Part of
Corpus Methods for Semantics: Quantitative studies in polysemy and synonymy
Edited by Dylan Glynn and Justyna A. Robinson
[Human Cognitive Processing 43] 2014
► pp. 391404
References (14)
References
Bybee, J.L. (2010). Language, usage and cognition . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, M. (2004). BYU-BNC: The British National Corpus . Available via [URL].Google Scholar
Goldberg, A.E. (1995). Constructions. A construction grammar approach to argument structure . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gries, St. Th. (2004). Coll.analysis 3. A program for R for Windows 2.x.
Gries, St. Th., & Stefanowitsch, A. (2004a). Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics , 9(1), 97–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2004b). Co-varying collexemes in the into-causative. In M. Achard, & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Language, culture, and mind (pp. 225–36). Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Hilpert, M. (2006). Distinctive collexemes and diachrony. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory , 2(2), 243–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2012). Diachronic collostructional analysis. How to use it, and how to deal with confounding factors. In J. Robinson, & K. Allan (Eds.), Current methods in historical semantics (pp. 133–160). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, G. (2005). It-extraposition in English: A functional view. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics , 10(2), 119–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, H.-J. (2000). English abstract nouns as conceptual shells: From corpus to cognition . 
Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, St. Th. (2003). Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics , 8(2), 209–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2005). Covarying collexemes. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory , 1(1), 1–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wulff, S., Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, St. Th. (2007). Brutal Brits and persuasive Americans: Variety-specific meaning construction in the into-causative. In G. Radden, K.-M. Köpcke, T. Berg, & P. Siemund (Eds.), Aspects of meaning construction (pp. 265–281). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (28)

Cited by 28 other publications

Goschler, Juliana & Anatol Stefanowitsch
2024. Constructional Transfer in L2 Learning: The Role of Entrenchment. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 72:3  pp. 283 ff. DOI logo
Kim, Jungsoo & Rok Sim
2024.  A Collostructional and Constructional Approach to the Transitive out of - ing Construction . English Studies 105:2  pp. 263 ff. DOI logo
Zhou, Jiangping
2023. A corpus-based study of explicit objective modal expressions in English. Studia Neophilologica 95:1  pp. 100 ff. DOI logo
Zhou, Jiangping
2023. A corpus-based study of congruent and metaphorical patterns of modality in English. Studia Neophilologica 95:3  pp. 351 ff. DOI logo
Zhou, Jiangping
2023. Meaning patterns of the NP de VP construction in modern Chinese: approaches of covarying collexeme analysis and hierarchical cluster analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 10:1 DOI logo
Zhou, Jiangping
2024. Functions of Ideational Metaphor in English. Sage Open 14:4 DOI logo
Johannsen, Berit
2022.  She has a stadium named after her . Constructions and Frames 14:1  pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Jiaojiao & Jiangping Zhou
2022. A Corpus-Based Study of Semantic Categorizations of Attracted Adjectives to the it BE ADJ clause Construction. Sage Open 12:2 DOI logo
Bouso, Tamara & Pablo Ruano San Segundo
2021. Another turn of the screw on the history of the reaction object construction. Functions of Language 28:2  pp. 208 ff. DOI logo
Bouso, Tamara & Pablo Ruano San Segundo
2024. The Reaction Object Construction in the Leech and Short’s model: A new strategy of discourse presentation in the nineteenth-century novel. Studia Neophilologica  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Diewald, Gabriele, Volodymyr Dekalo & Dániel Czicza
2021. Grammaticalization of verdienen into an auxiliary marker of deontic modality. In Modality and Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 32],  pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Podhorodecka, Joanna
2021. Real-life pseudo-passives: The usage and discourse functions of adjunct-based passive constructions. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 57:1  pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Rosemeyer, Malte & Eitan Grossman
2021. Why don’t grammaticalization pathways always recur?. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 17:3  pp. 653 ff. DOI logo
Boas, Hans C.
2020. Constructions in English Grammar. In The Handbook of English Linguistics,  pp. 277 ff. DOI logo
Dekalo, Volodymyr
2020. Zur Entwicklung der modalenverstehen-Konstruktion: Ein Konservierungseffekt im Zuge der Auxiliarisierung. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 48:1  pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
Martínez Caro, Elena & Jorge Arús-Hita
2020. Giveas a light verb. Functions of Language 27:3  pp. 280 ff. DOI logo
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Susanne Flach
Feltgen, Quentin
2019. Diachronic Emergence of Zipf-like Patterns in Construction-Specific Frequency Distributions: A Quantitative Study of the Way Too Construction. Lexis :16 DOI logo
Gabrielatos, Costas
2019. If-Conditionals and Modality: Frequency Patterns and Theoretical Explanations. Journal of English Linguistics 47:4  pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Schanding, Brian & Hye K. Pae
2018. Shell noun use in English argumentative essays by native speakers of Japanese, Turkish, and English. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4:1  pp. 54 ff. DOI logo
Wiliński, Jarosław
2018. Adjectives in extraposed constructions with that-clauses: a quantitative corpus-driven analysis. Brno studies in English :1  pp. [83] ff. DOI logo
Bouso, Tamara
2017. Muttering Contempt and Smiling Appreciation: Disentangling the History of the Reaction Object Construction in English. English Studies 98:2  pp. 194 ff. DOI logo
Bouso, Tamara
2020. The growth of the transitivising Reaction Object Construction. Constructions and Frames 12:2  pp. 239 ff. DOI logo
Bouso, Tamara
2022. Where Does Lexical Diversity Come From? Horizontal Interaction in the Network of the Late Modern English Reaction Object Construction. English Studies 103:8  pp. 1334 ff. DOI logo
Bouso, Tamara
2024. Towards a usage-based characterisation of the English Superlative Object Construction. Constructions and Frames 16:1  pp. 100 ff. DOI logo
Desagulier, Guillaume
2017. Association and Productivity. In Corpus Linguistics and Statistics with R [Quantitative Methods in the Humanities and Social Sciences, ],  pp. 197 ff. DOI logo
Põldvere, Nele, Matteo Fuoli & Carita Paradis
2016. A study of dialogic expansion and contraction in spoken discourse using corpus and experimental techniques. Corpora 11:2  pp. 191 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.