Chapter published in:
Motion and Space across Languages: Theory and applications
Edited by Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano
[Human Cognitive Processing 59] 2017
► pp. 13–36

Motion and semantic typology

A hot old topic with exciting caveats

| Universidad de Zaragoza
Published online: 14 August 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.59.02iba
References

References

Acedo-Matellán, V., & Mateu, J.
2013 Satellite-framed Latin vs. verb-framed Romance: A syntactic approach. Probus, 25(2), 227–265.Google Scholar
Alonso-Alonso, R.
2016 Cross-linguistic influence in the interpretation of boundary-crossing events in L2 acquisition. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 14(1), 161–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aske, J.
1989 Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 15, 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Athanasopoulos, P., & Treffers-Daller, J.
(Eds.) 2015 Language diversity and bilingual processing. Special issue. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18(5). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bally, Ch.
1932 Linguistique générale et linguistique française. Paris: Ernest Leroux.Google Scholar
Beavers, J., Levin, B., & Tham, S.-W.
2010 The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics, 44, 183–316.Google Scholar
Berman, R. A., & Slobin, D. I.
(Eds.) 1994 Relating events in narrative. A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Berthele, R.
2006 Ort und Weg. Eine vergleichende Untersuchung der sprachlichen Raumreferenz in Varietäten des Deutschen, Rätoromanischen und Französischen. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Disentangling manner and path. Evidence from varieties of German and Romance. In J. Goschler, & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Variation and change in the encoding of motion events (55–75). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 When bilinguals forget their manners. Language dominance and motion event descriptions in French and German. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14, 39–70.Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, J., Enfield, N. J., Essegbey, J., Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., Kita, S., Lüpke, F., & Ameka, F. K.
2007 Principles of event segmentation in language: The case of motion events. Language, 83(3), 495–532. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A., & Gullberg, M.
2008 Bidirectional crosslinguistic influence in L1–L2 encoding of manner in speech and gesture: A study of Japanese speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 225–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cifuentes-Férez, P.
2009 A crosslinguistic study on the motion verbs in English and Spanish. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Croft, W., Barðdal, J., Hollmann, W., Sotirova, V., & Taoka, C.
2010 Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. In H. C. Boas (Ed.), Contrastive studies in construction grammar (201–235). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Cadierno, T.
(Eds.) 2009 Constructing a second language. Special section of Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fanego, T.
2012 Motion events in English: The emergence and diachrony of Manner salience from Old English to Late Modern English. Folia Linguistica Historica, 33, 29–85.Google Scholar
Filipović, L.
2007 Talking about motion: A crosslinguistic investigation of lexicalization patterns. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Constructing causation in language and memory: Implications for access to justice in multilingual interactions. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 20(1), 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Filipović, L., & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
2015 Motion. In E. Dąbrowska, & D. Divjak (Eds.), Mouton handbook of cognitive linguistics (526–545). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flecken, M., Athanasopoulos, P., Kuipers, J. R., & Thierry, G.
2015 On the road to somewhere: Brain potentials reflect language effects on motion event perception. Cognition, 141, 41–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, T.
1989 Mind, code, and context: Essays in pragmatics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Grinevald, C.
2011 On constructing a working typology of the expression of path. Cahiers de Faits de Langue, 3, 43–70.Google Scholar
Han, Z.-H., & Cadierno, T.
(Eds.) 2010 Linguistic relativity in SLA: Thinking for speaking. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Hong, C.-S.
1985 Syntaxe des verbes de mouvement en coréen contemporain. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huber, J.
In press. Motion and the English verb. A diachronic study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Iacobini, C.
2015 “Particle-verbs in Romance”. In P. O. Müller, I. Ohnheiser, S. Olsen, & F. Rainer (Eds.) Word-formation. An international handbook of the languages of Europe, 626–658. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Iacobini, C., & Fagard, B.
2011 A diachronic approach to variation and change in the typology of motion event expression. A case study: From Latin to Romance. Cahiers de Faits de Langue, 3, 151–171.Google Scholar
Iacobini, C., & Masini, F.
2007 Verb-particle constructions and prefixed verbs in Italian: Typology, diachrony and semantics. In G. Booij, L. Ducceschi, B. Fradin, E. Guevara, A. Ralli, & S. Scalise (Eds.), On-line proceedings of the fifth Mediterranean morphology meeting (157–184). Bologna: Università degli studi di Bologna.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
2004 Language typologies in our language use: The case of Basque motion events in adult oral narratives. Cognitive Linguistics, 15, 317–349. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 Sound symbolism and motion in Basque. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
2009 Path salience in motion events. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, & Ş. Özçalışkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (403–414). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., & Filipović, L.
2013 Lexicalisation patterns and translation. In A. Rojo, & I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics and translation: Advances in some theoretical models and applications (251–281). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ikegami, Y.
1970 The semiological structure of the English verbs of motion: A stratificational approach. Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, N.
2017 Use of mimetics in Motion event descriptions by English and Korean learners of L2 Japanese: Does language typology make a difference? In N. Iwasaki, P. Sells, & K. Akita (Eds.), The grammar of Japanese mimetics. Perspectives from structure, acquisition, and translation (193–218). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
1983 Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kita, S., & Özyürek, A.
2003 What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal?: Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 16–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lai, V. T., Garrido-Rodriguez, G., & Narasimhan, B.
2013 Thinking for speaking in early and late bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(1), 139–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lamiroy, B.
1983 Les verbes de mouvement en français et en espagnol – étude comparée de leurs infinitives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
1987 Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M.
1992 The lexical semantics of verbs of motion: The perspective from unaccusativity. In I. M. Roca (Ed.), Thematic structure: Its role in grammar (247–269). Berlin: Foris. CrossrefzGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C.
2003 Space in language and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C., & Wilkins, D. P.
2006 Grammars of space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mani, I., & Pustejvosky, J.
2012 Interpreting motion. Grounded representations for spatial language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D.
1992 Hand and mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2000 Analogic/analytic representations and cross-linguistic differences in thinking for speaking. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 43–60.Google Scholar
2005 Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D., & Duncan, S.
2000 Growth points in thinking for speaking. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (141–161). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Y.
2003 Typologies of lexicalization patterns and event integration: Clarifications and reformulations. In S. Chiba et al. (Eds.), Empirical and theoretical investigations into language: A festschrift for Masaru Kajita (403–417). Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Morimoto, Y.
2001 Los verbos de movimiento. Madrid: Visor Libros.Google Scholar
Noonan, M.
2003 Motion events in Chantyal. In E. Shay, & U. Seibert (Eds.), Motion, direction and location in languages – in honor of Zygmunt Frajzyngier (211–234). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nuckolls, J. B.
2014 ‘Ideophones’ challenges for typological linguistics. The case of Pastaza Quichua. Pragmatics and Society, 5(3), 355–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pavlenko, A.
(Ed.) 2011 Thinking and speaking in two languages. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Pawlak, N.
1986 Expressing spatial relations in the Hausa language. Warsaw: Warsaw University.Google Scholar
Porquier, R.
2001 ‘Il m’a sauté dessus’, ‘je lui ai couru après’: Un cas de postposition en français. Journal of French Language Studies, 11, 123–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pulverman, R., Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Sootsman Buresh, J.
2008 Infants discriminate manners and paths in non-linguistic dynamic events. Cognition, 108, 825–830. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ogura, M.
2002 Verbs of motion in Medieval English. Cambridge: Boydell & Brewer.Google Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş.
2015 Ways of crossing a spatial boundary in typologically distinct languages. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(2), 485–508. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Allen, S., Furman, R., & Brown, A.
2005 How does linguistic framing of events influence co-speech gestures? Insights from cross-linguistic variations and similarities. Gesture, 5, 215–237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ricca, D.
1993 I verbi deittici di movimento in Europa: Una ricerca interlinguistica. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Robinson, P., & Ellis, N. C.
Eds. Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition London Routledge
Schøsler, L.
2008 L’expression des traits manière et direction des verbes de mouvement. Perspectives diachroniques et typologiques. In E. Stark, R. Schmidt-Riese, & E. Stoll (Eds.), Romanische Syntax im Wandel (113–132). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Schröder, J.
1993 Lexikon deutscher Verben der Fortbewegung. Berlin/Leipzig: Langenscheidt/Verlag Enzyklopädie.Google Scholar
Senft, G.
1997 Referring to space: Studies in Austronesian and Papuan languages. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Shull, S.
2003 The experience of space. The privileged role of spatial prefixation in Czech and Russian. Munich: Verlag Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
Sitoe, B.
2001 Verbs of motion in Changana. Leiden: Research School, CNWS.Google Scholar
Skopeteas, S.
2008 Encoding spatial relations: Language typology and diachronic change in Greek. Language Typology and Universals, 61, 54–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I.
1991 Learning to think for speaking: Native language, cognition and rhetorical style. Pragmatics, 1, 7–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996 Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (195–220). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
2003 Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In D. Gentner, & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (157–192). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1997 Mind, code, and text. In J. Bybee, J. Haiman, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Essays on language function and language type: Dedicated to T. Givón (437–467). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000 Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In S. Niemeier, & R. Dirven (Eds.), Evidence for linguistic relativity (107–138). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist, & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (219–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2005 Relating narrative events in translation. In D. D. Ravid, & H. B.-Z. Shyldkrot (Eds.), Perspectives on language and language development: Essays in honor of Ruth A. Berman (115–129). Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 What makes manner of motion salient?: Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. In M. Hickmann, & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (59–81). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 From S-language and V-language to PIN and PIV. Paper presented at the workshop Human Locomotion across Languages. Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 6 June 2008.
Slobin, D. I., & Hoiting, N.
1994 Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: Typological considerations. Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 20, 487–503. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I., Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., Kopecka, A., & Majid, A.
2014 Manners of human gait: A crosslinguistic event-naming study. Cognitive Linguistics, 25, 701–741. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stam, G.
2015 Changes in thinking for speaking: A longitudinal case study. The Modern Language Journal, 99, 83–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stolova, N. I.
2015 Cognitive linguistics and lexical change. Motion verbs from Latin to Romance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Storjohann, P.
2003 A diachronic contrastive lexical field analysis of verbs of human locomotion in German and English. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Sugiyama, Y.
2005 Not all verb-framed languages are created equal: The case of Japanese. Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistics Society, 31, 299–310.Google Scholar
Svorou, S.
1994 The grammar of space. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L.
1985 Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1991 Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistics Society, 17, 480–519. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000a Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. I: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000b Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
In press. The targeting system of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tesnière, L.
1959 Eléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Toratani, K.
2012 The role of sound-symbolic forms in motion event descriptions. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 10(1), 90–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verkerk, A.
2015 Where do all the motion verbs come from? The speed of development of manner verbs and path verbs in Indo-European. Diachronica, 32, 69–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wälchi, B., & Cysouw, M.
2012 Lexical typology through similarity semantics: Toward a semantic map of motion verbs. Linguistics, 50(3), 671–710.Google Scholar
Wolff, P., & Holmes, K. J.
2011 Linguistic relativity. WIREs Cog Sci, 2, 253–265. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yiu, C. Y.-M.
2014 The typology of motion events. An empirical study of Chinese dialects. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, M. L., & Oh, E.
2007 On the syntactic composition of manner and motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Alonso Alonso, Rosa
2020. Boundary-crossing events across languages. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18:2 ► pp. 316 ff. Crossref logo
Cappelle, Bert
2020.  In Broader Perspectives on Motion Event Descriptions [Human Cognitive Processing, 69], ► pp. 235 ff. Crossref logo
De Knop, Sabine
2020. From construction grammar to embodied construction practice. Constructions and Frames 12:1 ► pp. 121 ff. Crossref logo
Matsumoto, Yo
2020.  In Broader Perspectives on Motion Event Descriptions [Human Cognitive Processing, 69], ► pp. 281 ff. Crossref logo
Meex, Birgitta
2020.  In Broader Perspectives on Motion Event Descriptions [Human Cognitive Processing, 69], ► pp. 63 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.