Chapter published in:
Motion and Space across Languages: Theory and applications
Edited by Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano
[Human Cognitive Processing 59] 2017
► pp. 229–254

Metaphorical motion constructions across specialized genres

| Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha
In this paper I discuss the metaphorical motivation of the figurative – fictive and metaphorical – motion constructions found in architecture, wine, and tennis texts as the preliminary step to argue for the need to adopt a discourse approach to exploring fictive motion in general. My main contention is that in order to explore this phenomenon particular attention needs to be paid to the topic(s) thus predicated, the users of the metaphors (bringing in the discourse communities they belong to), and the characteristics of the discourses and genre(s) where the expressions are used.
Keywords: metaphorical motion, genre, sensory data, image metaphor, conceptual metaphor, synaesthesia
Published online: 14 August 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.59.10cab
References

References

Barnden, J. A., Glasbey, S. R., Lee, M. L., & Wallington, A. M.
2004 Varieties and directions of inter-domain influence in metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 19(1), 1–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, V. K.
2000 Genres in conflict. In A. Trosborg (Ed.), Analysing professional genres (147–162). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bloomer, K., & Moore, Ch.
(with a contribution by R. J. Yudell) 1977 Body, memory, and architecture. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Caballero, R.
2006 Re-viewing space. Figurative language in architects’ assessment of built space. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 Manner-of-motion verbs in wine description. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 2095–2114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009  form is motion. Dynamic predicates in English architectural discourse. In K.-U. Panther, L. L. Thornburg, & A. Barcelona (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (277–290). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 The role of metaphor in tennis reports and forums. Text & Talk, 32(6), 703–726. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 Language, space and body: Sensing and construing built space through metaphor. In J. Bamford, F. Poppi, & D. Mazzi (Eds.), Space, place and the discursive construction of identity (107–134). Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Caballero, R., & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
2013 Ways of perceiving and thinking: Re-vindicating culture in conceptual metaphor research. Journal of Cognitive Semiotics, 5(1/2), 268–290.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. And yet they DON’T move. A genre approach to metaphorical motion. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Caballero, R., & Paradis, C.
2013 Perceptual landscapes from the perspective of cultures and genres. In R. Caballero, & J. E. Díaz-Vera (Eds.), Sensuous cognition. Explorations into human sentience: Imagination, (e)motion and perception (77–107). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caballero, R., & Suárez-Toste, E.
2010 A genre approach to imagery in winespeak. In G. Low, Z. Todd, A. Deignan, & L. Cameron (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor in the real world (265–287). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eggins, S.
1994 An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
[1985] 1994 An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
2008 Vision metaphors for the intellect: Are they really cross-linguistic? Atlantis, 30(1), 15–33.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., & Caballero, R.
2014 Una aproximación al estudio de los eventos de movimiento metafóricos desde la tipología semántica y el género. Anuari de Filologia. Estudis de Lingüística, 4, 139–155.Google Scholar
Johnson, M.
1987 The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
2000 Metaphor and emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
1987 Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M.
1989 More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
1986 Abstract motion. Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 12, 455–471. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1987 Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2000 Virtual reality. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 29, 77–103.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R.
2005 The language of evaluation. Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R., Matthiessen, Ch., & Painter, C.
1997 Working with functional grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Matlock, T.
2004 The conceptual motivation of fictive motion. In G. Radden, & K.-U. Panther (Eds.), Studies in linguistic motivation (221–248). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Matlock, T., & Bergmann, T.
2015 Fictive Motion. In E. Dąbrowska, & D. Divjak (Eds.), Mouton handbook of cognitive linguistics (546–562). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Y.
1996 Subjective motion in English and Japanese verbs. Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 183–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morris, M. W., Sheldon, O. J., Ames, D. R., & Young, M. J.
2007 Metaphors and the market: Consequences and preconditions of agent and object metaphors in stock market commentary. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102, 174–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş.
2004 Typological variation in encoding the manner, path, and ground components of a metaphorical motion event. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 2, 73–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 Metaphor meets typology: Ways of moving metaphorically in English and Turkish. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(1), 207–246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş., & Stites, L. J.
2013 Moving across metaphorical spaces over developmental time. In R. Caballero, & J. E. Díaz-Vera (Eds.), Sensuous cognition. Explorations into human sentience: Imagination, (e)motion and perception (221–249). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panther, K.-U., & Radden, G.
(Eds.) 1999 Metonymy in language and thought. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L. L.
(Eds.) 2003 Pragmatic inferencing in metonymy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, C.
2004 Where does metonymy stop? Senses, facets, and active zones. Metaphor and Symbol, 19(4), 245–264. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 Touchdowns in winespeak: Ontologies and construals in use and meaning-making. In M. Goded Rambaud, & A. Poves Luelmo (Eds.), Actas del primer congreso internacional sobre aproximaciones lingüísticas a la descripción de la comida y del vino (57–72). Madrid: UNED.Google Scholar
Paradis, C., & Eeg-Olofsson, M.
2013 Describing sensory experience: The genre of wine reviews. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(1), 22–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza-Ibáñez, F. J.
2000 The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads (109–132). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Talmy, L.
1988 Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 12, 49–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996 Fictive motion in language and “ception”. In P. Bloom, M. F. Garrett, L. Nadel, & M. A. Peterson (Eds.), Language and space (211–276). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000 Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol I: Conceptual structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, G.
1996 Introducing functional grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Cappelle, Bert
2020.  In Broader Perspectives on Motion Event Descriptions [Human Cognitive Processing, 69], ► pp. 235 ff. Crossref logo
Moore, Kevin Ezra
2020. Moving Time vs. Frame-relative motion. Constructions and Frames 12:2 ► pp. 272 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.