövecses, Zoltán & Szilvia Csabi

2014. Lexicography and cognitive linguistics. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 27:1 ► pp. 118 ff.

Lahey, Ernestine

2019.  In Experiencing Fictional Worlds [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 32], ► pp. 53 ff.

Lai, Huei-Ling, Kawai Chui, Wen-Hui Sah, Siaw-Fong Chung & Chao-Lin Liu

2018.  In Big Data in Computational Social Science and Humanities [Computational Social Sciences, ], ► pp. 195 ff.

Lan, Chun & Dongmei Jia

2016. Conceptual metonymies and metaphors behind the Five Phases. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 7:1 ► pp. 66 ff.

Lan, Chun & Dongmei Jia

2020. Conceptual metonymies and metaphors behind SHUI (WATER) and HUO (FIRE) in ancient and modern Chinese. Applied Linguistics Review 11:2 ► pp. 281 ff.

Laorden, Carlos, Xabier Ugarte-Pedrero, Igor Santos, Borja Sanz, Javier Nieves & Pablo G. Bringas

2014. Study on the effectiveness of anomaly detection for spam filtering. Information Sciences 277 ► pp. 421 ff.

Law, James

2019. Diachronic frame analysis. Constructions and Frames 11:1 ► pp. 43 ff.

Lemghari, El Mustapha

2019. A metaphor-based account of semantic relations among proverbs. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 6:1 ► pp. 158 ff.

Lemghari, El Mustapha

2021. La structure syntactico-sémantique de jouer dans la construction [Jouer + du + Nom d’instrument de musique] : une affaire de zone active massive. Travaux de linguistique n° 80:1 ► pp. 63 ff.

Lemghari, El Mustapha, F. Neveu, B. Harmegnies, L. Hriba & S. Prévost

2018. Le nom propre en lecture qualitative : de la métonymie à la métaphtonymie. SHS Web of Conferences 46 ► pp. 12004 ff.

Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara

2020.  In Body Part Terms in Conceptualization and Language Usage [Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts, 12], ► pp. 32 ff.

Lewandowski, Wojciech

2021. Constructions are not predictable but are motivated: evidence from the Spanish completive reflexive. Linguistics 59:1 ► pp. 35 ff.

Lin, Zi-yu

2021.  In New Perspectives on Corpus Translation Studies [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 227 ff.

Littlemore, Jeannette, Satomi Arizono & Alice May

2016. The interpretation of metonymy by Japanese learners of English. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14:1 ► pp. 51 ff.

Lu, Huaguo & Xiangqing Wei

2019. Structuring Polysemy in English Learners’ Dictionaries: A Prototype Theory-Based Model. International Journal of Lexicography 32:1 ► pp. 20 ff.

Lu, Huaguo, Ya Zhang & Xia Hao

2020. The Contribution of Cognitive Linguistics to the Acquisition of Polysemy: A Dictionary Entry-Based Study with Chinese Learners of English. International Journal of Lexicography 33:3 ► pp. 306 ff.

LUO, Ruifeng, J. Heled & A. Yuan

2018. Research on Metonymy of Cognitive Linguistics from Corpus Approach of Computer Science. MATEC Web of Conferences 173 ► pp. 03015 ff.

Makoeva, Dana Gisovna

2018. COGNITIVE MECHANISMS OF SEMANTIC SHIFT IN BI-TRANSITIVE CONSTRUCTIONS: METAPHOR, METONYMY, FIGURATIVENESS. Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice :1-1 ► pp. 138 ff.

Martin, Paul & Pam Papadelos

2017. Who stands for the norm? The place of metonymy in androcentric language. Social Semiotics 27:1 ► pp. 39 ff.

Massoussi, Taoufik & Salah Mejri

2010. Traitement automatique des métonymies. Revue française de linguistique appliquée Vol. XIV:2 ► pp. 43 ff.

Matusz, Łukasz

2020. I will see it done: Metonymic extensions of the verb see in English. Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies :31(4) ► pp. 88 ff.

Miller, Craig S.

2014. Metonymy and reference-point errors in novice programming. Computer Science Education 24:2-3 ► pp. 123 ff.

Moritz, Ivana

2017.  In The Pragmeme of Accommodation: The Case of Interaction around the Event of Death [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 13], ► pp. 301 ff.

Moya-Guijarro, Arsenio Jesús & Begoña Ruiz Cordero

2020. A multimodal cognitive analysis of visual metonymies in picture books featuring same-sex-parent families. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18:2 ► pp. 372 ff.

Mullis, Eric

2019.  In Pragmatist Philosophy and Dance, ► pp. 149 ff.

Nesset, Tore & Svetlana Sokolova

2019. Compounds and culture. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 17:1 ► pp. 257 ff.

Novoselec, Zvonimir

2017.  In Computational and Corpus-Based Phraseology [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10596], ► pp. 337 ff.

Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg

2014. Metonymy and the way we speak. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 27:1 ► pp. 168 ff.

Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg

2018.  In Conceptual Metonymy [Human Cognitive Processing, 60], ► pp. 121 ff.

Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg

2019.  In Metaphor and Metonymy in the Digital Age [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 8], ► pp. 175 ff.

Papišta, Žolt

2022. Metonymie in der Gedichtübersetzung. Babel. Revue internationale de la traduction / International Journal of Translation

Papousek, Ilona, Christian Rominger, Elisabeth M. Weiss, Corinna M. Perchtold, Andreas Fink & Kurt Feyaerts

2019. Humor creation during efforts to find humorous cognitive reappraisals of threatening situations. Current Psychology

Paradis, Carita

2004. Where Does Metonymy Stop? Senses, Facets, and Active Zones. Metaphor and Symbol 19:4 ► pp. 245 ff.

Peirsman, Yves

2011. Review of Panther, Thornburg & Barcelona (): Metonymy and Metaphor in Grammar. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9:1 ► pp. 315 ff.

Pepper, Steve & Pierre J. L. Arnaud

2020. Absolutely PHAB. The Mental Lexicon 15:1 ► pp. 101 ff.

Perak, Benedikt

2018.  In Conceptual Metonymy [Human Cognitive Processing, 60], ► pp. 205 ff.

Peters, Wim & Yorick Wilks

2003. Data-Driven Detection of Figurative Language Use in Electronic Language Resources. Metaphor and Symbol 18:3 ► pp. 161 ff.

Peña Cervel, María Sandra

2016. Argument structure and implicational constructions at the crossroads. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14:2 ► pp. 474 ff.

PIQUER-PÍRIZ, ANA Mª

2017.  Jeannette Littlemore. Metonymy: hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. Pp. 240. ISBN 978-1-107-04362-6 . Language and Cognition 9:3 ► pp. 568 ff.

Radden, Günter

2018.  In Conceptual Metonymy [Human Cognitive Processing, 60], ► pp. 161 ff.

Rakhilina, Ekaterina & Tatiana Reznikova

2022.  In The Typology of Physical Qualities [Typological Studies in Language, 133], ► pp. 1 ff.

Rakhilina, Ekaterina V., Tatiana I. Reznikova & Olga Yu. Shemanaeva

2009.  In Logic, Language, and Computation [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5422], ► pp. 69 ff.

Reznikova, T. I., A. A. Bonch-Osmolovskaya & Ye. V. Rakhilina

2008. Verbs of pain in the light of grammar of constructions. Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics 42:2 ► pp. 115 ff.

Richardson, Peter & Charles M. Mueller

2022. Contested paths. Metaphor and the Social World 12:1 ► pp. 138 ff.

Robinson, Alexandra, Stephen Llewelyn & Blake Wassell

2018. Showing Mercy to the Ungodly and the Inversion of Invective in Jude. New Testament Studies 64:2 ► pp. 194 ff.

Sakaguchi, Kei

2022.  In The Language of Food in Japanese [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 25], ► pp. 232 ff.

Salamurović, Aleksandra

2019.  In Political Discourse in Central, Eastern and Balkan Europe [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 84], ► pp. 239 ff.

Salamurović, Aleksandra

2020. Metonymy and the conceptualisation of nation in political discourse. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 8:1 ► pp. 181 ff.

Santos, Igor, Carlos Laorden, Borja Sanz & Pablo G. Bringas

2012. Enhanced Topic-based Vector Space Model for semantics-aware spam filtering. Expert Systems with Applications 39:1 ► pp. 437 ff.

Santos, Igor, Carlos Laorden, Xabier Ugarte-Pedrero, Borja Sanz & Pablo G. Bringas

2012.  In E-Business and Telecommunications [Communications in Computer and Information Science, 314], ► pp. 203 ff.

Schönefeld, Doris

2018. Friending someone into submission: Verbal cues for understanding. Word Structure 11:2 ► pp. 211 ff.

Shenhav, Shaul R.

2007. Detecting stories. Journal of Language and Politics 6:2 ► pp. 177 ff.

Slabakova, Roumyana, Jennifer Cabrelli Amaro & Sang Kyun Kang

2016. Regular and Novel Metonymy: Can You Curl up with a Good Agatha Christie in Your Second Language?. Applied Linguistics 37:2 ► pp. 175 ff.

Smirnova, Elizaveta & Svetlana Shustova

2018. Denominal verbs with metaphorical meanings in British business media discourse. Metaphor and the Social World 8:2 ► pp. 267 ff.

Snoek, Conor

2022. From ‘clubs’ to ‘clocks’: lexical semantic extensions in Dene languages. Cognitive Linguistics 33:1 ► pp. 193 ff.

Soto Nieto, Almudena

2020. La red polisémica de negro . Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 33:2 ► pp. 562 ff.

Stadler, Michael W.

2019. Thinking, Experiencing and Rethinking Mereological Interdependence. Gestalt Theory 41:1 ► pp. 31 ff.

Stampoulidis, Georgios & Marianna Bolognesi

2019. Bringing metaphors back to the streets: a corpus-based study for the identification and interpretation of rhetorical figures in street art. Visual Communication ► pp. 147035721987753 ff.

Su, Chuandong, Xiaoxi Huang, Fumiyo Fukumoto, Jiyi Li, Rongbo Wang & Zhiqun Chen

2020. English and Chinese Neural Metonymy Recognition Based on Semantic Priority Interruption Theory. IEEE Access 8 ► pp. 30060 ff.

Sulikowska, Anna

2020. Das semantische Potential der Idiome aus kognitiver Perspektive. Yearbook of Phraseology 11:1 ► pp. 139 ff.

Sullivan, Karen

2008. Genre-dependent metonymy in Norse skaldic poetry. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 17:1 ► pp. 21 ff.

SUZUKI, KOHEI

2017. <i>Metonymy: Hidden Shortcuts in Language, Thought and Communication</i>. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 34:1 ► pp. 183 ff.

Szeverényi, Sándor

2017.  In Proceedings of the 4th Mikola Conference - 14-15, November 2014 [Proceedings of the 4th Mikola Conference - 14-15, November 2014, 51], ► pp. 107 ff.

Tabacaru, Sabina

2017. When language bites . Pragmatics & Cognition 24:2 ► pp. 186 ff.

Urios-Aparisi, Eduardo

2010. The Body of Love in Almodóvar's Cinema: Metaphor and Metonymy of the Body and Body Parts. Metaphor and Symbol 25:3 ► pp. 181 ff.

Vaičiukynaitė, Justina

2020. Images of the Lithuanian Political Elite in the Eyes of Citizens. Politologija :97 ► pp. 42 ff.

Veale, Tony, Kurt Feyaerts & Geert Brône

2006. The cognitive mechanisms of adversarial humor. Humor – International Journal of Humor Research 19:3

Velasco-Sacristán, Marisol

2010. Metonymic grounding of ideological metaphors: Evidence from advertising gender metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics 42:1 ► pp. 64 ff.

Vilar Lluch, Sara

2022. Redefining attitude for studying explicit and indirect evaluations of human behaviour. Functions of Language

Wachowski, Wojciech

2019.  In Memory, Identity and Cognition: Explorations in Culture and Communication [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 155 ff.

WEISS, DAVID

2005. Metonymy in Black and White: Shelby Steele's Revelatory Racial Tropes. Howard Journal of Communications 16:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Wiesinger, Evelyn

2021.  In Constructions in Contact 2 [Constructional Approaches to Language, 30], ► pp. 140 ff.

Wilcox, Phyllis Perrin

2004. A cognitive key: Metonymic and metaphorical mappings in ASL. Cognitive Linguistics 15:2

Wilkos, Aleksandra

2021. Głośna pustka. Afrofuturyzm jako dekolonizacja (A City Called Mirage Kiluanjiego Kia Hendy). Przegląd Kulturoznawczy :3 (49) ► pp. 640 ff.

Winter, Bodo & Mahesh Srinivasan

2022. Why is Semantic Change Asymmetric? The Role of Concreteness and Word Frequency and Metaphor and Metonymy. Metaphor and Symbol 37:1 ► pp. 39 ff.

Yamaguchi, Toshiko

2015. The rise of demonstrative-based first/second-person markers in the history of Japanese. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16:2 ► pp. 250 ff.

Yen Chiang, Anita & Wen-yu Chiang

2016. Behold, I am Coming Soon! A Study on the Conceptualization of Sexual Orgasm in 27 Languages. Metaphor and Symbol 31:3 ► pp. 131 ff.

Zhang, Cun & Charles Forceville

2020. Metaphor and metonymy in Chinese and American political cartoons (2018–2019) about the Sino-US trade conflict. Pragmatics & Cognition 27:2 ► pp. 474 ff.

Zhang, Weiwei, Dirk Speelman & Dirk Geeraerts

2015. Cross-linguistic variation in metonymies for PERSON. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:1 ► pp. 220 ff.

Zibin, Aseel

2018. The effect of the Arab Spring on the use of metaphor and metonymy in Jordanian economic discourse. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 16:1 ► pp. 254 ff.

Zibin, Aseel, Abdel Rahman Mitib Altakhaineh & Elham T. Hussein

2020. On the comprehension of metonymical expressions by Arabic-speaking EFL learners: A cognitive linguistic approach. Topics in Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 45 ff.

司, 景方

2018. Critical Discourse Analysis of News Discourse on Perspective of Metonymy. Modern Linguistics 06:03 ► pp. 532 ff.

宫, 健宇

2016. The Cognitive Construal of Metonymic Meanings. Modern Linguistics 04:04 ► pp. 109 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 may 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.