Part of
Metonymy in Language and ThoughtEdited by Klaus-Uwe Panther and Günter Radden
[Human Cognitive Processing 4] 1999
► pp. 17–59
Edited by Klaus-Uwe Panther and Günter Radden
[Human Cognitive Processing 4] 1999
► pp. 17–59
Towards a Theory of Metonymy
Cited by
Cited by 208 other publications
Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed
2022. Taboo metaphtonymy, gender, and impoliteness: how male and female Arab cartoonists think and draw. Social Semiotics ► pp. 1 ff. 
Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed
2023. Cartooning and sexism in the time of Covid-19: Metaphors and metonymies in the Arab mind. Discourse & Society 34:2 ► pp. 147 ff.
Ahmadgoli, Kamran & Morteza Yazdanjoo
2020. Multimodal representation of social discourses in Asghar Farhadi’s A Separation: a social semiotic study. Social Semiotics 30:5 ► pp. 699 ff.
Apresjan, Valentina, Anastasiya Lopukhina & Maria Zarifyan
2021. Representation of Different Types of Adjectival Polysemy in the Mental Lexicon. Frontiers in Psychology 12
ARICA AKKOK, Elif & Yanghee LEE
2022. THE SEMANTIC ASPECTS OF TURKISH DIMENSION ADJECTIVES “BÜYÜK (BIG)” AND “KÜÇÜK (SMALL). Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi 62:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2017. Chapter 9. Irony has a metonymic basis. In Irony in Language Use and Communication [Figurative Thought and Language, 1], ► pp. 201 ff.
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2017. Introduction. Figurative thought, figurative language, figurative grammar?. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56], ► pp. 2 ff.
Baicchi, Annalisa
2007. Review of Günter, Köpcke, Berg & Siemund (2007): Aspects of Meaning Construction. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 5 ► pp. 307 ff.
Barnden, John
2018. Chapter 4. Some contrast effects in metonymy. In Conceptual Metonymy [Human Cognitive Processing, 60], ► pp. 97 ff.
Barnden, John A.
2022. Metonymy, reflexive hyperbole and broadly reflexive relationships. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20:1 ► pp. 33 ff.
Bello, Umar
2022. Metaphors we are robbed by: a critical discourse analysis of ‘the national cake’ and Nigeria’s prebendal elite. Text & Talk 42:6 ► pp. 827 ff.
Belosevic, Milena
2022.
Veggie-Renate und Merci-Jens
. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 50:2 ► pp. 289 ff.
Benczes, Réka
Bierwiaczonek, Bogusław
2018. Chapter 7. How metonymy motivates constructions. In Conceptual Metonymy [Human Cognitive Processing, 60], ► pp. 185 ff.
Bierwiaczonek, Bogusław
2020. Figures of speech revisited. In Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language [Figurative Thought and Language, 9], ► pp. 226 ff.
Blanco Carrión, Olga
2018. Chapter 2. Conventionality and linguistic domain(s) involved in the characterization of metonymies (for the creation of a detailed typology of metonymy). In Conceptual Metonymy [Human Cognitive Processing, 60], ► pp. 55 ff.
Borbely, Antal F.
2004. Toward a Psychodynamic Understanding of Metaphor and Metonymy: Their Role in Awareness and Defense. Metaphor and Symbol 19:2 ► pp. 91 ff.
Brdar, Mario
2019. On the regularity of metonymy across languages (exemplified on some metonymies in medical discourse). ExELL 7:1 ► pp. 52 ff.
Brdar, Mario & Rita Brdar-Szabó
Brdar, Mario & Rita Brdar-Szabó
2022. Targetting metonymic targets. In Figurative Thought and Language in Action [Figurative Thought and Language, 16], ► pp. 59 ff.
Brdar, Mario, Rita Brdar-Szabó & Tanja Gradečak
Brdar-Szabó, Rita & Mario Brdar
2021. Metonymic indeterminacy and metalepsis. In Figurative Language – Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11], ► pp. 175 ff.
Brdar-Szabó, Rita & Mario Brdar
2022. Metonymy in multimodal discourse, or. In Figurativity and Human Ecology [Figurative Thought and Language, 17], ► pp. 209 ff.
Brink, Nina
2023. Metonymic relations underlying the one-word utterances of Afrikaans-speaking infants and toddlers. Language and Cognition 15:1 ► pp. 86 ff.
Broccias, Cristiano
2022. A Cognitive Grammar approach to ‘metonymy’. In Figurative Thought and Language in Action [Figurative Thought and Language, 16], ► pp. 37 ff.
Caballero, Rosario
2019. Chapter 7. Sensory experiences, meaning and metaphor. In Perception Metaphors [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 19], ► pp. 127 ff.
Catalano, Theresa & John W. Creswell
2013. Understanding the Language of the Occupy Movement. Qualitative Inquiry 19:9 ► pp. 664 ff.
Celle, Agnès, Anne Jugnet, Laure Lansari & Emilie L’Hôte
2018. Describing and Expressing Surprise. In Surprise: An Emotion? [Contributions To Phenomenology, 97], ► pp. 163 ff.
Chaplin, Evgenii Vladimirovich
2019. HYPOTHETICAL-DEDUCTIVE METHOD TO DESCRIBE METONYMY IN THE SPHERE OF VERBS OF SPEAKING. Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice :11 ► pp. 381 ff.
Chen, Xianglan, Fang Li, Yachao Duan & Yahui Duan
2019. The length of preceding context influences metonymy processing. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 17:1 ► pp. 243 ff.
Chen, Yi-chen
2019. Teaching figurative language to EFL learners: an evaluation of metaphoric mapping instruction. The Language Learning Journal 47:1 ► pp. 49 ff.
Chen, Yi-chen & Huei-ling Lai
2012. EFL learners’ awareness of metonymy–metaphor continuum in figurative expressions. Language Awareness 21:3 ► pp. 235 ff.
Chen, Yi-chen & Huei-ling Lai
2014. The influence of cultural universality and specificity on EFL learners' comprehension of metaphor and metonymy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 24:3 ► pp. 312 ff.
Cho, Hye-Jin
2017. A Study on the Cognitive Structure and the Extension of Meaning of Spanish Phraseological Units of BOCA. Iberoamérica 19:2 ► pp. 33 ff.
Cienki, Alan
2013. Bringing concepts from cognitive linguistics into the analysis of policies and the political. Journal of International Relations and Development 16:2 ► pp. 294 ff.
Cienki, Alan
2022. The study of gesture in cognitive linguistics: How it could inform and inspire other research in cognitive science. WIREs Cognitive Science 13:6
Coschignano, Serena
Crespo-Fernández, Eliecer
2022. Euphemism in laxative TV commercials: at the crossroads between politeness and persuasion. Journal of Politeness Research 18:1 ► pp. 11 ff.
Cuadrado-Fernandez, Antonio
2015. Difference Is No Excuse: Separate Struggles, Shared Concerns, and the Articulation of Collective Identity in Contemporary Anglophone Poetry. In Cultural Essentialism in Intercultural Relations, ► pp. 99 ff.
Dai, Xin
2022. Estudio cognitivo e intercultural del eufemismo chino y español de muerte. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 35:2 ► pp. 449 ff.
Denroche, Charles
Devylder, Simon
2019. Chapter 8. Mereology in the flesh. In Metaphor and Metonymy in the Digital Age [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 8], ► pp. 199 ff.
Di Biase-Dyson, Camilla
2022. Building Ideas out of Wood. What Ancient Egyptian Funerary ‘Models’ Tell Us about Thought and Communication. Cambridge Archaeological Journal ► pp. 1 ff.
Digonnet, Rémi
2018. The Linguistic Expression of Smells: From Lack to Abundance?. In Sensory Perceptions in Language, Embodiment and Epistemology [Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, 42], ► pp. 177 ff.
Ding, Fangfang
2015. Rethinking the Cognitive Study of Metonymy. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 5:9 ► pp. 1836 ff.
Diyanati, Masoumeh & Hadaegh Rezaei
2022. Metonymical noun-noun nominal compounds in Persian. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia ► pp. 1 ff.
Drożdż, Grzegorz
2016. From the meaning of the concrete noun to its grammatical property and back. In Studies in Lexicogrammar [Human Cognitive Processing, 54], ► pp. 95 ff.
Drożdż, Grzegorz
2022. Metonymic patterns of count-to-mass and mass-to-count changes and their implications for metonymy research. In Figurativity and Human Ecology [Figurative Thought and Language, 17], ► pp. 251 ff.
Dziedzic-Rawska, Alicja
2017. Expressing the Prison Self. In Multiculturalism, Multilingualism and the Self [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 63 ff.
Dąbrowska, Dorota
2016. A multimodal perspective on metaphors and metonymies in art: A case study of the artwork Agora by Magdalena Abakanowicz. Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies :13(2) ► pp. 4 ff.
Eubanks, Philip
2005. Globalization, "Corporate Rule," and Blended Worlds: A Conceptual-Rhetorical Analysis of Metaphor, Metonymy, and Conceptual Blending. Metaphor and Symbol 20:3 ► pp. 173 ff.
Eubanks, Philip
2008. An Analysis ofCorporate Rulein Globalization Discourse: Why We Need Rhetoric to Explain Conceptual Figures. Rhetoric Review 27:3 ► pp. 236 ff.
FALKUM, INGRID L., MARTA RECASENS & EVE V. CLARK
2017. “The moustache sits down first”: on the acquisition of metonymy. Journal of Child Language 44:1 ► pp. 87 ff.
Feng, Mei
Feng, William Dezheng
2017. Metonymy and visual representation: towards a social semiotic framework of visual metonymy. Visual Communication 16:4 ► pp. 441 ff.
Ferrerós Pagès, Carla
2021. Significats metafòrics i metonímics del mot polisèmic per a ‘cor’ en català (cor) i en francès (cœur). Revista de Filología Románica 38 ► pp. 133 ff.
Ferrerós-Pagès, Carla
2022. Verbs That Express Passive Hearing in Catalan and French: Semantic Change of the Forms sentir (Catalan) and entendre (French). Languages 7:4 ► pp. 301 ff.
Fisher, Harwood
2003. Metonymy as concept: A metaphor for rhetoric, not for thought. Semiotica 2003:147
Fougner Rydning, Atin
2005. The Return of Sense on the Scene of Translation Studies in the Light of the Cognitive Blending Theory. Meta 50:2 ► pp. 392 ff.
Eric Fredua-Kwarteng
2015. How Prospective Teachers Conceptualized Mathematics: Implications for Teaching. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 10:2 ► pp. 77 ff.
Ghafel, Banafsheh & Akbar Mirzaie
2014. Colours in Everyday Metaphoric Language of Persian Speakers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 136 ► pp. 133 ff.
Gibbs Jr., Raymond W.
Glaz, Adam
2016. Virtual lexicogrammar. In Studies in Lexicogrammar [Human Cognitive Processing, 54], ► pp. 75 ff.
Glebkin, Vladimir
2014. Cultural-historical psychology and the cognitive view of metonymy and metaphor. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12:2 ► pp. 288 ff.
Glotova, Elena
2014. The Suffering Minds: Cognitive Stylistic Approach to Characterization in “The Child-Who-Was-Tired” by Katherine Mansfield and “Sleepy” by Anton Chekhov. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 4:12
Golubeva, Tatiana
2023. The proper names ‘Assad’, ‘ISIL’, ‘ISIS’, ‘Daesh’ and ‘European’ as metonymic blends in political
discourse. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 115 ff.
Guo, Wanling
2022. Ideal Foreign Oriented Definition Model of Words with Chinese Characteristics. Researching and Teaching Chinese as a Foreign Language 3:2
GÖKÇE, Sevgi
2021. Metaphorical and Metonymical Heart in Turkish: Kalp and Yürek. Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları/Journal of Language and Literature Studies
Halverson, Sandra L. & Jan Oskar Engene
2010. Domains and Dimensions in Metonymy: A Corpus-Based Study ofSchengenandMaastricht. Metaphor and Symbol 25:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Hapchenko, Оlena
2016. The cognitive aspects of metonymy. Ukrainian Linguistics :46 ► pp. 53 ff.
Herrero-Ruiz, Javier
2020. On Some Pragmatic Effects of Event Metonymies. Metaphor and Symbol 35:4 ► pp. 266 ff.
Herrero-Ruiz, Javier
2021. Interpretations based on delayed-domain (dis)appearance in printed advertising. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 19:2 ► pp. 299 ff.
Hsu, Yen, Chia-Jung Lee & Pei-Ying Yang
2019. Design Techniques of Ambient Media Advertisements and Message Comprehension. In HCI International 2019 – Late Breaking Papers [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11786], ► pp. 28 ff.
Häcker, Martina
2020. ‘A pointing stocke to euery one that passeth vp and downe’: Metonymy in Late Medieval and Early Modern English Terms of Ridicule. Neophilologus 104:1 ► pp. 131 ff.
Ilchuk, O.
2019. KONZEPTUELLE UND LEXIKALISCHE METONYMISCHE MODELLE DER ABGELEITETEN SUFFIXALEN SUBSTANTIVE DER MODERNEN DEUTSCHEN SPRACHE. Studia Philologica :12 ► pp. 56 ff.
Imamović, Adisa & Anela Mulahmetović Ibrišimović
2015. Some conceptual and grammatical properties of body part metonymies in English and Bosnian. ExELL 3:1 ► pp. 26 ff.
Ioannou, Georgios
2017. A corpus-based analysis of the verb pleróo in Ancient Greek. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15:1 ► pp. 253 ff.
Jacques, Guillaume
2022. Review of Linlin Sun ‘Flexibility in the parts-of-speech system of classical Chinese’. Linguistic Typology 26:3 ► pp. 671 ff.
Janowicz, Krzysztof
2005. Extending Semantic Similarity Measurement with Thematic Roles. In GeoSpatial Semantics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3799], ► pp. 137 ff.
Jensen, Thomas Wiben
2022. The Indexical Affordance of Metaphor: Stain as a Case Example. Metaphor and Symbol 37:3 ► pp. 208 ff.
Jiang, Liping, Ghayth K. Sh. Al-Shaibani, Fenglin Yang, Mengmeng Cheng & Minghuan Huang
2022. The metonymic mechanism of English translation of Chinese intangible cultural heritage terms from the perspective of cognitive psychology. Frontiers in Psychology 13
Jugnet, Anne & Emilie Lhôte
2019. Chapter 8. Looking at ‘unexpectedness’. In Surprise at the Intersection of Phenomenology and Linguistics [Consciousness & Emotion Book Series, 11], ► pp. 140 ff.
Jurewicz, Joanna
2019. Polysemy and cognitive linguistics. The case of vána
. Lingua Posnaniensis 61:2 ► pp. 61 ff.
Jurewicz, Joanna
2022. Filozofia i doświadczenie. In O Ty, z jakiejkolwiek przychodzisz krainy, przeczytaj opowiedzianą pieśń… Księga jubileuszowa profesor Jolanty Sierakowskiej-Dyndo,
Kashanizadeh, Zahra & Charles Forceville
2020. Visual and multimodal interaction of metaphor and metonymy. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 7:1 ► pp. 78 ff.
Kashanizadeh, Zahra & Charles Forceville
2022. Visual and multimodal interaction of metaphor and metonymy. In Visual Metaphors [Benjamins Current Topics, 124], ► pp. 83 ff.
Kawaletz, Lea & Ingo Plag
2015. Predicting the Semantics of English Nominalizations: A Frame-Based Analysis of -ment Suffixation. In Semantics of Complex Words [Studies in Morphology, 3], ► pp. 289 ff.
Kim, Subin, Subin Kim, HyunJu Lee & HyunJu Lee
2021. A Metaphor-based Approach to Pain Pictogram Design . Archives of Design Research 34:1 ► pp. 157 ff.
Komatsubara, Tetsuta
2019. Cognitive principles underlying predicational metonymy. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 6:2 ► pp. 247 ff.
Kos, Petr
Kosecki, Krzysztof
2007. On Multiple Metonymies within Indirect Speech Acts . Research in Language 5 ► pp. 213 ff.
Kosecki, Krzysztof
2016. Western Conception of Time in Signed Languages: a Cognitive Linguistic Perspective. In Conceptualizations of Time [Human Cognitive Processing, 52], ► pp. 85 ff.
Kosecki, Krzysztof
2019. Ernest Hemingway’s “Mr. and Mrs. Elliot”: A Case of Inversion of the Romantic Philosophy of Love. In Contacts and Contrasts in Cultures and Languages [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 65 ff.
Kosecki, Krzysztof
2020. On Patterns of Conceptual Construal in Tok Pisin. In Cultural Conceptualizations in Language and Communication [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 43 ff.
Kowalewski, Hubert
Krishnan, Madhu
2012. Abjection and the fetish: Reconsidering the construction of the postcolonial exotic in Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’sHalf of a Yellow Sun. Journal of Postcolonial Writing 48:1 ► pp. 26 ff.
Kuczok, Marcin
2016. The interplay of metaphor and metonymy in English noun+noun compounds. In Studies in Lexicogrammar [Human Cognitive Processing, 54], ► pp. 193 ff.
Kuczok, Marcin
2020. The Interplay of Metaphor and Metonymy in Christian Symbols. Metaphor and Symbol 35:4 ► pp. 236 ff.
Kujawiak, Aleksandra
2019. Metonimiczne użycie onimu Bruksela w dyskursie prasowym (na materiale tygodnika „Polityka”). Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Linguistica 53 ► pp. 47 ff.
Kwon, Iksoo & Eunsong Kim
2021. (Meta-)Ground Viewpoint Space and structurally-framed irony: A case study of the mobile game Liyla and the Shadows of War
. Cognitive Linguistics 32:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Kövecses, Zoltán
2013. The Metaphor–Metonymy Relationship: Correlation Metaphors Are Based on Metonymy. Metaphor and Symbol 28:2 ► pp. 75 ff.
KÖVECSES, ZOLTÁN
2017. The Hungarian rootes-in language and cognition. Language and Cognition 9:1 ► pp. 121 ff.
Kövecses, Zoltán
2020. Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory,
Kövecses, Zoltán & Szilvia Csabi
2014. Lexicography and cognitive linguistics. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 27:1 ► pp. 118 ff.
Lahey, Ernestine
2019. Chapter 4. World-building as cognitive feedback loop. In Experiencing Fictional Worlds [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 32], ► pp. 53 ff.
Lai, Huei-Ling, Kawai Chui, Wen-Hui Sah, Siaw-Fong Chung & Chao-Lin Liu
2018. Language Communities, Corpora, and Cognition. In Big Data in Computational Social Science and Humanities [Computational Social Sciences, ], ► pp. 195 ff.
Lan, Chun & Dongmei Jia
2016. Conceptual metonymies and metaphors behind the Five Phases. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 7:1 ► pp. 66 ff.
Lan, Chun & Dongmei Jia
2020. Conceptual metonymies and metaphors behind SHUI (WATER) and HUO (FIRE) in ancient and modern Chinese. Applied Linguistics Review 11:2 ► pp. 281 ff.
Laorden, Carlos, Xabier Ugarte-Pedrero, Igor Santos, Borja Sanz, Javier Nieves & Pablo G. Bringas
2014. Study on the effectiveness of anomaly detection for spam filtering. Information Sciences 277 ► pp. 421 ff.
Law, James
Lemghari, El Mustapha
2019. A metaphor-based account of semantic relations among proverbs. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 6:1 ► pp. 158 ff.
Lemghari, El Mustapha
2021. La structure syntactico-sémantique de jouer dans la construction [Jouer + du + Nom d’instrument de musique] : une affaire de zone active massive. Travaux de linguistique n° 80:1 ► pp. 63 ff.
Lemghari, El Mustapha, F. Neveu, B. Harmegnies, L. Hriba & S. Prévost
2018. Le nom propre en lecture qualitative : de la métonymie à la métaphtonymie. SHS Web of Conferences 46 ► pp. 12004 ff.
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara
2020. Polysemic chains, body parts and embodiment. In Body Part Terms in Conceptualization and Language Usage [Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts, 12], ► pp. 32 ff.
Lewandowski, Wojciech
2021. Constructions are not predictable but are motivated: evidence from the Spanish completive reflexive. Linguistics 59:1 ► pp. 35 ff.
Lin, Zi-yu
2021. Going to Understand 柴? Evidence and Significance of Metonymic Chains in Chinese/English Translation. In New Perspectives on Corpus Translation Studies [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 227 ff.
Littlemore, Jeannette
Littlemore, Jeannette, Satomi Arizono & Alice May
2016. The interpretation of metonymy by Japanese learners of English. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14:1 ► pp. 51 ff.
Littlemore, Jeannette & Laura V. Fielden-Burns
2023. On the fringes of metaphor: Using ambiguously figurative vague language to pragmatically negotiate sensitive topics in the English as a Medium of Instruction classroom. Journal of Pragmatics 209 ► pp. 1 ff.
Lu, Huaguo & Xiangqing Wei
2019. Structuring Polysemy in English Learners’ Dictionaries: A Prototype Theory-Based Model. International Journal of Lexicography 32:1 ► pp. 20 ff.
Lu, Huaguo, Ya Zhang & Xia Hao
2020. The Contribution of Cognitive Linguistics to the Acquisition of Polysemy: A Dictionary Entry-Based Study with Chinese Learners of English. International Journal of Lexicography 33:3 ► pp. 306 ff.
LUO, Ruifeng, J. Heled & A. Yuan
2018. Research on Metonymy of Cognitive Linguistics from Corpus Approach of Computer Science. MATEC Web of Conferences 173 ► pp. 03015 ff.
Lyubymova, Svitlana
2022. Nomen Est Omen Socialis. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica 14:2 ► pp. 116 ff.
Makoeva, Dana Gisovna
2018. COGNITIVE MECHANISMS OF SEMANTIC SHIFT IN BI-TRANSITIVE CONSTRUCTIONS: METAPHOR, METONYMY, FIGURATIVENESS. Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice :1-1 ► pp. 138 ff.
Martin, Paul & Pam Papadelos
2017. Who stands for the norm? The place of metonymy in androcentric language. Social Semiotics 27:1 ► pp. 39 ff.
Massoussi, Taoufik & Salah Mejri
2010. Traitement automatique des métonymies. Revue française de linguistique appliquée Vol. XIV:2 ► pp. 43 ff.
Matusz, Łukasz
2020. I will see it done: Metonymic extensions of the verb see in English. Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies :31(4) ► pp. 88 ff.
Miller, Craig S.
2014. Metonymy and reference-point errors in novice programming. Computer Science Education 24:2-3 ► pp. 123 ff.
Moritz, Ivana
2017. Sacrificed, Lost or Gave Life for Their Country: Cognitive Analysis of Euphemisms for Death in G.W. Bush and B. Obama’s War Speeches. In The Pragmeme of Accommodation: The Case of Interaction around the Event of Death [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 13], ► pp. 301 ff.
Moya-Guijarro, Arsenio Jesús & Begoña Ruiz Cordero
2020. A multimodal cognitive analysis of visual metonymies in picture books featuring same-sex-parent families. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18:2 ► pp. 372 ff.
Mullis, Eric
2019. Movement Research: The Most Originally Mine. In Pragmatist Philosophy and Dance, ► pp. 149 ff.
Nesset, Tore & Svetlana Sokolova
Njuguna, Bernard G. & Helga Schröder
2022. Figurative language and persuasion in CPG sermons: The Example of a Gĩkũyũ televangelist. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 18:1 ► pp. 151 ff.
Novoselec, Zvonimir
2017. Cultural Models and Motivation of Idioms with the Component ‘Heart’ in Croatian. In Computational and Corpus-Based Phraseology [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10596], ► pp. 337 ff.
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg
2014. Metonymy and the way we speak. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 27:1 ► pp. 168 ff.
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg
2018. Chapter 5. What kind of reasoning mode is metonymy?. In Conceptual Metonymy [Human Cognitive Processing, 60], ► pp. 121 ff.
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg
2019. Chapter 7. Figurative reasoning in hedged performatives. In Metaphor and Metonymy in the Digital Age [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 8], ► pp. 175 ff.
Papišta, Žolt
2022. Metonymie in der Gedichtübersetzung (Metonymy in Poetry Translation). SSRN Electronic Journal
Papišta, Žolt
2022. Metonymie in der Gedichtübersetzung. Babel. Revue internationale de la traduction / International Journal of Translation 68:2 ► pp. 267 ff.
Papousek, Ilona, Christian Rominger, Elisabeth M. Weiss, Corinna M. Perchtold, Andreas Fink & Kurt Feyaerts
2019. Humor creation during efforts to find humorous cognitive reappraisals of threatening situations. Current Psychology
Paradis, Carita
2004. Where Does Metonymy Stop? Senses, Facets, and Active Zones. Metaphor and Symbol 19:4 ► pp. 245 ff.
Peirsman, Yves
2011. Review of Panther, Thornburg & Barcelona (): Metonymy and Metaphor in Grammar. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9:1 ► pp. 315 ff.
Pepper, Steve & Pierre J. L. Arnaud
Perak, Benedikt
2018. Chapter 8. The role of metonymy in the constructionist approach to the conceptualization of emotions. In Conceptual Metonymy [Human Cognitive Processing, 60], ► pp. 205 ff.
Peters, Wim & Yorick Wilks
2003. Data-Driven Detection of Figurative Language Use in Electronic Language Resources. Metaphor and Symbol 18:3 ► pp. 161 ff.
Peña Cervel, Ma Sandra
2022. For Better, for Worse, for Richer, for Poorer, in Sickness and in Health: A Cognitive-Linguistic Approach to Merism. Metaphor and Symbol 37:3 ► pp. 229 ff.
Peña Cervel, María Sandra
2016. Argument structure and implicational constructions at the crossroads. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14:2 ► pp. 474 ff.
PIQUER-PÍRIZ, ANA Mª
2017.
Jeannette Littlemore. Metonymy: hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. Pp. 240. ISBN 978-1-107-04362-6
. Language and Cognition 9:3 ► pp. 568 ff.
Radden, Günter
2018. Chapter 6. Molly married money. In Conceptual Metonymy [Human Cognitive Processing, 60], ► pp. 161 ff.
Rakhilina, Ekaterina & Tatiana Reznikova
2022. Chapter 1. Introduction. In The Typology of Physical Qualities [Typological Studies in Language, 133], ► pp. 1 ff.
Rakhilina, Ekaterina, Daria Ryzhova & Yulia Badryzlova
2022. Lexical typology and semantic maps: Perspectives and challenges. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 41:1 ► pp. 231 ff.
Rakhilina, Ekaterina V., Tatiana I. Reznikova & Olga Yu. Shemanaeva
2009. Dealing with Polysemy in Russian National Corpus: The Case of Adjectives. In Logic, Language, and Computation [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5422], ► pp. 69 ff.
Reznikova, T. I., A. A. Bonch-Osmolovskaya & Ye. V. Rakhilina
2008. Verbs of pain in the light of grammar of constructions. Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics 42:2 ► pp. 115 ff.
Richardson, Peter & Charles M. Mueller
Robinson, Alexandra, Stephen Llewelyn & Blake Wassell
2018. Showing Mercy to the Ungodly and the Inversion of Invective in Jude. New Testament Studies 64:2 ► pp. 194 ff.
Rooney, David
2022. “A Primordial Situation”: Metonymical Linkages in US Newspaper Coverage of Wet Markets. Environmental Communication 16:6 ► pp. 836 ff.
Sakaguchi, Kei
2022. Chapter 8. A frame-semantic approach to Japanese taste terms. In The Language of Food in Japanese [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 25], ► pp. 232 ff.
Salamurović, Aleksandra
2019. Chapter 10. Under One Sun?. In Political Discourse in Central, Eastern and Balkan Europe [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 84], ► pp. 239 ff.
Salamurović, Aleksandra
2020. Metonymy and the conceptualisation of nation in political discourse. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 8:1 ► pp. 181 ff.
Salamurović, Aleksandra
2023. The Metonymy EUrope as a Means of Legitimizing Nations in the Western Balkans. In Konzepte der NATION im europäischen Kontext im 21. Jahrhundert [Linguistik in Empirie und Theorie/Empirical and Theoretical Linguistics, ], ► pp. 219 ff.
Santos, Igor, Carlos Laorden, Borja Sanz & Pablo G. Bringas
2012. Enhanced Topic-based Vector Space Model for semantics-aware spam filtering. Expert Systems with Applications 39:1 ► pp. 437 ff.
Santos, Igor, Carlos Laorden, Xabier Ugarte-Pedrero, Borja Sanz & Pablo G. Bringas
2012. Spam Filtering through Anomaly Detection. In E-Business and Telecommunications [Communications in Computer and Information Science, 314], ► pp. 203 ff.
Schönefeld, Doris
2018. Friending someone into submission: Verbal cues for understanding. Word Structure 11:2 ► pp. 211 ff.
Shenhav, Shaul R.
Slabakova, Roumyana, Jennifer Cabrelli Amaro & Sang Kyun Kang
2016. Regular and Novel Metonymy: Can You Curl up with a Good Agatha Christie in Your Second Language?. Applied Linguistics 37:2 ► pp. 175 ff.
Smirnova, Elizaveta & Svetlana Shustova
2018. Denominal verbs with metaphorical meanings in British business media discourse. Metaphor and the Social World 8:2 ► pp. 267 ff.
Snoek, Conor
2022. From ‘clubs’ to ‘clocks’: lexical semantic extensions in Dene languages. Cognitive Linguistics 33:1 ► pp. 193 ff.
Soto Nieto, Almudena
2020. La red polisémica de negro
. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 33:2 ► pp. 562 ff.
Stadler, Michael W.
2019. Thinking, Experiencing and Rethinking Mereological Interdependence. Gestalt Theory 41:1 ► pp. 31 ff.
Stampoulidis, Georgios & Marianna Bolognesi
2023. Bringing metaphors back to the streets: a corpus-based study for the identification and interpretation of rhetorical figures in street art. Visual Communication 22:2 ► pp. 243 ff.
Su, Chuandong, Xiaoxi Huang, Fumiyo Fukumoto, Jiyi Li, Rongbo Wang & Zhiqun Chen
2020. English and Chinese Neural Metonymy Recognition Based on Semantic Priority Interruption Theory. IEEE Access 8 ► pp. 30060 ff.
Sulikowska, Anna
2020. Das semantische Potential der Idiome aus kognitiver Perspektive. Yearbook of Phraseology 11:1 ► pp. 139 ff.
Sullivan, Karen
2008. Genre-dependent metonymy in Norse skaldic poetry. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 17:1 ► pp. 21 ff.
SUZUKI, KOHEI
2017. <i>Metonymy: Hidden Shortcuts in Language, Thought and Communication</i>. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 34:1 ► pp. 183 ff.
Szeverényi, Sándor
2017. Proceedings of the 4th Mikola Conference - 14-15, November 2014 [Proceedings of the 4th Mikola Conference - 14-15, November 2014, 51], ► pp. 107 ff.
Tabacaru, Sabina
Trantescu, Ana-Maria & Georgiana Reiss
2022. Considerations on the meaning and translation of English heart idioms. Integrating the cognitive linguistic approach. Open Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 427 ff.
Tur, Cristina
2022. Metonimias y metáforas conceptuales con manus en el teatro latino. Emerita 90:1 ► pp. 121 ff.
Turner, Sarah & Jeannette Littlemore
2023. The Many Faces of Creativity,
Urios-Aparisi, Eduardo
2010. The Body of Love in Almodóvar's Cinema: Metaphor and Metonymy of the Body and Body Parts. Metaphor and Symbol 25:3 ► pp. 181 ff.
Vaičiukynaitė, Justina
2020. Images of the Lithuanian Political Elite in the Eyes of Citizens. Politologija :97 ► pp. 42 ff.
Veale, Tony, Kurt Feyaerts & Geert Brône
2006. The cognitive mechanisms of adversarial humor. Humor – International Journal of Humor Research 19:3
Velasco-Sacristán, Marisol
2010. Metonymic grounding of ideological metaphors: Evidence from advertising gender metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics 42:1 ► pp. 64 ff.
Vilar Lluch, Sara
2022. Redefining attitude for studying explicit and indirect evaluations of human behaviour. Functions of Language 29:2 ► pp. 199 ff.
Wachowski, Wojciech
2019. How Fundamental and Ubiquitous Really Is Metonymy?. In Memory, Identity and Cognition: Explorations in Culture and Communication [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 155 ff.
WEISS, DAVID
2005. Metonymy in Black and White: Shelby Steele's Revelatory Racial Tropes. Howard Journal of Communications 16:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Wiesinger, Evelyn
2021. The Spanish verb-particle construction [V para atrás]. In Constructions in Contact 2 [Constructional Approaches to Language, 30], ► pp. 140 ff.
Phyllis Perrin Wilcox
2004. A cognitive key: Metonymic and metaphorical mappings in ASL. cogl 15:2 ► pp. 197 ff.
Wilk, Przemysław
2015. Some Implications for Developing Learners’ Figurative Language Competence Across Modalities: Metaphor, Metonymy and Blending in the Picture Modality. In New Media and Perennial Problems in Foreign Language Learning and Teaching [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 169 ff.
Wilkos, Aleksandra
2021. Głośna pustka. Afrofuturyzm jako dekolonizacja (A City Called Mirage Kiluanjiego Kia Hendy). Przegląd Kulturoznawczy :3 (49) ► pp. 640 ff.
Winter, Bodo & Mahesh Srinivasan
2022. Why is Semantic Change Asymmetric? The Role of Concreteness and Word Frequency and Metaphor and Metonymy. Metaphor and Symbol 37:1 ► pp. 39 ff.
Yamaguchi, Toshiko
2015. The rise of demonstrative-based first/second-person markers in the history of Japanese. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16:2 ► pp. 250 ff.
Yen Chiang, Anita & Wen-yu Chiang
2016. Behold, I am Coming Soon! A Study on the Conceptualization of Sexual Orgasm in 27 Languages. Metaphor and Symbol 31:3 ► pp. 131 ff.
Zhang, Cun & Charles Forceville
2020. Metaphor and metonymy in Chinese and American political cartoons (2018–2019) about the Sino-US trade
conflict. Pragmatics & Cognition 27:2 ► pp. 474 ff.
Zhang, Cun & Zhengjun Lin
2023. Metaphor analysis of the COVID-19 public health emergency on Chinese national news media. Pragmatics and Society 14:1 ► pp. 90 ff.
Zhang, Weiwei, Dirk Speelman & Dirk Geeraerts
2015. Cross-linguistic variation in metonymies for PERSON. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:1 ► pp. 220 ff.
Zhong, Lingli & Zhengguang Liu
2022. Metonymic event-based time interval concepts in Mandarin Chinese—Evidence from time interval words. Frontiers in Psychology 13
Zibin, Aseel
2018. The effect of the Arab Spring on the use of metaphor and metonymy in Jordanian economic discourse. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 16:1 ► pp. 254 ff.
Zibin, Aseel, Abdel Rahman Mitib Altakhaineh & Elham T. Hussein
2020. On the comprehension of metonymical expressions by Arabic-speaking EFL learners: A cognitive linguistic approach. Topics in Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 45 ff.
司, 景方
2018. Critical Discourse Analysis of News Discourse on Perspective of Metonymy. Modern Linguistics 06:03 ► pp. 532 ff.
宫, 健宇
2016. The Cognitive Construal of Metonymic Meanings. Modern Linguistics 04:04 ► pp. 109 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2020. Cognitive pragmatics of American presidential debates: a case for economic metaphors. Cognition, Communication, Discourse :21
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.