The morphosyntax of manner expressions has attracted less attention than that of path expressions in the framing typology. Drawing primarily on experimental and quantitative data in Japanese and English, we propose and examine three parameters in the complex typology of manner expressions. It is argued that coarse-grained, event-inherent manners that the speaker does not intend to stress (e.g. normal running) are more likely to be realized in tight morphosyntactic constructions headed by manner verbs than fine-grained, event-concomitant manners that the speaker intends to stress (e.g. an annoying and characteristic shout of a jogger). The proposed parameters appear to share an iconic, communicative motivation that links pragmatic prominence with morphosyntactic prominence.
2009A grammar of sound-symbolic words in Japanese: Theoretical approaches to iconic and lexical properties of mimetics. Ph.D. Dissertation, Kobe University.
Akita, K.
2012Toward a frame-semantic definition of sound-symbolic words: A collocational analysis of Japanese mimetics. Cognitive Linguistics, 23(1), 67–90.
Akita, K.
2013Expressiveness in mimetic syntax: Quantitative evidence from Japanese and English. Paper presented at the Grammar of Mimetics Workshop. SOAS, University of London, London, UK, 10 May 2013.
Akita, K.
2015Yootai-hyoogen no ruikeiron ni okeru yootai no tenkeisei [The typicality of manner in the typology of manner expressions]. In Y. Yumoto, & N. Ono (Eds.), Goi-imiron no arata nakanoosei o sagutte [Searching for new possibilities of lexical semantics] (354–380). Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
Akita, K., Matsumoto, Y., & Ohara, K. H.
2010Idoo-hyoogen no ruikeiron ni okeru tyokuzi-teki-keiro-hyoogen to yootai-goi-repaatorii [Deictic path expressions and manner lexicon in the typology of motion expressions]. In T. Kageyama (Ed.), Lexicon forum, 5 (1–25). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
Akita, K., & Usuki, T.
2016A constructional account of the “optionality” of quotative marking on Japanese mimetics. Journal of Linguistics, 52(2), 245–275. .
Allen, S., Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Brown, A., Furman, R., Ishizuka, T., & Fujii, M.
2007Language-specific and universal influences in children’s syntactic packaging of Manner and Path: A comparison of English, Japanese, and Turkish. Cognition, 102, 16–48.
Beavers, J., Levin, B., & Tham, S. W.
2010The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics, 46(2), 331–377.
Boas, H. C.
2008Toward a frame-constructional approach to verb classification. In E. S. Acevedo, & F. J. C. Rodríguez (Eds.), Grammar, constructions, and interfaces: Special issue of Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 57, 17–48.
Cardini, F. E.
2008Manner of motion saliency: An inquiry into Italian. Cognitive Linguistics, 19(4), 533–569.
Childs, G. T.
1994African ideophones. In L. Hinton, J. Nichols, & J. J. Ohala (Eds.), Sound symbolism (178–204). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2011Corpus linguistics with Google?Proceedings of the Second Conference of International Society for the Linguistics of English. [URL]
Dingemanse, M.
2011The meaning and use of ideophones in Siwu. Ph.D. Dissertation, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics & Radboud University Nijmegen.
Dingemanse, M.
2017Expressiveness and system integration: On the typology of ideophones, with special reference to Siwu. STUF – Language Typology and Universals, 70(2), 119–141.
Dingemanse, M., & Akita, K.
2016An inverse relation between expressiveness and grammatical integration: On the morphosyntactic typology of ideophones, with special reference to Japanese. Journal of Linguistics, FirstView.
Enfield, N. J.
2002Cultural logic and syntactic productivity: Associated posture constructions in Lao. In N. J. Enfield (Ed.), Ethnosyntax: Explorations in grammar and culture (231–258). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Güldemann, T.
2008Quotative indexes in African languages: A synchronic and diachronic survey. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hamano, S.
1998The sound-symbolic system of Japanese. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Hinton, L., Nichols, J., & Ohala, J. J.
(Eds.)1994Sound symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hirose, M.
1981Japanese and English contrastive lexicology: The role of Japanese “mimetic” adverbs. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Hundt, M., Nesselhauf, N., & Biewer, C.
(Eds.)2007Corpus linguistics and the Web Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
2006Sound symbolism and motion in Basque. München: LINCOM Europa.
2006Where there’s a sound, there’s motion: Two types of path PPs that appear after verbs of sound emission. Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference of Construction Grammar. University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, 3 September 2006.
Kakehi, H., Tamori, I., & Schourup, L.
1996Dictionary of iconic expressions in Japanese. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kawachi, K.
2014Patterns of expressing motion events in Kupsapiny. In O. Hieda (Ed.), Recent advances in Nilotic linguistics (103–136). Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
Kita, S.
1997Two-dimensional semantic analysis of Japanese mimetics. Linguistics, 35(2), 379–415.
Kita, S.
2001Semantic schism and interpretive integration in Japanese sentences with a mimetic: A reply to Tsujimura. Linguistics, 39(2), 419–436.
Kloe, D. R.
1977A dictionary of onomatopoeic sounds, tones and noises in English and Spanish including those of animals, man, nature, machinery and musical instruments, together with some that are not imitative or echoic. Detroit, MI: Blaine Ethridge.
Levin, B.
1993English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levin, B.
2015Verb classes within and across languages. In A. Malchukov, & B. Comrie (Eds.), Valency classes in the World's languages. Vol. 2: Case studies from New Guinea, Australia, and the Americas, and theoretical outlook (1627–1670). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M.
1995Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Malt, B. C., Ameel, E., Imai, M., Gennari, S. P., Saji, N., & Majid, A.
2014Human locomotion in languages: Constraints on moving and meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 74, 107–123.
Matsumoto, Y.
2003Typologies of lexicalization patterns and event integration: Clarifications and reformulations. In S. Chibaet al. (Eds.), Empirical and theoretical investigations into language: A Festschrift for Masaru Kajita (403–417). Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
Matsumoto, Y.
2013Determinants of Manner, Path, and Deixis saliency across languages. Paper presented at the International Workshop SYLEX III: Space and Motion across Languages and Applications. University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain, 21 November 2013.
Nasu, A.
2002Nihongo-onomatope no gokeisei to inritu-koozoo [Word formation and prosodic structures of Japanese onomatopoeia]. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Tsukuba.
Nuckolls, J. B.
1996Sounds like life: Sound-symbolic grammar, performance, and cognition in Pastaza Quechua. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ohara, K. H.
2002Linguistic encodings of motion events in Japanese and English: A preliminary look. The Hiyoshi Review of English Studies, 41, 122–153.
Özçalışkan, Ş., & Slobin, D. I.
2003Codability effects on the expression of manner of motion in Turkish and English. In A. S. Özsoy, D. Akar, M. Nakipoğlu-Demiralp, E. Erguvanlı-Taylan, & A. Aksu-Koç (Eds.), Studies in Turkish linguistics (259–270). Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Press.
Saito, T.
2011An investigation of the linguistic encoding of motion and state-change events in English and Japanese through Talmy’s typology. Ph.D. Dissertation, Tohoku University.
2000Simple and complex verbs in Jaminjung: A study of event categorisation in an Australian language. Wageningen: Ponsen & Looijen.
Slobin, D. I.
1997Mind, code, and text. In J. Bybee, J. Haiman, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Essays on language function and language type: Dedicated to T. Givón (437–467). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2004The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist, & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (219–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
1983Verb-descriptivity in German and English: A contrastive study in semantic fields. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.
Sohn, H.
1994Korean. London: Routledge.
Sugiyama, Y.
2005Not all verb-framed languages are created equal: The case of Japanese. Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistics Society, 31, 299–310.
Talmy, L.
1985Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Talmy, L.
1991Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistics Society, 17, 480–519.
Talmy, L.
2000Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tamori, I., & Schourup, L.
1999Onomatope: Keitai to imi [Onomatopoeia: Form and meaning]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.
Tamura, Y.
2006Characteristics of English sound-emission path construction: A prototype cross-linguistic account. In M. Yamanashi (Ed.), Studies in Cognitive Linguistics, 5 (209–242). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
Taylor, J. R.
1996On running and jogging. Cognitive Linguistics, 7(1), 21–34.
Toratani, K.
2006On the optionality of to-marking on reduplicated mimetics in Japanese. In T. J. Vance, & K. Jones (Eds.), Japanese/Korean linguistics, 14 (415–422). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
2017The position of to/∅-marked mimetics in Japanese sentence structure. In N. Iwasaki, P. Sells, & K. Akita (Eds.), The grammar of Japanese mimetics. Perspectives from structure, acquisition, and translation (35–72). London: Routledge.
Van Valin, R. D., Jr., & LaPolla, R. J.
1997Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.