Article published in:Practical Theories and Empirical Practice: A linguistic perspective
Edited by Andrea C. Schalley
[Human Cognitive Processing 40] 2012
► pp. 185–244
Evidentiality, modality, focus and other puzzles
Some reflections on metadiscourse and typology
Metadiscourse is a fundamental property of human communication in a way similar to speech acts. From a cross-linguistic study of metadiscourse, we can learn ‘how humans bridge the divide between self and others’ in communication. This chapter concentrates on those pragmatic aspects of metadiscourse which are associated, in some languages, with markers of evidentiality, epistemic modality, and focus (information structure). With respect to typological comparison, I advocate a domain-centered, onomasiologically-oriented approach. I argue that we have to distinguish between a subjective, speaker-related dimension of metadiscourse and an intersubjective, interactionally-oriented one in order to solve some longstanding puzzles in this domain. Data from Quechua, Tibetan, Hungarian, Albanian, and some other languages is used to support the presented claims. Keywords: Albanian; epistemic modality; evidentiality; focus; Hungarian; information structure; metadiscourse; mirative; Quechua; Tibetan
Published online: 19 December 2012
Cited by 5 other publications
Brosig, Benjamin, Foong Ha Yap & Kathleen Ahrens
Schalley, Andrea C.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 june 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.