Article published in:
Corpus Methods for Semantics: Quantitative studies in polysemy and synonymy
Edited by Dylan Glynn and Justyna A. Robinson
[Human Cognitive Processing 43] 2014
► pp. 391404
References
Bybee, J.L
(2010)  Language, usage and cognition . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, M
(2004)  BYU-BNC: The British National Corpus . Available via http://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/bnc.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A.E
(1995)  Constructions. A construction grammar approach to argument structure . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gries, St. Th
(2004) Coll.analysis 3. A program for R for Windows 2.x.
(2012) Frequencies, probabilities, association measures in usage-/exemplar-based linguistics: Some necessary clarifications. Studies in Language , 36(3), 477–510. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, St. Th., & Stefanowitsch, A
(2004a) Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics , 9(1), 97–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004b) Co-varying collexemes in the into-causative. In M. Achard, & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Language, culture, and mind (pp. 225–36). Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Hilpert, M
(2006) Distinctive collexemes and diachrony. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory , 2(2), 243–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Diachronic collostructional analysis. How to use it, and how to deal with confounding factors. In J. Robinson, & K. Allan (Eds.), Current methods in historical semantics (pp. 133–160). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, G
(2005) It-extraposition in English: A functional view. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics , 10(2), 119–159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, H.-J
(2000)  English abstract nouns as conceptual shells: From corpus to cognition . 
Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, St. Th
(2003) Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics , 8(2), 209–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Covarying collexemes. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory , 1(1), 1–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wulff, S., Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, St. Th
(2007) Brutal Brits and persuasive Americans: Variety-specific meaning construction in the into-causative. In G. Radden, K.-M. Köpcke, T. Berg, & P. Siemund (Eds.), Aspects of meaning construction (pp. 265–281). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 17 other publications

Boas, Hans C.
2020.  In The Handbook of English Linguistics,  pp. 277 ff. Crossref logo
Bouso, Tamara
2017. Muttering Contempt and Smiling Appreciation: Disentangling the History of the Reaction Object Construction in English. English Studies 98:2  pp. 194 ff. Crossref logo
Bouso, Tamara
2020. The growth of the transitivising Reaction Object Construction. Constructions and Frames 12:2  pp. 239 ff. Crossref logo
Bouso, Tamara & Pablo Ruano San Segundo
2021. Another turn of the screw on the history of the reaction object construction. Functions of Language 28:2  pp. 208 ff. Crossref logo
Dekalo, Volodymyr
2020.  Zur Entwicklung der modalen verstehen-Konstruktion: Ein Konservierungseffekt im Zuge der Auxiliarisierung . Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 48:1  pp. 101 ff. Crossref logo
Desagulier, Guillaume
2017.  In Corpus Linguistics and Statistics with R [Quantitative Methods in the Humanities and Social Sciences, ],  pp. 197 ff. Crossref logo
Diewald, Gabriele, Volodymyr Dekalo & Dániel Czicza
2021.  In Modality and Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 32],  pp. 81 ff. Crossref logo
Gabrielatos, Costas
2019. If-Conditionals and Modality: Frequency Patterns and Theoretical Explanations. Journal of English Linguistics 47:4  pp. 301 ff. Crossref logo
Kaunisto, Mark
2018.  In Changing Structures [Studies in Language Companion Series, 195],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Martínez Caro, Elena & Jorge Arús-Hita
2020.  Give as a light verb. Functions of Language 27:3  pp. 280 ff. Crossref logo
Podhorodecka, Joanna
2021. Real-life pseudo-passives: The usage and discourse functions of adjunct-based passive constructions. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 57:1  pp. 33 ff. Crossref logo
Põldvere, Nele, Matteo Fuoli & Carita Paradis
2016. A study of dialogic expansion and contraction in spoken discourse using corpus and experimental techniques. Corpora 11:2  pp. 191 ff. Crossref logo
Rosemeyer, Malte & Eitan Grossman
2021. Why don’t grammaticalization pathways always recur?. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 17:3  pp. 653 ff. Crossref logo
Schanding, Brian & Hye K. Pae
2018. Shell noun use in English argumentative essays by native speakers of Japanese, Turkish, and English. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4:1  pp. 54 ff. Crossref logo
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Susanne Flach
2020.  In Computational Phraseology [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 24],  pp. 248 ff. Crossref logo
Wang, Jiaojiao & Jiangping Zhou
2022. A Corpus-Based Study of Semantic Categorizations of Attracted Adjectives to the it BE ADJ clause Construction. SAGE Open 12:2  pp. 215824402210912 ff. Crossref logo
Wiliński, Jarosław
2018. Adjectives in extraposed constructions with that-clauses: a quantitative corpus-driven analysis. Brno studies in English :1  pp. [83] ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 may 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.