Chapter published in:
Motion and Space across Languages: Theory and applications
Edited by Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano
[Human Cognitive Processing 59] 2017
► pp. 301–328

Motion event contrasts in Romance languages

Deixis in Spanish as a second language

| University of East Anglia
This chapter explores language contrasts among Romance languages in the semantic domain of motion events. Romance languages are verb-framed languages in the typology of motion events by Talmy (1985, 2000). However, some intratypological differences have been observed among them, regarding the expression of certain components such as Path, Cause, and Deixis. The aim of this chapter is twofold. First, it discusses how these semantic contrasts have implications for the theoretical framework of the study of motion events. Second, it examines how these intratypological contrasts impact on the acquisition of a second language by speakers of a typologically-close and genetically-related language. This is illustrated with examples from Spanish as a second language by native speakers of French and Italian.
Keywords: caused-motion, Deixis, Path, Romance languages, second language acquisition
Published online: 14 August 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.59.13hij
References

References

Andersen, R.
1983 Transfer to somewhere. In S. Gass, & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning (177–201). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Aske, J.
1989 Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. Proceedings of the Fiftenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 15, 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berman, R. A., & Slobin, D. I.
(Eds.) 1994 Relating events in narrative. A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Berthele, R.
2006 Ort und Weg. Eine vergleichende Untersuchung der sprachlichen Raumreferenz in Varietäten des Deutschen, Rätoromanischen und Französischen. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Disentangling manner and path: Evidence from varieties of German and Romance. In J. Goschler, & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Variation and change in the encoding of motion events (55–76). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A., & Gullberg, M.
2008 Bidirectional crosslinguistic influence in L1–L2 encoding of manner in speech and gesture: A study of Japanese speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 225–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cadierno, T.
2004 Expressing motion events in a second language: A cognitive typological perspective. In M. Achard, & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching (13–49). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008a Learning to talk about motion in a foreign language. In P. Robinson, & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (239–275). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2008b Motion events in Danish and Spanish: A focus on form pedagogical approach. In S. De Knopp, & T. De Rycker (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar (239–275). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2013 Thinking for speaking in second language acquisition. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Crossref.Google Scholar
Cardini, F. E.
2008 Manner of motion saliency: An inquiry into Italian. Cognitive Linguistics, 19(4), 533–569. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cini, M.
(Ed.) 2008 I verbi sintagmatici in italiano e nelle varietà dialettali. Stato dell’arte e prospettive di ricerca. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Choi, S., & Lantolf, J. P.
2008 Representation and embodiment of meaning in L2 communication. Motion events in the speech and gesture of advanced L2 Korean and L2 English speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 191–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Czechowska, N., & Ewert, A.
2011 Perception of motion by Polish-English bilinguals. In V. Cook, & B. Bassetti (Eds.), Language and bilingual cognition (287–314). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Cadierno, T.
2009 Constructing a second language: Introduction to the special section. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 111–139. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, G., & Mosca, M.
2010 Some constructions of Path: from Italian to some classical languages. In G. Marotta, A. Lenci, L. Meini, & F. Rovai (Eds.), Space in language. Proceedings of the Pisa international conference (317–338). Pisa: ETS.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J.
1966 Deictic categories in the semantics of come . Foundations of Language, 2, 219–227.Google Scholar
Filipović, L.
2007 Talking about motion: A crosslinguistic investigation of lexicalization patterns. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Filipović, L., & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
2015 Motion. In E. Dąbrowska, & D. Divjak (Eds.), Mouton handbook of cognitive linguistics (527–545). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, V.
1977 Study of the comings and goings of the speakers of four languages: Spanish, Japanese, English, and Turkish. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, 2, 61–94.Google Scholar
1978 Towards a universal for deictic verbs of motion. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, 3, 72–88.Google Scholar
Goschler, J., & Stefanowitsch, A.
(Eds.) 2013 Variation and change in the encoding of motion events. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gullberg, M.
2009 Reconstructing verb meaning in a second language: How English speakers of L2 Dutch talk and gesture about placement. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 222–245. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Han, Z.-H., & Cadierno, T.
(Eds.) 2010 Linguistic relativity in SLA: Thinking for speaking. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Hijazo-Gascón, A.
2011 La expresión de eventos de movimiento y su adquisición en segundas lenguas. Ph.D. Dissertation, Universidad de Zaragoza.Google Scholar
2015 Acquisition of motion events in L2 Spanish by German, French, and Italian speakers. Language Learning Journal. Crossref.Google Scholar
Hijazo-Gascón, A., & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
2010 Tipología, lexicalización y dialectología aragonesa. Archivo de Filología Aragonesa, 66, 245–280.Google Scholar
2013a Las lenguas románicas y la tipología de los eventos de movimiento. Romanische Forschungen, 125(4), 465–494. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013b Same family, different Paths: Intratypological differences in three Romance languages. In J. Goschler, & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Variation and change in the encoding of motion events (39–54). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huang, S., & Tanangkingsing, M.
2005 Reference to motion events in six Western Austronesian languages: Toward a semantic typology. Oceanic Linguistics, 44(2), 307–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iacobini, C.
2009 The role of dialects in the emergence of Italian phrasal verbs. Morphology, 19(1), 15–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iacobini, C., & Masini, F.
2007a The emergence of verb-particle constructions in Italian: locative and actional meanings. Morphology, 16(2), 155–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007b Verb-particle constructions and prefixed verbs in Italian: Typology, diachrony and semantics. In G. Booij, E. Gevara, A. Ralli, S. Sgroi, & S. Scalise (Eds.), On-line proceedings of the fifth Mediterranean morphology meeting (MMM5) (Fréjus, 15–18 September 2005) (157–184). Bologna: Università degli Studi di Bologna.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
2004 Motion events in Basque narratives. In S. Strömqvist, & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (89–111). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2015 Going beyond motion events typology: The case of Basque as a verb-framed language. Folia Linguistica, 49(2), 307–352. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 Path salience in motion events. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, & Ş. Özçalışkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (403–414). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., & Hijazo-Gascón, A.
2012 Variation in motion events: Theory and applications. In L. Filipović, & K. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), Space and time across languages and cultures. Linguistic diversity (349–371). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A.
2008 Crosslinguistic influence in language and cogntion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kellerman, E.
1978 Transfer and non-transfer: where are we now? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2, 37–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995 Crosslinguistic influence: Transfer to nowhere? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 47–77.Google Scholar
Kopecka, A.
2004 Étude typologique de l’expression de l’espace: localisation et déplacement en français et en polonais. Ph.D. Dissertation, Université Lumière Lyon 2.Google Scholar
2006 The semantic structure of motion verbs in French: Typological perspectives. In M. Hickmann, & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (83–101). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 L’expression du déplacement en français: L’interaction des facteurs sémantiques, aspectuels et pragmatiques dans la construction du sens spatial. Langages, 173, 54–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lewandowski, W.
2014 Deictic verbs: Typology, thinking for speaking and SLA. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 27, 43–65.Google Scholar
Lewis, T. N.
2009 The role of motion event gestures in L2 development in a study abroad context. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
2012 The effect of context on the L2 thinking for speaking development of path gestures. L2 Journal, 4, 247–268.Google Scholar
Mosca, M.
2007 Spatial language in spoken Italian dialogues. A cognitive linguistics perspective. Ph.D. Dissertation, Università degli studi di Pisa.Google Scholar
2012 Italian motion constructions: Different functions of ‘particles’. In L. Filipović, & K. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), Space and time across languages and cultures. Linguistic diversity (373–393). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Negueruela, E., Lantolf, J., Rehn Jordan, S., & Gelabert, J.
2004 The ‘private function’ of gesture in second language speaking activity: A study of motion verbs and gesturing in English and Spanish. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14, 113–147. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Odlin, T.
1989 Language transfer: Crosslinguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pourcel, S., & Kopecka, A.
2005 Motion expression in French: Typological diversity. Durham and Newcastle Working Papers in Linguistics, 11, 139–153.Google Scholar
Ragnarsdóttir, H., & Strömqvist, S.
2004 Time, space and manner in Icelandic and Swedish. In S. Strömqvist, & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (113–141). Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Robinson, P., & Ellis, N. C.
(Eds.) 2008 Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schwarze, C.
1985 Uscire e andare fuori: struttura sintattica e semantica lessicale. In A. Franchi De Bellis, & L. M. Savoia (Eds.), Sintassi e morfologia della lingua italiana d’uso. Teoria ed applicazioni descrittive. SLI XXIV (355–371). Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Sebastián, E., & Slobin, D. I.
1994 Development of Spanish forms: Spanish. In R. A. Berman, & D. I. Slobin (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study (239–284). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I.
1991 Learning to think for speaking. Native language, cognition and rhetorical style. Pragmatics, 1, 7–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996a Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (195–220). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
1996b From “though and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In J. J. Gumperz, & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (70–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1997 Mind, code and text. In J. Bybee, J. Haiman, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Essays on language function and language type: Dedicated to T. Givón (437–467). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist, & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (219–357). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2005 Relating narrative events in translation. In D. Ravid, & B. Shyldkrot (Eds.), Perspectives on language and language development: Essays in honor of Ruth A. Berman (115–130). Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 What makes Manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse and cognition. In M. Hickmann, & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (59–82). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I., & Hoiting, N.
1994 Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: Typological considerations. Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 20, 487–503. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stam, G.
1998 Changes in patterns of thinking about motion with L2 acquisition. In S. Santi, Guaïtella, C. Cavé, & G. Konopczynski (Eds.), Oralité et gestualité: communication multimodale, interaction (616–620). Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
2010 Can a L2 speaker’s patterns of thinking for speaking change? In Z.-H. Han, & T. Cadierno (Eds.), Linguistic relativity in SLA: Thinking for speaking (59–83). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
2015 Changes in thinking for speaking: A longitudinal case study. The Modern Language Journal, 99, 83–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stolova, N. I.
2008 From satellite-framed Latin to verb-framed Romance. Late Latin as an intermediary stage. In R. Wright (Ed.), Latin vulgaire – latin tardif VIII. Actes du VIIIe colloque international sur le latin vulgaire et tardif. Oxford, 6–9 settembre 2006 (253–262). Zürich: Olms-Weidmann.Google Scholar
2015 Cognitive linguistics and lexical change. Motion verbs from Latin to Romance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Strömqvist, S., & Verhoeven, L.
(Eds.) 2004 Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Talmy, L.
1975 Semantics and syntax of motion. In J. P. Kimbal (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics 4 (181–238). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1985 Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (36–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1991 Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, 17, 480–519. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000 Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vicario, F.
1997 I verbi analitici in friulano. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Zlatev, J., & Yangklang, P.
2004 A third way to travel: The place of Thai in motion event typology. In S. Strömqvist, & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (159–190). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Colasacco, Marina Anna
2019. A cognitive approach to teaching deictic motion verbs to German and Italian students of Spanish . International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 57:1 ► pp. 71 ff. Crossref logo
Hijazo-Gascón, Alberto & Reyes Llopis-García
2019. Applied cognitive linguistics and foreign language learning. Introduction to the special issue . International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 57:1 ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 december 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.