Cover not available
Part of
The Conversation Frame: Forms and functions of fictive interaction
Edited by Esther Pascual and Sergeiy Sandler
[Human Cognitive Processing 55] 2016
► pp. 343–361

Echolalia as communicative strategy

Fictive interaction in the speech of children with autism

| Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Brazil
ORCID logo | Zhejiang University, China
We explore how fictive interaction (Pascual 2002, 2014), manifested as echolalia (i.e. prior speech repeated verbatim), is successfully used by autistic children as a compensatory strategy in conversation. We video-recorded four Brazilian autistic children between the ages of 4 and 12 in interactions with adults in weekly therapy sessions. We found that these autistic children do not use direct speech to represent prior speech only, as in ordinary reported speech. Instead, they use direct speech to make mental contact with past (types of) communicative situations. Reenactment is used fictively as a means of expressing needs, describing situations, and referring to people, animals, and events. These fictive quotations may reflect socio-communicative or socio-cultural knowledge, or experiences with prior specific interactions.
Keywords: autism, echolalia, literal quotation, metonymy
Published online: 1 November 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.55.17dor
References (38)
References
Bánréti, Z. (2010). Recursion in aphasia. Clinical Linguistics & Phonology, 24(11), 906–914. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, M., Tomasello, M., & Striano, T. (2005). Role reversal imitation and language in typically developing infants and children with autism. Infancy, 8(3), 253–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, H., & Gerrig, R. (1990). Quotation as demonstration. Language, 66(4), 784–805. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Courchesne, E., & Pierce, K. (2005). Brain overgrowth in autism during a critical time in development: Implications for frontal pyramidal neuron and interneuron development and connectivity. International Journal of Development Neurosciences, 23(2–3), 153–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dobbinson, S., Perkins, M., & Boucher, J. (2003). The interactional significance of formulas in autistic language. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 17(4/5), 299–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, J.W. (2014). Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(3), 359–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, J.W., & Giora, R. (2014). From cognitive-functional linguistics to dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(3), 351–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, J.W., Hobson, P., & Hobson, J.A. (2014). Dialogic resonance and intersubjective engagement in autism. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(3), 411–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G. (1981). Social ritual and relative truth in natural language. In K.D. Knorr Cetina, & A.V. Cicourel (Eds.), Advances in social theory and methodology: Toward an integration of micro and macro sociologies (pp. 175–202). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
. [1985] (1994). Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural languages. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fernandes, F. (2003). Terapia de linguagem em crianças com transtorno do espectro autístico: Um estudo transversal. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia, 1, 49–56.Google Scholar
Jarque, M.J., & Pascual, E. (2016). Mixed viewpoints in factual and fictive discourse in Catalan Sign Language narratives. In B. Dancygier, L. Wei-lun-Lu, & A. Verhagen (Eds.), Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities (pp. 259–280). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kanner, L. (1943). Autistic disturbance of affective contact. Nervous Child, 2, 217–250.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R.W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
. (1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. II: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Millward, C., Powell, S., Messer, D., & Jordan, R. (2000). Recall for self and other in autism: Children’s memory for events experienced by themselves and their peers. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30(1), 15–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paccia, J., & Curcio, F. (1982). Language processing and forms of immediate echolalia in autistic children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 25, 42–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pascual, E. (2002). Imaginary trialogues: Conceptual blending and fictive interaction in criminal courts. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
. (2006). Fictive interaction within the sentence: A communicative type of fictivity in grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(2), 245–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pascual, E., & Versluis, C. (2006). Verbale demonstratie als strategie van functionele adaptatie bij Broca-afasie: Een gevalstudie. Voortgang, 24, 169–182.Google Scholar
Pascual, E., Królak, E., & Janssen, T.A.J.M. (2013). Direct speech compounds: Evoking socio-cultural scenarios through fictive interaction. Cognitive Linguistics, 24(2), 345–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prizant, B., & Duchan, J. (1987). The functions of immediate echolalia in autistic children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 46, 241–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prizant, B., & Rydell, P. (1984). Analysis of functions of delayed echolalia in autistic children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 27, 183–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prizant, B. (1983). Language acquisition and communicative behavior in autism: Toward an understanding of the “whole” of it. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 48(3), 296–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rydell, P., & Mirenda, P. (1991). The effects of two levels of linguistic constraint on echolalia and generative language production in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 19(2), 271–281.Google Scholar
Schneider, D.E. (1938). The clinical syndromes of echolalia, echopraxia, grasping and sucking: their significance in the disorganization of the personality. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 88(2), 200–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schopler, E., Reichler, R.J., & Renner, B.R. (1986). The childhood autism rating scale (CARS) for diagnostic screening and classification in autism. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
Schuler, A. (1979). Beyond echolalia: Promoting language in children with autism. The National Autistic Society, 7(4), 455–469.Google Scholar
Sterponi, L., & Shankey, J. (2014). Rethinking echolalia: Repetition as interactional resource in the communication of a child with autism. Journal of Child Language, 41(2), 275–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. 1. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (1986). Introducing constructed dialogue in Greek and American conversational and literary narratives. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), Direct and indirect speech (pp. 311–322). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1989). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2006). Construction grammar for kids. Constructions, 11(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
Xiang, M., & Pascual, E. (2016). Debate with Zhuangzi: Fictive interaction blends in ancient Chinese philosophy. Pragmatics 26(1), 137–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wetherby, A. (1986). Ontogeny of communicative functions in autism. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 16(3), 295–316.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Xie, Fan, Esther Pascual & Todd Oakley
2023. Functional echolalia in autism speech: Verbal formulae and repeated prior utterances as communicative and cognitive strategies. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo
Pascual, Esther, Aline Dornelas & Todd Oakley
2017. When “Goal!” means ‘soccer’. Pragmatics & Cognition 24:3 ► pp. 315 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.