Chapter published in:
Studies in Figurative Thought and Language
Edited by Angeliki Athanasiadou
[Human Cognitive Processing 56] 2017
► pp. 253271
References

References

Barcelona, A.
2003aClarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within cognitive linguistics: An update. In R. Dirven, & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (207–278). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(Ed.) 2003bMetaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. A Cognitive Perspective. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bartsch, R.
2003Generating polysemy: Metaphor and metonymy. In R. Dirven, & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (49–74). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cohen, B.
2006The colors of clay: Special techniques in Athenian vases. Los Angeles, California: Getty Publications.Google Scholar
Dirven, R.
2003Introduction. In R. Dirven, & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (1–40). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, D.
2014From structure to context: Modern linguistics from a distance In studies in Greek linguistics, 35, 35–51. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Department of Linguistics, School of Philology, Aristotle University. 8–10 May 2014. Thessaloniki: Aristotle University. http://​ins​.web​.auth​.gr​/images​/MEG​_PLIRI​/MEG​_35​_35​_51​.pdf
Green, A.
1997The Intuition of the negative in Playing and Reality. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 78, 1071–1084.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R.
2003The metaphoric and metonymic poles. In R. Dirven, & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (41–48). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
1987Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. I Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1990Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. II Descriptive Application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Melrose, R.
1995The seduction of abduction: Peirce’s theory of signs and indeterminacy in Language. Journal of Pragmatics, 23, 493–507. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nerlich, B., & Clarke, D. D.
1992Outline of a model for semantic change. In G. Kellermann, & M. D. Morrisey (Eds.), Diachrony within Synchrony: Language History and Cognition. Papers from the International Symposium at the University of Duisburg, 26–28 March 1990 (125–141). Frankfurt-am-Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Panther, K.-U., & Radden, G.
(Eds.)1999Metonymy in Language and Thought. (Human Cognitive Processing 4). Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L.
2007Metonymy. In D. Geeraerts, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (236–263). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Piaget, J.
1962Play, Dreams and imitation in childhood. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Radden, G.
2003How metonymic are metaphors? In R. Dirven, & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (407–436). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, V. S.
2011The tell-tale brain: Unlocking the mystery of human nature. London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Díez Velasco, O. I.
2003Patterns of conceptual interaction. In R. Dirven, & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (489–532). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Saussure, F. de
1974Course in general linguistics. Glasgow: William Collins Sons & Co Ltd.Google Scholar
Taylor, J.
2003Category extension by metonymy and metaphor. In R. Dirven, & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (323–348). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C., & Dasher, R. B.
2005Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Veloudis, I.
1996Kapjos, kapu, kapote … [Someone, somewhere, sometime …]. In Studies in Greek Linguistics, 16: 366–377. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of the Department of Linguistics, School of Philology, Aristotle University. 4–6 May 1995. Thessaloniki: Aristotle University.Google Scholar
1998“Quantifying” superlatives and homo sapiens. Journal of Semantics, 15, 215–237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005I simasia prin, kata ke meta ti glosa. [Meaning in and beyond language]. Athens: Kritiki.Google Scholar
2012Tapini glosa, tipiki logiki ke anthropino vioma [Humble language, Formal logic and Human experience]. Athens: Nissos.Google Scholar
2017How do languages acquire grammatical elements? The story of ka(n)- series in Modern Greek retold. Linguistics, 55(1), 117–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, L.
1922Tractatus logico-philosophicus. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar