The use of interactive structures as communicative strategy in Dutch and Portuguese aphasic speakers
This is a comparative study involving conversational data from Brazilian Portuguese and Netherlands Dutch speakers with agrammatic aphasia, a linguistic impairment after acquired brain damage. These speakers typically communicate through reduced syntactic structures. We found the four participants in our study to creatively manipulate their elliptical repertoire to exploit shared interactive knowledge. They used non-quotative direct speech for expressing mental and emotional states and states of affairs, as well as narrative events and grammatical concepts. Both the Dutch and Brazilian participants typically combined fictive direct speech with the topic-comment structure, sometimes expressed as a fictive question-answer pair. We argue that this particular use of elliptical repertoire represents a communicative strategy to manage interactive requirements when facing linguistic limitations.
References (57)
References
Armstrong, E., & Ulatowska, H. (2007). Making stories: Evaluative language and the aphasia experience. Aphasiology, 21, 673–774.
Bánréti, Z. (2010). Recursion in aphasia. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 24(11), 906–914.
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1987). Competition, variation and language learning. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 157–193). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bates, E., Wulfeck, B., & MacWhinney, B. (1991). Crosslinguistic research in aphasia: An overview. Brain and Language, 41, 123–148.
Beeke, S., Maxim, J., & Wilkinson, R. (2007). Using conversation analysis to assess and treat people with aphasia. Seminars in Speech and Language, 28(2), 136–147.
Beeke, S.,Wilkinson, R., & Maxim, J. (2002). Interaction and grammar in aphasia: A comparison of conversation and language testing in a nonfluent speaker. Brain and Language, 83(1), 190–192.
Belford, E.M. (2006). Topicalização de objetos e deslocamento de sujeitos na fala carioca: Um estudo sociolingüístico [Topicalization of objects and movement of subjects in Carioca dialect: A sociolinguistic study]. Master’s thesis, Faculdade de Letras, Rio de Janeiro: UFRJ.
Berko-Gleason, J., Goodglass, H., Obler, M., Green, E., Hyde, M.R., & Weintraub, S. (1980). Narrative strategies of aphasic and normal speaking subjects. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 30, 370–382.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S.C. (1987). Politeness. Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, H.H., & Gerrig, R.J. (1990). Quotations as demonstrations. Language, 66, 764–805.
De Roo, E., Kolk, H., & Hofstede, B. (2003). Structural properties of syntactically reduced speech: A comparison of normal speakers and Broca’s aphasics. Brain and Language, 86, 99–115.
Doesborgh, S.J.C. (2004). Assessment and treatment of linguistic deficits in aphasic patients. PhD dissertation, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.
Givón, T. (1979). On understanding grammar. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1983). The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger.
Goodwin, C. (2003). Conversation and brain damage. New York: Oxford University Press.
Haiman, J. (1978). Conditionals are topics. Language, 54, 564–589.
Heeschen, C., & Schegloff, E.A.S. (1999). Agrammatism, adaptation theory, conversation analysis. On the role of so-called telegraphic style in talk-in-interaction. Aphasiology, 13, 365–405.
Hofstede, B.T.M., & Kolk, H. (1994). The effects of task variation on the production of grammatical morphology in Broca’s aphasia: A multiple case study. Brain and Language, 46, 278–328.
Jacobs, J. (2001). The dimensions of topic-comment. Linguistics, 39, 641–681.
Kleppa, L. (2008). Agramatismo sob o ponto de vista da Teoria da Adaptação [Agrammatism from an Adaptation Theory perspective]. Anais do Seta, 2, 261–265.
Kleppa, L. (2009). Fala reduzida em sujeitos afásicos e outros registros [Elliptic speech by aphasic speakers and in other registers]. Estudos Linguísticos, 38(2), 249–258.
Kleppa, L. (2010). Estilo reduzido em sujeitos agramáticos, não-afásicos, telegramas e manchetes [Elliptic style in agrammatic speakers, telegrams and headlines]. Revista L@el em (Dis)curso, 2, 93–108.
Kleppa, L. (2014). Estruturas de tópico-comentário na fala reduzida de um sujeito afásico [Topic-comment structures in the elliptic speech of an aphasic speaker]. Estudos Linguísticos, 43(2), 926–939.
Kolk, H., & Van Grunsven, M.J.F. (1985). Agrammatism as a variable phenomenon. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 347–384.
Kolk, H., & Heeschen, C. (1990). Adaptation symptoms and impairment symptoms in Broca’s aphasia. Review. Aphasiology, 4, 221–231.
Kolk, H. (1995). A time-based approach to agrammatic production. Brain and Language, 50, 282–303.
Kolk, H. (2001). Does agrammatic speech constitute a regression to child language? A three-way comparison between agrammatic, child, and normal ellipsis. Brain and Language, 77, 340–350.
Kolk, H. (2004). Agrammatism. In R.D. Kent (Ed.), The MIT encyclopedia of communication disorders (pp. 231–233). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12–44). Seattle: University of Washington Press. Reprinted in the Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7, 3–38, 1997.
Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Pensylvania Press.
Li, C.N., & Thompson, S.A. (1976). Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In C.N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 457–489). New York: Academic Press Inc.
MacWhinney, B., & Bates, E. (1989). The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Maslova, E.A., & Bernini, G. (2006). Sentence topics in the languages of Europe and beyond. In G. Bernini et al. (Eds.), Pragmatic organization of discourse in the languages of Europe (pp. 67–120). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Mathis, T., & Yule, G. (1994). Zero quotatives. Discourse Processes 18, 63–76.
Menn, L., & Obler, L.K. (Eds.). (1990). Agrammatic aphasia: A cross-language narrative sourcebook. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Nikolaeva, I. (2001). Secondary topic as a relation in information structure. Linguistics, 39, 1–49.
Pascual, E. (2002). Imaginary trialogues: Conceptual blending and fictive interaction in criminal courts. Utrecht: LOT.
Pascual, E. (2006a). Questions in legal monologues: Fictive interaction as argumentative strategy in a murder trial. Text & Talk, 26(3), 383–402.
Pascual, E. (2006b). Fictive interaction within the sentence: A communicative type of fictivity in grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(2), 245–267.
Pascual, E., Królak, E., & Janssen, Th. A.J.M. (2013). Direct speech compounds: Evoking socio-cultural scenarios through fictive interaction. Cognitive Linguistics 24(2), 345–366.
Pontes, E. (1987). O tópico no Português do Brasil [Topic in Brazilian Portuguese]. Campinas: Editora Pontes.
Primus, B. (1993). Word order and information structure: A performance-based account of topic positions and focus positions. In J. Jacobs, A. van Stechow, W. Sternefeld, & Th. Venneman (Eds.), Syntax: Ein Internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung, 1 [Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research] (pp. 880–896). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ruiter, M.B. (2008). Speaking in ellipsis. The effect of a compensatory style of speech on functional communication in chronic agrammatism. PhD Dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.
Ruiter, M.B., Kolk, H., & Rietveld, T.C.M. (2010). Speaking in ellipses: The effect of a compensatory style of speech on functional communication in chronic agrammatism. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation: An International Journal, 20(3), 423–458.
Saffran, E.M., Berndt, R., & Schwartz, M.F. (1989). Quantitate analysis of aphasic sentence production: Further development and new data. Brain and Language, 37, 440–479.
Steen, G.J. (2011). Genre between the humanities and the sciences. In M. Callies, W.R. Keller, & A. Lohöfer (Eds.), Bi-directionality in the cognitive sciences: Avenues, challenges, and limitations (pp. 21–42). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Streit-Olness, G., & Stewart, C. (2007). Assigning prominence to information through narrative evaluation: The effects of aphasia severity. Brain and Language, 103, 8–249.
Tannen, D. (1989). Talking voices. Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Tesak, J., & Dittmann, J. (1991). Telegraphic style in normals and aphasics. Linguistics, 29, 1111–1137.
Webster, J., Franklin, S., Howard, D. (2001). An Investigation of the Interaction between Thematic and Phrasal Structure in Nonfluent Agrammatic Subjetcs. Brain and Language, 78, 197–211.
Wilkinson, R. (2009). Projecting a reference in aphasic talk and normal talk. Discourse Processes, 46(2–3), 206–225.
Wilkinson, R., Beeke, S., & Maxim, J. (2010). Formulating actions and events with limited linguistic resources: Enactment and iconicity in agrammatic aphasic talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(1), 57–84.
Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Kleppa, Lou-Ann
2020.
Construções de tópico-comentário no Jornal Nacional.
Cadernos de Linguística 1:2
► pp. 01 ff.
Pascual, Esther, Aline Dornelas & Todd Oakley
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.