Cover not available
Part of
Motion and Space across Languages: Theory and applications
Edited by Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano
[Human Cognitive Processing 59] 2017
► pp. 367–398

Chapter 13
On the reception of translations

Exploring the impact of typological differences on legal contexts

| Universidad de Murcia
| Universidad de Murcia
Three experiments are designed to test the effects that the loss of manner information may have on the translation of crime accounts. The first two experiments hypothesize that losing Manner in the Spanish translation of an English crime description will elicit a less severe judgment of the offense than that elicited by a translation that reproduces a higher degree of manner information. Results reveal significant differences between the two versions except for those cases that involve an extremely high degree of violence. The third experiment shifts the focus from reception to the product and process of translation, investigating what professional interpreters do when requested to interpret a crime account. General results from the three experiments suggest that manner information influences the audience’s judgments on the degree of criminal violence involved.
Keywords: degree of violence, Manner of motion, translation process, translation product
Article outline
  • 1.The impact of linguistic framing on language use and cognition
    • 1.1Effects of typological differences on translation: Slobin’s thinking for translating
    • 1.2Effects of linguistic framing on people’s memory and judgments
  • 2.Study 1
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Materials
    • 2.3Procedure
    • 2.4Results and discussion
  • 3.Study 2
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Materials and procedure
    • 3.3Results and discussion
  • 4.Study 3
    • 4.1Participants
    • 4.2Materials and procedure
    • 4.3Results and discussion
  • 5.General conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 14 August 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.59.15roj
References (38)
References
Beavers, J., Levin, B., & Tham, S. W. 2010. The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics, 46, 331–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, R. A., & Slobin, D. I. 1994. Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Cifuentes-Férez, P., & Rojo, A. 2015. Thinking for translating: A think-aloud protocol on the translation of manner of motion verbs. Target, 27(2), 273–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W., Barðdal, J., Hollmann, W., Sotirova, V., & Taoka, C. 2010. Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. In H. C. Boas (Ed.), Contrastive studies in construction grammar (201–235). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fausey, C. M., & Boroditsky, L. 2010. Subtle linguistic cues influence perceived blame and financial liability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 175, 644–650. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fausey, C., & Boroditsky, L. 2011. Who dunnit? Cross-linguistic differences in eye-witness memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(1), 150–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feist, M. I., & Cifuentes-Férez, P. 2013. Remembering how: language, memory and the salience of manner. Journal of Cognitive Science, 144, 379–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filipović, L. 1999. Language-specific expression of motion and its use in narrative texts. MPhil Dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
2007b. Language as a witness: Insights from cognitive linguistics. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 142, 245–267.Google Scholar
2010a. Thinking and speaking about motion: Universal vs. language‑ specific effects. In G. Marotta, A. Lenci, L. Meini, & F. Rovai (Eds.), Space in language. Proceedings of the Pisa international conference (235–248). Pisa: ETS.Google Scholar
2010b. Typology meets witness narratives and memory: Theory and practice entwined in cognitive linguistics. In E. Tabakowska, M. Choinski, & L. Wiraszka (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics in action: Theory to application and back (269–291). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2011. Speaking and remembering in one or two languages: Bilingual vs. monolingual lexicalization and memory for motion events. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15(4), 466–485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013a. Constructing causation in language and memory: implications for access to justice in multilingual interactions. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 20(1), 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013b. Typology as a continuum: Intratypological evidence from English and Serbo-Croatian. In J. Goschler, & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Variation and change in the encoding of motion events (17–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filipović, L., & Geva, S. 2012. Language-specific effects on lexicalization and memory of motion events. In L. Filipović, & K. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), Space and time across languages and cultures. Language, culture and cognition (269–282). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filipović, L., & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. 2015. Motion. In E. Dąbrowska, & D. Divjak (Eds.), Mouton handbook of cognitive linguistics (526–545). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gennari, S. P., Sloman, S. A., Malt, B. C., & Fitch, T. 2002. Motion events in language and cognition. Cognition, 83, 49–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. 2003. What translation tells us about motion: A contrastive study of typologically different languages. International Journal of English Studies, 32, 153–178.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., & Filipović, L. 2013. Lexicalisation patterns and translation. In A. Rojo, & I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics and translation: Advances in some theoretical models and applications (251–281). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malt, B. C., Sloman, S. A., & Gennari, S. P. 2003 Speaking versus thinking about objects and actions. In D. Gentner, & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind (81–111). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Molés-Cases, T. 2016. La traducción de los eventos de movimiento en un corpus paralelo alemán-español de literatura infantil y juvenil. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, A., Massey, C., & Gleitman, L. 2002. Shake, rattle, ‘n’ roll: the representations of motion in language and cognition. Cognition, 84, 189–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996a. From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In J. J. Gumperz, & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (195–217). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1996b. Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (195–220). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. 1997. Mind, code, and text. In J. Bybee, J. Haiman, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Essays on language function and language type: Dedicated to T. Givón (437–467). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I. 2003. Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In D. Gentner, & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the investigation of language and thought (157–191). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2004. The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist, & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives in Translation (219–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2005. Narrating events in translation. In D. Ravid, & H. B.-Z. Shyldkrot (Eds.), Perspectives on language and language development: Essays in honor of Ruth A. Berman (115–129). Dordrecht: Kluver. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. What makes manner of motion salient? In M. Hickmann, & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (59–82) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strömqvist, S., & Verhoeven, L. (Eds.). 2004. Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and lexical descriptions. Vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (36–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1991. Path to realization: a typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistics Society, 17, 480–519. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000a. Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. I: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000b. Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Trueswell, J., & Papafragou, A. 2010. Perceiving and remembering events cross-linguistically: Evidence from dual-task paradigms. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 64–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trujillo, J. 2003. The difference in resulting judgments when descriptions use high-manner versus neutral-manner verbs. Senior Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Lewandowski, Wojciech & Şeyda Özçalışkan
2024.  Translating Motion Events Across Physical and Metaphorical Spaces in Structurally Similar Versus Structurally Different Languages . Metaphor and Symbol 39:1 ► pp. 10 ff. DOI logo
Tosun, Sümeyra & Luna Filipović
2022. Lost in translation, apparently: Bilingual language processing of evidentiality in a Turkish–English Translation and judgment task. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 25:5 ► pp. 739 ff. DOI logo
Hijazo-Gascón, Alberto
2019. Translating accurately or sounding natural?. Pragmatics and Society 10:1 ► pp. 72 ff. DOI logo
Hijazo-Gascón, Alberto
2021. Translating accurately or sounding natural?. In Police Interviews [Benjamins Current Topics, 118], ► pp. 73 ff. DOI logo
Molés-Cases, Teresa
2019. Why typology matters: a corpus-based study of explicitation and implicitation of Manner-of-motion in narrative texts. Perspectives 27:6 ► pp. 890 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.