Cover not available
Part of
Motion and Space across Languages: Theory and applications
Edited by Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano
[Human Cognitive Processing 59] 2017
► pp. 301–328

Chapter 11
Motion event contrasts in Romance languages

Deixis in Spanish as a second language

| University of East Anglia
This chapter explores language contrasts among Romance languages in the semantic domain of motion events. Romance languages are verb-framed languages in the typology of motion events by Talmy (1985, 2000). However, some intratypological differences have been observed among them, regarding the expression of certain components such as Path, Cause, and Deixis. The aim of this chapter is twofold. First, it discusses how these semantic contrasts have implications for the theoretical framework of the study of motion events. Second, it examines how these intratypological contrasts impact on the acquisition of a second language by speakers of a typologically-close and genetically-related language. This is illustrated with examples from Spanish as a second language by native speakers of French and Italian.
Keywords: caused-motion, Deixis, Path, Romance languages, second language acquisition
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Romance language contrasts in the domain of motion
    • 2.1Path description in French and Spanish
    • 2.2Path description in Italian
    • 2.3Deixis in Romance languages
    • 2.4Implications of these language contrasts for the theory
  • 3.Impact of intratypological variation among Romance languages on second language acquisition
    • 3.1Crosslinguistic influence
    • 3.2Re-thinking for speaking
    • 3.3Crosslinguistic influence among Romance languages
  • 4.Path in L2 Spanish by French and Italian native speakers
    • 4.1Plus-ground analysis
    • 4.2Plus-ground with more than one element
    • 4.3Caused-motion constructions
  • 5.Deixis in Spanish as a second language
    • 5.1Results: Quantitative analysis
    • 5.2Results: Qualitative analysis
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusions and further research
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 14 August 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.59.13hij
References (75)
References
Andersen, R. 1983. Transfer to somewhere. In S. Gass, & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning (177–201). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Aske, J. 1989. Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. Proceedings of the Fiftenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 15, 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, R. A., & Slobin, D. I. (Eds.). 1994. Relating events in narrative. A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Berthele, R. 2006. Ort und Weg. Eine vergleichende Untersuchung der sprachlichen Raumreferenz in Varietäten des Deutschen, Rätoromanischen und Französischen. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013. Disentangling manner and path: Evidence from varieties of German and Romance. In J. Goschler, & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Variation and change in the encoding of motion events (55–76). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, A., & Gullberg, M. 2008. Bidirectional crosslinguistic influence in L1–L2 encoding of manner in speech and gesture: A study of Japanese speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 225–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cadierno, T. 2004. Expressing motion events in a second language: A cognitive typological perspective. In M. Achard, & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching (13–49). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008a. Learning to talk about motion in a foreign language. In P. Robinson, & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (239–275). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2008b. Motion events in Danish and Spanish: A focus on form pedagogical approach. In S. De Knopp, & T. De Rycker (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar (239–275). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2013. Thinking for speaking in second language acquisition. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Cardini, F. E. 2008. Manner of motion saliency: An inquiry into Italian. Cognitive Linguistics, 19(4), 533–569. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cini, M. (Ed.). 2008. I verbi sintagmatici in italiano e nelle varietà dialettali. Stato dell’arte e prospettive di ricerca. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Choi, S., & Lantolf, J. P. 2008. Representation and embodiment of meaning in L2 communication. Motion events in the speech and gesture of advanced L2 Korean and L2 English speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 191–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Czechowska, N., & Ewert, A. 2011. Perception of motion by Polish-English bilinguals. In V. Cook, & B. Bassetti (Eds.), Language and bilingual cognition (287–314). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Cadierno, T. 2009. Constructing a second language: Introduction to the special section. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 111–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, G., & Mosca, M. 2010. Some constructions of Path: from Italian to some classical languages. In G. Marotta, A. Lenci, L. Meini, & F. Rovai (Eds.), Space in language. Proceedings of the Pisa international conference (317–338). Pisa: ETS.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. 1966. Deictic categories in the semantics of come . Foundations of Language, 2, 219–227.Google Scholar
Filipović, L., & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. 2015. Motion. In E. Dąbrowska, & D. Divjak (Eds.), Mouton handbook of cognitive linguistics (527–545). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, V. 1977. Study of the comings and goings of the speakers of four languages: Spanish, Japanese, English, and Turkish. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, 2, 61–94.Google Scholar
1978. Towards a universal for deictic verbs of motion. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, 3, 72–88.Google Scholar
Goschler, J., & Stefanowitsch, A. (Eds.). 2013. Variation and change in the encoding of motion events. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Han, Z.-H., & Cadierno, T. (Eds.). 2010. Linguistic relativity in SLA: Thinking for speaking. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Hijazo-Gascón, A. 2011. La expresión de eventos de movimiento y su adquisición en segundas lenguas. Ph.D. Dissertation, Universidad de Zaragoza.Google Scholar
2015. Acquisition of motion events in L2 Spanish by German, French, and Italian speakers. Language Learning Journal. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Hijazo-Gascón, A., & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. 2010. Tipología, lexicalización y dialectología aragonesa. Archivo de Filología Aragonesa, 66, 245–280.Google Scholar
2013a. Las lenguas románicas y la tipología de los eventos de movimiento. Romanische Forschungen, 125(4), 465–494. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013b. Same family, different Paths: Intratypological differences in three Romance languages. In J. Goschler, & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Variation and change in the encoding of motion events (39–54). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, S., & Tanangkingsing, M. 2005. Reference to motion events in six Western Austronesian languages: Toward a semantic typology. Oceanic Linguistics, 44(2), 307–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iacobini, C. 2009. The role of dialects in the emergence of Italian phrasal verbs. Morphology, 19(1), 15–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iacobini, C., & Masini, F. 2007a. The emergence of verb-particle constructions in Italian: locative and actional meanings. Morphology, 16(2), 155–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007b. Verb-particle constructions and prefixed verbs in Italian: Typology, diachrony and semantics. In G. Booij, E. Gevara, A. Ralli, S. Sgroi, & S. Scalise (Eds.), On-line proceedings of the fifth Mediterranean morphology meeting (MMM5) (Fréjus, 15–18 September 2005) (157–184). Bologna: Università degli Studi di Bologna.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. 2004. Motion events in Basque narratives. In S. Strömqvist, & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (89–111). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2015. Going beyond motion events typology: The case of Basque as a verb-framed language. Folia Linguistica, 49(2), 307–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. Path salience in motion events. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, & Ş. Özçalışkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (403–414). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., & Hijazo-Gascón, A. 2012. Variation in motion events: Theory and applications. In L. Filipović, & K. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), Space and time across languages and cultures. Linguistic diversity (349–371). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A. 2008. Crosslinguistic influence in language and cogntion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kellerman, E. 1978. Transfer and non-transfer: where are we now? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2, 37–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995. Crosslinguistic influence: Transfer to nowhere? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 47–77.Google Scholar
Kopecka, A. 2004. Étude typologique de l’expression de l’espace: localisation et déplacement en français et en polonais. Ph.D. Dissertation, Université Lumière Lyon 2.Google Scholar
2006. The semantic structure of motion verbs in French: Typological perspectives. In M. Hickmann, & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (83–101). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. L’expression du déplacement en français: L’interaction des facteurs sémantiques, aspectuels et pragmatiques dans la construction du sens spatial. Langages, 173, 54–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewandowski, W. 2014. Deictic verbs: Typology, thinking for speaking and SLA. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 27, 43–65.Google Scholar
Lewis, T. N. 2009. The role of motion event gestures in L2 development in a study abroad context. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
2012. The effect of context on the L2 thinking for speaking development of path gestures. L2 Journal, 4, 247–268.Google Scholar
Mosca, M. 2007. Spatial language in spoken Italian dialogues. A cognitive linguistics perspective. Ph.D. Dissertation, Università degli studi di Pisa.Google Scholar
2012. Italian motion constructions: Different functions of ‘particles’. In L. Filipović, & K. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), Space and time across languages and cultures. Linguistic diversity (373–393). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Negueruela, E., Lantolf, J., Rehn Jordan, S., & Gelabert, J. 2004. The ‘private function’ of gesture in second language speaking activity: A study of motion verbs and gesturing in English and Spanish. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14, 113–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Odlin, T. 1989. Language transfer: Crosslinguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pourcel, S., & Kopecka, A. 2005. Motion expression in French: Typological diversity. Durham and Newcastle Working Papers in Linguistics, 11, 139–153.Google Scholar
Ragnarsdóttir, H., & Strömqvist, S. 2004. Time, space and manner in Icelandic and Swedish. In S. Strömqvist, & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (113–141). Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Robinson, P., & Ellis, N. C. (Eds.). 2008. Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schwarze, C. 1985. Uscire e andare fuori: struttura sintattica e semantica lessicale. In A. Franchi De Bellis, & L. M. Savoia (Eds.), Sintassi e morfologia della lingua italiana d’uso. Teoria ed applicazioni descrittive. SLI XXIV (355–371). Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Sebastián, E., & Slobin, D. I. 1994. Development of Spanish forms: Spanish. In R. A. Berman, & D. I. Slobin (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study (239–284). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
1996a. Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (195–220). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
1996b. From “though and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In J. J. Gumperz, & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (70–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1997. Mind, code and text. In J. Bybee, J. Haiman, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Essays on language function and language type: Dedicated to T. Givón (437–467). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist, & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (219–357). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2005. Relating narrative events in translation. In D. Ravid, & B. Shyldkrot (Eds.), Perspectives on language and language development: Essays in honor of Ruth A. Berman (115–130). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. What makes Manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse and cognition. In M. Hickmann, & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (59–82). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I., & Hoiting, N. 1994. Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: Typological considerations. Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 20, 487–503. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stam, G. 1998. Changes in patterns of thinking about motion with L2 acquisition. In S. Santi, Guaïtella, C. Cavé, & G. Konopczynski (Eds.), Oralité et gestualité: communication multimodale, interaction (616–620). Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
2010. Can a L2 speaker’s patterns of thinking for speaking change? In Z.-H. Han, & T. Cadierno (Eds.), Linguistic relativity in SLA: Thinking for speaking (59–83). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
2015. Changes in thinking for speaking: A longitudinal case study. The Modern Language Journal, 99, 83–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stolova, N. I. 2008. From satellite-framed Latin to verb-framed Romance. Late Latin as an intermediary stage. In R. Wright (Ed.), Latin vulgaire – latin tardif VIII. Actes du VIIIe colloque international sur le latin vulgaire et tardif. Oxford, 6–9 settembre 2006 (253–262). Zürich: Olms-Weidmann.Google Scholar
2015. Cognitive linguistics and lexical change. Motion verbs from Latin to Romance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Strömqvist, S., & Verhoeven, L. (Eds.). 2004. Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 1975. Semantics and syntax of motion. In J. P. Kimbal (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics 4 (181–238). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (36–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1991. Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, 17, 480–519. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000. Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vicario, F. 1997. I verbi analitici in friulano. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Zlatev, J., & Yangklang, P. 2004. A third way to travel: The place of Thai in motion event typology. In S. Strömqvist, & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (159–190). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Vesnina, Nataliia
2024. Motion events in Swedish and French: a Holistic Spatial Semantics analysis. Language and Cognition ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Wiesinger, Evelyn
2023. Chapter 12. On the role of verb-particle constructions in Old Spanish. In Constructions in Spanish [Constructional Approaches to Language, 34], ► pp. 309 ff. DOI logo
Colasacco, Marina Anna
2019. A cognitive approach to teaching deictic motion verbs to German and Italian students of Spanish. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 57:1 ► pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Hijazo-Gascón, Alberto & Reyes Llopis-García
2019. Applied cognitive linguistics and foreign language learning. Introduction to the special issue. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 57:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.