Chapter published in:
Motion and Space across Languages: Theory and applications
Edited by Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano
[Human Cognitive Processing 59] 2017
► pp. 419446
References

References

Aske, J.
1989Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 15, 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, R.
2006Bosnian Croatian Serbian: A grammar with sociolinguistic commentary. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Beavers, J., Levin, B., & Tham, S. W.
2010The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics, 46, 331–377. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berman, R. A., & Slobin, D. I.
1994Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Berthele, R.
2006Ort und Weg: Die sprachliche Raumreferenz in Varietäten des Deutschen, Rätoromanischen und Französischen. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009The many ways to search for a frog story: On a fieldworker’s troubles collecting spatial language data. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, & Ş. Özçalışkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (162–174). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Brucale, L.
2011Manner of motion verbs in Latin. Paper presented at the conference Historical-Comparative Linguistics in the 21st Century. Humboldt-Kolleg, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy, 22–25 September 2011.
Cardini, F. E.
2008Manner of motion saliency: an inquiry into Italian. Cognitive Linguistics, 19, 533–570. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, M., Weimar, K., Flecken, M., Lambert, M., & von Stutterheim, C.
2012Tracing trajectories: Motion event construal by advanced L2 French-English and L2 French-German speakers. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 3, 202–230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, J.
2008The acquisition of verb compounding in Mandarin Chinese. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Chen, L., & Guo, J.
2009Motion events in Chinese novels: Evidence for an equipollently-framed language. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1749–1766. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fanego, T.
2012Motion events in English: The emergence and diachrony of manner salience from Old English to Late Modern English. Folia Linguistica Historica, 33, 29–85.Google Scholar
Filipović, L.
2007Talking about motion: A crosslinguistic investigation of lexicalization patterns. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flecken, M., von Stutterheim, C., & Carroll, M.
2014Grammatical aspect influences motion event perception: Findings from a cross-linguistic non-verbal recognition task. Language and Cognition, 6, 45–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goschler, J., & Stefanowitsch, A.
(Eds.) 2013Variation and change in the encoding of motion events. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hottenroth, P.-M.
1985Die italienischen Ortsadverbien. In C. Schwarze (Ed.), Bausteine für eine italienische Grammatik. Vol. 2 (385–462). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Iacobini, C., & Masini, F.
2006The emergence of verb–particle constructions in Italian: Locative and actional meanings. Morphology, 16: 155–188.Google Scholar
2007Verb-particle constructions and prefixed verbs in Italian: Typology, diachrony and semantics. In G. Booij, L. Ducceschi, B. Fradin, E. Guevara, A. Ralli, & S. Scalise (Eds.), On-line proceedings of the fifth Mediterranean morphology meeting (157–184). Bologna: Università degli studi di Bologna.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
2006Sound symbolism and motion in Basque. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
2009Path salience in motion events. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, & Ş. Özçalışkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (403–414). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Jovanović, J., & Martinović-Zić, A.
2004Why manner matters: Contrasting English and Serbo-Croatian typology in motion description. In C. L. Moder, & A. Martinović-Zić (Eds.), Discourse across languages and cultures (210–226). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kopecka, A.
2006The semantic structure of motion verbs in French: Typological perspectives. In M. Hickmann, & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (83–101). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, J.
1981Die Übernahme der deutschen und der niederländischen Konstruktion Verb + Verbzusatz durch die Nachbarsprachen. In W. Meid, & K. Heller (Eds.), Sprachkontakt als Ursache von Veränderungen der Sprach‑ und Bewusstseinsstruktur: Eine Sammlung von Studien zur sprachlichen Interferenz (129–140). Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Lamarre, C.
2007The linguistic encoding of motion events in Chinese: with reference to cross-dialectal variation. In Ch. Lamarre, & T. Ohori (Eds.), Typological studies of the linguistic expressions of motion events. Vol. 1: Perspectives from South and Southeast Asia (3–33). Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C., Meira, S.
The Language and Cognition Group. 2003. ‘Natural concepts’ in the spatial topological domain – adpositional meanings in crosslinguistic perspective: An exercise in semantic typology. Language, 79, 485–516. Crossref
Majid, A., Boster, J. S., & Bowerman, M.
2008The cross-linguistic categorization of everyday events: A study of cutting and breaking. Cognition, 109, 235–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malt, B. C., Gennari, S., Imai, M., Ameel, E., Tsuda, N., & Majid, A.
2008Talking about walking: Biomechanics and the language of locomotion. Psychological Science, 19, 232–240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Y.
2003Typologies of lexicalization patterns and event integration: Clarifications and reformulations. In S. Chiba et al. (Eds.), Empirical and theoretical investigations into language: A Festschrift for Masaru Kajita (403–418). Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Mayer, M.
1969Frog, where are you? New York: Dial Press.Google Scholar
Oh, K.-J.
2009Motion events in English and Korean fictional writings and translations. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, & Ş. Özçalışkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (253–262). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Schwarze, C.
1985“Uscire” e “andare fuori”: struttura sintattica e semantica lessicale. In A. Franchi de Bellis, & L. M. Savola (Eds.), Sintassi e morfologia della lingua italiana d’uso: Theorie e aplicazioni descrittive (355–371). Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I.
1996aFrom “thought and language” to “thinking to speaking”. In J. J. Gumperz, & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (70–96.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1996bTwo ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (195–220). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
1997Mind, code, and text. In J. Bybee, J. Haiman, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Essays on language function and language type: Dedicated to T. Givón (437–467). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In D. Gentner, & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the investigation of language and thought (157–191). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2004The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist, & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (219–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2005Relating events in translation. In D. Ravid, & H. B.-Z. Shyldkrot (Eds.), Perspectives on language and language development: Essays in honor of Ruth A. Berman (115–129). Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. In M. Hickmann, & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (59–81). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008From S-language and V-language to PIN and PIV. Paper presented at the workshop Human Locomotion across Languages. Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 6 June 2008.
Slobin, D. I., & Hoiting, N.
1994Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: Typological considerations. Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 20, 487–505. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I., Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., Kopecka, A., & Majid, A.
2014Manners of human gait: A crosslinguistic event-naming study. Cognitive Linguistics, 25, 701–741. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Snell-Hornby, M.
1983Verb-descriptivity in German and English. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
von Stutterheim, C., Andermann, M., Carroll, M., Flecken, M., & Schmiedtová, B.
2012 . How grammaticized concepts shape event conceptualization in language production: insights from linguistic analysis, eye tracking data, and memory performance. Linguistics, 50, 833–867. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L.
1985Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and lexical description. Vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (36–149). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1991Path to realization. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 17, 480–519. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2009Main verb properties and equipollent framing. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, & Ş. Özçalışkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (389–402). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Troberg, M., & Burnett, H.
2011Resultative secondary predication in medieval French and the satellite-framed/verb-framed distinction. Paper presented at the Workshop on Verbal Elasticity: Framing the Verb/satellite Distinction from a Biolinguistic Perspective. Centre de Lingüística Teòrica, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 3–5 October 2011.
Verkerk, A.
2013Scramble, scurry and dash: The correlation between motion event encoding and manner verb lexicon size in Indo-European. Language Dynamics and Change, 3, 169–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Where do all the motion verbs come from? The speed of development of manner verbs and path verbs in Indo-European. Diachronica, 32, 69–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vidaković, I.
2006Second language acquisition of dynamic spatial relations. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Voeltz, F. K. E., & Kilian-Hatz, C.
(Eds.) 2001Ideophones. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, D.
2004The verbalization of motion events in Arrernte. In S. Strömqvist, & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (144–157). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Wood, R. E.
1972Dutch syntactic loans in Papiamentu. Revue des langues vivantes / Tijdschrift voor levende talen, 38, 635–647.Google Scholar
Yiu, C. Y.-M.
2014The typology of motion events: An empirical study of Chinese dialects. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Zlatev, J., & Yangklang, P.
2004A third way to travel: The place of Thai and serial verb languages in motion event typology. In S. Strömqvist, & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (159–190). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Fanego, Teresa
2020. On the History of the English Progressive Construction Jane came whistling down the street. Journal of English Linguistics 48:4  pp. 319 ff. Crossref logo
Matsumoto, Yo & Kazuhiro Kawachi
2020.  In Broader Perspectives on Motion Event Descriptions [Human Cognitive Processing, 69],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Soroli, Efstathia, Maya Hickmann & Henriëtte Hendriks
2019.  In The Semantics of Dynamic Space in French [Human Cognitive Processing, 66],  pp. 250 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.