Part of
Studies in Figurative Thought and LanguageEdited by Angeliki Athanasiadou
[Human Cognitive Processing 56] 2017
► pp. 296–321
Edited by Angeliki Athanasiadou
[Human Cognitive Processing 56] 2017
► pp. 296–321
Chapter 12The psychological reality of spatio-temporal metaphors
Time provides essential structure to human experience. This chapter reviews the available empirical evidence for a fundamental metaphoric structure such as time is space in figurative language and thought. The chapter is organized into three over-arching themes: Motion through time, temporal succession, and duration estimation. A large part of the experimental evidence lends support to the psychological reality of the time is space metaphor, revealing the inextricable link between conceptual metaphor in language and time perception. The review also reveals that linguistic space-time mappings may be overridden by cultural conventions, calling for further empirical cross-linguistic and cross-cultural exploration within experimental cognitive linguistics.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Motion through time
- 3.Temporal succession
- 4.Duration estimation
- 5.Conclusion
-
Acknowledgements -
References
References (45)
Alards-Tomalin, D., Leboe-McGowan, J. P., Shaw, J. D. M., & Leboe-McGowan, L. C. 2014. The effects of numerical magnitude, size, and color saturation on perceived interval duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(2), 555–566. 
Bender, A., Beller, S., & Bennardo, G. 2010. Temporal frames of reference: Conceptual analysis and empirical evidence from German, English, Mandarin Chinese and Tongan. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 10(3), 283–307. .
.Boroditsky, L. 2000. Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75(1), 1–28.
2001. Does language shape thought?: Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43(1), 1–22.
Boroditsky, L., Fuhrman, O., & McCormick, K. 2011. Do English and Mandarin speakers think about time differently? Cognition, 118(1), 123–129.
Buckner, R. L., & Carroll, D. C. 2007. Self-projection and the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 49–57.
Casasanto, D. 2005. Perceptual foundations of abstract thought. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
2008. Who’s afraid of the big bad Whorf? Crosslinguistic differences in temporal language and thought. Language Learning, 58(s1), 63–79.
2010. Space for thinking. In V. Evans, & P. Chilton (Eds.), Language, Cognition and Space: The State of the Art and New Directions (453–478). London: Equinox.
Casasanto, D., & Boroditsky, L. 2008. Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition, 106(2), 579–593.
Cienki, A. 1998. Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphoric expressions. Discourse and Cognition: Bridging the Gap, 189–204.
Clark, H. H. 1973. Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (27–63). New York: Academic Press.
Cohen, J., Hansel, C., & Sylvester, J. D. 1953. A new phenomenon in time judgment. Nature, 172, 901–903.
Comrie, B. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
1985. Tense. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Dahl, Ö. 2000. Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. 1993. The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122(3), 371–396.
De la Fuente, J., Santiago, J., Roman, A., Dumitrache, C., & Casasanto, D. 2014. When you think about it, your past is in front of you: How culture shapes spatial conceptions of time. Psychological Science, 25(9), 1682–1690.
Evans, V. 2004. How we conceptualise time: Language, meaning and temporal cognition. Essays in Arts and Sciences, 33(2), 13.
2013. Language and time: A cognitive linguistics approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gentner, D., Imai, M., & Boroditsky, L. 2002. As time goes by: Evidence for two systems in processing space → time metaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17(5), 537–565.
Jackendoff, R. 1983. Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. Basic Books.
2003. Metaphors We Live By. 1980. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levinson, S. C. 2003. Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, S. C., & Majid, A. 2013. The island of time: Yélî Dnye, the language of Rossel Island. Cultural Psychology, 4, 61
Macrae, C. N., Miles, L. K., & Best, S. B. 2012. Moving through time. Mental time travel and social behavior. In J. P. Forgas, K. Fiedler, & C. Sedikides (Eds.), Social Thinking and Interpersonal Behavior (113–126). New York: Psychology Press.
McGlone, M. S., & Harding, J. L. 1998. Back (or forward?) to the future: The role of perspective in temporal language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(5), 1211–1223.
Miles, L. K., Nind, L. K., & Macrae, C. N. 2010. Moving through time. Psychological Science, 21(2), 222–223.
Miles, L. K., Tan, L., Noble, G. D., Lumsden, J., & Macrae, C. N. 2011. Can a mind have two time lines? Exploring space–time mapping in Mandarin and English speakers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(3), 598–604.
Moore, K. E. 2006. Space-to-time mappings and temporal concepts. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(2), 199–244.
Núñez, R. E., Motz, B. A., & Teuscher, U. 2006. Time after time: The psychological reality of the ego-and time-reference-point distinction in metaphorical construals of time. Metaphor and Symbol, 21(3), 133–146.
Núñez, R. E., & Sweetser, E. 2006. With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30(3), 401–450.
Rothe-Wulf, A., Beller, S., & Bender, A. 2014. Temporal frames of reference in three Germanic languages: Individual consistency, interindividual consensus, and cross-linguistic variability. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1–23.
Sarrazin, J.-C., Giraudo, M.-D., Pailhous, J., & Bootsma, R. J. 2004. Dynamics of Balancing Space and Time in Memory: Tau and Kappa Effects Revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(3), 411–430.
Sinha, C., Sinha, V. D. S., Zinken, J., & Sampaio, W. 2011. When time is not space: the social and linguistic construction of time intervals and temporal event relations in an Amazonian culture. Language and Cognition, 3(1), 137–169.
Slobin, D. I. 1996. From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, 17, 70–96.
Spreng, R. N., & Levine, B. 2006. The temporal distribution of past and future autobiographical events across the lifespan. Memory & Cognition, 34(8), 1644–1651.
Suddendorf, T. 2010. Linking yesterday and tomorrow: Preschoolers’ ability to report temporally displaced events. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28(2), 491–498.
Traugott, E. C. 1978. On the expression of spatio-temporal relations in language. Universals of Human Language, 3, 369–400.
Tulving, E. 1985. Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 26(1), 1–12.
Tversky, B., Kugelmass, S., & Winter, A. 1991. Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions. Cognitive Psychology, 23(4), 515–557.
Vallesi, A., Binns, M. A., & Shallice, T. 2008. An effect of spatial–temporal association of response codes: Understanding the cognitive representations of time. Cognition, 107(2), 501–527.
Whorf, B. L. 1956. Language, thought, and reality. Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (J. B. Carroll Ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Bylund, Emanuel, Steven Samuel & Panos Athanasopoulos
2024. Crosslinguistic Differences in Food Labels Do Not Yield Differences in Taste Perception. Language Learning 74:S1 ► pp. 20 ff. 
Stamenković, Dušan, Vladimir Figar & Miloš Tasić
2023. Facing salient and non-salient time sequence orientation types expressed by adverbs in English, Mandarin and Serbian. Linguistics 61:1 ► pp. 47 ff.
Li, Heng & Yu Cao
2022. Time for politics: The relationship between political attitude and implicit space-time mappings. Current Psychology 41:3 ► pp. 1184 ff.
Dobrovol’skij, Dmitrij
2021. On some specific features of conventional figurative language (Acerca de algunas características específicas del lenguaje figurado convencional). Studies in Psychology 42:2 ► pp. 373 ff.
Kiklewicz, Aleksander
2021. Problem realności psychologicznej metafor konceptualnych. Prace Językoznawcze 24:4 ► pp. 7 ff.
Shen, Shu & Heng Li
2021. It’s owl time!: the relationship between chronotype and resolution of temporal ambiguity. Chronobiology International 38:8 ► pp. 1103 ff.
Nute, Kevin
2019. Changing Interpretations of Otherness in English-Language Accounts of Japanese Architecture. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering 18:5 ► pp. 479 ff.
Zanker, Andreas T.
2019. Metaphor in Homer,
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.