Article published in:
Multilingual Cognition and Language Use: Processing and typological perspectives
Edited by Luna Filipović and Martin Pütz
[Human Cognitive Processing 44] 2014
► pp. 97–120

Compound verbs in English and Bulgarian and the relativity debate

In this chapter we argue that the constraints regulating the characteristic products of word-formation processes in different languages showcase the Whorfian principle at work. The structure-centered analysis of the differences in the creation and usage of compound verbs in English and Bulgarian reveals the centrality of the effects of the ergative cryptotype among the major differences between the two languages. Specific features of compound verbs in the two languages seem to drive language users towards registering and encoding marked patterns of salience in conceptualizing events for communicative purposes via the “self-imposing causal loop”. This leads to recognizing a causal role for language in the culture-cognition-language interface.
Keywords: culture–cognition–language interface, ergative cryptotype, Whorfianism, word formation
Published online: 10 June 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.44.04bag
References
Aarts, Bas
2007  Syntactic Gradience: The Nature of Grammatical Indeterminacy . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ackema, Peter & Ad Neeleman
2004  Beyond Morphology: Interface Conditions on Word-formation. [Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 6] . Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Avramova, Tsvetanka & Petya Osenova
2003 Once again on the issue of the boundary between a complex word and a phrase. Balgarski ezik [Bulgarian Language] 1: 68–75. (in Bulgarian)Google Scholar
Bagasheva, Alexandra, Hristo Stamenov & Maria Kolarova
2013. Semantic packaging in verb-based compounds in English and Bulgarian.Slavia Meridionalis. Studia Slavica et Balcanica13: 201–226.
Barsalou, Lawrence & Christopher Hale
1993 Components of conceptual representation: From feature lists to recursive frames. In I. V. Mechelen, J. Hampton, R. Michalski, & P. Theuns (Eds.), Categories and Concepts: Theoretical Views and Inductive Data Analysis , 97–144. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence
1999 Perceptual Symbol Systems. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 22 (6): 577–660.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie
1983  English Word-formation . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
2000 Loci of diversity and convergence in thought and language. In M. Pütz & M. Verspoor (Eds.), Explorations in Linguistic Relativity [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory – series IV, Vol. 199], 101–123. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William & Alan Cruse
2004  Cognitive Linguistics . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Oliveira, Roberta Pires & Robson de Souza Bittencour
2008 An interview with Mark Johnson and Tim Rohrer: From neurons to sociocultural situatedness. In R. Frank, 
R. Dirven­, T. Ziemke, & E. Bernárdez (Eds.), Body, Language and Mind, Vol. 2: Sociocultural Situatedness [Cognitive Linguistics Research 35.2], 21–51. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Deutscher, Guy
2010  Through the Language Glass: How Words Colour Your World . London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Devitt, Michael & Kim Sterelny
1987  Language and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Erdmann, Peter
2009 Compound verbs. In G. Rohdenburg & J. Schluter (Eds.), One Language, Two Grammars?: Differences between British and American English , 38–59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan & Melanie Green
2006  Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction . Edinburgh: ­Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan
2007 Towards a cognitive compositional semantics: An overview of LCCM Theory. In U. Magnusson, H. Kardela, & A. Glaz (Eds.), Further Insights into Semantics and Lexicography , 11–42. Lublin, Poland: Wydawnictwo UMCS.Google Scholar
2009  How Words Mean: Lexical Concepts, Cognitive Models and Meaning Construction . Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Everett, Daniel
2012  Language: The Cultural Tool . London: Profile Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles
2006 Frame semantics. In D. Geeraerts (Ed.), Cognitive Linguistics. Basic Readings , 373–400. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. (originally published in Linguistics in the morning calm. 1982. Linguistic society of Korea, Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company. 111–137). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, Clifford
1973  The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays . New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele
2010 Verbs, constructions and semantic frames. In M. Rappaport-Hovav, 
E. Doron, & I. Sichel (Eds.), Syntax, Lexical Semantics, and Event Structure [Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 27] , 39–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan
2003 Thought before language: Do we think ergative?In D. Gentner, & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought , 493–522. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Goossens, Louis
2003 Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. In R. Dirven, & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast , 349–377. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hohenhaus, Peter
2005 Lexicalization and Institutionalization. In P. Štekauer & R. Lieber (Eds.), Handbook of Word-Formation , 335–373. Berlin: Springer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
2009 Compounding in the parallel architecture and conceptual semantics. In R. Lieber, & P. Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding , 105–128. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kiefer, Ferenc
1993 Thematic roles and compounds. Folia Lingüística XXVII (1–2): 45–55.Google Scholar
Lampert, Martina
2009  Attention and Recombinance. A Cognitive-Semantic Investigation into Morphological Compositionality in English . Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
1987  Foundations of Cognitive Grammar . Vol. 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1990  Concept, Image, Symbol . Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
2008  Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction . Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Penny
1996  The Whorf Theory Complex: A Critical Reconstruction . Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen
2003 Language and mind: Let’s get the issues straight!In D. Gentner, & 
S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought , 25–47. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Libben, Gary
2006 Why study compound processing? An overview of the issues. In G. Libben, & G. Jarema (Eds.), The Representation and Processing of Compound Words , 1–22. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lucy, John
1997 Linguistic relativity. Annual Review of Anthropology 26: 291–312. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lucy, John & Suzanne Gaskins
2003 Interaction of language type and referent type in the development of nonverbal classification preferences. In D. Gentner, & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought , 465–492. ­Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Manova, Stela
2005 Towards a Theory of Conversion in Slavic: Evidence from Bulgarian, Russian and Serbo-Croatian. Glossos 6: 1–27.Google Scholar
Marchand, Hans
1969  The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation . 2nd edition. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Marchetti, Giorgio
2006 A presentation of attentional semantics. Cognitive Processing 7: 163-194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
1984 The evolution of noun incorporation. Language 60: 847–894. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murdarov, Vladko
1983  Contemporary Word-formation Processes . Sofia: Naouka i Izkustvo. (In Bulgarian).Google Scholar
Nagano, Akiko
2007 Marchand’s analysis of back-formation revisited: Back-formation as a type of conversion. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 54 (1): 33–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nitsolova, Russalina
2008  A Grammar of Bulgarian. Morphology . Sofia: Sofia University Publishing House “St. Kliment Ohridski” (in Bulgarian).Google Scholar
Palmer, Gary
1996  Toward a Theory of Cultural Linguistics . Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Radden, Günter & René Dirven
2007  Cognitive English Grammar . Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radeva, Vasilka
2007  In the World of Words . Sofia: Sofia University Publishing House 
“St. Kliment Ohridski” (In Bulgarian).Google Scholar
Rice, Sally & Gary Prideaux
1991 Event-packaging. The case of object incorporation in English. BLS 17: 299–311.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1911 The problem of noun incorporation in American languages. American Anthropologist 13: 250–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2007 Entrenchment, salience and basic levels. In D. Geeraerts & 
H. ­Cuyckens, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics , 117–138. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schulze, Woflgang
1999 Cognitive Linguistics Meets Typology: The Architecture of a “Grammar of Scenes and Scenarios”. Paper of talk given at the TABU day(U Groningen 1999), version corrected by Joseph Swango]; at: http://​www​.lrz​.de​/~wschulze​/cog​_typ​.htm. (last accessed January 2012).
Schwanenflugel, Paula & Pei-Jung Lin
1991 Cross-cultural aspects in word meanings. In P. J. Schwanenflugel (Ed.), The Psychology of Word Meanings , 71–90. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elizabeth
1982  The Syntax of Words . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sharifian, Fazard
2011  Cultural Conceptualizations and Language . Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sickinger, Pawel
2012 Mental Models and Linguistic Cues: Investigating the Interface Between Language and Mental Representation Across Cultures. In 35th International LAUD Symposium. Cognitive Psycholinguistics: Bilingualism, Cognition and Communication , 125–147. Essen:Linguistic Agency University of Duisburg.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan
1979 The role of language in language acquisition. Invited Address, 50th Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Philadelphia.
1987 Thinking for Speaking. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society : 435–444.
1996 Two ways of travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani, & S. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning , 195–220. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Steels, Luc
2012a Forward. In L. Steels (Ed.), Experiments in Cultural Language Evolution [Advances in Interaction Studies, Volume 3], vii–xii. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: ­Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012b Self-organization and selection in cultural language evolution. In L. Steels (Ed.), Experiments in Cultural Language Evolution [Advances in Interaction Studies, Volume 3], 1–37. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Štekauer, Pavol
1998  An Onomasiological Theory of English Word-Formation [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics]. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Štekauer, Pavol, Salvador Valera, & Lívia Körtvélyessy
2012  Word-formation in the World’s Languages: A Typological Survey . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1985 Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and Lexicon , 56–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2000  Towards a Cognitive Semantics . Vol. I and Vol. II. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tendahl, Markus
2009  A Hybrid Theory of Metaphor: Relevance Theory and Cognitive Linguistics . Palgrave: MacMillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thornburg, Linda & Klaus-Uwe Panther
2000 Why we subject incorporate (in English): A post-Whorfian view. In M. Pütz, & M. Verspoor (Eds.), Explorations in Linguistic Relativity [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory – series IV, Vol. 199], 319–345. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
2003  Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
2008  Origins of Human Communication . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Underhill, James
2009  Humboldt, Worldview and Language . Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vachkova, Kina & Vesselin Vachkov
1998 Word-formation and analyticity. Typological conditioning of some word-formation processes in Contemporary Bulgarian. Slavyanska Filologiya [Slavonic Philology] 22: 95–101. (in Bulgarian).Google Scholar
Verhagen, Arie
2007 Construal and perspectivization. In D. Geeraerts, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics , 48–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vogel, Petra
2000 Grammaticalization and part of speech systems. In P. Vogel, & B. Comrie (Eds.), Approaches to the Typology of Word Classes , 259–284. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wald, Benji & Lawrence Besserman
2002 The emergence of the verb-verb compound in twentieth century English and twentieth century linguistics. In D. Minkova, & R. Stockwell (Eds.), Studies in the History of the English Language: A millennial perspective , 417–447. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin Lee
1945 Grammatical categories. Language 21: 1–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1956  Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (J.B. Carroll, Ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wu, Ling-ling & Lawrence Barsalou
2009 Perceptual simulation in conceptual combination: Evidence from property generation. Acta Psychologica 132 (2): 173–189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter
2006 Introduction: What the theory of the lexicon is about. In 
D. Wunderlich­ (Ed.), Advances in the Theory of the Lexicon [Interface Explorations 13], 1–26. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar