The Semantics of German Verb Prefixes

| Loyola University New Orleans
ISBN 9789027246653 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
ISBN 9789027269126 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
The Semantics of German Verb Prefixes is the most comprehensive study ever undertaken in this area of German grammar. Using an extensive collection of naturally occurring data, the author proposes an image-schematic interpretation for each of the productive prefixes be-, ver-, er-, ent-, zer-, um-, über-, unter-, and durch-. These abstract semantic patterns underlie a remarkable range of particular meanings, and they consistently account for subtle contrasts between prefixed verbs and alternative constructions such as simple verbs, particle verbs, and verbs with other prefixes. Furthermore, the author develops a schematic meaning for the prefixed verb construction itself. This grammatical meaning reflects the interpreter’s perspective and attentional focus as the objective event is imagined to unfold. Underlying all of these proposals is a novel conception of meaning as a dynamic and flexible process with a constantly active role for the interpreter. This volume will be of great value to cognitive linguists as well as scholars and students of German who want to gain insights into a central and puzzling part of the morphosyntax and semantics of the German language.
[Human Cognitive Processing, 49]  2015.  xiii, 284 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
List of figures
List of tables
Chapter 1. Route-path prefixes and basic concepts
Chapter 2. Be-
Chapter 3. Ent-
Chapter 4. Er-
Chapter 5. Zer-
Chapter 6. Ver-
Chapter 7. The system of prefixes
Index of subjects and names
Index of verbs, prefixes and particles


Beaton, K.B.
(1996) A practical dictionary of German usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Cited in text as “Beaton” with page number.]Google Scholar
Becker, Donald A.
(1971) Case grammar and German be . Glossa, 5, 125–145.Google Scholar
Bellavia, Elena
(1996) The German über . In M. Pütz, & R. Dirven (Eds.), The construal of space in language and thought [Cognitive Linguistics Research 8] (pp. 73–107). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Belz, Julie Anne
(1997) Mind, metaphor, and prefix: Evidence for prototype category structure in NHG ver-. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Bister-Broosen, H., Genzmer, H., & Pynes, P.
(1992) Spektrum: Grammatik im Kontext. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bloch, Ernst, Halley, Anne, & Suvin, Darko
(1970) ‘Entfremdung, Verfremdung’: Alienation, Estrangement. The Drama Review, 15(1), 120–125. www​.jstor​.org​/stable​/1144598 DOI: CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bouillon, Henri
(1978) Kontrastive Syntagmatik der deutschen Präpositionen auf und über . In J. Lerot, & R. Kern (Eds.), Mélanges de linguistique et de littérature offerts au professeur Henri Draye à l’occasion de son éméritat (pp. 3–13). Louvain: Bibliothèque de l’Université, Bureau de recueil.Google Scholar
Brinkmann, Hennig
(1962) Die deutsche Sprache: Gestalt und Leistung. Düsseldorf: Schwann.Google Scholar
Brinkmann, Ursula
(1997) The locative alternation in German: Its structure and acquisition [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 15]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brugman, Claudia
(1981). The story of over. Master’s thesis, University of California, Berkeley. Reproduced by Indiana University Linguistics Club (1983).
Buzsáki, György
(2006) Rhythms of the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
. Version 1.6.3 (March2011) Institut für deutsche Sprache Mannheim. cosmas2​.ids​-mannheim​.de​/cosmas2​-web​/menu​.home​.do.
Croft, William
(1998) The structure of events and the structure of language. In Michael Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language: cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (67–92). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Curme, George O.
(1922) A grammar of the German language. 2nd ed. New York: Frederick Ungar.Google Scholar
Deane, Paul
(1993) Multimodal spatial representation: On the semantic unity of over and other polysemous prepositions. Duisburg: L.A.U.D. Series A, paper no. 332.Google Scholar
Dewell, Robert B.
(1994)  Over again: Image-schema transformations in semantic analysis. Cognitive Linguistics, 5, 351–380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Case meaning and sequence of attention: Source landmarks as accusative and dative objects of the verb. In A. Foolen, & F. van der Leek (Eds.), Constructions in cognitive linguistics (pp. 47–65). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) The semantics of be-verb constructions and the German locative alternation. Leuvense Bijdragen, 93, 15–59.Google Scholar
(2007a) Moving around: The role of the conceptualizer in semantic interpretation. Cognitive Linguistics, 18, 383–415. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007b) Why Monday comes before Tuesday: The role of a non-deictic conceptualiser. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 25, 291–301. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Moving over: The role of systematic semantic processes in defining individual lexemes. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 5, 271–288. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) The meaning of particle/prefix constructions in German [Human Cognitive Processing 34]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David
(1991) Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67, 547–619. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duden Deutsches Universalwörterbuch
(1996) Mannheim, Leipzig, Wien, & Zürich: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Duden Die Grammatik
[Duden Band 4] (2006) Mannheim, Leipzig, Wien, & Zürich: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Duden Richtiges und gutes Deutsch: Wörterbuch der sprachlichen Zweifelsfälle
[Duden Band 9] (2007) Mannheim, Leipzig, Wien, & Zürich: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Eberhard, Johann August, Lyon, Otto, & Rückert, Friedrich
(1802/1910) Synonymisches Handwörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. 17th ed. Available online at www​.textlog​.de​/synonym​.html. [Cited in text as “Eberhard” with article number.]
Eroms, Hans-Werner
(1980) Be-Verb und Präpositionalphrase [Monographien zur Sprachwissenschaft 9]. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Farrell, R.B.
(1977) Dictionary of German synonyms. 3rd ed. Cambridge: University Press. [Cited in text as “Farrell” with page number.]Google Scholar
Fleischer, Wolfgang
(1971) Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Geiger, Gad, & Lettvin, Jerome
(1997) A view on Dyslexia. CBCL Paper #148/AI Memo #1608, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. http://​cbcl​.mit​.edu​/people​/geiger​/geiger​-new​.html.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
(1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Günther, Hartmut
(1974) Das System der Verben mit be- in der deutschen Sprache der Gegenwart. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
(1987) Wortbildung, Syntax, be-Verben und das Lexikon. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur (PBB), 109, 179–201.Google Scholar
Hallwass, Edith
(1991) Mehr Erfolg mit gutem Deutsch. Munich: Mosaik.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Bruce Wayne
(1984) The semantics of English spatial prepositions. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, San Diego. Reproduced by University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor (1986).
Heidegger, Martin
(2006) Mindfulness (Besinnung). Translation by Parvis Emad, & Thomas Kalary. Continuum.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul, & Thompson, Sandra
(1980) Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language, 56, 251–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
(1983) Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1986) Distributive location. Sophia Linguistica, 20/21, 15–24.Google Scholar
Janda, Laura A.
(1986) A semantic analysis of the Russian verbal prefixes: Za-, pere-, do-, and ot-. Munich: O. Sagner (Slawistische Beiträge).Google Scholar
von Károlyi, Catya, Winner, Ellen, Gray, Wendy, & Sherman, Gordon F.
(2003) Dyslexia linked to talent: Global visual-spatial ability. Brain and Language, 85(3), 427–431. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kühnhold, Ingeburg
(1973) Präfixverben. In I. Kühnhold, & H. Wellmann (Eds.), Das Verb (Deutsche Wortbildung: Typen und Tendenzen in der Gegenwartssprache, Erster Hauptteil) [Sprache der Gegenwart 29] (pp. 141–362). Düsseldorf: Schwann.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
(1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
(1987) Foundations of cognitive Grammar I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: University Press.Google Scholar
(1991) Foundations of cognitive Grammar II: Descriptive application. Stanford: University Press.Google Scholar
(2013) Essentials of cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leopold, Max
(1907) Die Vorsilbe VER- und ihre Geschichte [Germanistische Abhandlungen 27]. Breslau: Marcus. openlibrary​.org:archive​.org​/stream​/dievorsilbeveru00leopgoog#page​/n3​/mode​/2upGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth
(1993) English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lindner, Susan Jean
(1983) A Lexico-Semantic Analysis of English Verb Particle Constructions with out and up . Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, San Diego. Reproduced by Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Matlock, Teenie
(2010) Abstract motion is no longer abstract. Language and Cognition, 2(2), 243–260. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, Laura A., & Ruppenhofer, Josef
(2001) Beyond alternations: A constructional model of the German applicative pattern. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Olsen, Susan
(1994) Lokativalternation im Deutschen und Englischen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 13, 201–235. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) Pleonastische Direktionale. In G. Harras, & M. Bierwisch (Eds.), Wenn die Semantik arbeitet: Festschrift für Klaus Baumgärtner zum 65. Geburtstag (pp. 303–330). Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Risch, Gabriela
(1995) Verbpräfigierung des Deutschen: Skalierungsverben mit über- und unter- . Ph.D. dissertation, Stuttgart.
Schmitz, Werner
(1964) Der Gebrauch der deutschen Präpositionen. Ismaning: Max Hueber.Google Scholar
Schröder, Jochen
(1986) Lexikon deutscher Präpositionen. Leipzig: Verlag Enzyklopädie Leipzig.Google Scholar
(1992) Lexikon deutscher Präfixverben. Berlin & Leipzig: Langenscheidt Verlag Enzyklopädie Leipzig.Google Scholar
Schulz, Dora, & Griesbach, Heinz
(1960) Grammatik der deutschen Sprache. München: Max Hueber.Google Scholar
Schulze, Rainer
(1991) Getting round to (a)round: Towards a description and analysis of a spatial predicate. In G. Rauh (Ed.), Approaches to prepositions (pp. 251–274). Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
(1993) The meaning of (a)round: A study of an English preposition. In R.A. Geiger, & B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Eds.), Conceptualizations and mental processing in language (pp. 399–431). Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stiebels, Barbara
(1996) Lexikalische Argumente und Adjunkte [studia grammatica 39]. Berlin: Akademie. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stiebels, Barbara, & Wunderlich, Dieter
(1994) Morphology feeds syntax: The case of particle verbs. Linguistics, 32, 913–968. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
(2000a) Toward a cognitive semantics I: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge / London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2000b) Toward a cognitive semantics II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge / London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Holly A., & Tversky, Barbara
(1996) Perspective in spatial descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 371–391. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Andrea, & Evans, Vyvyan
(2003) The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scenes, embodied meaning and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weinrich, Harald
(1993) Textgrammatik der deutschen Sprache. Mannheim, Leipzig, Wien, & Zürich: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter
(1983) On the compositionality of German prefix verbs. In R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze, & A. von Stechow (Eds.), Meaning, use and interpretation of language (pp. 452–465). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(1987) An investigation of lexical composition: the case of German be- verbs. Linguistics, 25, 283–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1993) On German um: semantic and conceptual aspects. Linguistics, 31, 111–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zifonun, Gisela et al.
(1997) Grammatik der deutschen Sprache [Schriften des Instituts für deutsche Sprache 7]. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Baeskow, Heike
2017. #Virtual Lexicality. The semantics of innovative prefixed verbal anglicisms in German. Word Structure 10:2  pp. 173 ff. Crossref logo
Fagard, Benjamin & Anetta Kopecka
2021. Source/Goal (a)symmetry. Studies in Language 45:1  pp. 130 ff. Crossref logo
Matsumoto, Yo
2020.  In Broader Perspectives on Motion Event Descriptions [Human Cognitive Processing, 69],  pp. 281 ff. Crossref logo
Matsumoto, Yo & Kazuhiro Kawachi
2020.  In Broader Perspectives on Motion Event Descriptions [Human Cognitive Processing, 69],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Mattes, Veronika
2019. What do children know about German verb prefixes?. The Mental Lexicon 14:2  pp. 274 ff. Crossref logo
Pross, Tillmann
2019. What about lexical semantics if syntax is the only generative component of the grammar?. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 37:1  pp. 215 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects & Metadata
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2014035752 | Marc record