Cover not available
Part of
Constructing Families of Constructions: Analytical perspectives and theoretical challenges
Edited by Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Alba Luzondo Oyón and Paula Pérez Sobrino
[Human Cognitive Processing 58] 2017
► pp. 301–337

Chapter 10
Multimodal constructional resemblance

The case of English circular motion constructions

| University of Freiburg

This chapter approaches the topic of constructional families by zooming in on five English motion constructions. Contrary to the traditional focus of Construction Grammar on verbal form-meaning pairings, the chapter discusses their multimodal dimension. A study in the NewsScape Library of Television News Broadcasts (Steen and Turner 2013) reveals that all five motion constructions studied therein show high co-occurrence rates with manner and path gestures. It is argued that according to the basic premises of Construction Grammar and the usage-based approach, co-speech motion gesture use is a defining part of these constructions. In support of this view, the chapter focuses on the influence of semantic readings, genre, and the broader discourse sequences’ degree of interactionality on co-speech motion gesture use.

Keywords: Construction Grammar, multimodality, motion constructions, path and manner gestures, manner modulation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Multimodality and Construction Grammar
  • 3.Outline of the chapter
  • 4.The role of gesture in motion event descriptions
  • 5.The data study
    • 5.1Data selection and coding parameters
    • 5.2Results of the data study
      • 5.2.1Overall gesture frequencies and gesture forms
      • 5.2.2Gesture semantics: Path, manner, and conflated gestures
      • 5.2.3Interim summary
      • 5.2.4Constructional semantic readings and gesture frequencies
      • 5.2.5Genre, interactionality, and gesture frequencies
  • 6.Multimodal constructions or manner modulation?
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 26 July 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.58.11zim
References
Andrén, M.
2010 Children’s gestures from 18 to 30 months. PhD thesis. Lund University: Centre for Languages and Literature.Google Scholar
Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M., Croft, W., Ellis, N., Holland, J., Ke, J., Larsen-Freeman, D., & Schoenemann, T.
2009 Language as a complex adaptive system: Position Paper. Language Learning, 59(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
Bressem, J.
2013 A linguistic perspective on the notation of form features in gestures. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body – Language – Communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (1079–1098). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bressem, J., & Müller, C.
2014 The “negative-assessment-construction”: A multimodal pattern. Presentation at GCLA 6, Erlangen, Nurnberg.Google Scholar
Brown, A., & Chen, J.
2013 Construal of Manner in Speech and Gesture in Mandarin, English, and Japanese. Cognitive Linguistics, 23(4), 605–631.Google Scholar
Brown, A., & Gullberg, M.
2008 Bidirectional crosslinguistic influence in L1- L2 encoding of manner in speech and gesture: A study of Japanese speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(2), 225–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butcher, C., & Goldin-Meadow, S.
2000 Gesture and the transition from one- to two-word speech: When hand and mouth come together. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (235–257). New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J.
2006 From usage to grammar. The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82, 711–733. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cavicchio, F., Brown, A., Furman, R., Allen, S., Özyürek, A., & Kita, S.
2014 Annotation of space and manner/path configuration in bilinguals’ speech and manual gestures. Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Multimodal Corpora, Tools and Resources, 25–28.Google Scholar
Chafe, W.
1994 Discourse, consciousness, and time: the flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chen, L., & Guo, J.
2009 Motion events in Chinese novels: Evidence for an equipollently-framed language. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1749–1766. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A.
2002 Questions about mental imagery, gesture, and image schemas. Journal of Mental Imagery, 26, 43–46.Google Scholar
2012 Usage events of spoken language and the symbolic units we (may) abstract from them. In J. Badio, & K. Kosecki (Eds.), Cognitive processes in language (149–158). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2013 Image schemas and mimetic schemas in cognitive linguistics and gesture studies. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 11(2), 417–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Spoken language usage events. Language and Cognition, 7(4), 499–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A., & Müller, C.
(Eds.) 2008 Metaphor and gesture. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corballis, M. C.
2002 From hand to mouth: The origins of language. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dancygier, B., & Sweester, E.
(Eds) 2012 Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diessel, H.
2015 Usage-based construction grammar. In E. Dabrowska, & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (295–321). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duncan, S.
2006 Co-expressivity of speech and gesture: Manner of motion in Spanish, English, and Chinese. Proceedings of the 27th Berkeley Linguistic Society Annual Meeting, 353–370.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
2002 The way we think. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Filipović, L.
2015 Talking about motion. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Forceville, C., & Urios-Aparisi, E.
2009 Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A.
1995 Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2003 Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 219–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S.
1997 When gesture and words speak differently. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6, 138–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 How our gestures help us learn. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & S. Teßendorf (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interactio. (792–803). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Healey, M. L., & Braun, A. R.
2013 Shared neural correlates for speech and gesture, functional brain mapping and the endeavor to understand the working brain, Available from: [URL]
Hickmann, M., Hendriks, H., & Gullberg, M.
2011 How to talk and gesture about motion in French and English: cross-linguistic and developmental perspectives. Language, interaction et acquisition, 2,1. Grammaticalization and language acquisition: Nouns and verbs across languages, 2(11), 29–156.Google Scholar
Hilpert, M.
2014 Construction Grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Imo, W.
2015 Was ist (k)eine Konstruktion? In C. Dürscheid, & Scheider, J. G. (Eds.), Handbuch, Satz, Äusserung, Schema (551–576). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iverson, J. M., & Fagan, M. K.
2004 Infant vocal-motor coordination: Precursor to the gesture-speech system? Child Development, 75, 1053–1066 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kellermann, E., & Van Hoof, A.
2003 Manual accents. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 41, 251–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A.
2004 Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kita, S., & Özyürek, A.
2003 What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(1), 16 Gesture: Visible 32.Google Scholar
Kita, S., Özyürek, A., Allen, S., Brown, A., Furman, R., & Ishizuka, T.
2007 Relations between syntactic encoding and co-speech gestures: Implications for a model of speech and gesture production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(8), 1212 Gesture: Visible 1236.Google Scholar
Koestler, A.
1964 The act of creation. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Kövesces, Z.
2010 Metaphor. A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ladewig, S. H.
2014 The cyclic gestures. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body-Language-Communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (1605–1617). Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
1999 Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G.
1977 The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
1987 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical prerequisites. Volume 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2000 Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2005 Construction Grammars: Cognitive, radical, and less So. In F. Ruiz de Mendoza, & M. S. Peña (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction (101–159). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mani, I. & Pustejovsky, J.
2012 Interpreting motion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, D.
1985 So you think gestures are nonverbal? Psychological Review, 92(3), 350–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992 Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2001 Imagery in motion event descriptions: Gestures as part of thinking-for-speaking in three languages. Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 255–267.Google Scholar
2005 Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D., & Duncan, S.
2000 Growth points in thinking-for-speaking. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (141–161). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mittelbeg, I.
2006 Metaphor and metonymy in language and gesture: Discourse evidence for multimodal models of grammar. PhD Dissertation, Cornell University. Published online, Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest/UMI.Google Scholar
Mittelberg, I.
2014 Multimodal existential constructions in German and English. Presentation at GCLA 6, Erlangen, Nurnberg.Google Scholar
Negueruela, E., Lantolf, J., Jordan, S., & J. Gelabert
2004 The “private function” of gesture in second language speaking activity: A study of motion verbs and gesturing in English and Spanish. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 113–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Allen, S., Furman, R., & Brown, A.
2005 How does linguistic framing influence co-speech gestures? Insights from crosslinguistic differences and similarities. Gesture, 5(1/2), 216–241.Google Scholar
Parrill, F.
2010 Viewpoint in speech-gesture integration: Linguistic structure, discourse structure, and event structure. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(5), 650–668. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parrill, F., & Sweetser, E.
2004 What we mean by meaning: Conceptual integration in gesture analysis and transcription. Gesture, 4, 197–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pragglejaz Group
2007 MIP: A Method for Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H.
1992 Lectures on conversation. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schoonjans, S.
2014 Modalpartikeln als multimodale Konstruktionen. Eine korpusbasierte Kookkurrenzanalyse von Modalpartikeln und Gestik im Deutschen. Unpublished dissertation. University of Leuven.Google Scholar
Selting, M., Auer, P., Barth-Weingarten, D., Bergmann, J. R., Bergmann, P., Birkner, K., Couper-Kuhlen, E., Deppermann, A., Gilles, P., Günthner, S., Hartung, M.
2009 Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2). Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, 10, 353–402.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I.
2004 The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist, & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (219–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Stam, G.
2006 Thinking for speaking about motion: L1 and L2 speech and gesture. IRAL 44(2), 143–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A.
2009 Bedeutung und Gebrauch in der Konstruktionsgrammatik. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, 21, 565–592.Google Scholar
Steen, F., & Turner, M.
2013 Multimodal Construction Grammar. In M. Borkent, Dancygier, B., & Hinnell, J. (Eds.), Language and the creative mind. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Sweester, E.
2006 Looking at space to study mental spaces: Co-speech gesture as a crucial data source in cognitive linguistics. In M. Gonzalez-Marquez, Mittelberg, I., Coulson, S., & M. Spivey (Eds.), Methods in Cognitive Linguistics (203–226). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Talmy, L.
1985 Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen, (Ed.), Language typology and semantic description. Vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (36–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2000 Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, E., & Trousdaele, G.
2013 Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M.
2008 Origins of human communication. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wittenburg, P., Brugman, H., Russel, A., Klassmann, A., & Sloetjes, H.
2006 Elan: a professional framework for multimodality research. Proceedings of Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC).Google Scholar
Zima, E.
2014a English multimodal motion constructions. A construction grammar perspective. Studies van de BKL – Travaux du CBL – Papers of the LSB, Volume 8. [URL]
2014b Gibt es multimodale Konstruktionen? Eine Studie zu [V(motion) in circles] und [all the way from X PREP Y]. Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, 15, 1–48.Google Scholar
in press. On the multimodality of [all the way from X PREP Y]. Linguistic Vanguard.
Zima, E., Bergs, Al.
Eds. In press Multimodality and Construction Grammar Special issue of Linguistic Vanguard
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Dressel, Dennis, Philipp Dankel & Alexander M. Teixeira Kalkhoff
2023. Chapter 13. What can collaboratively produced lists tell us about constructions?. In Constructions in Spanish [Constructional Approaches to Language, 34], ► pp. 340 ff. DOI logo
Hart, Christopher & Javier Marmol Queralto
2021. What can cognitive linguistics tell us about language-image relations? A multidimensional approach to intersemiotic convergence in multimodal texts. Cognitive Linguistics 32:4 ► pp. 529 ff. DOI logo
Hart, Christopher & Bodo Winter
2022. Gesture and legitimation in the anti-immigration discourse of Nigel Farage. Discourse & Society 33:1 ► pp. 34 ff. DOI logo
Pleyer, Michael, Ryan Lepic & Stefan Hartmann
2022. Compositionality in Different Modalities: A View from Usage-Based Linguistics. International Journal of Primatology DOI logo
Rice, Alexander
2022. A recurring absence gesture in Northern Pastaza Kichwa. Gesture 21:1 ► pp. 28 ff. DOI logo
Steen, Francis F., Anders Hougaard, Jungseock Joo, Inés Olza, Cristóbal Pagán Cánovas, Anna Pleshakova, Soumya Ray, Peter Uhrig, Javier Valenzuela, Jacek Woźny & Mark Turner
2018. Toward an infrastructure for data-driven multimodal communication research. Linguistics Vanguard 4:1 DOI logo
Turner, Mark
2022. Multimodal body, multimodal mind, multimodal communication. In Dynamism in Metaphor and Beyond [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 9], ► pp. 95 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.