Article published in:
Corpus Methods for Semantics: Quantitative studies in polysemy and synonymy
Edited by Dylan Glynn and Justyna A. Robinson
[Human Cognitive Processing 43] 2014
► pp. 443485
Agresti, A
(2002)  Categorical data analysis (2nd ed.). Hoboken: John Wiley. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arppe, A
2006Frequency considerations in morphology. Finnish verbs differ, too. SKY Journal of Linguistics , 19, 175–189.Google Scholar
Baayen, R.H
(2008)  Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) languageR: Data sets and functions with “Analyzing Linguistic Data: A practical introduction to statistics”. R package version 1.1. Retrieved from http://​CRAN​.R​-project​.org​/package​=languageR.
Benzécri, J.P
(1992)  Correspondence analysis handbook . New York:Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
De Leeuw, J., & Mair, P
(2009a) Simple and canonical correspondence analysis using the R package anacor. Journal of Statistical Software , 31, 1–18. Retrieved from http://​www​.
jstatsoft​.org​/v31​/i05/.Google Scholar
(2009b) Gifi methods for optimal scaling in R: The package homals. Journal of Statistical Software , 31, 1–20. Retrieved from http://​www​.jstatsoft​.org​/v31​/i04/.Google Scholar
Delaere, I., Plevoets, K., & De Sutter, G
(Submitted) Measuring text type variation through profile-based correspondence analysis: How far apart are translated and non-translated Dutch? Target . International Journal of Translation Studies .Google Scholar
Divjak, D
(2010)  Structuring the lexicon: A clustered model for near-synonymy . Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dray, S., & Dufour, A.-B
(2007) The ade4 package: Implementing the duality diagram for ecologists. Journal of Statistical Software , 22, 1–20.Google Scholar
Gifi, A
(1990)  Nonlinear multivariate analysis . Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Glynn, D., & Sjölin, M
(2011) Cognitive Linguistic methods for literature: A usage-based approach to metanarrative and metalepsis. In A. Kwiatkowska (Ed.), Texts and minds: Papers in cognitive poetics and rhetoric (pp. 85–102). Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Glynn, D
(2009) Polysemy, syntax, and variation: A usage-based method for Cognitive Semantics. In V. Evans, & S. Pourcel (Eds.), New directions in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 77–106). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Synonymy, lexical fields, and grammatical constructions: A study in usage-based Cognitive Semantics. In H.-J. Schmid, & S. Handl (Eds.), Cognitive foundations of linguistic usage-patterns: Empirical studies (pp. 89–118). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014a) The conceptual profile of the lexeme home: A multifactorial diachronic analysis. In J.E. Díaz-Vera (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy across time and cultures (pp. 265–293). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2014b) The social nature of anger: Multivariate corpus evidence for context effects upon conceptual structure. In I. Novakova, P. Blumenthal, & D. Siepmann (Eds.), Emotions in discourse (pp. 69–82). Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(In press) Cognitive socio-semantics: The theoretical and analytical role of context in meaning. Review of Cognitive Linguistics .Google Scholar
Gower, J., Gardner-Lubbe, S., & le Roux, N
(2010)  Understanding biplots . Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Greenacre, M., & Blasius, J
(Eds.) (2006)  Multiple correspondence analysis and related methods . London: Chapman & Hall. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenacre, M., & Nenadić, O
(2010) ca: Simple, multiple and joint correspondence analysis. R package version 0.33. Retrieved from http://​CRAN​.R​-project​.org​/package​=ca.
Greenacre, M
(1984)  Theory and applications of correspondence analysis . London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(2006) From simple to multiple correspondence analysis. InM. Greenacre, & J. Blasius(Eds.), Multiple correspondence analysis and related methods (pp. 41–76). London: Chapman & Hall. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007)  Correspondence analysis in practice . London: Chapman & Hall. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010)  Biplots in practice . Bilbao: Fundación BBVA.Google Scholar
Husson, F., Lê, S., & Pagès, J
(2011)  Exploratory multivariate analysis by example using R . 
London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Kowalczyk, T., Pleszczynska, E., & Ruland, F
(Eds.) (2004)  Grade models and methods for data analysis . München: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krawczak, K
(2014a) Shame and its near-synonyms in English: A multivariate corpus-driven approach to social emotions. In I. Novakova, P. Blumenthal, & D. Siepmann (Eds.), Emotions in discourse (pp. 84–94). Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2014b) Epistemic stance predicates in English: A quantitative corpus-driven study of subjectivity. In D. Glynn, & M. Sjölin (Eds.), Subjectivity and epistemicity: Corpus, discourse, and literary approaches to stance (pp. 355–386). Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Krawczak, K., & Glynn, D
(2011) Context and cognition: A corpus-driven approach to parenthetical uses of mental predicates. In K. Kosecki, & J. Badio (Eds.), Cognitive processes in language (pp. 87–99). Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Krawczak, K., & Kokorniak, I
(2012) Subjective construal of think in Polish. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics , 48, 439–472. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Le Roux, B., & Rouanet, H
(2005)  Geometric data analysis: From correspondence analysis to structured data analysis . London: Kluwer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010)  Multiple correspondence analysis . London: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lê, S., & Husson, F
(2008) FactoMineR: An R package for multivariate analysis. Journal of Statistical Software , 25, 1–18.Google Scholar
Murtagh, F
(2005)  Correspondence analysis and data coding with R and Java . London: Chapman & Hall. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nenadić, O., & Greenacre, M
(2007) Correspondence analysis in R, with two- and three-dimensional graphics: The ca package. Journal of Statistical Software , 20. Retrieved from http://​ww​.jstatsoft​.org​/v20​/i03.Google Scholar
Oksanen, J., Blanchet, G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., O’Hara, R.B., Simpson, G.L., Solymos, P., Henry, M., Stevens, H., & Wagner, H
(2011) vegan: Community ecology package. R package version 1.17-11. Retrieved from http://​CRAN​.R​-project​.org​/package​=vegan.
Oksanen, J
(2006) Multivariate analysis of ecological communities in R: vegan tutorial. Retrieved from http://​cc​.oulu​.fi​/jarioksa​/softhelp​/vegan​.html.
Pardo, C
(2010) ‘pamctdp’. Retrieved from http://​www​.docentes​.unal​.edu​.co​/cepardot.
Plevoets, K., Speelman, D., & Geeraerts, D
(2008) The distribution of T/V pronouns in Netherlandic and Belgian Dutch. In K. Schneider, & A. Baron (Eds.), Variational pragmatics: Regional varieties in pluricentric languages (pp. 181–209). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rencher, A
(2002)  Methods of multivariate analysis (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmidtke-Bode, K
(2009)  Going-to-V and gonna-V in child language: A quantitative approach to constructional development. Cognitive Linguistics , 20, 509–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Speelman, D., Grondelaers, S., & Geeraerts, D
(2003) Profile-based linguistic uniformity as a generic method for comparing language varieties. Computers and the Humanities , 37, 317–337. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szelid, V., & Geeraerts, D
(2008) Usage-based dialectology: Emotion concepts in the Southern Csango dialect. Review of Cognitive Linguistics , 6, 23–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Venables, W., & Ripley, B
(2002)  Modern applied statistics with S (4th ed.). London: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weller, S., & Romney, K
(1990)  Metric scaling correspondence analysis . London: Sage.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 38 other publications

Almutairi, Bandar Alhumaidi A.
2022. Diachronic changes of least delicate appraisal in parliamentary and congressional language. Functions of Language Crossref logo
Clarke, Isobelle
2018.  In Online Harassment [Human–Computer Interaction Series, ],  pp. 151 ff. Crossref logo
Dattner, Elitzur
2015.  In Causation, Permission, and Transfer [Studies in Language Companion Series, 167],  pp. 271 ff. Crossref logo
Debras, Camille
2017. The shrug. Gesture 16:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Desagulier, Guillaume
2017.  In Corpus Linguistics and Statistics with R [Quantitative Methods in the Humanities and Social Sciences, ],  pp. 239 ff. Crossref logo
Deshors, Sandra C.
2017. Structuring subjectivity in Asian Englishes. English Text Construction 10:1  pp. 132 ff. Crossref logo
Deshors, Sandra C.
2017. Zooming in on Verbs in the Progressive: A Collostructional and Correspondence Analysis Approach. Journal of English Linguistics 45:3  pp. 260 ff. Crossref logo
Deshors, Sandra C. & Mark Waltermire
2019. The indicative vs. subjunctive alternation with expressions of possibility in Spanish. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24:1  pp. 67 ff. Crossref logo
Divjak, Dagmar, Nina Szymor & Anna Socha-Michalik
2015. Less is more: possibility and necessity as centres of gravity in a usage-based classification of core modals in Polish. Russian Linguistics 39:3  pp. 327 ff. Crossref logo
Du, Jing, Fuyin Thomas Li & Mengmin Xu
2020.  Pò (‘break’), qiē (‘cut’) and kāi (‘open’) in Chinese. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18:1  pp. 213 ff. Crossref logo
Fagard, Benjamin & Karolina Krawczak
2017. Les prépositions à et de et la complémentation verbale. Langages N° 206:2  pp. 65 ff. Crossref logo
Fang, Lumin
2020. Constituency map of the alternative for Germany (AfD) vote in 2017: analysing characteristic differences via multiple correspondence analysis. Journal of Contemporary European Studies  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Flach, Susanne
2020. Schemas and the frequency/acceptability mismatch: Corpus distribution predicts sentence judgments. Cognitive Linguistics 31:4  pp. 609 ff. Crossref logo
Gaio, Mario, Carmen Ferrajolo, Alessia Zinzi, Consiglia Riccardi, Pasquale Di Filippo, Ludovica Carangelo, Gorizio Pieretti, Francesco Rossi, Giovanni Francesco Nicoletti & Annalisa Capuano
2021. Association of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) and Warfarin With Haemorrhagic Risk by Applying Correspondence Analysis to Data From the Italian Pharmacovigilance Database – A Case Study. Frontiers in Pharmacology 12 Crossref logo
Garraffoni, André R. S., Fabrício C. Alcântara & Hélio H. Checon
2017. Evaluating the anesthetization and fixation efficacy of “soft” and “hard” freshwater benthic meiofauna: what is the best method for specimen preservation?. Limnology 18:2  pp. 209 ff. Crossref logo
Hartmann, Stefan
2021. Diachronic Cognitive Linguistics. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 9:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Ioannou, Georgios
2017. A corpus-based analysis of the verb pleróo in Ancient Greek. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15:1  pp. 253 ff. Crossref logo
Ioannou, Georgios
2019. From Athenian fleet to prophetic eschatology. Correlating formal features to themes of discourse in Ancient Greek . Folia Linguistica 53:s40-s2  pp. 355 ff. Crossref logo
Jannusch, Tim, Darren Shannon, Michaele Völler, Finbarr Murphy & Martin Mullins
2021. Smartphone Use While Driving: An Investigation of Young Novice Driver (YND) Behaviour. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 77  pp. 209 ff. Crossref logo
Krawczak, Karolina
2018. Reconstructing social emotions across languages and cultures. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 16:2  pp. 455 ff. Crossref logo
Krawczak, Karolina & Dylan Glynn
2015. Operationalizing mirativity. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:2  pp. 353 ff. Crossref logo
Lam, Chris
2014.  In 2014 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (IPCC),  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Lam, Chris
2016. Correspondence Analysis: A Statistical Technique Ripe for Technical and Professional Communication Researchers. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 59:3  pp. 299 ff. Crossref logo
Larsson, Tove
2022. Grammatical stance marking across registers. Register Studies  pp. 243 ff. Crossref logo
Larsson, Tove, Marcus Callies, Hilde Hasselgård, Natalia Judith Laso, Sanne van Vuuren, Isabel Verdaguer & Magali Paquot
2020. Adverb placement in EFL academic writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 25:2  pp. 155 ff. Crossref logo
Larsson, Tove & Henrik Kaatari
2022. Extraposition in learner and expert writing. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research  pp. 33 ff. Crossref logo
Liu, Meili
2022. Towards a dynamic behavioral profile of the Mandarin Chinese temperature term re: a diachronic semasiological approach. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 0:0 Crossref logo
Podhorodecka, Joanna
2021. Real-life pseudo-passives: The usage and discourse functions of adjunct-based passive constructions. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 57:1  pp. 33 ff. Crossref logo
Rogos-Hebda, Anna
2020. It’s Raining Immigrants! HELLelujah!: The Metaphors of Immigration in Early American Magazines (1828–1959). Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies :29/2 Crossref logo
Shao, Bin, Yingying Cai & Graeme Trousdale
2019. A Multivariate Analysis of Diachronic Variation in A Bunch of noun: A Construction Grammar Account. Journal of English Linguistics 47:2  pp. 150 ff. Crossref logo
Silvennoinen, Olli O.
2018. Constructional schemas in variation. Constructions and Frames 10:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Soares da Silva, Augusto
2020. Exploring the cultural conceptualization of emotions across national language varieties. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18:1  pp. 42 ff. Crossref logo
Soares da Silva, Augusto
2021.  In Figurative Language – Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11],  pp. 387 ff. Crossref logo
Szymor, Nina
2018. Translation: universals or cognition?. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 30:1  pp. 53 ff. Crossref logo
Tahi, Mathias, Caudou Trebissou, Fabienne Ribeyre, Boguinard Sahin Guiraud, Désiré N’ da Pokou & Christian Cilas
2019. Variation in yield over time in a cacao factorial mating design: changes in heritability and longitudinal data analyses over 13 consecutive years. Euphytica 215:6 Crossref logo
Tizón-Couto, David & David Lorenz
2021. Variables are valuable: making a case for deductive modeling. Linguistics 59:5  pp. 1279 ff. Crossref logo
Zehentner, Eva
2020. Cognitive reality of constructions as a theoretical and methodological challenge in historical linguistics. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34  pp. 371 ff. Crossref logo
Zhang, Zheng-sheng
2016.  In Integrating Chinese Linguistic Research and Language Teaching and Learning [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 7],  pp. 215 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 may 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.