Chapter published in:
Studies in Figurative Thought and Language
Edited by Angeliki Athanasiadou
[Human Cognitive Processing 56] 2017
► pp. 4273
References

References

Anderson, J. R.
2010Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York, NY: Worth Publishers.
Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. J.
1998The atomic components of thought. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bergen, B., & Binsted, K.
2003The cognitive linguistics of scalar humor. In M. Achard, & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Language, culture, and mind (79–92). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Bergh, G.
2005Min(d)ing English language data on the Web: What can Google tell us? ICAME Journal , 29, 25–46.
Bergh, G., & Zanchetta, E.
2008Web linguistics. In A. Lüdeling, & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus linguistics: An international handbook (309–327). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bhaya, R.
1985Telling lies: Some literary and other violations of Grice’s maxim of quality. Nottingham Linguistic Circular, 14, 53–71.
Bierwiaczonek, B.
2013Metonymy in language, thought, and brain. London & Oakville: Equinox.
Byrne, R. M. J.
2007Precis of the rational imagination: How people create alternatives to reality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30(5–6), 439–453.
Cano, L.
2003–2004At the risk of exaggerating: How do listeners react to hyperbole? Anglogermanica Online 2 (http://​www​.uv​.es​/anglogermanica​/2003–2004​/Cano​.htm)
Carston, R., & Wearing, C.
2011Metaphor, hyperbole and simile: A pragmatic approach. Language and Cognition, 3(2), 283–312. Crossref link
2015Hyperbolic language and its relation to metaphor and irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 79, 79–92. Crossref link
Claridge, C.
2011 Hyperbole in English: A corpus-based study of exaggeration . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, H.
1996Psychology of language . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Colston, H. L., & O’Brien, J.
2000Contrast of kind versus contrast of magnitude: The pragmatic accomplishments of irony and hyperbole. Discourse Processes, 30, 179–199. Crossref link
Dirven, R., & Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J.
2010Looking back at 30 years of cognitive linguistics. In E. Tabakowska, M. Choiński, & Ł. Wiraszka (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics in action: From theory to application and back (13–70). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Fillmore, C. J.
1982Frame semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm (111–138). Seoul: Hanshin.
Gibbs, R. W.
2000Irony in talk among friends. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(1–2), 5–27. Crossref link
2011Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes, 48(8), 529–562. Crossref link
Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. L.
2012Interpreting figurative meaning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Goldberg, A.
1995Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, A.
2006Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grady, J.
1999A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor: Correlation vs. resemblance. In R. W. Gibbs, & G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (79–100). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Grice, P. H.
1975Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (41–58). New York: Academic.
Haverkate, H.
1990A speech-act analysis of irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 77–109. Crossref link
Herrero, J.
2009Understanding tropes: At the crossroads between pragmatics and cognition. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Hopper, P J., & Traugott, E. C.
2003Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Johnson, C. D.
2010Hyperboles: The rhetoric of excess in Baroque literature and thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kilgarriff, A., & Grefenstette, G.
2003Introduction to the special issue on the Web as corpus. Computational Linguistics, 29(3), 333–347. Crossref link
Kövecses, Z.
2005Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
2015Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref link
Kreuz, R., & Roberts, R.
1995Two cues for verbal irony: Hyperbole and the ironic tone of voice. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10(1), 21–31. Crossref link
Kunneman, F., Liebrecht, C., van den Bosch, A., & van Mulken, M.
2014Signaling sarcasm: From hyperbole to hashtag. Information Processing and Management. Crossref link
Lakoff, G.
1987Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Crossref link
1993The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
1980Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
1999Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M.
1989More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Crossref link
Langacker, R. W.
1987Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume 1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
1999Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
Lausberg, H.
1990Handbuch der literarischen Rhetorik: Eine Grundlegung der Literaturwissenschaft. München: Hueber.
Leech, G.
1983Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.
Leisi, E.
1953Der Wortinhalt: seine Struktur im Deutschen und Englischen. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer.
Littlemore, J.
2015Metonymy. Hidden shortcuts in language, thought, and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
McCarthy, M., & Carter, R.
2004 “There’s millions of them”: hyperbole in everyday conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(2), 149–184. Crossref link
Norrick, N. R.
2004Hyperbole, extreme case formulation. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1727–1739. Crossref link
Pomerantz, A.
1986Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9(2–3), 219–229. Crossref link
Renouf, A.
2003WebCorp: Providing a renewable data source for corpus linguists. In S. Granger, & S. Petch-Tyson (Eds.), Extending the scope of corpus-based research: New applications, new challenges (39–58). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Rosch, E.
1978Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch, & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (27–48). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rubio-Fernández, P., Wearing, C., & Carston, R.
2013How metaphor and hyperbole differ: An empirical investigation of the relevance-theoretic account of loose use. In D. Mazzarella, I. Needham-Didsbury, & K. Tang (Eds.), UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 35 (20–45).(https://​www​.ucl​.ac​.uk​/pals​/research​/linguistics​/publications​/wpl​/13papers​/Rubio​-Fernandez​_et​_al​._UCLWPL2013​.pdf).
2015Metaphor and hyperbole: Testing the continuity hypothesis. Metaphor and Symbol, 30, 24–40. Crossref link
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J.
1998On the nature of blending as a cognitive phenomenon. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 259–274. Crossref link
2011Metonymy and cognitive operations. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza (Eds.), Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics. Towards a consensus view (103–123). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
2013Meaning construction, meaning interpretation, and formal expression in the Lexical Constructional Model. In B. Nolan, & E. Diedrichsen (Eds.), Linking constructions into functional linguistics: The role of constructions in grammar (231–270). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
2014Mapping concepts. Understanding figurative thought from a cognitive-linguistic perspective. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 27(1), 187–207. Crossref link
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Baicchi, A.
2007Illocutionary constructions: Cognitive motivation and linguistic realization. In I. Kecskes, & L. R. Horn (Eds.), Explorations in pragmatics: Linguistic, cognitive, and intercultural aspects (95–128). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Galera, A.
2014Cognitive modeling: A linguistic perspective. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Luzondo, A.
2016Figurative and non-figurative motion in English resultative constructions. Language and Cognition, 8, 32–58. Crossref link
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Mairal, R.
2008Levels of description and constraining factors in meaning construction: An introduction to the Lexical Constructional Model. Folia Linguistica, 42(2), 355–400.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Peña, M. S.
2005Conceptual interaction, cognitive operations, and projection spaces. In F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza, & M. S. Peña (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction (254–280). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
2008Grammatical metonymy within the ‘action’ frame in English and Spanish. In M. A. Gómez, J. L. Mackenzie, & E. M. González-Álvarez (Eds.), Current trends in contrastive linguistics: Functional and cognitive perspectives (251–280). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Pérez, L.
2011The contemporary theory of metaphor: Myths, developments and challenges. Metaphor and Symbol, 26, 161–185. Crossref link
Sert, O.
2008An interactive analysis of hyperboles in a British TV series: Implications for EFL classes. ARECLS, 5, 1–28 (http://​research​.ncl​.ac​.uk​/ARECLS​/volume​_5​/sert​_vol5​.pdf).
2009Developing interactional competence by using TV series in ‘English as an additional language’ classrooms. Enletawa Journal, 2, 23–50 (http://​files​.eric​.ed​.gov​/fulltext​/ED513115​.pdf).
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D.
1995Relevance, communication and cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Spitzbardt, H.
1963Overstatement and understatement in British and American English. Philologica Pragensia, 6, 277–286.
Sullivan, K.
2013Frames and constructions in metaphoric language. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Talmy, L.
2000Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Van der Henst, J.-B., & Sperber, D.
2012Testing the cognitive and communicative principles of relevance. In D. Wilson, & D. Sperber (Eds.), Meaning and relevance (279–306). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Tomasello, M.
2003Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E.
1991 The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Veale, T.
2012Exploding the creativity myth. The computational foundations of linguistic creativity . London & New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Wilson, M.
2002Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 625–636. Crossref link
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D.
2012Explaining irony. In D. Wilson, & D. Sperber (Eds.), Meaning and relevance (123–145). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Wittgenstein, L.
1953Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Cited by

Cited by other publications

No author info given
2020.  In Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language [Figurative Thought and Language, 9], Crossref logo
No author info given
2020.  In Producing Figurative Expression [Figurative Thought and Language, 10], Crossref logo
No author info given
2020.  In Producing Figurative Expression [Figurative Thought and Language, 10], Crossref logo
No author info given
2020. The role of echoing in meaning construction and interpretation. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18:1 Crossref logo
Barnden, John
2018. Broadly reflexive relationships, a special type of hyperbole, and implications for metaphor and metonymy. Metaphor and Symbol 33:3  pp. 218 ff. Crossref logo
Barnden, John A.
2017.  In Irony in Language Use and Communication [Figurative Thought and Language, 1],  pp. 145 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.