Cover not available
Part of
Conceptualizations of Time
Edited by Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk
[Human Cognitive Processing 52] 2016
► pp. 3–24

Temporal Reference Without the Concept of Time?

ORCID logo
In this article I argue that whatever the preferred construal of time is, it is always further reducible to one that assumes tenseless reality. In particular, I argue for the superiority of an approach according to which the differences between the future, present and past are quantitative on the level of basic building blocks over a more intuitive view on which the differences are, as on the surface level, qualitative. I demonstrate that a qualitative construal is reducible to a quantitative one and that as such the latter fares better with the B-theoretic, tenseless outlook on reality.
Keywords: A-theory, B-theory, Default Semantics, Direct-Quantitative View, Modal-Contextualist View, supervenience
Published online: 14 June 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.52.01jas
References (42)
References
Abusch, D. 1988. Sequence of Tense, Intensionality and Scope. In H. Borer (ed.), Proceedings of the Seventh West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 1–14). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Baron, S. 2013. Talking About the Past. Erkenntnis 78: 547–560. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bittner, M. 2005. Future Discourse in a Tenseless Language. Journal of Semantics 22: 339–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourne, C. 2006. A Future for Presentism. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Condoravdi, C. 2002. Temporal Interpretation of Modals: Modals for the Present and for the Past. In D. Beaver, et al. (eds.), The Construction of Meaning (pp. 59–88). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Evans, N., & Levinson, S.C. 2009. The Myth of Language Universals: Language Diversity and its Importance for Cognitive Science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32, 429–492. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faller, M. 2002. Remarks on Evidential Hierarchies. In D. Beaver, et al. (eds.), The Construction of Meaning (pp. 89–111). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Grice, P. 2001. Aspects of Reason. Edited by R. Warner. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1953. Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. Transl. by J. Stambaugh as Being and Time. 1996. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. 1928. Vorlesungen zur Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewusstseins. Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung IX. Halle: Max Niemeyer. Transl. by J.B. Brough as Lectures on the Phenomenology of the Consciousness of Internal Time in: On the Phenomenology of the Consciousness of Internal Time (1893–1917). Part A. 1991. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Jaszczolt, K.M. 2005. Default Semantics: Foundations of a Compositional Theory of Acts of Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Defaults in Semantics and Pragmatics. In E.N. Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: [URL]Google Scholar
. 2009. Representing Time: An Essay on Temporality as Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2010. Default Semantics. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis (pp. 215–246). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2012. Cross-linguistic Differences in Expressing Time and Universal Principles of Utterance Interpretation. In L. Filipović & K.M. Jaszczolt (eds.), Space and Time in Languages and Cultures: Linguistic Diversity (pp. 95–121). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Temporality and Epistemic Commitment: An Unresolved Question. In K. Jaszczolt & L. de Saussure (eds.). Time: Language, Cognition, and Reality (pp. 193–209). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaszczolt, K.M., & Srioutai, J. 2011. Communicating about the Past through Modality in English and Thai. In A. Patard & F. Brisard (eds.), Cognitive Approaches to Tense, Aspect and Epistemic Modality (pp. 249–278). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamp, H., & Reyle, U. 1993. From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Kratzer, A. 1981/2012. The Notional Category of Modality. In H.-J. Eikmeyer & H. Rieser (eds.), Words, Worlds and Contexts – New Approaches to Word Semantics (pp. 38–74). Berlin: W. de Gruyter. Revised edition in Kratzer, A. 2012. Modals and Conditionals (27–69). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Le Poidevin, R. 2007. The Images of Time: An Essay on Temporal Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. The Temporal Prison. Analysis 71, 456–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S.C. 2003. Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, B., & Bennett, K. 2005. Supervenience. In E. Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: [URL]Google Scholar
McTaggart, J.E. 1908. The Unreality of Time. Mind 17. Reprinted in McTaggart, J.E. 1934. Philosophical Studies (pp. 110–31). London: E. Arnold.Google Scholar
Matthewson, L. 2006. Temporal Semantics in a Superficially Tenseless Language. Linguistics and Philosophy 29, 673–713. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mellor, D.H. 1998. Real Time II. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moltmann, F. 2013. The Semantics of Existence. Linguistics and Philosophy 36, 31–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noonan, H.W. 2013. Presentism and Eternalism. Erkenntnis 78, 219–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oaklander, L.N., & White, V.A. 2007. B-time: A reply to Tallant. Analysis 67, 332–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olson, E.T. 2009. The Rate of Time’s Passage. Analysis 69, 3–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, J. 2012. Presentists May Say Goodbye to A-properties. Analysis 72, 270–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Q. 1993. Language and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2002. Time and Degrees of Existence: A Theory of “Degree Presentism”. In C. Callender (ed.), Time, Reality and Experience (pp. 119–136). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Srioutai, J. 2004. The Thai c1a: A Marker of Tense or Modality? In E. Daskalaki, et al. (eds.), Second CamLing Proceedings (pp. 273–280). University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
. 2006. Time Conceptualization in Thai with Special Reference to d 1ay1 II, kh3oe:y, k1aml3ang, y3u:I and c1 a . PhD thesis. University of Cambridge.
Strawson, P.F. 1959. Individuals. An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. London: Methuen. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tallant, J. 2007. What is B-time? Analysis, 67, 147–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Time. Analysis 73, 369–379. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tallant, J., & Ingram, D. 2012. Time for Distribution? Analysis 72, 264–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tonhauser, J. 2011. Temporal Reference in Paraguayan Guaraní, a Tenseless Language. Linguistics and Philosophy 34, 257–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Fintel, K., & Matthewson, L. 2008. Universals in Semantics. The Linguistic Review 25, 139–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werner, T. 2011. Modal Entailments. Journal of Semantics 28, 451–484. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Kasia M. Jaszczolt
2023. Understanding Human Time, DOI logo
Ongstad, Sigmund
2023. The Challenge of Positioning Space and Time in Systemic Studies of Animal Utterances as Both Embodied and External Contexts. Linguistic Frontiers 6:3 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Jaszczolt, K. M.
2020. Human Imprints of Real Time: from Semantics to Metaphysics. Philosophia 48:5 ► pp. 1855 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.