Article published in:
Multilingual Cognition and Language Use: Processing and typological perspectives
Edited by Luna Filipović and Martin Pütz
[Human Cognitive Processing 44] 2014
► pp. 287–308

L1-based prototypicality effects in L2 vocabulary learning

| Beijing Normal University
| University of Hong Kong
One issue in multilingual cognition is whether there is a unitary or two conceptual systems that map onto different languages. This chapter addresses this issue by exploring whether and how prototypicality effects manifest in L2 vocabulary learning. In our two-step study we first used free sense-listing and prototypicality-rating tasks to locate cultural variations in prototypicality of the senses of 17 polysemous words between Chinese and English. Then we carried out a no-cue-English-word-learning-and-immediate-cued-recall task to examine whether Chinese participants would recall better and faster newly-learned English word senses that are prototypical in Chinese but not in English. The existence of L1-based prototypicality effects in L2 vocabulary learning are confirmed, providing support for the unitary conceptual model in L2 learning.
Keywords: Chinese, English, polysemous words, second language acquisition, unitary conceptual model
Published online: 10 June 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.44.11xia
References
Anglin, J. M
1977  Word, Object and Conceptual Development . New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Sharon Lee, Lila R. Gleitman, & Henry Gleitman
1983 What some concepts might not be. Cognition 13: 263–308. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence W
1983 Ad hoc categories. Memory and Cognition 11: 211–227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Castgeb, Holly Z. & Mark S. Strauss
2006 Do individuals with autism process categories differently? The effect of typicality and development. Child Development 77: 1717–1729. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chrea, Christelle, Dominique Valentin, & Herve Abdi
2009 Graded structure in odour categories: A cross-cultural case study. Reception 38: 292–309.Google Scholar
De Groot, Annette M B
1992 Bilingual lexical representation: A closer look at conceptual representations. In R. Frost & L. Katz, eds., Orthography, Phonology, Morphology, and Meaning , 389–412. Amsterdam: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Rod, R. Heimbach, Y. Tanaka, & A. Yamazaki
1999 Modified input and the acquisition of word meanings by children and adults. In R. Ellis, ed., Learning a Second Language through Interaction , 63–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Györi, Gábor
1996 Historical aspects of categorization. In E. H. Casad, ed., Cognitive Linguistics in the Redwoods: The Expansion of a New Paradigm in Linguistics , 175–206. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiran, Swathi & Cynthia K. Thompson
2003 Effects of typicality on online category verification of animate category exemplars in aphasia. Brain and Language 85: 441–450. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George
1987  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind . Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Kun Kun
2008 A comparison of color metaphors between Chinese and English cultures. In Q. Feng, ed., Cognitive Linguistics and Rhetoric Studies: 2008 International Symposium , 402–408. Shanghai: Shanghai University Press. [刘坤坤. 2008. 从颜色隐喻探索中英文化应用区别.《认知语言学与修辞学研究–2008 年国际研讨会论文集》, 402–408. 
上海: 上海大学出版社.]Google Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian
2008 A unified model. In P. Robinson & N. Ellis, eds., Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition , 341–371. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Meints, Kerstin, Kim Plunkett, & Paul L. Harris
1999 When does an ostrich become a bird? The role of typicality in early word comprehension. Developmental Psychology 35: 1072–1078. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. A
1956 The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 63: 81–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Onishi, Kristine H., Gregory L. Murphy, & Kathryn Bock
2008 Prototypicality in sentence production. Cognitive Psychology 56: 103–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rips, Lance J., Edward J. Shoben, & Edward E. Smith
1973 Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12: 1–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor
1973a On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In T. E. Moore, ed., Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language , 111–144. New York: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1973b Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 4: 328–350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1975 Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104: 192–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor & Carolyn B. Mervis
1975 Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology 7: 573–605. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yin, Xiao Mei
2008 On the meaning change of Chinese and English plant terms: A Cognitive Linguistic perspective. Journal of Human University of Science and Engineering 29: 162–164. [尹小梅. 2008. 从认知角度探讨英语文化植物词的意义演变方式. 《湖南科技学院学报》 29: 162–164.]Google Scholar
Zhang, Jing Cheng
2009 On the cultural differences between Chinese and English animal terms. Journal of Liaoning Medical University: Social Science Edition 7: 103–105. [张景成. 2009. 从动物词汇看汉英文化背景的差异.《辽宁医学院学报（社会科学版）》 7: 103–105.]Google Scholar