Impersonals and other Agent Defocusing Constructions in French

| Rice University
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027246660 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027269072 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
This book investigates French impersonals as a functional category. Any structure whose agent is defocused and whose predicate describes a situation stable enough to be generally available should be considered impersonal. In addition to il impersonals, the category also includes demonstrative (ce/ça), middle (se), and indefinite (on) structures. These different forms belong to the same functional category because they systematically code general and predictable events that cannot be imputed to a specific cause. Because generality and predictability are gradual notions, impersonals can only be identified within the context of specific constructional islands which therefore constitute the organizing principle of the French impersonal category.

Conducted in Cognitive Grammar, the analysis follows the functional tradition in expanding the scope of French impersonals beyond il constructions, but also proposes a way of precisely delineating the category. This book will be of interest to anyone interested in impersonal constructions and French linguistics.
[Human Cognitive Processing, 50]  2015.  ix, 372 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
Preface
ix
Chapter 1. Narrow and broad impersonals: Definitions and scope of analysis
1–35
Chapter 2. A cognitive approach to French impersonals
37–60
Chapter 3. The semantic range of il impersonals
61–98
Chapter 4. Simple Impersonals: Pattern of Usage
99–164
Chapter 5. Complex impersonals
165–218
Chapter 6. Demonstrative impersonals
219–262
Chapter 7. Middle impersonals
263–298
Chapter 8. Indefinite impersonals
299–342
Chapter 9. Concluding remarks
343–357
References
359–366
Index
367–372
“The volume is a very valuable contribution and reveals to be fruitful reading for students and scholars interested in the impersonal domain, both in French and from a cross-linguistic perspective. Indeed, the innovative functional definition of impersonality will undoubtedly be of great service for comparisons between languages, at least within the Romance language area.”
References

References

Achard, Michel
(1998) Representation of cognitive structures: Syntax and semantics of French complements. Cognitive Linguistics Research 11. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
(2000) The distribution of French raising constructions. BLS, 26, 1–12. Crossref link
(2001) French ça and the dynamics of reference. In Ruth Brend, Alan Melby, & Arle Lommel (Eds.), LACUS Forum 27: Speaking and understanding (pp. 49–62). Fullerton, CA: LACUS.
(2002) The meaning and distribution of French mood inflections. In Frank Brisard (Ed.), Grounding: The epistemic footing of deixis and reference (pp. 197–249). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2007) Usage-based semantics: Body parts with three French breaking verbs. In Marja Nenonen & Sinikka Niemi (Eds.), Collocations and Idioms 1 (pp. 1–13). Joensuu: Joensuu University Press.
(2009) The distribution of French intransitive predicates. Linguistics, 47(3), 513–558. Crossref link
(2010) Fields and settings: French il and ça impersonals in copular complement constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(3), 441–498. Crossref link
(2012) The impersonals value of demonstrative and middle constructions. In Myriam Bouveret & Dominique Legallois (Eds.), French constructions (pp. 177–200). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
. (in press). Abstract locational subjects: Field and settings in French and English. In Marja-Liisa Helasvuo & Tuomas Huumo (Eds.) Subjects in constructions: Canonical and non canonical. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ackema, Paul, & Schoorlemmer, Maaike
(1994) The middle construction and the syntax-semantics interface. Lingua, 93, 59–90. Crossref link
(1995) Middles and nonmovement. Linguistic Inquiry, 26(2), 173–197.
Afonso, Susana
(2008) Existentials as impersonalizing devices: The case of European Portuguese. Transactions of the Philological Society, 106(2), 180–215. Crossref link
Bally, Charles
(1932) Linguistique générale et linguistique française. Bern: Francke.
Barlow, Michael, & Kemmer, Suzanne
(2000) Usage-based models of language. Stanford: CSLI.
Benveniste, Emile
(1966) Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Gallimard.
Blevins, James
(2003) Passives and impersonals. Journal of Linguistics, 39, 473–520. Crossref link
Blinkenberg, Andreas
(1960) Le problème de la transitivité en français moderne. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.
Bolinger, Dwight
(1973) Ambient it is meaningful too. Journal of Linguistics, 9, 261–270. Crossref link
(1977) Meaning and form. London & New York: Longman.
Bruneau, Charles, & Heulluy, Marcel
(1937) Grammaire pratique de la langue française à l’usage des honnêtes gens. Paris: Delagrave.
Brunot, Ferdinand
(1936) La pensée et la langue. Paris: Masson.
Bybee, Joan
(2001) Phonology and language use. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Cabredo Hofheer, Patricia
(2003) Arbitrary readings of third person plural pronominals. In Mattias Weisgerber (Ed.), Proceedings of the Conference Sinn und Beudetung 7. FB Sprachwissenschaft.Germany: Universität Konstanz.
(2008) Les pronoms impersonnels humains – syntaxe et interprétation. Modèles Linguistiques, XXIX-1(57), 35–56.
Cadiot, Pierre
(1988) De quoi ça parle? A propos de la référence de ça pronom-sujet. Le français Moderne, 65, 174–192.
Carlier, Anne
(1996) ‘Les Gosses ça se lève tôt le matin’: L’interprétation générique du syntagme nominal disloqué au moyen de ce ou ça . Journal of French Language Studies, 6, 133–162. Crossref link
Carnie, Andrew, & Harley, Heidi
(2005) Existential impersonals. Studia Linguistica, 59(1), 45–65. Crossref link
Chomsky, Noam
(1981) Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
(1995) The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Corblin, Francis
(1995) Les formes de reprise dans le discours: Anaphores et chaînes de références. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
Condoravdi, Cleo
(1989) The middle: Where semantics and morphology meet. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 11, 18–30.
Coveney, Aidan
(2003) “Anything you can do, tu can do better”: Tu and vous as substitutes for indefinite on in French. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7(2), 164–191. Crossref link
Creissels, Denis
(2008a) Impersonal and related constructions: A typological approach. Manuscript, University of Lyon. Downloaded from: http://​www​.deniscreissels​.fr​/public​/Creissels​-impers​.constr​.pdf.
(2008b) Impersonal pronouns and coreference: The case of French on . Manuscript, University of Lyon. Downloaded from: http://​www​.deniscreissels​.fr​/public​/Creissels​-ON​.pdf.
Croft, William
(2001) Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref link
Cummins, Sarah
(2000) The unaccusative hypothesis and the impersonal construction in French. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 45(3/4), 227–251.
Diessel, Holger
(1999) Demonstratives: Form, function and grammaticalization. Typological Studies in Language, 42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Divjak, Dagmar, & Janda, Laura
(2008) Ways of attenuating agency in Russian. Transactions of the Philological Society, 106(2), 138–179. Crossref link
Dowty, David
(2000) The semantic asymmetry of “argument alternations” (and why it matters). Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik. Available at: http://​www​.ling​.ohio​-state​.edu​/~dowty.
Fauconnier, Gilles
(1985) Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, & London: Bradford.
Fauconnier, Gilles, & Turner, Mark
(2002) The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Fillmore, Charles
(1982) Frame semantics. In The linguistics society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 111–137). Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company
Fillmore, Charles, Kay, Paul, & O’Connor, Mary Catherine
(1988) Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone . Language, 64(3), 501–538. Crossref link
François, Alexis
(1933) Histoire de la langue française (tome VI, partie IIB: La langue post-classique). Paris: Colin.
Gadet, Françoise
(1992) Le français populaire. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Galichet, Georges
(1968) Grammaire structurale du français moderne. Paris & Limoges: Editions Charles-Lavauzelle.
Gavioli, Laura
(2005) Exploring corpora for ESP learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Gledhill, Christopher
(2003) Fundamentals of French syntax. München LINCOM EUROPA.
Goldberg, Adele
(1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
(2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalizations in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gougenheim, Georges
(1963) Système grammatical de la langue française. Paris: Editions d’Artrey.
Grammaire larousse du XXe siècle (1936) Paris: Librairie Larousse.
Grevisse, Maurice
(1936) Le bon usage. Cours de grammaire française et de langage français. Gembloux: Duculot.
(1969) Le bon usage (9ème édition). Gembloux: Duculot.
(1986) Le bon usage (12ème édition). Paris, Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot.
Gries, Stefan, & Divjak, Dagmar
(2009) Behavioral profiles: A corpus-based approach towards cognitive semantic analysis. In Vyvyan Evans, & Stephanie Pourcel (Eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics (pp. 57–75). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Gries, Stefan, & Stefanowitsch, Anatol
(Eds.) (2006) Corpora in cognitive linguistics: Corpus-based approaches to syntax and lexis. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
Grimshaw, Jane
(1980) Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gross, Maurice
(1968) Grammaire transformationnelle du français: Syntaxe du verbe. Paris: Larousse.
Guénette, Louise
(1996) Le démonstratif en français. Paris: Honoré Champion.
Guéron, Jacqueline
(1980) On the syntax and semantics of PP extraposition. Linguistic Inquiry, 11, 637–678.
Heluasvo, Marja-Liisa, & Vilkuna, Maria
(2008) Impersonal is personal: Finnish perspectives. Transactions of the Philological Society, 106(2), 216–245. Crossref link
Hériau, Michel
(1980) Le verbe impersonnel en français moderne. Lille: Atelier de reproductions de thèses, Université de Lille III.
Herschensohn, Julia
(1982) The French impersonal as a base generated structure. Studies in Language, 6, 193–219. Crossref link
(1996) Case suspension and binary complement structure in French. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Hilty, Gerold
(1959)  Il impersonnel: Syntaxe historique et interprétation littéraire. Le Français Moderne, 27, 241–251.
Hopper, Paul, & Thompson, Sandra
(1980) Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language, 56, 251–299. Crossref link
Johnson-Laird, Philip
(1993) Foreword. In Cristina Cacciari, & Patrizia Tabossi (Eds.), Idioms: Processing, structure, and interpretation (pp. vii–x). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Jones, Michael
(1996) Foundations of French syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Karttunnen, Laurie
(1971) Some observations on factivity. Papers in Linguistics, 4, 55–70. Crossref link
Kayne, Richard
(1979) Rightward NP movement in French and English. Linguistic Inquiry, 10, 710–719.
Keenan, Edward, & Dryer, Matthew
(2007) Passive in the world’s languages. In Timothy Shopen (Ed.), Clause structure, language typology and syntactic description, Vol. 1, (2nd Edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kemmer, Suzanne
(1993) The middle voice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Kiparsky, Paul, & Kiparsky, Carol
(1970) Fact. In Manfred Bierwisch, & Karl E. Heidolph (Eds.), Progress in linguistics (pp. 143–173). The Hague: Mouton.
Kirsner, Robert
(1979) The problem of presentative sentences in modern Dutch. North-Holland Linguistic Series 43. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Koenig, Jean-Pierre
(1999)  On a tué le président! The nature of passives and ultra-indefinites. In Barbara Fox, Dan Jurafsky, & Laura Michaelis (Eds.), Cognition and function in language (pp. 256–272). Stanford: CSLI.
Koenig, Jean-Pierre, & Mauner, Gail
(1999) A-definites and the discourse status of implicit arguments. Journal of Semantics, 16(3), 207–236. Crossref link
Labelle, Marie
(1992) Change of state and valency. Journal of Linguistics, 28, 375–414. Crossref link
Lakoff, George
(1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press. Crossref link
Lakoff, George, & Johnson, Mark
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lambrecht, Knud
(1994) Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representation of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Langacker, Ronald
(1982) Space grammar, analyzability, and the English passive. Language, 58, 22–80. Crossref link
(1985) Observations and speculations on subjectivity. In John Haiman (Ed.), Iconicity in syntax (pp. 109–150). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(1987a) Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
(1987b) Nouns and verbs. Language, 63, 53–94. Crossref link
(1988) A usage-based model. In Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (Ed.), Topics in cognitive linguistics (pp. 127–161). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(1990) Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 5–38. Crossref link
(1991) Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
(1993) Reference point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 1–38. Crossref link
(1995) Raising and transparency. Language, 71(1), 1–62. Crossref link
(1999) Virtual reality. Study in the Linguistic Sciences, 29(2), 77–103.
(2000) A dynamic usage-based model. In Michael Barlow & Suzanne Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp. 1–63). Stanford: CSLI.
(2002) The control cycle: Why grammar is a matter of life and death. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Japanese Cognitive Linguistics Association, 2, 193–220.
(2004) Aspects of the grammar of finite clauses. In Michel Achard, & Suzanne Kemmer (Eds.), Language, culture, and mind (pp. 535–577). Stanford: CSLI.
(2005) Construction grammars: Cognitive, radical, and less so. In Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, & M. Sandra Peña Cevel (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction (pp. 101–159). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2006) Dimensions of defocusing. In Masayoshi Shibatani, & Taro Kageyama (Eds.), Voice and grammatical relations: In honor of Masayoshi Shibatani (pp. 115–137). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(2007) Constructing the meanings of personal pronouns. In Günter Radden, Klaus-Michael Köpcke, Thomas Berg, & Peter Siemund (Eds.), Aspects of meaning construction (pp. 171–197). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(2008) Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref link
(2009) Investigations in cognitive grammar. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
Lauwers, Peter
(2004) La description du français entre la tradition grammaticale et le modernité linguistique. Leuven, Paris, & Dudley, MA: Peeters.
Lazard, Gilbert
(1998) Actancy. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
Lazdina, Tereza Budina
(1966) Teach yourself Latvian. London: The English Universities Press.
Le Bidois, Georges, & Le Bidois, Robert
(1935) Syntaxe du français moderne, Vol. 1. New York: Strechert.
(1938) Syntaxe du français moderne, Vol. 2. New York: Strechert.
Legendre, Géraldine
(1989) Unaccusativity in French. Lingua, 79, 95–164. Crossref link
(1990) French impersonal constructions. NLLT, 8, 81–128.
Lekakou, Marika
(2003) Greek passives on the middle interpretation. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Greek Linguistics . Downloaded from: https://​www​.academia​.edu​/884778​/Greek​_passives​_on​_the​_middle​_interpretation.
(2004) Middles as disposition ascriptions. In Cécile Meier, & Mattias Weisgerber (Eds.), Proceedings of the conference “sub8 – Sinn und Beudetung” Arbeitpapier 117, (pp. 181–195). FB Sprachwissenschaft. Germany: Universität Konstanz.
Lyons, Christopher
(1995) Voice, aspect and arbitrary arguments. In John Charles Smith, & Martin Maiden (Eds.), Linguistic theory and the Romance languages (pp. 77–114). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Malchukov, Andrej, & Siewierska, Anna
(2011) Impersonal constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Malchukov, Andrej, & Ogawa, Akio
(2011) Towards a typology of impersonal constructions. In Andrej Malchukov, & Anna Siewierska (Eds.), Impersonal constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 19–56). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Martin, Robert
(1970) La transformation impersonnelle. Revue de Linguistique Romane, 34, 377–394.
Martinon, Philippe
(1927) Comment on parle en français. Paris: Larousse.
Melis, Ludo
(1990) La voie pronominale. Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot. Crossref link
Mendikoetxea, Amaya
(2008) Clitic impersonal constructions in Romance: Syntactic features and semantic interpretation. Transactions of the Philological Society, 106(2), 290–336. Crossref link
Michaelis, Laura
(2005) Entity and event coercion in a symbolic theory of syntax. In Jan-Ola Östman, & Mirjam Fried (Eds.), Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions (pp. 45–88). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(2004) Type shifting in construction grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion. Cognitive Linguistics, 15, 1–67. Crossref link
Moignet, Gérard
(1974) Etudes de psycho-systématique française. Paris: Klincksieck.
Olsson, Hugo
(1986) La concurrence entre il, ce et cela (ça) comme sujet d’expressions impersonnelles en français contemporain. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Perlmutter, David
(1978) Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. BLS, 4, 157–189. Crossref link
(Ed.) (1983) Studies in relational grammar 1. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
Perlmutter, David, & Rosen, Carol
(Eds.) (1984) Studies in relational grammar 2. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
Perlmutter, David, & Postal, Paul
(1983) Some proposed laws of basic clause structure. In David Perlmutter (Ed.), Studies in relational grammar 1 (pp. 81–129). Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
(1984) Impersonal passives and some relational laws. In David Perlmutter, & Carol Rosen (Eds.), Studies in relational grammar 2 (pp. 126–171). Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
Pollock, Jean-Yves
(1978) Trace theory and French syntax. In Jay Keyser (Ed.), Recent transformational studies in European languages (pp. 65–112). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Postal, Paul
(1982) Arc pair grammar descriptions. In Pauline Jacobson, & Geoffrey Pullum (Eds.), The nature of syntactic representation (pp. 341–425). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Crossref link
(1984) French indirect object cliticization and SSC/BT. Linguistic Analysis, 14, 111–172.
Pustejovsky, James
(1989) Type coercion and selection. Paper presented at West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics , Vancouver.
(1995) Linguistic constraints on type coercion. In Patrick Saint-Dizier, & Evelyn Viegas (Eds.), Computational lexical semantics (pp. 71–97). Cambridge, New York, & Melbourne: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Radford, Andrew
(2004) Minimalist syntax: Exploring the structure of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Rice, Sally
(1987) Towards a cognitive model of transitivity. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California San Diego.
Rowlett, Paul
(2007) The syntax of French. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Ruwet, Nicolas
(1972) Théorie syntaxique et syntaxe du français. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
(1989) Weather-verbs and the unaccusative hypothesis. In Carl Kirschner, & Janet De Cesaris (Eds.), Studies in Romance linguistics (pp. 313–345). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
1991Syntax and human experience. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sandfeld, Kristian
(1929) Syntaxe du français contemporain. Paris: Champion.
Sansó, Andrea
(2005) Semantic maps in action, a discourse-based approach to passive and impersonal constructions. In Annalisa Baicchi, Cristiano Broccias, & Andrea Sansó (Eds.), Modelling thought and constructing meaning (pp. 89–106). Milan: Angeli.
Sechehaye, Albert
(1950) Essai sur la structure logique de la langue. Paris: Champion.
Shibatani, Masayochi
(1985) Passive and related constructions: A prototype analysis. Language, 61, 821–848. Crossref link
Siewierska, Anna
(2008a) Ways of impersonalizing: Pronominal vs. verbal strategies. In Maria de los Angeles Gómez González, J. Lachlan MacKenzie, & Elsa M. González Alvarez (Eds.), Current trends in contrastive linguistics, functional and cognitive perspectives (pp. 3–26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(2008b) Introduction, impersonalization: An agent-based vs. a subject-based perspective. Transactions of Philological Society, 106(2), 115–137. Crossref link
Sinclair, John
(1991) Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(1996) The search for units of meaning. Textus, 9, 75–106.
Sloń, Anna
(2007) The ‘impersonal’ impersonal construction in Polish: A cognitive grammar analysis. In Dagmar Divjak, & Agata Kochańska (Eds.), Cognitive paths through the Slavic domain (pp. 257–287). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
Smith, Michael
(1985) An analysis of German dummy subject constructions in cognitive grammar. In Scott DeLancey, & Russell Tomlin (Eds.), Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Pacific Linguistics Conference (pp. 412–425). Eugene: Department of Linguistics, University of Oregon.
(2000) Cataphors, spaces, propositions: Cataphoric pronouns and their function. Proceedings from the Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 36(1), 483–500.
(2004) Cataphoric pronouns as mental space designators. In Robert Kirsner, Ellen Contini-Morava, & Betsy Rodriguez-Bachiller (Eds.), Cognitive and communicative approaches to linguistic analysis (pp. 61–90). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(2006) The conceptual structure of German impersonal constructions. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 17(2), 79–138.
Stéfanini, Jean
(1962) La voix pronominale en ancien et en moyen français. Aix-en-Provence: Ophrys.
Stefanowitsch, Anatol, & Gries, Stefan
(2003) Collostructions: On the interaction between verbs and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), 209–243. Crossref link
Tesnière, Lucien
(1959) Eléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.
Tomasello, Michael
(1999) The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
(2003) Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Van Oosten, Jeanne
(1977) Subjects and agenthood in English. Chicago Linguistic Society, 13, 451–471.
Wagner, Robert Léon, & Pinchon, Jacqueline
(1962) Grammaire du français classique et moderne. Paris: Hachette.
Wartburg, von Walter, & Zumthor, Paul
(1958) Précis de syntaxe du français contemporain. Bern: Francke.
Wilmet, Marc
(1997) Grammaire critique du français. Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot.
Wehrli, Eric
(1986) On some properties of the French clitic se . In Hagit Borer (Ed.), The syntax of pronominal clitics (pp. 263–283). San Francisco: Academic Press.
Yoon, Soyeon
(2012) Constructions, semantic compatibility, and coercion: An empirical usage-based approach. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Rice University.
Zribi-Hertz, Anne
(1982) La construction “se-moyen” du français et son statut dans le triangle moyen, passif réfléchi. Lingvisticæ Investigationes, VI(2), 345–401. Crossref link
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Szcześniak, Konrad
2019. Meaning hides in the confusion of the construction. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 6:1  pp. 58 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 may 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects
BIC Subject: CFK – Grammar, syntax
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2014039899