Chapter published in:Conceptual Metonymy: Methodological, theoretical, and descriptive issues
Edited by Olga Blanco-Carrión, Antonio Barcelona and Rossella Pannain
[Human Cognitive Processing 60] 2018
► pp. 55–74
Conventionality and linguistic domain(s) involved in the characterization of metonymies (for the creation of a detailed typology of metonymy)
This is the second of three chapters devoted to the presentation of a set of criteria included in a database resulting from a project on the characterization of conceptual metonymy. It discusses Fields 5 and 7 of the database entry model, concerning conventionality, either conceptual or conceptual and linguistic, and the linguistic levels where metonymies operate (grammatical rank, meaning, form, grammatical process, and function).
Keywords: database entry model, descriptive criteria, form, function, grammatical process, grammatical rank
Published online: 17 May 2018
in preparation). On the pervasive role of metonymy in constructional meaning and structure in discourse comprehension: An empirical study from a cognitive linguistic perspective. (Provisional title). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dirven, R., & Verspoor, M. H.
Fillmore, C. J.
1990a Epistemic stance and grammatical form in English conditional sentences. Papers from Twenty-Six Regional Meeting of the Chicago Lingusitics Society, 137–162. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kövecses, Z., & Radden, G.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
Mann, W.C., & Thompson, S.A.
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L.
Panther, K.-U. & Thornburg, L.
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Mairal, R.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Pérez Hernández, L.
Merriam Webster online dictionary.
Oxford English Dictionary
second edition on CD-Rom (OED).
Cited by other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.