Cover not available
Part of
Motion and Space across Languages: Theory and applications
Edited by Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano
[Human Cognitive Processing 59] 2017
► pp. 229–254

Chapter 8
Metaphorical motion constructions across specialized genres

| Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha
In this paper I discuss the metaphorical motivation of the figurative – fictive and metaphorical – motion constructions found in architecture, wine, and tennis texts as the preliminary step to argue for the need to adopt a discourse approach to exploring fictive motion in general. My main contention is that in order to explore this phenomenon particular attention needs to be paid to the topic(s) thus predicated, the users of the metaphors (bringing in the discourse communities they belong to), and the characteristics of the discourses and genre(s) where the expressions are used.
Keywords: metaphorical motion, genre, sensory data, image metaphor, conceptual metaphor, synaesthesia
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.An overview of figurative motion: Fictive and metaphorical cases
    • 2.1Fictive motion
    • 2.2Metaphorical motion
  • 3.Figurative motion across three specific discourses and genres
    • 3.1Motion constructions in tennis reports
    • 3.2Motion constructions in architectural reviews
    • 3.3Motion constructions in wine tasting notes
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 14 August 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.59.10cab
References (42)
References
Barnden, J. A., Glasbey, S. R., Lee, M. L., & Wallington, A. M. 2004. Varieties and directions of inter-domain influence in metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 19(1), 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, V. K. 2000. Genres in conflict. In A. Trosborg (Ed.), Analysing professional genres (147–162). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloomer, K., & Moore, Ch. (with a contribution by R. J. Yudell). 1977. Body, memory, and architecture. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Caballero, R. 2006. Re-viewing space. Figurative language in architects’ assessment of built space. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Manner-of-motion verbs in wine description. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 2095–2114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. form is motion. Dynamic predicates in English architectural discourse. In K.-U. Panther, L. L. Thornburg, & A. Barcelona (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (277–290). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. The role of metaphor in tennis reports and forums. Text & Talk, 32(6), 703–726. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. Language, space and body: Sensing and construing built space through metaphor. In J. Bamford, F. Poppi, & D. Mazzi (Eds.), Space, place and the discursive construction of identity (107–134). Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Caballero, R., & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. 2013. Ways of perceiving and thinking: Re-vindicating culture in conceptual metaphor research. Journal of Cognitive Semiotics, 5(1/2), 268–290.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. And yet they DON’T move. A genre approach to metaphorical motion. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Caballero, R., & Paradis, C. 2013. Perceptual landscapes from the perspective of cultures and genres. In R. Caballero, & J. E. Díaz-Vera (Eds.), Sensuous cognition. Explorations into human sentience: Imagination, (e)motion and perception (77–107). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caballero, R., & Suárez-Toste, E. 2010. A genre approach to imagery in winespeak. In G. Low, Z. Todd, A. Deignan, & L. Cameron (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor in the real world (265–287). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eggins, S. 1994. An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. [1985] 1994. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. 2008. Vision metaphors for the intellect: Are they really cross-linguistic? Atlantis, 30(1), 15–33.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., & Caballero, R. 2014. Una aproximación al estudio de los eventos de movimiento metafóricos desde la tipología semántica y el género. Anuari de Filologia. Estudis de Lingüística, 4, 139–155.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. 1987. The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. 2000. Metaphor and emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. 1989. More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. 1986. Abstract motion. Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 12, 455–471. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2000. Virtual reality. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 29, 77–103.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. 2005. The language of evaluation. Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R., Matthiessen, Ch., & Painter, C. 1997. Working with functional grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Matlock, T. 2004. The conceptual motivation of fictive motion. In G. Radden, & K.-U. Panther (Eds.), Studies in linguistic motivation (221–248). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Matlock, T., & Bergmann, T. 2015. Fictive Motion. In E. Dąbrowska, & D. Divjak (Eds.), Mouton handbook of cognitive linguistics (546–562). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Y. 1996. Subjective motion in English and Japanese verbs. Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 183–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morris, M. W., Sheldon, O. J., Ames, D. R., & Young, M. J. 2007. Metaphors and the market: Consequences and preconditions of agent and object metaphors in stock market commentary. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102, 174–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş. 2004. Typological variation in encoding the manner, path, and ground components of a metaphorical motion event. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 2, 73–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005. Metaphor meets typology: Ways of moving metaphorically in English and Turkish. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(1), 207–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş., & Stites, L. J.. 2013. Moving across metaphorical spaces over developmental time. In R. Caballero, & J. E. Díaz-Vera (Eds.), Sensuous cognition. Explorations into human sentience: Imagination, (e)motion and perception (221–249). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panther, K.-U., & Radden, G. (Eds.). 1999. Metonymy in language and thought. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L. L. (Eds.). 2003. Pragmatic inferencing in metonymy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, C. 2004. Where does metonymy stop? Senses, facets, and active zones. Metaphor and Symbol, 19(4), 245–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. Touchdowns in winespeak: Ontologies and construals in use and meaning-making. In M. Goded Rambaud, & A. Poves Luelmo (Eds.), Actas del primer congreso internacional sobre aproximaciones lingüísticas a la descripción de la comida y del vino (57–72). Madrid: UNED.Google Scholar
Paradis, C., & Eeg-Olofsson, M. 2013. Describing sensory experience: The genre of wine reviews. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(1), 22–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza-Ibáñez, F. J. 2000. The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads (109–132). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 1988. Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 12, 49–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996. Fictive motion in language and “ception”. In P. Bloom, M. F. Garrett, L. Nadel, & M. A. Peterson (Eds.), Language and space (211–276). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000. Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol I: Conceptual structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, G. 1996. Introducing functional grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Li, Longxing
2024. Review of Julich-Warpakowski (2022): Motion Metaphors in Music Criticism: An Empirical Investigation of Their Conceptual Motivation and Their Metaphoricity. Metaphor and the Social World DOI logo
Chen, Shujun & Lihuan Wu
2023. Variable motion encoding within Chinese: a usage-based perspective. Language and Cognition 15:3 ► pp. 480 ff. DOI logo
Yoshinari, Yuko
2022. Chapter 10. Motion expressions in Japanese wine-tasting descriptions. In The Language of Food in Japanese [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 25], ► pp. 294 ff. DOI logo
Cappelle, Bert
2020. Chapter 8. Looking into visual motion expressions in Dutch, English, and French. In Broader Perspectives on Motion Event Descriptions [Human Cognitive Processing, 69], ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
Moore, Kevin Ezra
2020. Moving Time vs. Frame-relative motion. Constructions and Frames 12:2 ► pp. 272 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Motion Metaphors in Music Criticism [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 10], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.