Chapter published in:
Motion and Space across Languages: Theory and applications
Edited by Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano
[Human Cognitive Processing 59] 2017
► pp. 367398
References

References

Beavers, J., Levin, B., & Tham, S. W.
2010The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics, 46, 331–377. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berman, R. A., & Slobin, D. I.
1994Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Cifuentes-Férez, P., & Rojo, A.
2015Thinking for translating: A think-aloud protocol on the translation of manner of motion verbs. Target, 27(2), 273–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W., Barðdal, J., Hollmann, W., Sotirova, V., & Taoka, C.
2010Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. In H. C. Boas (Ed.), Contrastive studies in construction grammar (201–235). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fausey, C. M., & Boroditsky, L.
2010Subtle linguistic cues influence perceived blame and financial liability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 175, 644–650. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fausey, C., & Boroditsky, L.
2011Who dunnit? Cross-linguistic differences in eye-witness memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(1), 150–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feist, M. I., & Cifuentes-Férez, P.
2013Remembering how: language, memory and the salience of manner. Journal of Cognitive Science, 144, 379–398. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Filipović, L.
1999Language-specific expression of motion and its use in narrative texts. MPhil Dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
2007aTalking about motion: A crosslinguistic investigation of lexicalization patterns. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007bLanguage as a witness: Insights from cognitive linguistics. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 142, 245–267.Google Scholar
2010aThinking and speaking about motion: Universal vs. language‑ specific effects. In G. Marotta, A. Lenci, L. Meini, & F. Rovai (Eds.), Space in language. Proceedings of the Pisa international conference (235–248). Pisa: ETS.Google Scholar
2010bTypology meets witness narratives and memory: Theory and practice entwined in cognitive linguistics. In E. Tabakowska, M. Choinski, & L. Wiraszka (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics in action: Theory to application and back (269–291). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2011Speaking and remembering in one or two languages: Bilingual vs. monolingual lexicalization and memory for motion events. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15(4), 466–485. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013aConstructing causation in language and memory: implications for access to justice in multilingual interactions. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 20(1), 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013bTypology as a continuum: Intratypological evidence from English and Serbo-Croatian. In J. Goschler, & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Variation and change in the encoding of motion events (17–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Filipović, L., & Geva, S.
2012Language-specific effects on lexicalization and memory of motion events. In L. Filipović, & K. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), Space and time across languages and cultures. Language, culture and cognition (269–282). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Filipović, L., & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
2015Motion. In E. Dąbrowska, & D. Divjak (Eds.), Mouton handbook of cognitive linguistics (526–545). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gennari, S. P., Sloman, S. A., Malt, B. C., & Fitch, T.
2002Motion events in language and cognition. Cognition, 83, 49–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
2003What translation tells us about motion: A contrastive study of typologically different languages. International Journal of English Studies, 32, 153–178.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., & Filipović, L.
2013Lexicalisation patterns and translation. In A. Rojo, & I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics and translation: Advances in some theoretical models and applications (251–281). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malt, B. C., Sloman, S. A., & Gennari, S. P.
2003 Speaking versus thinking about objects and actions. In D. Gentner, & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind (81–111). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Molés-Cases, T.
2016La traducción de los eventos de movimiento en un corpus paralelo alemán-español de literatura infantil y juvenil. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, A., Massey, C., & Gleitman, L.
2002Shake, rattle, ‘n’ roll: the representations of motion in language and cognition. Cognition, 84, 189–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I.
1991Learning to think for speaking: Native language, cognition, and rhetorical style. Pragmatics, 1, 7–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996aFrom “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In J. J. Gumperz, & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (195–217). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1996bTwo ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (195–220). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I.
1997Mind, code, and text. In J. Bybee, J. Haiman, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Essays on language function and language type: Dedicated to T. Givón (437–467). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I.
2003Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In D. Gentner, & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the investigation of language and thought (157–191). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2004The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist, & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives in Translation (219–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2005Narrating events in translation. In D. Ravid, & H. B.-Z. Shyldkrot (Eds.), Perspectives on language and language development: Essays in honor of Ruth A. Berman (115–129). Dordrecht: Kluver. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006What makes manner of motion salient? In M. Hickmann, & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (59–82) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strömqvist, S., & Verhoeven, L.
(Eds.) 2004Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Talmy, L.
1985Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and lexical descriptions. Vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (36–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1991Path to realization: a typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistics Society, 17, 480–519. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000aToward a cognitive semantics. Vol. I: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000bToward a cognitive semantics. Vol. II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Trueswell, J., & Papafragou, A.
2010Perceiving and remembering events cross-linguistically: Evidence from dual-task paradigms. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 64–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trujillo, J.
2003The difference in resulting judgments when descriptions use high-manner versus neutral-manner verbs. Senior Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Hijazo-Gascón, Alberto
2019. Translating accurately or sounding natural?. Pragmatics and Society 10:1  pp. 72 ff. Crossref logo
Hijazo-Gascón, Alberto
2021.  In Police Interviews [Benjamins Current Topics, 118], Crossref logo
Molés-Cases, Teresa
2019. Why typology matters: a corpus-based study of explicitation and implicitation of Manner-of-motion in narrative texts. Perspectives 27:6  pp. 890 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 06 may 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.