Cover not available
Part of
Motion and Space across Languages: Theory and applications
Edited by Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano
[Human Cognitive Processing 59] 2017
► pp. 123–150

Chapter 4
The importance of minority languages in motion event typology

The case of Aragonese and Catalan

 | University of Zaragoza
 | University of East Anglia
 | Universidad de Zaragoza
Romance languages have been classified as verb-framed languages in Talmy’s typology (1991, 2000). However, it has been argued that languages with the same genetic affiliation and/or within the same typological group do not necessarily show the same behavior when it comes to describe motion events, that is, there is intratypological variation (see Goschler and Stefanowitsch 2013). This paper examines how speakers of Aragonese and Catalan, two Romance minority languages of Aragón (Spain), talk about motion based on data from the frog story. We conclude that there is no intratypological variation with respect to Manner of motion. As expected in verb-framed languages, both languages hardly describe this component either in detail or frequently. However, as far as Path is concerned, Catalan and, especially, Aragonese, can be regarded as high-path salient languages. Speakers describe this component in detail by means of pleonastic locative adverbial structures, complete path constructions, and adverbial pronouns.
Keywords: motion events, minority languages, Aragonese, Catalan
Article outline
  • 1.Intratypological variation in genetically-similar languages
  • 2.Aragonese and Catalan motion events
    • 2.1Languages, informants, and data
    • 2.2Aragonese and Catalan as verb-framed languages: Motion verbs
    • 2.3Manner
    • 2.4Path
      • 2.4.1Minus-ground and plus-ground phrases in path descriptions
      • 2.4.2“Complex paths” in path descriptions
  • 3.Conclusions: Intratypological contrasts and minority languages
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 14 August 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.59.06iba
References (80)
References
Aliaga-Jiménez, J. L., Giralt-Latorre, J., & Moret-Oliver, M. T. 2016. Tres hitos en la historiografía de las lenguas minoritarias de Aragón. In M. C. Horno-Chéliz, I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano, & J. L. Mendívil-Giró (Eds.), Panorama actual de la ciencia del lenguaje. Primer sexenio de Zaragoza Lingüística (403–427). Zaragoza: PUZ.Google Scholar
Alvar, M. 1953. El dialecto aragonés. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
1973. Estudios sobre el dialecto aragonés. Zaragoza: IFC.Google Scholar
1976a. Un problema de lenguas en contacto: la frontera catalano-aragonesa. Anuario de Filología Aragonesa, XVIII–XIX, 27–37.Google Scholar
1976b. Catalán y aragonés en las regiones fronterizas. Anuario de Filología Aragonesa, XVIII–XIX, 135–184.Google Scholar
1996. Aragonés. In M. Alvar (Ed.), Manual de dialectología hispánica. El español de España (263–288). Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Arnal, M. L., & Lagüéns, V. 2014. Léxico diferencial e historia: a propósito del diccionario diferencial del español de Aragón (DDEAR). In E. Montero-Cartelle (Ed.), Actas del VIII congreso internacional de historia de la lengua española. Santiago de Compostela. 14–18 de septiembre de 2009 (1219–2236). Santiago: Meubook.Google Scholar
Badia-Margarit, A. M. 1947. Los complementos pronominalo-adverbiales derivados de ibi e inde en la Península Ibérica. Madrid: CSIC.Google Scholar
1951. Sobre “ibi” e “inde” en las lenguas de la Península Ibérica. Revista de Filología Española, XXXI, 62–74.Google Scholar
Berman, R. A., & Slobin, D. I. 1994. Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Berthele, R. 2006. Ort und Weg. Die sprachliche Raumreferenz in Varietäten des Deutschen, Rätoromanischen und Französischen. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Contact de langues et conceptualisations spatiales. Aspects de la sémantique et de la grammaire de la référence spatiale en sursilvan, vallader et surmiran. Vox Romanica, 66, 60–71.Google Scholar
2013. Disentangling Manner and Path: Evidence from varieties of German and Romance. In J. Goschler, & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Variation and change in the coding of motion events (55–75). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buesa, T. 1980. Estado actual de los estudios sobre el dialecto aragonés. In A. Ubieto-Arteta (Ed.), Actas de las II jornadas sobre el estado actual de los estudios sobre Aragón (355–400). Zaragoza: IFC.Google Scholar
Cadierno, T. 2004. Expressing motion events in a second language: A cognitive typological perspective. In M. Achard, & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching (13–49). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Castañer-Martín, R. M. 1999. Las hablas altoaragonesas. Estado actual de la cuestión. In J. M. Enguita-Utrilla (Ed.), Jornadas de filología aragonesa II. En el L aniversario del AFA (265–317). Zaragoza: IFC.Google Scholar
Cifuentes-Férez, P. 2010. The semantics of the English and the Spanish motion verb lexicons. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 8, 233–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cini, M. (Ed.). 2008. I verbi sintagmatici in italiano e nelle varietà dialettali. Stato dell’arte e prospettive di ricerca. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Company-Company, C., & Espinosa-Elorza, R. M. 2014. Adverbios demostrativos de lugar. In C. Company-Company (Ed.), Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española. Tercera parte: Adverbios, preposiciones y conjunciones. Relaciones interoracionales (127–246). México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México-Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Conte, A., Cortés, Ch., Martínez, A., Nagore, F., & Vázquez, Ch. 1977. El aragonés: Identidad y problemática de una lengua. Zaragoza: Librería Central.Google Scholar
Enguita-Utrilla, J. M. (Ed.). 1991. I curso de geografía lingüística de Aragón. Zaragoza: IFC.Google Scholar
(Ed.). 1999. Jornadas de filología aragonesa II. En el L aniversario del AFA. Zaragoza: IFC.Google Scholar
2008. Spanish and historical dialect in Aragon. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 193/194, 79–89.Google Scholar
Espluga, J., & Capdevila, A. 1995. Franja, frontera i llengua: conflictes d’identitat als pobles d’Aragó que parlen català. Lleida: Pagès Editors.Google Scholar
Fabra, P. 2008. Gramàtica catalana. Barcelona: Institut d'Estudis Catalans.Google Scholar
Filipović, L. 2013. Typology as a continuum: Intratypological evidence from English and Serbo-Croatian. In J. Goschler, & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Variation and change in the coding of motion events (17–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García-Miguel, J. M. 2006. Los complementos locativos. In C. Company-Company (Ed.), Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española, 1: La frase verbal (1253–1336). México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México-Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Gargallo-Gil, J. E. 2001. La frontera lingüística catalano-aragonesa, el Aragón fronterizo de lengua catalana y otros romances de frontera. Revista de Filología Románica, 18, 189–211.Google Scholar
Gazdaru, D. 1950. HIC, IBI, INDE, en las lenguas ibero-románicas. Filología, II, 29–44.Google Scholar
Giralt-Latorre, J. 1995. Valors i funcions d’IBI i INDE als parlars lliterans. Alazet, 7, 57–74.Google Scholar
Goschler, J., & Stefanowitsch, A. (Eds.). 2013. Variation and change in the coding of motion events. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hijazo-Gascón, A. 2011. La expresión de eventos de movimiento y su adquisición en segundas lenguas. Ph.D. Dissertation, Universidad de Zaragoza.Google Scholar
Hijazo-Gascón, A., & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. 2013a. Las lenguas románicas y la tipología de los eventos de movimiento. Romanische Forschungen, 125(4), 467–494. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013b. Same family, different Paths: Intratypological differences in three Romance languages. In J. Goschler, & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Variation and change in the encoding of motion events (39–54). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huguet-Canalis, À., & Suïls, J. 1998. Llengües en contacte i actituds lingüístiques: el cas de la frontera catalano-aragonesa. Vol. 11. Barcelona: Horsori Editorial, Sl.Google Scholar
Iacobini, C. 2015. “Particle-verbs in Romance”. In P. O. Müller, I. Ohnheiser, S. Olsen, & F. Rainer (Eds.) Word-formation. An international handbook of the languages of Europe, 626–658. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2009. The role of dialects in the emergence of Italian phrasal verbs. Morphology, 19(1), 15–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iacobini, C., & Masini, F. 2007a. The emergence of verb-particle constructions in Italian: locative and actional meanings. Morphology, 16(2), 155–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007b. Verb-particle constructions and prefixed verbs in Italian: typology, diachrony and semantics. In G. Booij, L. Ducceschi, B. Fradin, E. Guevara, A. Ralli, & S. Scalise (Eds.), On-line proceedings of the fifth Mediterranean morphology meeting (157–184). Bologna: Università degli studi di Bologna.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. 2004. Motion events in Basque narratives. In S. Strömqvist, & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (89–111). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2009a. Path salience in motion events. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, & Ş. Özçalışkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (403–414). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
2009b. Lexicalisation patterns and sound symbolism in Basque. In J. Valenzuela, A. Rojo, & C. Soriano (Eds.), Trends in cognitive linguistics: Theoretical and applied models (239–254). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2015. Going beyond motion events typology: The case of Basque as a verb-framed language. Folia Linguistica, 49(2), 307–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., & Hijazo-Gascón, A. 2012. Variation in motion events: Theory and applications. In L. Filipović, & K. M. Jaszczolt (Eds), Space and time across languages and cultures. Linguistic diversity (349–371). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopecka, A. 2006. The semantic structure of motion verbs in French: Typological perspectives. In M. Hickmann, & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (83–101). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, A. 1952. El aragonés, idioma pirenaico. Actas del primer congreso internacional de estudios pirenaicos. San Sebastián, 1950 (65–69). Huesca: Instituto de Estudios Pirenaicos.Google Scholar
Lacasa-Carrascosa, M. P. 2010. El habla de Alcolea de Cinca: Breve caracterización lingüística y vocabulario. Archivo de Filología Aragonesa, 66, 193–216.Google Scholar
Lagüéns-Gracia, V. 2012. Notas léxicas sobre documentos municipales aragoneses. Cuadernos del Instituto Historia de la Lengua, 7, 257–295.Google Scholar
Martín-Zorraquino, M. A., & Enguita-Utrilla, J. M. 2000. Las lenguas de Aragón. Zaragoza: CAI.Google Scholar
Martín-Zorraquino, M. A., & Fort-Cañellas, M. R. 1996. La frontera catalano-aragonesa. In M. Alvar (Ed.), Manual de dialectología hispánica. El español de España (263–292). Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Martín-Zorraquino, M. A., Fort, M. R., Arnal, M. L., & Giralt, J. 1995. Estudio sociolingüístico de la Franja Oriental de Aragón. Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragoza.Google Scholar
1999. Los estudios lingüísticos sobre la Franja Oriental de Aragón. In J. M. Enguita (Ed.), Jornadas de filología aragonesa II. En el L aniversario del AFA (367–404). Zaragoza: Institución Fernando el Católico.Google Scholar
Mateu, J., & Rigau, G. 2010. Verb-particle constructions in Romance: A lexical-syntactic account. Probus: International Journal of Latin and Romance Linguistics, 22, 241–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D. 2000. Analogic/analytic representations and cross-linguistic differences in thinking for speaking. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 43–60.Google Scholar
Mayer, M. 1969. Frog, where are you? New York: Dial Press.Google Scholar
Milà i Fontanals, M. 1861. De los trovadores en España. Barcelona: Verdaguer.Google Scholar
Moret-Coso, H. 1996. Sobre la llengua de Mequinensa. Calaceit: Institut d’Estudis del Baix Cinca.Google Scholar
Mosca, M. 2012. Italian motion constructions: Different functions of ‘particles’. In L. Filipović, & K. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), Space and time across languages and cultures. Linguistic diversity (373–393). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nagore, F. 1977. Gramática de la lengua aragonesa. Zaragoza: Librería General.Google Scholar
2013. Lingüistica diatopica de l’Alto Aragón. Cómo ye l’aragonés de cada puesto: carauteristicas, bibliografía, testos, mapas. Huesca: Consello d’a Fabla Aragonesa / IEA.Google Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş., & Slobin, D. I. 2003. Codability effects on the expression of manner of motion in Turkish and English. In A. S. Özsoy, D. Akar, M. Nakipoğlu-Demiralp, E. Erguvanlı-Taylan, & A. Aksu-Koç (Eds.), Studies in Turkish linguistics (259–270). Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Press.Google Scholar
Pavón-Lucero, M. V. 1999. Clases de partículas: preposición, conjunción y adverbio. In I. Bosque, & V. Demonte (Eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (565–656). Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Pérez Saldanya, M., & Rigau, G. 2005. “Cuesta arriba e por llano”: The development of “postpositions” in Spanish and Catalan. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, 4, 69–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rohlfs, G. 1978. Dialectos del Pirineo aragonés (semejanzas y diferencias). Archivo de Filología Aragonesa, 34–35, 215–217.Google Scholar
Schwarze, C. 1985. Uscire e andare fuori: struttura sintattica e semantica lessicale. In A. Franchi De Bellis, & L. M. Savoia (Eds.), Sintassi e morfologia della lingua italiana d’uso. Teoria ed applicazioni descrittive. SLI XXIV (355–371). Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
1996. Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (195–220). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
1997. Mind, code, and text. In J. Bybee, J. Haiman, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Essays on language function and language type: Dedicated to T. Givón (437–467). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998. Coding of motion events in narrative texts. Berkeley, CA: University of California at Berkeley, Departments of Psychology and Linguistics.Google Scholar
2004. The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist, & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (219–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2006. What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. In M. Hickmann, & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (59–81). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I., Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., Kopecka, A., & Majid, A. 2014. Manners of human gait: a crosslinguistic event-naming study. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(4), 701–741. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Solà, J., Lloret, M.-R., Mascaró, J., & Pérez Saldanya, M. (Dirs.). 2002. Gramàtica del català contemporani. Barcelona: Empúries.Google Scholar
Stolova, N. I. 2015. Cognitive linguistics and lexical change. Motion verbs from Latin to Romance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sugiyama, Y. 2005. Not all verb-framed languages are created equal: The case of Japanese. Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistics Society, 31, 299–310.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 1991. Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, 17, 480–519. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000. Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Veny, J. [1978] 1989. Els parlars catalans. Síntesi de dialectologia. Mallorca: Editorial Moll.Google Scholar
Vicario, F. 1997. I verbi analitici in friulano. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Wheeler, M. 1999. Catalan: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Wiesinger, Evelyn
2023. Chapter 12. On the role of verb-particle constructions in Old Spanish. In Constructions in Spanish [Constructional Approaches to Language, 34], ► pp. 309 ff. DOI logo
Becerra, Rodrigo, Jorge Osorio, Ítalo Cantarutti & Gabriel Llanquinao
2022. Motion Events in L1 and L2 Mapudungun Narratives: Typology and Cross-Linguistic Influence. Frontiers in Communication 7 DOI logo
Lewandowski, Wojciech & Şeyda Özçalışkan
2021. How language type influences patterns of motion expression in bilingual speakers. Second Language Research 37:1 ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Anastasio, Simona & Sandra Benazzo
2020. L’expression du déplacement en italien et français L2 : influence translinguistique vs tendances communes. Discours :26 DOI logo
Irsara, Martina & Ulrike Domahs
2020. The Use of the Verb Run in English Learner-Narratives An Analysis of Verb Constructions Influenced by Different L1s . EL.LE :1 DOI logo
Muñoz, Meritxell & Teresa Cadierno
2019. Mr Bean exits the garage driving or does he drive out of the garage? Bidirectional transfer in the expression of Path. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 57:1 ► pp. 45 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.