Chapter published in:
Motion and Space across Languages: Theory and applications
Edited by Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano
[Human Cognitive Processing 59] 2017
► pp. 151176
References

References

Acedo-Matellán, V., & Mateu, J.
2013Satellite-framed Latin vs. verb-framed Romance: A syntactic approach. Probus. International Journal of Latin and Romance Linguistics, 25, 227–265.Google Scholar
Amenta, L.
2008Esistono i verbi sintagmatici nel dialetto e nell’italiano regionale siciliano? In M. Cini (Ed.), I verbi sintagmatici in italiano e nelle varietà dialettali: Stato dell’arte e prospettive di ricerca. Atti delle giornate di studio, Torino, 19–20 febbraio 2007 (159–174). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Aske, J.
1989Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 15, 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blake, B. J.
[1994] 2001Case. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W., Barðdal, J., Hollmann, W., Sotirova, V., & Taoka, C.
2010Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex events. In H. C. Boas (Ed.), Contrastive construction grammar (201–236). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cuzzolin, P., & Haverling, G.
2009Syntax, sociolinguistics, and literary genres. In P. Baldi, & P. Cuzzolin (Eds.), New perspectives on historical Latin syntax (19–64). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
De Mauro, T., Mancini, F., Vedovelli, M., & Voghera, M.
1993Lessico di frequenza dell’Italiano parlato. Milano: ETASLibri.Google Scholar
Dufresne, M., Dupuis, F., & Longtin, C.-M.
2001Un changement dans la diachronie du français: La perte de la préfixation aspectuelle en a-. Revue Québécoise de Linguistique, 29(2), 34–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, G., & Mosca, M.
2010Some constructions of path: From Italian to some classical languages. In G. Marotta, A. Lenci, L. Meini, & F. Rovai (Eds.), Space in language: Proceedings of the Pisa international conference (317–338). Pisa: ETS.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J.
1977Scenes-and-frame semantics. In A. Zampolli (Ed.), Linguistic structures processing (55–82). Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
1982Frame semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (111–137). Seoul: Hanshing Publishing.Google Scholar
Geyer, P., & Kuntz, O.
1965Itinerarium Burdigalense. In P. Geyer, O. Cuntz, A. Francheschini, R. Weber, L. Bieler, J. Fraipont, & F. Glorie (Eds.), Itinera et alia geographica. Itineraria Hierosolymitana. Itineraria Romana. Geographica (1–26). Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
González Fernández, M. J.
1997Sobre la motivación semántica de las expresiones pleonásticas de movimiento: Subir arriba, bajar abajo, entrar adentro y salir afuera. In C. Company-Company (Ed.), Cambios diacrónicos en el español (123–141). México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Hoffman, J. B., & Szantyr, A.
1965Syntax und Stilistik. Munich: C. H. Becksche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Horrocks, G. C.
1981Space and time in Homer. Prepositional and adverbial particles in the Greek epic. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
Hunt, E. D.
1982Holy Land pilgrimage in the Late Roman Empire AD 312–460. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Iacobini, C., & Corona, L.
2016L’espressione della direzione del moto dal latino classico all’italiano antico. In M. Fruyt, G. V. M. Haverling, & R. Sornicola (Eds.), Actes du XXVIIe Congrès international de linguistique et de philologie romanes (Nancy, 15–20 juillet 2013). Section 2: Linguistique latine/linguistique romane (87–100). Nancy: ATILF.Google Scholar
Iacobini, C., & Masini, F.
2006The emergence of verb-particle constructions in Italian: Locative and actional meanings. Morphology, 16(2), 155–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Verb-particle constructions and prefixed verbs in Italian: Typology, diachrony and semantics. In G. Booij, L. Ducceschi, B. Fradin, E. Guevara, A. Ralli, & S. Scalise (Eds.), On-line proceedings of the fifth Mediterranean morphology meeting (157–184). Bologna: Università degli studi di Bologna.Google Scholar
2009I verbi sintagmatici dell’italiano fra innovazione e persistenza: Il ruolo dei dialetti. In A. Cardinaletti, & N. Munaro (Eds.), Italiano, italiani regionali e dialetti (115–136). Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
2009Path salience in motion events. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, & Ş. Özçalışkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (403–414). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
2015Going beyond motion events typology: The case of Basque as a verb-framed language. Folia Lingvistica, 49(2), 307–352.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., & Hijazo-Gascón, A.
2012Variation in motion events. Theory and applications. In L. Filipović, & K. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), Space and time in languages and cultures. Linguistic diversity (349–371). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kopecka, A.
2006The semantic structure of motion verbs in French: Typological perspectives. In M. Hickmann, & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (83–101). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Continuity and change in the representation of motion events in French. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, & Ş. Özçalışkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (415–426). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, W.
1974Proto-Indo-European syntax. Austin-London: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Luraghi, S.
1996Studi su casi e preposizioni nel greco antico. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Marotta, G., & Meini, L.
2012Spatial prepositions in Italian L2: Universal and language-specific principles. In L. Filipović, & K. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), Space and time in languages and cultures. Linguistic diversity (373–393). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martínez-Vázquez, M.
2013Intralinguistic variation in the expression of motion events in English and Spanish. Lingue e Linguaggi, 9, 143–156.Google Scholar
Masini, F.
2005Multi-word expressions between syntax and the lexicon: The case of Italian verb-particle constructions. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 18, 145–173.Google Scholar
Meini, L.
2009Dimensioni dello spazio nelle preposizioni. Uno studio empirico sll’italiano L2. Pisa: Pisa University Press.Google Scholar
Meini, L., & McGillivray, B.
2010Between semantics and morpho-syntax: Spatial verbs and prepositions in Latin. In G. Marotta, A. Lenci, L. Meini, & F. Rovai (Eds.), Space in language. Proceedings of the Pisa international conference (383–400). Pisa: ETS.Google Scholar
Milani, C.
1969aI grecismi nell’Itinerarium Egeriae. Aevum, 43, 200–234.Google Scholar
1969bStudi sull’Itinerarium Egeriae. L’aspetto classico della lingua di Egeria. Aevum, 43, 381–452.Google Scholar
1990Note di linguistica egeriana. In Accademia Petrarca di lettere, arti e scienze (Arezzo) (Ed.), Atti del convegno internazionale sulla Peregrinatio Egeriae (109–135). Florence: Olschki.Google Scholar
Molinelli, P.
1998Premesse metodologiche per una sociologia del latino. In G. Bernini, P. L. Cuzzolin, & P. Molinelli (Eds.), Ars linguistica. Studi offerti a Paolo Ramat (411–433). Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Mosca, M.
2010Eventi di moto in italiano tra sintassi e semantica: Uno studio cognitivo empirico. Pisa: Edizioni PLUS.Google Scholar
2012Italian motion constructions. Different functions of ‘particles’. In L. Filipović, & K. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), Space and time in languages and cultures. Linguistic diversity (373–393). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Expressions of motion in Peregrinatio Egeriae. In J. F. Val-Álvaro, J. L. Mendívil-Giró, M. C. Horno-Chéliz, I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano, A. Hijazo-Gascón, J. Simón-Casas, & I. Solano-Martín (Eds.), De la unidad del lenguaje a la diversidad de las lenguas (622–632). Zaragoza: PUZ.Google Scholar
Pianigiani, O.
1907Vocabolario etimologico italiano. http://​www​.etimo​.it.
Poccetti, P., Poli, D., & Santini, C.
1999Una storia della lingua latina. Formazione, usi, comunicazione. Rome: Carocci.Google Scholar
Quaglia, S.
2012On the syntax of some apparent spatial particles in Italian. In M. Butt, & T. H. King (Eds.), Proceedings of the LFG12 conference. Stanford: CSLI Publications. http://​cslipublications​.stanford​.edu​/LFG​/17​/lfg12​.html.
Schwarze, C.
1985Uscire e andar fuori: Struttura sintattica e semantica lessicale. In A. Franchi De Bellis, & L. M. Savoia (Eds.), Sintassi e morfologia della lingua italiana d’uso. Teoria ed applicazioni descrittive. SLI XXIV (355–371). Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
2008In luogo di conclusione: Prospettive di ricerca. In M. Cini (Ed.), I verbi sintagmatici in italiano e nelle varietà dialettali: Stato dell’arte e prospettive di ricerca. Atti delle giornate di studio, Torino, 19–20 febbraio 2007 (209–223). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Simone, R.
1997Esistono verbi sintagmatici in italiano?. In T. De Mauro, & V. Lo Cascio (Eds.), Lessico e grammatica. Teorie linguistiche e applicazioni lessicografiche (155–170). Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
2008I verbi sintagmatici come costruzione e come categoria. In M. Cini (Ed.), I verbi sintagmatici in italiano e nelle varietà dialettali: Stato dell’arte e prospettive di ricerca. Atti delle giornate di studio, Torino, 19–20 febbraio 2007 (13–30). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I.
2004The many ways to search for a frog. Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist, & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (219–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2006What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse and cognition. In M. Hickmann, & S. Robert (Eds), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (60–81). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008From S-language and V-language to PIN and PIV. Paper presented at the workshop Human Locomotion across Languages. Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 6 June 2008.
Stolova, N. I.
2015Cognitive linguistics and lexical change. Motion verbs from Latin to Romance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Tabacco, R.
2000Itinerarium Alexandri. Testo, apparato critico, introduzione, traduzione e commento a cura di Raffaella Tabacco. Florence: Olschki.Google Scholar
Talmy, L.
2000aToward a cognitive semantics. Vol. I: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000bToward a cognitive semantics. Vol. II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Troberg, M., & Burnett, H.
2011Resultative secondary predication in Medieval French and the satellite-framed/verb-framed distinction. Paper presented at the Workshop on Verbal Elasticity: Framing the Verb/Satellite Distinction from a Biolinguistic Perspective. Centre de Lingüística Teòrica, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 3–5 October 2011.
Väänänen, V.
1987Le journal-épitre d’Egérie (Itinerarium Egeriae). Etude linguistique. Helsinki: Suomalainen tiedeakatemia.Google Scholar
Vineis, E.
2005Il latino. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Zwarts, J.
2005Prepositional aspect and the algebra of paths. Linguistics and Philosophy, 28(6), 739–779. CrossrefGoogle Scholar