Chapter published in:
Constructing Families of Constructions: Analytical perspectives and theoretical challenges
Edited by Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Alba Luzondo Oyón and Paula Pérez-Sobrino
[Human Cognitive Processing 58] 2017
► pp. 5376
References

References

Bąçzkowska, A.
2011Space, time and language: A cognitive analysis of English prepositions. Bydgoszcz: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Kazimierza Wielkiego.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L.
2008Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 71, 230–244.Google Scholar
Beitel, D., Gibbs, R. W. Jr., & Sanders, P.
2001The embodied approach to the polysemy of the spatial preposition on . In H. Cuyckens, & B. Zawada (Eds.), Polysemy in Cognitive Linguistics: Selected papers from the International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Amsterdam, 1997 (241–260). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bergen, B. K., & Chang, N.
2005Embodied construction grammar in simulation-based language understanding. In J.-O. Östman, & M. Fried (Eds.). Construction Grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions (147–190). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergen, B., & Wheeler, K.
2010Grammatical aspect and mental simulation. Brain and Language, 112, 150–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr.
2006aEmbodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2006bMetaphor interpretation as embodied simulation. Mind and Language, 21, 434–458. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., & Matlock, T.
2008Metaphor, imagination and simulation: Psycholinguistic evidence. In R. W. Gibbs Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (247–261). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A.
1995A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2006Constructions at work. The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grady, J.
1997Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Herskovits, A.
1986/2009Language and spatial cognition: An interdisciplinary study of the prepositions in English. London & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchins, E.
1999Cognitive artifacts. In R. A. Wilson, & F. C. Keil (Eds.), The MIT Encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences (126–128). Cambridge, Massachusetts & London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Johansson Falck, M.
2013Narrow paths, difficult roads, and long ways: Travel through space and metaphorical meaning. In C. Paradis, C. J. Hudson, & U. Magnuson (Eds.). The construal of spatial meaning: Windows into conceptual space (214–235). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Temporal prepositions explained: Cross-linguistic analysis of English and Swedish unit of TIME landmarks. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 1(2), 271–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016What trajectors reveal about TIME metaphors: Corpus analysis of English and Swedish. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 21(1), 28–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johansson Falck, M., & Gibbs, R. W. Jr.
2012Embodied motivations for metaphorical meanings. Cognitive Linguistics, 23(2): 251–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johansson, R., Holsanova, J., & Holmqvist, K.
2006Pictures and spoken descriptions elicit similar eye movements during mental imagery, both in light and in complete darkness. Cognitive Science, 30(6), 1053–1079. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M.
1987The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
1987Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
1980Metaphors we live by. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1999Philosophy in the flesh. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R.
2002Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar (2nd ed.). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lindstromberg, S.
2010English prepositions explained. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandler, J. H.
2010The spatial foundations of the conceptual system. Language and Cognition, 2(1), 21–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandler, J. M.
2012On the spatial foundations of the conceptual system and its enrichment. Cognitive Science, 36, 421–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandler, J. M., & C. P. Cánovas
2014On defining Image Schemas. Language and Cognition, 6(4) (2014), 510–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Navarro, I.
1999The metaphorical use of on. Journal of English Studies, I(1999), 145–164.Google Scholar
2000A cognitive semantic analysis of the English lexical unit IN. Cuadernos de Ivenstigación Filológica, XXVI, 189–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reddy, M.
1993The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (164–201). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F.
2013Meaning construction, meaning interpretation and formal expression in the Lexical Constructional Model. In B. Nolan, & E. Diedrichsen (Eds.), Linking constructions into Functional Linguistics: The role of constructions in RRG Grammars [Studies in Language Series] (231–270). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rice, S. A.
1993Prepositional prototypes. In M. Pütz, & R. Dirven (Eds.), The construal of space in language and thought: 19th international LAUD symposium on language and space (135–165). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Spivey, M. J., & Geng, J. J.
2001Oculomotor mechanisms activated by imagery and memory: Eye movements to absent objects. Psychological Research, 65, 235–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanfield, R. A., & Zwaan, R. A.
2001The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science, 12, 153–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tyler, A., & Evans, V.
2007The Semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scenes, embodied meaning and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vandeloise, C.
2006Are there spatial prepositions? In M. Hickmann, & R. Stephane (Eds.), Typological studies in language, 66: Space in Languages (139–154). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A., Stanfield, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H.
2002Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychological Science, 13, 168–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Knop, Sabine De
2020. The embodied teaching of complex verbal constructions with German placement verbs and spatial prepositions. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18:1  pp. 131 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 february 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.