Article published in:
Corpus Methods for Semantics: Quantitative studies in polysemy and synonymy
Edited by Dylan Glynn and Justyna A. Robinson
[Human Cognitive Processing 43] 2014
► pp. 6185
Boas, H
(2003)  A constructional approach to resultatives . Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Broccias, C
(2001) Allative and ablative at-constructions. In M. Andronis, C. Ball, H. Elston, & S. Neuvel (Eds.), CLS 37: The main session: Papers from the 37th meeting of the Chicago linguistic society. Volume 1 (pp. 67–82). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Croft, W
(2003) Lexical rules vs. constructions: A false dichotomy. In H. Cuyckens, T. Berg, R. Dirven, & K. Panther (Eds.), Motivation in language: Studies in honour of Günter 
Radden (pp. 49–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R
(1991)  A new approach to English grammar: On semantic principles . Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fellbaum, C
(1998) (Ed.). WordNet: An electronic lexical database . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C., & Kay, P
MS). Construction Grammar (course reader) . University of California, Berkeley.
Fillmore, C
(2001) Mini-grammars of some time-when expressions in English. In J. Bybee, & M. Noonan (Eds.), Complex sentences in grammar and discourse: Essays in honor of Sandra A. Thompson (pp. 31–60). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glynn, D
(2004) Constructions at the crossroads: The place of construction grammar between field and frame. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics , 2, 197–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Testing the hypothesis: Objectivity and verification in usage-based cognitive semantics. In D. Glynn, & K. Fischer (Eds.), Quantitative cognitive semantics: Corpus-driven approaches (pp. 239–270). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A
(1995)  Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2006)  Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A., Casenhiser, D., & Sethuraman, N
(2004) Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics , 15(3), 289–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kilgarriff, A
(1997) I don’t believe in word senses. Computers and the Humanities , 31(2), 91–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levin, B
(1993)  En glish verb classes and alternations . Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, S
(1989)  Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, St. Th
(2003) Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics , 8(2), 209–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Covarying collexemes. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory , 1(1), 1–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van der Leek, F
(1996) The English conative construction: A compositional account. In 
L. Dobrin, K. Singer, & L. McNair (Eds.), CLS 32: The main session: Papers from the 32th meeting of the Chicago linguistic society (pp. 363–378). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

No author info given
2015.  In Argument Structure in Usage-Based Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 17], Crossref logo
Dattner, Elitzur
2019. The Hebrew dative: Usage patterns as discourse profile constructions. Linguistics 57:5  pp. 1073 ff. Crossref logo
Perek, Florent & Amanda L. Patten
2019. Towards an English Constructicon using patterns and frames. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24:3  pp. 354 ff. Crossref logo
Pijpops, Dirk, Dirk Speelman, Freek Van de Velde & Stefan Grondelaers
2021. Incorporating the multi-level nature of the constructicon into hypothesis testing. Cognitive Linguistics 32:3  pp. 487 ff. Crossref logo
Romain, Laurence
2022. Putting the argument back into argument structure constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 33:1  pp. 35 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 july 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.