Article published in:

The Conversation Frame: Forms and functions of fictive interaction
Edited by Esther Pascual and Sergeiy Sandler
[Human Cognitive Processing 55] 2016
► pp. 343–361

Echolalia as communicative strategy

Fictive interaction in the speech of children with autism

Aline Dornelas | Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Brazil

Esther Pascual | Zhejiang University, China

We explore how fictive interaction (Pascual 2002, 2014), manifested as echolalia (i.e. prior speech repeated verbatim), is successfully used by autistic children as a compensatory strategy in conversation. We video-recorded four Brazilian autistic children between the ages of 4 and 12 in interactions with adults in weekly therapy sessions. We found that these autistic children do not use direct speech to represent prior speech only, as in ordinary reported speech. Instead, they use direct speech to make mental contact with past (types of) communicative situations. Reenactment is used fictively as a means of expressing needs, describing situations, and referring to people, animals, and events. These fictive quotations may reflect socio-communicative or socio-cultural knowledge, or experiences with prior specific interactions.

Keywords: echolalia, autism, literal quotation, metonymy

Published online: 01 November 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.55.17dor

References

Bánréti, Z.

(2010) Recursion in aphasia. Clinical Linguistics & Phonology, 24(11), 906–914.

Carpenter, M., Tomasello, M., & Striano, T.

(2005) Role reversal imitation and language in typically developing infants and children with autism. Infancy, 8(3), 253–278.

Clark, H., & Gerrig, R.

(1990) Quotation as demonstration. Language, 66(4), 784–805.

Courchesne, E., & Pierce, K.

(2005) Brain overgrowth in autism during a critical time in development: Implications for frontal pyramidal neuron and interneuron development and connectivity. International Journal of Development Neurosciences, 23(2–3), 153–170.

Dobbinson, S., Perkins, M., & Boucher, J.

(2003) The interactional significance of formulas in autistic language. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 17(4/5), 299–307.

Du Bois, J.W.

(2014) Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(3), 359–410.

Du Bois, J.W., & Giora, R.

(2014) From cognitive-functional linguistics to dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(3), 351–357.

Du Bois, J.W., Hobson, P., & Hobson, J.A.

(2014) Dialogic resonance and intersubjective engagement in autism. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(3), 411–441.

Fauconnier, G.

(1981) Social ritual and relative truth in natural language. In K.D. Knorr Cetina, & A.V. Cicourel (Eds.), Advances in social theory and methodology: Toward an integration of micro and macro sociologies (pp. 175–202). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

[1985] (1994) Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural languages. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.

(2002) The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.

Fernandes, F.

(2003) Terapia de linguagem em crianças com transtorno do espectro autístico: Um estudo transversal. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia, 1, 49–56.

Jarque, M.J., & Pascual, E.

(2016) Mixed viewpoints in factual and fictive discourse in Catalan Sign Language narratives. In B. Dancygier, L. Wei-lun-Lu, & A. Verhagen (Eds.), Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities (pp. 259–280). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Kanner, L.

(1943) Autistic disturbance of affective contact. Nervous Child, 2, 217–250.

Lakoff, G.

(1987) Women, fire and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Langacker, R.W.

(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

(1991) Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. II: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Millward, C., Powell, S., Messer, D., & Jordan, R.

(2000) Recall for self and other in autism: Children’s memory for events experienced by themselves and their peers. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30(1), 15–28.

Paccia, J., & Curcio, F.

(1982) Language processing and forms of immediate echolalia in autistic children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 25, 42–47.

Pascual, E.

(2002) Imaginary trialogues: Conceptual blending and fictive interaction in criminal courts. Utrecht: LOT.

(2006) Fictive interaction within the sentence: A communicative type of fictivity in grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(2), 245–267.

(2014) Fictive interaction: The conversation frame in thought, language and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Pascual, E., & Versluis, C.

(2006) Verbale demonstratie als strategie van functionele adaptatie bij Broca-afasie: Een gevalstudie. Voortgang, 24, 169–182.

Pascual, E., Królak, E., & Janssen, T.A.J.M.

(2013) Direct speech compounds: Evoking socio-cultural scenarios through fictive interaction. Cognitive Linguistics, 24(2), 345–366.

Prizant, B., & Duchan, J.

(1987) The functions of immediate echolalia in autistic children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 46, 241–249.

Prizant, B., & Rydell, P.

(1984) Analysis of functions of delayed echolalia in autistic children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 27, 183–192.

Prizant, B.

(1983) Language acquisition and communicative behavior in autism: Toward an understanding of the “whole” of it. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 48(3), 296–307.

Rydell, P., & Mirenda, P.

(1991) The effects of two levels of linguistic constraint on echolalia and generative language production in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 19(2), 271–281.

Schneider, D.E.

(1938) The clinical syndromes of echolalia, echopraxia, grasping and sucking: their significance in the disorganization of the personality. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 88(2), 200–216.

Schopler, E., Reichler, R.J., & Renner, B.R.

(1986) The childhood autism rating scale (CARS) for diagnostic screening and classification in autism. New York: Irvington.

Schuler, A.

(1979) Beyond echolalia: Promoting language in children with autism. The National Autistic Society, 7(4), 455–469.

Sterponi, L., & Shankey, J.

(2014) Rethinking echolalia: Repetition as interactional resource in the communication of a child with autism. Journal of Child Language, 41(2), 275–304.

Talmy, L.

(2000) Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. 1. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

Tannen, D.

(1986) Introducing constructed dialogue in Greek and American conversational and literary narratives. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), Direct and indirect speech (pp. 311–322). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

(1989) Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tomasello, M.

(2006) Construction grammar for kids. Constructions, 11(1), 1–23.

Xiang, M., & Pascual, E.

(2016) Debate with Zhuangzi: Fictive interaction blends in ancient Chinese philosophy. Pragmatics 26(1), 137–162.

Wetherby, A.

(1986) Ontogeny of communicative functions in autism. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 16(3), 295–316.

Cited by

Cited by other publications

Pascual, Esther, Aline Dornelas & Todd Oakley

2017. When “Goal!” means ‘soccer’. Pragmatics & Cognition 24:3 ► pp. 315 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 april 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.