Part of
Conceptual Metonymy: Methodological, theoretical, and descriptive issues
Edited by Olga Blanco-Carrión, Antonio Barcelona and Rossella Pannain
[Human Cognitive Processing 60] 2018
► pp. 261286
Barcelona, A.
2008The interaction of metonymy and metaphor in the meaning and form of ‘bahuvrihi’ compounds. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 6, 208–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, L.
2008Exocentric compounds. Morphology, 18, 51–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010The typology of exocentric compounding. In S. Scalise & I. Vogel (Eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding (167–176). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, L., Lieber, R., & Plag, I.
2013The Oxford reference guide to English morphology. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benczes, R.
2013On the non-viability of the endocentric-exocentric distinction: Evidence from linguistic creativity. Explorations in English Language and Linguistics 1(1), 3–18.Google Scholar
Brugmann, K.
1889GrundiΒ der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen II. Strassburg, 2nd edn.Google Scholar
Coseriu, E.
1977Inhaltliche Wortbildungslehre (am Beispiel des Typs coupe-papier). In H. E. Brekle & D. Kastovsky (Eds.), Perspektiven der Wortbildungsforschung (46–61). Bonn: Grundmann.Google Scholar
Damaso, J., & Cotter, C. Online dictionaries as emerging archives of contemporary usage and collaborative lexicography. English Today 90 23(2), 19–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, M.
1990–2012The corpus of contemporary American English: 425 million words, 1990-present. Available online at [URL].
Dressler, W. U.
2006Compound types. In G. Libben, & G. Jarema (Eds.), The representation and processing of compound words (23–44). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guevara, E., & Scalise, S.
2009Searching for universals in compounding. In S. Scalise, E. Magni, & A. Bisetto (Eds.), Universals in language today (101–128). Dordrecht: Springer DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M.
2002Understanding Morphology. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K.
(Eds.), 2002The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, O.
1909–1949A modern English grammar on historical principles I–VII. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Killingley, S. Y., & Killingley, D.
1995Sanskrit. München and Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume I: Theoretical prerequisites. Standford CA: Standford University Press.Google Scholar
Libben, G., Gibson, M., Bom Yoon, Y., & Sandra, D.
2003Compound fracture: the role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness. Brain and Language, 84, 50–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, J.
2015Metonymy: Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marchand, H.
1969The categories and types of present day English word formation. München: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Panther, K.-U., Thornburg, L. L., & ‎Barcelona, A.
2009Metonymy and metaphor in grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petersen, W.
1914–1915Der Ursprung der Exozentrika. IF 34: 254–285.Google Scholar
Plag, I.
2003Word-formation in English. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Portero-Muñoz, C.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J.
1985A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Radden, G.
2005The ubiquity of metonymy. In J. L. Otal Campo, I. Navarro i Ferrando, & B. Bellés Fortuño (Eds.), Cognitive and discourse approaches to metaphor and metonymy (11–28). Castelló (Spain): Universitat Jaume I.Google Scholar
Ryder, M. E.
1994Ordered chaos: The interpretation of English noun-noun compounds. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Scalise, S., & Guevara, E.
2006Exocentric compounding in a typological framework. Lingue e Linguaggio, 2, 185–206.Google Scholar
Smith, Rachel E.
2011Urban dictionary: youth slanguage and the redefining of definition. English Today, 27, 43–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar