Edited by Angeliki Athanasiadou
[Human Cognitive Processing 56] 2017
► pp. 126–149
Chapter 5How metonymy and grammar interact
Some effects and constraints in a cross-linguistic perspective
It is often assumed that the relationship between metonymy and grammar is one-way traffic. By applying a cross-linguistic perspective in studying the relationship between grammar and metonymy to the example of so-called embellished clippings and local genitive constructions (arising via an anti-associative-like stage) we demonstrate that whether a certain type of metonymy is available in a given language is dependent on the ecological conditions present in the system (including its word-formation system). The relationship between grammar and metonymy is quite complex: it often involves genuine two-way interaction, and it is often a whole cluster of interrelated structural facts that can formally align potential metonymic source expressions and thus facilitate or, conversely, pre-empt the application of a given metonymy.
- 2.How metonymy and grammar interact
- 2.1Clippings across languages
- 2.2From vehicles and locatives to (anti-associative) plurals and collectives via genitives
- 3.Summing up
Cited by 1 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.