Chapter published in:
Conceptual Metonymy: Methodological, theoretical, and descriptive issues
Edited by Olga Blanco-Carrión, Antonio Barcelona and Rossella Pannain
[Human Cognitive Processing 60] 2018
► pp. 185204
References

References

Akatsuka, N.
2002Negative conditionality, subjectivisation and conditional reasoning. In A. Athanasiadou & R. Dirven (Eds.), On conditionals again (325–354). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Baicchi, A.
2011Metaphoric motivation in grammatical structure: The caused motion construction from the perspective of the Lexical-Constructional Model. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Motivation in grammar and the lexicon (149–169). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barcelona, A.
2005The multilevel operation of metonymy in grammar and discourse, with particular attention to metonymic chains with particular attention to metonymic chains. In F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza & S. Peña Cervel (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction (313–352). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Berk, L.
1999English syntax: From word to discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D.
1990Language and species. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bierwiaczonek, B.
2007On formal metonymy. In K. Kosecki (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference ‘Perspectives on Metonymy’ held in Lódź, Poland, May 6–7 2005 (43–67). Frankfurt am Mein: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2011Raising constructions and their metonymic offspring. In B. Bierwiaczonek, B. Cetnarowska, & A. Turula (Eds), Syntax in cognitive grammar (245–257). Częstochowa: Wydawnictwo Wyższej Szkoły Lingwistycznej.Google Scholar
2013aMetonymy in language, thought and brain. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
2013bOn dependent and autonomous constructions in grammar. In K. Papaja & A. Rojczyk (Eds.), Continuity and change in the English language and culture (9–26). Katowice: Wydawnictwo Wyższej Szkoły Zarządzania Ochroną Pracy w Katowicach.Google Scholar
2014On constructivization – a few remarks on the role of metonymy in grammar. In K. Rudnicka-Szozda & A. Szwedek (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics in the making (5–20). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2016An Introductory English Grammar in Constructions. Częstochowa: Wydawnictwo Akademii im. J. Długosza.Google Scholar
Brdar-Szabó, R.
2007The role of metonymy in motivating cross-linguistic differences in the exploitation of stand-alone conditionals in indirect directives. In K. Kosecki (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference ‘Perspectives on Metonymy’ held in Lódź, Poland, May 6–7 2005 (175–197). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Brdar, M., & Brdar-Szabó, R.
2013Some reflections on metonymy and word-formation. Explorations in English Language and Linguistics 1(1), 40–62.Google Scholar
Culicover, P., & Jackendoff, R.
2005Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E.
2005Mental spaces in grammar. Conditional constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, N.
2007Insubordination andits uses. In Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations (366–431). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Ch.
1990Epistemic stance and grammatical form in conditional sentences. CLS, 26, (137–162). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
2013Berkeley Construction Grammar. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar (111–132). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A.
1995Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. [Cognitive Theory of Language and Culture]. Chicago & London: The University Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2006Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hilpert, M.
2014Construction Grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Huddleston, R. A., & Pullum, G. K.
2002The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
2002Foundations of language. Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, G., & Svartvik, J.
2002A communicative grammar of English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Panther, K.-U., & Radden, G.
2011Introduction: Reflections on motivation revisited. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Motivation in grammar and the lexicon (1–26). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L.
2003Metonymies as natural inference and activation schemas: the case of dependent clauses as independent speech acts. In K.-U. Panther & L. Thornburg (Eds.), Metonymy in pragmatic inferencing (127–147). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L. L.
2011Emotion and desire in independent complement clauses. In M. Brdar, S. Gries, & M. Žic Fuchs (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics. Convergence and expansion (87–114). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L. L. & Barcelona, A.
(Eds.) 2011Metonymy and metaphor in grammar. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J.
1972A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1985A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z.
1999Towards a theory of metonymy. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (17–59). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radden, G., & Panther, K.-U.
(Eds), 2004Studies in linguistic motivation. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ruppenhofer, J., & Michaelis, L.
2010A constructional account of argument omissions. Constructions and frames 2(2), 158–184. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, K.
2013Frames and constructions in metaphoric language. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swan, M.
1995Practical English usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sweetser, E.
1990From etymology to pragmatics. Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 54]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J.
2002Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, E., & Trousdale, G.
2013Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vince, M.
1994Advanced language practice. Oxford: MacMillan Neinemann English Language Teaching.Google Scholar