This chapter argues for a view of evidentials as a type of shifter and outlines a theory of reference for evidentials that separates the configuration of the ground from the relational axis, and the alignment between ground and figure. The chapter also evaluates a proposal by Kockelman (2004) that draws on Jakobson’s notion of “event type” and Goffman’s “speaker roles” to suggest an existing analogy between “commitment events” for modals and “source events” for evidentials. The scope properties of ‘factual’ forms in both systems notably constitute a formal difference between (epistemic) modality and evidentiality that cannot be accounted for solely by the referential properties of evidentials.
Aikhenvald, A. Y.2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, S. R., & Keenan, E. L.1985. Deixis. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic fieldwork vol. 3 (259–308). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Aikhenvald, A., & Dixon, R. M. W. (Eds.) 2003. Studies in evidentiality. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Aikhenvald, A., & Dixon, R. M. W. (Eds.) 2013. The grammar of knowledge: a cross-linguistic typology [Explorations in Linguistic Typology 7]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bendix, E. H.1992. The grammaticalization of responsibility and evidence: Interactional potential of evidential categories in Newari. In J. H. Hill & J. T. Irvine (Eds.), Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse (226–247). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bickel, B., & Nichols J.2007. Inflectional Morphology. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: vol. 3 grammatical categories and the lexicon (169–240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boye, K.2012. Epistemic meaning: A crosslinguistic and functional cognitive study. [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 43]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Comrie, Bernard. 1985. Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Creissels, D.2008. Person variation in Akhvakh verb morphology: functional motivation and origin of an uncommon pattern. STUF, 61(4), 309–325.
Creissels, D.2009. Language documentation and verb inflection typology: the case of Northern Akhvakh (Nakh-Daghestanian). Handout at Chronos 9, October 2–4, Paris.
Curnow, T. J.2002. Types of interaction between evidentials and first person subjects. Anthropological Linguistics, 44(2), 178–196.
Du Bois, John W.1986. Self-Evidence and Ritual Speech. Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, Ed. by Wallace L. Chafe and Johanna Nichols, 313–336. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Eberhard, D.2009. Mamaindê grammar: A northern Nambikwara language and its cultural context. 2 volumes. Utrecht: LOT Publications.
Floyd, S., Norcliffe, N., & San Roque, L. (Eds.) 2017. Egophoricity. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Faller, M.2002. Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
Goffman, E.1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Hanks, W. F.1990. Referential practice: Language and lived space among the Maya. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hanks, W. F.2009. Fieldwork on deixis. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(1), 10–24.
Hale, A.1980. Person markers: Finite conjunct and disjunct forms in Newari. In Trail R. (Ed.), Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistics 7 (95–106). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Hargreaves, D.2005. Agency and intentional action in Kathmandu Newar. Himalayan Linguistics, 5, 1–48.
Hengeveld, K., & Dall’Aglio Hattnher, M. M.2015. “Four types of evidentiality in the native languages of Brazil. Linguistics, 53(3), 479–524.
Jacobsen, W. H.1986. The heterogeneity of evidentials in Makah. In W. Chafe, & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic encoding of epistemology (3–28). Norwood: Ablex.
Jakobson, R.1957. Shifters and verbal categories. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Dept. of Slavic Languages and Literatures. Reprinted in L. R. Waugh & M. Monville-Burston (Eds.), [1990] On language (386–392). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jespersen, Otto. 1922. Language; its nature, development, and origin, London: Geroge Allen & Unwin Ltd.
Klein, Wolfgang. 1994. Time in language. London: Routledge.
Kockelman, P.2004. Stance and subjectivity. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14, 127–150.
Kockelman, P.2008. Review of “Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives”. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 22(2), E105–E118.
Kockelman, P.2010. Language, culture, and mind: Natural constructions and social kinds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Landaburu, J.1992. La langue ika ou Arhuaco: Morphosyntaxe du verbe. Amerindia, 17, 1–30.
Landaburu, J.2000. La lengua ika. In M. S. Gonzales de Peréz, & M. L. Rodrigues de Montes (Eds.), Lenguas indígenas de Colombia: Una visión descriptíva (733–748). Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.
Loughnane, R.2010. A Grammar of Oksapmin. PhD thesis. University of Melbourne.
Lyons, J.1977. Semantics vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mithun, M.1999. The Languages of Native North America (Cambridge Language Surveys). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oswalt R. L.1986. The evidential system of Kashaya. In W. Chafe, & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: the linguistic coding of epistemology (29–45). Norwood N.J.: Ablex.
Ramirez, H.1997. A fala Tukano dos Ye’pâ-Masa, vol. 1: Gramática. Manaus: Inspetoria Salesiana Missionária da Amazônia & Centro “Iauareté” de Documentação Etnográfica e Missionária.
Reichenbach, H.1947. Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: Macmillan & Co.
Rule, W. M.1977. A comparative study of the Foe, Huli, and Pole languages of Papua New Guinea, [Oceania Linguistic Monographs 20]. Sydney: University of Sydney.
San Roque, L.2008. An introduction to Duna grammar. Canberra: The Australian National University dissertation.
San Roque, L., & Loughnane, R.2012. Evidentiality in Highland New Guinea. Linguistic Typology 16, 111–167.
Traugott, E. C.2006. Historical aspects of modality. In W. Frawley, (Ed.), The Expression of Modality (107–139). Mouton de Gruyter.
2019. Explorations of Engagement: Introduction. Open Linguistics 5:1 ► pp. 650 ff.
San Roque, Lila
2019. Evidentiality. Annual Review of Anthropology 48:1 ► pp. 353 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.