Part of
Corpus Methods for Semantics: Quantitative studies in polysemy and synonymyEdited by Dylan Glynn and Justyna A. Robinson
[Human Cognitive Processing 43] 2014
► pp. 391–404
Edited by Dylan Glynn and Justyna A. Robinson
[Human Cognitive Processing 43] 2014
► pp. 391–404
Collostructional analysis
Measuring associations between constructions and lexical elements
This chapter offers a practical introduction to a set of corpus-linguistic analytical methods that are referred to collectively as ‘collostructional analysis’. The overarching aim in conducting a collostructional analysis is to find out which lexical items form collocations with a given grammatical construction. The purpose of such an undertaking, in the context of this book, is to facilitate the semantic analysis of grammatical constructions. The chapter discusses several case studies in order to show that the semantic description of grammatical constructions benefits from a quantitative analysis of the lexical material that occurs with the respective constructions. A final discussion surveys advantages and pitfalls of collostructional methods.
Keywords: collocations, quantitative analysis
References
Bybee, J.L
(2010)
Language, usage and cognition
. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 
Davies, M
Goldberg, A.E
(1995)
Constructions. A construction grammar approach to argument structure
. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gries, St. Th
(2004) Coll.analysis 3. A program for R for Windows 2.x.
(2012) Frequencies, probabilities, association measures in usage-/exemplar-based linguistics: Some necessary clarifications.
Studies in Language
, 36(3), 477–510.
Gries, St. Th., & Stefanowitsch, A
(2004a) Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
, 9(1), 97–129.
(2004b) Co-varying collexemes in the into-causative. In M. Achard, & S. Kemmer (Eds.),
Language, culture, and mind
(pp. 225–36). Stanford: CSLI.
Hilpert, M
(2006) Distinctive collexemes and diachrony.
Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory
, 2(2), 243–56.
(2012) Diachronic collostructional analysis. How to use it, and how to deal with confounding factors. In J. Robinson, & K. Allan (Eds.),
Current methods in historical semantics
(pp. 133–160). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kaltenböck, G
(2005) It-extraposition in English: A functional view.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
, 10(2), 119–159.
Schmid, H.-J
(2000)
English abstract nouns as conceptual shells: From corpus to cognition
.
Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, St. Th
(2003) Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
, 8(2), 209–243.
(2005) Covarying collexemes.
Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory
, 1(1), 1–43.
Wulff, S., Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, St. Th
(2007) Brutal Brits and persuasive Americans: Variety-specific meaning construction in the into-causative. In G. Radden, K.-M. Köpcke, T. Berg, & P. Siemund (Eds.),
Aspects of meaning construction
(pp. 265–281). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by
Cited by 20 other publications
Boas, Hans C.
2020. Constructions in English Grammar. In The Handbook of English Linguistics, ► pp. 277 ff. 
Bouso, Tamara
2017. Muttering Contempt and Smiling Appreciation: Disentangling the History of the Reaction Object Construction in English. English Studies 98:2 ► pp. 194 ff.
Bouso, Tamara
2020. The growth of the transitivising Reaction Object Construction. Constructions and Frames 12:2 ► pp. 239 ff.
Bouso, Tamara
2022. Where Does Lexical Diversity Come From? Horizontal Interaction in the Network of the Late Modern English Reaction Object Construction. English Studies 103:8 ► pp. 1334 ff.
Bouso, Tamara & Pablo Ruano San Segundo
2021. Another turn of the screw on the history of the reaction object construction. Functions of Language 28:2 ► pp. 208 ff.
Dekalo, Volodymyr
2020.
Zur Entwicklung der modalen
verstehen-Konstruktion: Ein Konservierungseffekt im Zuge der Auxiliarisierung
. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 48:1 ► pp. 101 ff.
Desagulier, Guillaume
2017. Association and Productivity. In Corpus Linguistics and Statistics with R [Quantitative Methods in the Humanities and Social Sciences, ], ► pp. 197 ff.
Diewald, Gabriele, Volodymyr Dekalo & Dániel Czicza
2021. Grammaticalization of verdienen into an auxiliary marker of deontic modality. In Modality and Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 32], ► pp. 81 ff.
Gabrielatos, Costas
2019. If-Conditionals and Modality: Frequency Patterns and Theoretical Explanations. Journal of English Linguistics 47:4 ► pp. 301 ff.
Johannsen, Berit
Kaunisto, Mark
2018. Structures, patterns, constructions – studying variation and change in lexico-grammar. In Changing Structures [Studies in Language Companion Series, 195], ► pp. 1 ff.
Martínez Caro, Elena & Jorge Arús-Hita
Podhorodecka, Joanna
2021. Real-life pseudo-passives: The usage and discourse functions of adjunct-based passive constructions. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 57:1 ► pp. 33 ff.
Põldvere, Nele, Matteo Fuoli & Carita Paradis
2016. A study of dialogic expansion and contraction in spoken discourse using corpus and experimental techniques. Corpora 11:2 ► pp. 191 ff.
Rosemeyer, Malte & Eitan Grossman
2021. Why don’t grammaticalization pathways always recur?. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 17:3 ► pp. 653 ff.
Schanding, Brian & Hye K. Pae
2018. Shell noun use in English argumentative essays by native speakers of Japanese, Turkish, and English. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4:1 ► pp. 54 ff.
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Susanne Flach
2020. Too big to fail but big enough to pay for their mistakes. In Computational Phraseology [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 24], ► pp. 248 ff.
Wang, Jiaojiao & Jiangping Zhou
2022. A Corpus-Based Study of Semantic Categorizations of Attracted Adjectives to the it BE ADJ clause Construction. SAGE Open 12:2 ► pp. 215824402210912 ff.
Wiliński, Jarosław
2018. Adjectives in extraposed constructions with that-clauses: a quantitative corpus-driven analysis. Brno studies in English :1 ► pp. [83] ff.
Zhou, Jiangping
2022. A corpus-based study of congruent and metaphorical patterns of modality in English. Studia Neophilologica ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.