Part of
Studies in Figurative Thought and Language
Edited by Angeliki Athanasiadou
[Human Cognitive Processing 56] 2017
► pp. 179198
References
Ahn, H. J., & Kwon, Y. J.
2007A study on metaphor and metonymy of Hand. Journal of Language Sciences, 14(2), 195–215.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. F., Stokoe, W. C., & Wilcox, S. E.
1995Gesture and the nature of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barnden, J. A.
2010Metaphor and metonymy: Making their connections more slippery. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(1), 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baş, M.
2015Conceptualization of emotion through body part idioms in Turkish: A cognitive linguistic study. PhD Hacetepe University, Ankara.Google Scholar
Bell, C.
1833The hand: Its mechanisms and vital endowments as evincing design. London: William Pickering.Google Scholar
Blomberg, J., & Zlatev, J.
2014Actual and non-actual motion: Why experientialist semantics needs phenomenology (and vice versa). Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 13(3), 395–418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brenzinger, M., & Kraska-Szlenk, I.
(Eds.) 2014The body in language: Comparative studies of linguistic embodiment. [Brill’s studies in language, cognition and culture 8]. Leiden/Boston: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casasanto, D.
2014Bodily relativity. In Lawrence Shapiro (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition (108–117). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Corballis, M.
1991The lopsided ape: Evolution of the generative mind. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2002From hand to mouth: The origins of language. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Crow, T.
2004Directionality is the key to the origin of modern Homo sapiens (the Broca-Annett axiom): A reply to Rogers’ view of ‘The speciation of modern homo sapiens’. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 9(2), 233–242.Google Scholar
Cushing, F. H.
1892Manual concepts: A study of the influence of hand-usage on culture-growth. American Anthropologist, 5(4), 289–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dehaene, S.
1997The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Duden
2002Redewendungen: Wörterbuch der deutschen Idiomatik. 2nd edition. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J., Majid, A., & van Staden, M.
2006Cross-linguistic categorization of the body: Introduction. Language Sciences, 28, 137–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erzse, K.
2006Hand und Fuß im interkulturellen Vergleich: Eine kontrastive Untersuchung von Redewendungen im Deutschen und Rumänischen. Germanistische Beiträge, 20–21, 179–254. [URL]
Everett, D. L.
2012Language: The cultural tool. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D.
2002The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in composite expressions. In R. Dirven, & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (435–465). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Ginneken, J.
1939La reconstruction typologique des langues archaïques de l’humanité. Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers-Maatschappij.Google Scholar
Goossens, L.
1990Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 417–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, B.
1997Cognitive foundations of grammar. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2014The body in language: Observations from grammaticalization. In M. Brenzinger, & I. Kraska-Szlenk (Eds.), The body in language: Comparative studies of linguistic embodiment. [Brill’s studies in language, cognition and culture 8] (13–32). Leiden & Boston: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kraska-Szlenk, I.
2014Semantic extensions of body part terms: common patterns and their interpretation. Language Sciences, 44, 15–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
1980Metaphors we live by. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Leader, D.
2016Hands: What we do with them – and why. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C., & Holler, J.
2014The origin of human multimodal communication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369, 20130302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luján M., & Ramón, E.
1999The Indo-European system of numerals from ‘1’ to ’10’. In J. Gvozdanović (Ed.), Numeral types and changes worldwide (199–219). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maalej, Z.
2014Body parts we live by in language and culture: The raaS ‘Head’ and yidd ‘Hand’ in Tunisian Arabic. In M. Brenzinger, & I. Kraska-Szlenk (Eds.), The body in language: Comparative studies of linguistic embodiment. [Brill’s studies in language, cognition and culture 8] (224–259). Leiden & Boston: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maalej, Z., & Yu, N.
Majewicz, A. F.
1984Le rôle du doigt et de la main et leurs désignations en certaines langues dans la formation des systèmes particuliers de numération et des noms de nombre. Lingua Posnaniensis, 26, 69–84.Google Scholar
Marchand, T. H. J.
2012Knowledge in hand: Explorations of brain, hand and tool. In R. Fardon, O. Harris, T. H. J. Marchand, M. Nuttal, C. Shore, V. Strang, & R. A. Wilson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social anthropology, Vol. 2 (261–270). London: Sage Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Márquez Linares, C., & Moreno Ortiz, A.
1999Fraseología comparada mediante el uso de córpora textuales: el caso de mano/hand. In Estudios de lingüística descriptiva y comparada (293–304). Sevilla: Kronos.Google Scholar
McGinn, C.
2015Prehension: The hand and the emergence of humanity. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
McManus, C.
2002Right hand, left hand: The origins of asymmetry in brains, bodies, atoms and cultures. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
McNeill, D.
2012How language began: Gesture and speech in human evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M.
1945Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Morrow, P. R.
2009Hand and heart: A study of the uses and phraseology associated with two common nouns. Language and Culture, Publication of Nagoya University, 20:2.Google Scholar
Pasch, H.
2014Embodiment in Zande. In M. Brenzinger, & I. Kraska-Szlenk (Eds.), The body in language: Comparative studies of linguistic embodiment. [Brill’s studies in language, cognition and culture 8] (199–223). Leiden & Boston: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Philippa, M., Debrandere, F., Quak, A., Schoonheim, T., & van der Sijs, N.
2003–2009Etymologisch woordenboek van het Nederlands [‘Etymological dictionary of Dutch’]. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Radman, Z.
(Ed.) 2013The hand, an organ of the mind. What the manual tells the mental. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Révész, G.
1958The human hand: a psychological study. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. [Original: De menschelijke hand. Amsterdam: Noord Hollandsche Uitgeversmaatschappij 1941].Google Scholar
Roebroeks, W.
2014Archeology: Art on the move. Nature, 514, 170–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Röhr, H. M.
1994Writing: Its evolution and relation to speech. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Galera-Masegosa, A.
2011Going beyond metaphtonymy: Metaphoric and metonymic complexes in phrasal verb interpretation. Language Value, 3(1), 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sadikaj, S.
2009Metaphorische Konzepte in somatischen Phraseologismen des Deutschen und Albanischen: Eine kontrastive Untersuchung anhand von Herz- und Hand-Somatismen. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Würzburg. ([URL])
Sharifian, F., Dirven, R., Yu, N., & Niemeier, S.
(Eds.) 2008Culture, body, and language: Conceptualizations of internal body organs across cultures and languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Staffeldt, S.
2011Die phraseologische Konstruktionsfamilie [X Präp Hand Verb]. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, 39, 188–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stewart, J., Gapenne, O., & Di Paolo, E. A.
(Eds.) 2010Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talento, S.
2014What hands/arms can say: A corpus-based analysis of the Swahili body-art terms mkono and mikono. In M. Brenzinger, & I. Kraska-Szlenk (Eds.), The body in language: Comparative studies of linguistic embodiment. [Brill’s studies in language, cognition and culture 8] (260–283). Leiden & Boston: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tiberius, C., & Schoonheim, T.
2014A frequency dictionary of Dutch. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vainik, E.
2009Towards a conceptualized model of bodily communication: A study of hand-expressions in Estonian. In J. Zlatev, M. Andrén, C. Lundmark, & M. Falck Johnsson (Eds.), Studies in language and cognition (438–453). London: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E.
1991The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vogiatzis, A.
2012Greek and English idioms with HAND: A Cognitive perspective. Master Thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Westmoreland, P.
2016A philosophical approach to the concept of handedness: The phenomenology of lived experience in left- and right-handers. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition.Google Scholar
White, M., & Villacañas, B.
2014Metaphor and phraseology from the language of bullfighting in Spanish. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 12(1), 99–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wils, J.
1965Merleau Ponty’s taalbegrip en de moderne linguïstiek [‘Merleau Ponty’s understanding of language and modern Linguistics]. Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte en Psychologie, 57(2), 1–32.Google Scholar
Wilson, F. R.
1998The hand: How its use shapes the brain, language, and human culture. New York: Vintage books.Google Scholar
De Witte, J. J. de.
1948De betekeniswereld van het lichaam. Taalpsychologische, taalvergelijkende studie. [The meaning world of the body. Language psychological, language comparative study]. PhD dissertation, Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Woelert, P.
2014Tool use and the human mind: From basic to materially mediated operative intentionality. Cognitive Semiotics, 7(2), 227–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Foolen, Ad
2019. Chapter 6. The value of left and right. In Emotion in Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 302],  pp. 139 ff. DOI logo
Foolen, Ad
2021. Staffeldt, Sven. 2018. Gebrauchssemantik von Hand. Korpusbasierte Studien zu somatischen Phraseologismen des Deutschen mit der Konstituente Hand (Stauffenburg Linguistik, Band 98). Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag. 513 S., € 78, ISBN 978-3-95809-519-9.. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik 2021:74  pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Musolff, Andreas
2023. Migrants’ NATION-AS-BODY metaphors as expressions of transnational identities. Language and Intercultural Communication 23:3  pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
Thomou, Paraskevi & Marilena Koutoulaki
2022. From usage patterns to meaning construction. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20:2  pp. 305 ff. DOI logo
Trojszczak, Marcin

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.