Chapter published in:
Evidence for Evidentiality
Edited by Ad Foolen, Helen de Hoop and Gijs Mulder
[Human Cognitive Processing 61] 2018
► pp. 4575
References

References

Aikhenvald, A.
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Binnick, R.
1979Past and perfect in Modern Mongolian. In H. Schwarz (Ed.), Studies on Mongolia – Proceedings of the first North American conference on Mongolian studies, (pp. 1–13). Washington: Western Washington University, Center for East Asian studies.Google Scholar
1990On the pragmatic differentiation of the Mongolian past tenses. Mongolian Studies, XIII, 47–56.Google Scholar
2012The past tenses of the Mongolian verb. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Boye, K.
2012Epistemic meaning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brosig, B.
2009Depictives and resultatives in modern Khalkh Mongolian. Hokkaidō gengo bunka kenkyū, 7, 71–101.Google Scholar
2012“Bilee” sul ügiin utga, hereglee [The meaning and usage of the particle “bile”]. Hel zohiol sudlal, V(37), 10–18.Google Scholar
2013aReview of SHIBAGAKI, Ryosuke. 2013. Analyzing secondary predication in East Asian languages. http://​linguistlist​.org​/issues​/24​/24​-4359​.html.Google Scholar
2013bReview of BINNICK, Robert. The past tenses of the Mongolian verb. Linguistics, 51(1), 231–241.Google Scholar
2014aThe aspect-evidentiality system of Middle Mongol. Ural-Altaic Studies, 13(2), 7–38.Google Scholar
2014bThe tense-aspect system of Khorchin Mongolian. In P. Suihkonen & L. Whaley (Eds.), Typology of languages of Europe and Northern and Central Asia (3–65). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
2015Aspect and related notions in the present tense system of Khalkha Mongolian. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana XI(3), 46–127.Google Scholar
Byambasan, P., Önörbayan, C., Pürev-Ochir, B., Sanjaa, J., & Janchivdorj, C.
1987Orchin cagiin mongol helnii ügzüin baiguulalt [The structure of (verbal) morphology of contemporary Mongolian]. Ulaanbaatar: Shinjleh uhaanii akadyemi.Google Scholar
Bybee, J., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W.
1994The evolution of grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chuluu, Ü.
1995Mongolian past tense markers and their usage. Mongolian Studies, 13, 85–112.Google Scholar
1998Studies on Mongolian verb morphology. Toronto: University of Toronto. Unpublished doctoral thesis.Google Scholar
Creissels, D.
2008Language documentation and verb inflection typology: The case of Northern Akhvakh (Nakh-Daghestanian). Paper presented at Chronos 9, 2–4 of October, Paris.
Croft, W.
2012 Verbs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Ö.
2013Tense-aspect-mood-evidentiality (TAME) and the organization of human memory. In K. V. Molsing & A. M. Tramunt Ibaños (Eds.), Time and TAME in language (22–53). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Haller, F.
2004Dialekt und Erzählungen von Themchen. Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar
Hashimoto, K. 橋本邦彦
1993aKakoji no ryōiki: Mongorugo no kakojikeisetsubiji no imi ni tsuite. Gengo kenkyū, 104, 1–20.Google Scholar
Hashimoto, K.
1993b “< -san4 > no imiron: hitotsu no keishiki to fukusū no imi no taiō ni tsuite. Muroran kōgyō daigaku kenkyū hōkoku (bunrihen), 43, 49–94.Google Scholar
1995Progressive in Mongolian. In T. Sakutarō, A. Kojiro, & M. Riichirō (Eds.), In honor of Nobuyuki Higashi (pp. 333–351). Tōkyō: Kenkyūsha.Google Scholar
2004Metarepresentational motivations – the grammaticalization of the verb of saying ge‑ in Mongolian. Tsukuba English Studies, 22, 35–49.Google Scholar
Heusinger, K. , von Klein, U., & Guntsetseg, D.
2011The case of accusative embedded subjects in Mongolian. Lingua, 121(1), 48–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Izvorski, R.
1997The present perfect as an epistemic modal. Proceedings of SALT VII, 222–239. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jingan
2010Mongorugo no modaritei. Tōkyō: Tōkyō gaikokugo daigaku. Unpublished doctoral thesis.Google Scholar
Johanson, L.
2003Evidentiality in Turkic. In A. Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Studies in evidentiality (273–290). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kalchofner, P.
1999Die Leistung der Indikativformen im Khalkha-Mongolischen. Zentralasiatische Studien, 29, 163–199.Google Scholar
2003Allaa – I get killed. The occurrence of the finite verbal forms ‑laa and -žee in Khalkha Mongolian. In A. Sárközi & A. Rákos Altaica budapestinensia MMII. Proceedings of the 45th Permanent International Altaistic Conference, Budapest, Hungary, June 23–28, 2002 (165–170). Budapest: Research group for Altaic studies, Hungarian academy of sciences; Department of Inner Asian studies, Eötvös Loránd University.
Kim, G. -S.
1995Orchin cagiin mongol helnii üil ügiin engiin cag, tüünii togtolcoo [The simple tenses of contemporary Mongolian and their system]. PhD dissertation (published 1998), Ulaanbaatar: Mongol ulsiin ündesnii ih surguul’.Google Scholar
Kullmann, R., & Tserenpil, D. -Y.
1996Mongolian grammar. Ulaanbaatar: Admon.Google Scholar
Matsuoka, Y. 松岡雄太
2008Mongorugo-no asupekuto-ni kan-suru kenkyū [A study of aspect in Mongolian]. Fukuoka: Kyūshū University.Unpublished doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Michael, L.
2006The moral implications of evidentiality in Nanti society: Epistemic distance as a pragmatic metaphor for moral responsibility. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Symposium about Language and Society– Austin, 13.Google Scholar
Mushin, I.
2001Evidentiality and epistemological stance– Narrative retelling. Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, D., Davidson, T., Narantuya, N., & Nordby, J.
1998Four past tense morphemes in Khalkh Mongol. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics, 6, 115–131.Google Scholar
Oswalt, R.
1986The evidential system of Kashaya. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality (29–45). Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
Plungian, V.
2011Types of verbal evidentiality marking. In G. Diewald, & E. Smirnova (Eds.), Linguistic realization of evidentiality in European languages (pp. 15–58). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Rule, W.
1977A comparative study of the Foe, Huli and Pole languages of Papua New Guinea. Sydney: University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Shibagaki, R.
2013Analysing secondary predication in East Asian languages. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Skribnik, E., & Seesing, O.
2014Evidentiality in Kalmyk. In A. Aikhenvald, & R. Dixon (Eds.), The grammar of knowledge (148–170). Oxford: Oxford UP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Song, J.
1997Tense, aspect and modality in Khalkha Mongolian. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of London, SOAS.Google Scholar
2002Grammaticalization of the verb ge‑ ‘to say’ in Khalkha Mongolian. Ƭsaka keizai hōka daigaku sōgō kagaku kenkyūsho nenpō, 3, 29–38.Google Scholar
Straughn, C.
2011Evidentiality in Uzbek and Kazakh. Chicago: University of Chicago. Unpublished dissertation.Google Scholar
Street, J.
1963Khalkha structure. Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar
2009On the three past tense endings of early Middle Mongolian. Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher 23, 126–159.Google Scholar
Svantesson, J- O.
1991Tense, mood and aspect in Mongolian. Lund University, Department of Linguistics, Working Papers, 38, 189–204.Google Scholar
Tatevosov, S.
2001From resultatives to evidentials– Multiple uses of the Perfect in Nakh-Daghestanian languages. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 443–464. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tournadre, N.
2008Arguments against the concept of ‘conjunct’/‘disjunct’ in Tibetan. In B. Huber, M. Volkart & P. Widmer (Eds.), Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek, Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier (281–308). Halle: IITBS.Google Scholar
Xuěyàn 雪艳
2013Mēnggǔyǔ chuánjù fànchóu (Evidentiality in Mongolian). In A. Yakup, L. Tohti, & D. Zhāng 张定京 (Eds.), Āěrtài yǔxì yǔyán chuánjù fànchóu yánjiū (180–186). Běijīng: Zhōngyāng mínzú dàxué chūbǎnshè.Google Scholar
[
Yáo, K.] Yuu, K. 2007Mongɣul kelen-ü “gekü” gedeg üge-yin tuqai ögülekü ni. Dumdadu ulus-un mongɣul sudulul 2007/4, 41–44.Google Scholar
Zeisler, B.
(2017) Don’t believe in a paradigm that you haven’t manipulated yourself!– Evidentiality, speaker’s attitude and admirativity in Ladakhi. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 15(2): 515–539.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Brosig, Benjamin
2021. Expressing intent, imminence and ire by attributing speech/thought in Mongolian. Folia Linguistica 0:0 Crossref logo
Brosig, Benjamin
2021. Expressing intent, imminence and ire by attributing speech/thought in Mongolian. Folia Linguistica 0:0 Crossref logo
San Roque, Lila
2019. Evidentiality. Annual Review of Anthropology 48:1  pp. 353 ff. Crossref logo
Slater, Keith W.
2018.  In Egophoricity [Typological Studies in Language, 118],  pp. 225 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 june 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.