Part of
Conceptualizations of Time
Edited by Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk
[Human Cognitive Processing 52] 2016
► pp. 187204
References
Ahrens, K., & Chu-Ren H
2002Time Passing is Motion. Language and Linguistics 3(3), 491–519.Google Scholar
Boroditsky, L
2000Metaphoric structuring: Understanding Time Through Spatial Metaphors. Cognition 75(1), 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001Does Language Shape Thought? Mandarin and English Speakers’ Conceptions of Time. Cognitive Psychology 43(1), 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011How Language Construct Time. In S. Dehaene & E. Brannon (eds.), Space, Time, and Number in the Brain: Searching for the Foundations of Mathematical Thought (pp. 333–341). London: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowerman, M
1996The Origins of Children’s Spatial Semantic Categories: Cognitive vs. Linguistic Determinants. In J.J. Gumperz & S.C. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity (pp. 145–176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M., & Choi, S
2003Space under Construction: Language-specific Spatial Categorization in First Language Acquisition. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (eds.), Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought (pp. 387–427). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chan, W
1963A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chatterje A
2001Language and Space: Some Interactions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5(2), 55–61(7). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, J.-Y
2007Do Chinese and English Speakers Think About Time Differently? Failure of Replicating Boroditsky (2001). Cognition 104, 427–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dong, W
2004The Chinese Conceptualization of Time Revisited. Contemporary Linguistics 6(2), 110–115.Google Scholar
Fang, Th. H
1957The Chinese View of Life. Hong Kong: The Union Press.Google Scholar
Gentner, D
2001Spatial Metaphors in Temporal Reasoning. In M. Gattis (ed.), Spatial Schemas and Abstract Thought (pp. 203–222). Cambridge: Massachusetts University Press.Google Scholar
Gentner, D., & Imai, M
1992Is the Future Always Ahead? Evidence for System-mappings in Understanding Space-time Metaphors. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 510–515.
Henderson, J.B
2006Premodern Chinese Notions of Astronomical History and Calendrical Time. In Ch. Huang & J.B. Henderson (eds.), Notions of Time in Chinese Historical Thinking (pp. 97–113). Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong Press.Google Scholar
Huang, Ch
2006“Time” and “Supertime” in Chinese Historical Thinking. In Ch. Huang & J.B. Henderson (eds.), Notions of Time in Chinese Historical Thinking (pp. 19–41). Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong Press.Google Scholar
Huang, Ch., & Zurcher, E
1995Cultural Notions of Space and Time in China. In Ch. Huang & E. Zurcher (eds.), Time and Space in Chinese Culture (pp. 3–16). Leiden; New York: Brill.Google Scholar
Kant, I
2014/1788The Critique of Practical Reason. Trans. by Thomas Kingsmill Abbott. Project Gutenberg E-book of Kant’s 1788 book.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G
1990The Invariance Hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 1 (1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. In A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, 2nd ed, (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R.W
2012Linguistic Manifestations of the Space-time (dis)analogy. In L. Filipovic & K.M. Jaszczolt (eds.), Space and Time in Languages and Cultures: Language, Culture and Cognition (pp. 191–215). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, L
1995The Notions of Time and Position in the Book of Changes and their Development. In Ch. Huang & E. Zurcher (eds.), Time and Space (pp. 89–113). Leiden; New York: Brill.Google Scholar
Liu, S
1990On the Functional Unity of the Four Dimensions of Thought in the Book of Changes . Journal of Chinese Philosophy 17(3), 359–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006On the Formation of a Philosophy of Time and History Through the Yijing . In Ch. Huang & J.B. Henderson (eds.), Notions of Time in Chinese Historical Thinking (pp. 75–94). Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong Press.Google Scholar
Lucy, J.A
1997Linguistic Relativity. Annual Review of Anthropology 26: 291–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McGlone, M.S., & Harding, J.L
1998Back (or Forward?) to the Future: The Role of Perspective in Temporal Language Comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 24(5), 1211–1223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radden, G
2003The Metaphor TIME AS SPACE Across Languages. In C.B.N. Baumgarten, M. Motz & J. Probst (eds.), Uebersetzen, Interkulturelle Kommunikation, Spracherwerb und Sprachvermittlung. Das Leben mit mehreren Sprachen Festschrift fuer Juliane House zum 60. Geburtstag. Vol. Zeitschrift fuer Interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht 8 (2/3), 226–239.Google Scholar
Richards, I.A
1936The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shinohara, K
1999Epistemology of Space and Time: Analysis of Conceptual Metaphors in English and Japanese. Tokyo: Kwansei Gakuin University Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D
1996Two Ways to Travel: Verbs of Motion in English and Spanish. In S. Masayoshi & S. Thompson (eds.), Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning (pp. 195–219). Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Sun, Q
2013Confucian Educational Philosophy and Its Implications for Lifelong Learning and Lifelong education. In W. Zhang (ed.), Conceptions of Lifelong Learning in Confucian Culture: Their Impact on Adult Learners, (pp. 60–79). Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tai, J. H-Y
1989Toward a Cognition-based Functional Grammar of Chinese. In Functionalism and Chinese Grammar, Monograph Series of the Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 1, 187–226.Google Scholar
Yu, N
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Su, Lily I-wen
2021. Our metaphorical minds. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 8:1  pp. 85 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.