Chapter published in:
Constructing Families of Constructions: Analytical perspectives and theoretical challenges
Edited by Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Alba Luzondo Oyón and Paula Pérez-Sobrino
[Human Cognitive Processing 58] 2017
► pp. 113
References

References

Arppe, A., Gilquin, G., Glynn, D., Hilpert, M., & Zeschel, A.
2010Cognitive corpus linguistics: Five points of debate on current theory and methodology. Corpora 5(1), 1–27. Crossref link
Barcelona, A.
2009Motivation of construction meaning and form: The role of metonymy and inference. In K.-U. Panther, & L. L. Thornburg (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (363–401). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Barðdal, J., Kristoffersen, K. E., & Sveen, A.
2011West Scandinavian ditransitives as a family of constructions: With a special attention to the Norwegian ‘V-REFL-NP’ construction. Linguistics 49(1), 53–104. Crossref link
Bergen, B., & Chang, N.
2005Embodied construction grammar in simulation-based language understanding. In J.-O. Östman, & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction Grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions (147–190). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
2013Embodied Construction Grammar. In T. Hoffmann, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar (168–190). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bergen, B., & Plauché, M.
2001Extensions of deictic and existential constructions in French: Voilà, voici and Il y a. In A. Cienki, B. Luka, & M. Smith (Eds.), Conceptual and discourse factors in linguistic structure (45–61). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
2005The convergent evolution of radial constructions: French and English deictics and existentials. Cognitive Linguistics 16(1), 1–42. Crossref link
Boas, H.
2003A constructional approach to resultatives. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Boas, H., & Gonzálvez, F.
(Eds.) 2014Romance perspectives on Construction Grammar. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Broccias, C.
2003The English change network: Forcing changes into schemas. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
Butler, C. S., & Gonzálvez, F.
2014Exploring functional-cognitive space. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Croft, W.
2001Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref link
2003Lexical Rules vs. Constructions: A False Dichotomy. In H. Cuyckens, T. Berg, R. Dirven, & K.-U. Panther (Eds.), Motivation in language: Studies in honor of Günter Radden (49–68). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
2013Radical Construction Grammar. In T. Hoffmann, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar (211–232). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dirven, R., & Ruiz de Mendoza, F.
2010Looking back at 30 years of Cognitive Linguistics. In E. Tabakowska, M. Choiński, & L. Wiraszka (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics in action. From theory to application and back (13–70). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dixon, R. M. W.
1991A new approach to English grammar. On semantic principles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Fillmore, C.
1985Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica 6(2), 222–254.
1988The mechanisms of Construction Grammar. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society [BLS 14], 35–55. Crossref link
Fillmore, C., Kay, P., & O’Connor, C.
1988Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language, 64, 501–538. Crossref link
Fried, M.
2007Constructing grammatical meaning: Isomorphism and polysemy in Czech reflexivization. Studies in Language 31(4), 721–764. Crossref link
Fried, M. & Östman, J.-O.
(Eds.) 2004Construction Grammar in a cross-language perspective. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Geeraerts, D.
1998/2006The semantic structure of the indirect object in Dutch. In W. Van Langendonck, & W. Van Belle (Eds.), The Dative II (185–210). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Reprinted in Geeraerts, D. 2006 Words and other wonders: Papers on lexical and semantic topics (175–197). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ghomeshi, J., Jackendoff, R., Rosen, N., & Russle, K.
2004Contrastive focus reduplication in English (The salad-salad paper). Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 22, 307–357. Crossref link
Goldberg, A.
1995Constructions. A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
1996Making one’s way through the data. In A. Alsina, J. Bresnan, & P. Sells (Eds.), Complex predicates (151–173). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
2006Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. New York: Oxford University Press.
2013Constructionist approaches. In T. Hoffmann, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar (15–31). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldberg, A., & Del Giudice, A.
2005Subject-auxiliary inversion: A natural category. The Linguistic Review, 22, 411–428. Crossref link
Goldberg, A., & Jackendoff, R.
2004The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language 80(3), 532–568. Crossref link
Gonzálvez, F.
2008Towards a constructionist, usage-based reappraisal of interpersonal manipulation: Evidence from secondary predication in English and Spanish. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 57, 109–136.
2009The family of object-related depictives in English and Spanish: Towards a constructionist, usage-based analysis. Language Sciences, 31, 663–723. Crossref link
2011Metaphor and metonymy do not render coercion superfluous: Evidence from the subjective-transitive construction. Linguistics 49(6), 1305–1358. Crossref link
2014“That’s so a construction!”. Some reflections on innovative uses of “so” in Present-day English. In M. A. Gómez, F. Ruiz de Mendoza, & F. Gonzálvez (Eds.), Theory and practice in functional-cognitive space (271–294). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Gonzálvez, F., & Butler, C.
2006Mapping functional cognitive space. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 39–96. Crossref link
Herbst, T.
2014The valency approach to argument structure constructions. In T. Herbst, H.-J. Schmid, & S. Faulhaber (Eds.), Constructions – collocations – patterns (167–216). Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter Mouton.
Hilpert, M.
2014Construction Grammar and its applications to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Hoffmann, T., & Trousdale, G.
(Eds.) 2013The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref link
Hopper, P.
2001Grammatical constructions and their discourse origins: Prototype or family resemblance? In M. Pütz, S. Niemeier, & R. Dirven (Eds.), Applied Cognitive Linguistics: Theory and language acquisition (109–129). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
Iwata, S.
2008The locative alternation: A lexical-constructional approach. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Janda, L.
1990The radial network of grammatical category: Its genesis and dynamic structure. Cognitive Linguistics 1(3), 269–288. Crossref link
Kay, P., & Fillmore, C. F.
1999Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What’s X doing Y? construction. Language 75(1), 1–33. Crossref link
Keller, R.
1995Zeichentheorie. Zu einer Theorie semiotischen Wissens. Tübingen: Francke.
Lakoff, G.
1987Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Crossref link
Langacker, R.
2008Cognitive Grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref link
Levin, B.
1993English verb classes and alternations. A preliminary investigation. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
Lindstromberg, S.
2010English prepositions explained. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Luzondo, A.
2014Constraining factors on the family of resultative constructions. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12(1), 30–63. Crossref link
Östman, J.-O., & Fried, M.
(Eds.) 2005Construction Grammars. Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Peña, M. S.
2009Constraints on subsumption in the caused-motion construction. Language Sciences 31(6), 740–765. Crossref link
2015A constructionist approach to causative frighten verbs. Linguistics 53(6), 1247–1302.
Pérez, L.
2013lllocutionary constructions: (multiple source)-in-target metonymies, illocutionary ICMs, and specification link. Language & Communication 33(2), 128–149. Crossref link
Rosch, E., & Mervis, C.
1975Family resemblances. Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605. Crossref link
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F., & Baicchi, A.
2007Illocutionary constructions: Cognitive motivation and linguistic realization. In I. Kecskes, & L. R. Horn (Eds.), Explorations in pragmatics: Linguistic, cognitive and intercultural aspects (95–127). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F., & Galera, A.
2014Cognitive modeling: A linguistic perspective. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Sag, I., Boas, C., & Kay. P.
2012Introducing sign-based construction grammar. In H. C. Boas, & I. Sag (Eds.), Sign-Based Construction Grammar (1–29). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Searle, J. R.
1976A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5, 1–23. Crossref link
1979Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Shibatani, M.
1985Passives and related constructions. Language 61(4), 821–48. Crossref link
Steels, L.
2012Design methods for Fluid Construction Grammar. In L. Steels (Ed.), Computational issues in Fluid Construction Grammar (3–36). Springer: Berlin. Crossref link
Tenny, C. L.
1994Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantics interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Crossref link
Torre, E.
2012Symmetry and asymmetry in Italian caused-motion constructions. An Embodied Construction Grammar approach. Constructions, 1, 1–38.
Tyler, A., & Evans, V.
2007The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scenes, embodied meaning and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van der Leek, F.
1996The English conative construction: A compositional account. Papers from the regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 32, 363–378.
Welke, K.
2011Valenzgrammatik des Deutschen. Eine Einführung. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. Crossref link
Wittgenstein, L.
1955Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.