Part of
Studies in Lexicogrammar: Theory and applications
Edited by Grzegorz Drożdż
[Human Cognitive Processing 54] 2016
► pp. 211228
References
Boye, K
2001The force-dynamic core meaning of Danish modal verbs. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, 33, 19–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Champagne, A.B., Klopfer, L.E., & Anderson, J.H
1980Factors influencing the learning of classical mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 48, 1074–1079. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Da Silva, A.S
2003Image schemas and category coherence: The case of the Portuguese Verb deixar. In H. Cuyckens, R. Dirven, & J. Taylor (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to lexical semantics (281–322). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
diSessa, A.A
1988Knowledge in pieces. In G. Forman & P. Pufall (Eds.), Constructivism in the computer age (49–70). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
1993Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2–3), 105–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996What do ‘just plain folk’ know about physics? In D.R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), The handbook of education and human development: New models of learning, teaching, and schooling (709–730). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Halloun, I.A., & Hestenes, D
1985The initial knowledge state of college physics students. American Journal of Physics, 53, 1043–1056. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hammer, D
1995Student inquiry in a physics class discussion. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 401–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M
1987The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination and reason. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Kuźniak, M., & Woźny, J
to appear. Force dynamics and physics. In Cognitive Linguistics 2013 conference proceedings . Warsaw: Warsaw University.
Lakoff, G., & Nunez, E
2000Where mathematics comes from, how the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Larkin, J., McDermott, J., Simon, D., & Simon, H.A
1980Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Science, 208, 1135–1142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandler, J
2010The spatial foundations of the conceptual systems. Language and Cognition, 2, 21–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, M
1983Naive theories of motion. In D. Gentner & A. Stevens (Eds.), Mental Models (299–324). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Reed, M
2006Lavender and Old Lace. Charleston, South Carolina: BiblioBazaar.Google Scholar
Slobin, D
2003Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind (157–192). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sweetser, E
1982A proposal for uniting deontic and epistemic modals. In Proceedings of the Eighth annual meeting of the Berkeley linguistics society . Berkeley, Calif.: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
1991From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, L
1976Semantic causative types. The grammar of causative constructions. In M. Shibatani (Ed.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 6 (43–116). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1985Lexicalisation patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. 3 (57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1988Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 12, 49–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vandenberghe, W
2002Instigative setting-constructions: Force dynamic research on ‘New’ types of agency. Leuvense Bijdragen, 90(4), 365–390.Google Scholar
Whorf, B.L
1956Language, thought and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Woźny, J
2010The prototype of the linguistic force-dynamic schema. Anglica Wratislaviensia, 48, 135–148.Google Scholar
Zlatev, J
2007Spatial semantics. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (318–350). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zlatev, J., Blomberg, J., & David, C
2010Translocation, language and the categorization of experience. In V. Evans & P. Chilton (Eds.), Language, space and cognition (389–418). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Zlatev, J., Blomberg, J., & Magnusson, U
2012Metaphor and subjective experience: A study of motion-emotion metaphors in English, Swedish, Bulgarian, and Thai. In A. Foolen, U. Lüdtke, P. Timothy, P. Racine, & J. Zlatev (Eds.), Moving Ourselves, Moving Others: Motion and emotion in intersubjectivity, consciousness and language (423–450). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar