Part of
Metonymy in Language and ThoughtEdited by Klaus-Uwe Panther and Günter Radden
[Human Cognitive Processing 4] 1999
► pp. 289–
Edited by Klaus-Uwe Panther and Günter Radden
[Human Cognitive Processing 4] 1999
► pp. 289–
Opposition as a Metonymic Principle
Cited by
Cited by 16 other publications
Apresjan, Valentina, Anastasiya Lopukhina & Maria Zarifyan
2021. Representation of Different Types of Adjectival Polysemy in the Mental Lexicon. Frontiers in Psychology 12 
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2017. Introduction. Figurative thought, figurative language, figurative grammar?. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56], ► pp. 2 ff.
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2017. Chapter 9. Irony has a metonymic basis. In Irony in Language Use and Communication [Figurative Thought and Language, 1], ► pp. 201 ff.
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2020. Intensification via figurative language. In Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language [Figurative Thought and Language, 9], ► pp. 92 ff.
Barnden, John
2018. Chapter 4. Some contrast effects in metonymy. In Conceptual Metonymy [Human Cognitive Processing, 60], ► pp. 97 ff.
Barnden, John A.
2022. Metonymy, reflexive hyperbole and broadly reflexive relationships. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20:1 ► pp. 33 ff.
Brdar-Szabó, Rita & Mario Brdar
2023. Figuratively used product names: From ergonyms to eponyms and paragons. Lingua 290 ► pp. 103552 ff.
Fisher, Harwood
2003. Metonymy as concept: A metaphor for rhetoric, not for thought. Semiotica 2003:147
Herrero Ruiz, Javier
2019. Metaphor and metonymy in jokes. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 32:2 ► pp. 650 ff.
Herrero-Ruiz, Javier
2020. On Some Pragmatic Effects of Event Metonymies. Metaphor and Symbol 35:4 ► pp. 266 ff.
Kosecki, Krzysztof
2007. On Multiple Metonymies within Indirect Speech Acts . Research in Language 5 ► pp. 213 ff.
Kraska-Szlenk, Iwona
2018. Address inversion in Swahili: Usage patterns, cognitive motivation and cultural factors. Cognitive Linguistics 29:3 ► pp. 545 ff.
Lewandowski, Wojciech
2021. Constructions are not predictable but are motivated: evidence from the Spanish completive reflexive. Linguistics 59:1 ► pp. 35 ff.
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg
2017. Chapter 1. Exploitingwh-questions for expressive purposes. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56], ► pp. 18 ff.
Pálinkás, István
2014. Blending and folk theory in an explanation of irony. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12:1 ► pp. 64 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.