Implicature of complex sentences in error models
Anton Benz | Centre for General Linguistics, Berlin, Germany
Due to their intensive discussion, implicatures of complex sentences became a kind of benchmark for testing different frameworks of Gricean pragmatics. We propose a novel approach which is based on a communication model with feedback and speaker errors in signal selection. The communication model is introduced as an extension of standard signalling games. In this model, implicatures are explained by the speaker’s tendency to omit parts of their utterances. In this explanation, the error coping strategy of the hearer plays an essential role. In order to account for implicature cancellation, clausal implicatures, and implicatures of complex sentences with disjunction, an additional nonmonotonic component is needed which represents normality assumptions about the level of speaker expertise. Keywords: complex sentences; error models; game theory; preferential models; scalar implicatures
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Zaefferer, Dietmar
2019.
How to avoid overcommitment: Communication as thought sharing (with consequences)
.
Theoretical Linguistics 45:1-2
► pp. 99 ff.
Benz, Anton & Jon Stevens
2018.
Game-Theoretic Approaches to Pragmatics.
Annual Review of Linguistics 4:1
► pp. 173 ff.
Benz, Anton
2017.
Pragmatics Between Experiment and Rationality: Response to Chapman. In
Semantics and Pragmatics: Drawing a Line [
Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, 11],
► pp. 75 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.