Cover not available
Part of
Evidence for Evidentiality
Edited by Ad Foolen, Helen de Hoop and Gijs Mulder
[Human Cognitive Processing 61] 2018
► pp. 45–75

Chapter 2
Factual vs. evidential? The past tense forms of spoken Khalkha Mongolian

| Academia Sinica

Past tense forms of spoken Khalkha Mongolian distinguish between established (‑sang) and non-established knowledge, which is then either based on direct (‑laa) or indirect (‑jee) evidence. Time of acquisition thus determines whether information source is marked, though vivid recollection (‑laa) and deferred realization (‑jee) overrule it. Conversely, attempted recollection in questions (‑l=uu) doesn’t presuppose sensory perception. A fourth suffix (‑v) is used if well-established events still surprise the speaker. These suffixes may also be used in a discontinuous fashion to refer to the future and then modally qualify predictions as inevitable (‑sang), apprehended [but preventable] (‑v), based on sensory evidence (‑laa) or inferred (‑jee). The distinction between unsourced ‑sang and sourced ‑laa/-jee is thus not about factual stance, but codes the extent to which information is consolidated in memory.

Keywords: direct evidence, discontinuous tense, indirect evidence, mirative, preventive, time of acquisition
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Linguistic evidence
  • 3.Frequencies
  • 4.Established past ‑sang
  • 5.Direct past ‑laa
  • 6.Indirect past ‑jee
  • 7.-v
  • 8.Questions
  • 9.Futures
  • 10.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgement
  • Abbreviations
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 19 July 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.61.03bro
References
Aikhenvald, A.
2004 Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Binnick, R.
1979 Past and perfect in Modern Mongolian. In H. Schwarz (Ed.), Studies on Mongolia – Proceedings of the first North American conference on Mongolian studies, (pp. 1–13). Washington: Western Washington University, Center for East Asian studies.Google Scholar
1990 On the pragmatic differentiation of the Mongolian past tenses. Mongolian Studies, XIII, 47–56.Google Scholar
2012 The past tenses of the Mongolian verb. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Boye, K.
2012 Epistemic meaning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brosig, B.
2009 Depictives and resultatives in modern Khalkh Mongolian. Hokkaidō gengo bunka kenkyū, 7, 71–101.Google Scholar
2012 “Bilee” sul ügiin utga, hereglee [The meaning and usage of the particle “bile”]. Hel zohiol sudlal, V(37), 10–18.Google Scholar
2013a Review of SHIBAGAKI, Ryosuke. 2013. Analyzing secondary predication in East Asian languages. [URL].Google Scholar
2013b Review of BINNICK, Robert. The past tenses of the Mongolian verb. Linguistics, 51(1), 231–241.Google Scholar
2014a The aspect-evidentiality system of Middle Mongol. Ural-Altaic Studies, 13(2), 7–38.Google Scholar
2014b The tense-aspect system of Khorchin Mongolian. In P. Suihkonen & L. Whaley (Eds.), Typology of languages of Europe and Northern and Central Asia (3–65). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
2015 Aspect and related notions in the present tense system of Khalkha Mongolian. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana XI(3), 46–127.Google Scholar
Byambasan, P., Önörbayan, C., Pürev-Ochir, B., Sanjaa, J., & Janchivdorj, C.
1987 Orchin cagiin mongol helnii ügzüin baiguulalt [The structure of (verbal) morphology of contemporary Mongolian]. Ulaanbaatar: Shinjleh uhaanii akadyemi.Google Scholar
Bybee, J., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W.
1994 The evolution of grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chuluu, Ü.
1995 Mongolian past tense markers and their usage. Mongolian Studies, 13, 85–112.Google Scholar
1998 Studies on Mongolian verb morphology. Toronto: University of Toronto. Unpublished doctoral thesis.Google Scholar
Creissels, D.
2008 Language documentation and verb inflection typology: The case of Northern Akhvakh (Nakh-Daghestanian). Paper presented at Chronos 9, 2–4 of October, Paris.
Croft, W.
2012 Verbs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Ö.
2013 Tense-aspect-mood-evidentiality (TAME) and the organization of human memory. In K. V. Molsing & A. M. Tramunt Ibaños (Eds.), Time and TAME in language (22–53). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Haller, F.
2004 Dialekt und Erzählungen von Themchen. Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar
Hashimoto, K. 橋本邦彦
1993a Kakoji no ryōiki: Mongorugo no kakojikeisetsubiji no imi ni tsuite. Gengo kenkyū, 104, 1–20.Google Scholar
Hashimoto, K.
1993b “< -san4 > no imiron: hitotsu no keishiki to fukusū no imi no taiō ni tsuite. Muroran kōgyō daigaku kenkyū hōkoku (bunrihen), 43, 49–94.Google Scholar
1995 Progressive in Mongolian. In T. Sakutarō, A. Kojiro, & M. Riichirō (Eds.), In honor of Nobuyuki Higashi (pp. 333–351). Tōkyō: Kenkyūsha.Google Scholar
2004 Metarepresentational motivations – the grammaticalization of the verb of saying ge‑ in Mongolian. Tsukuba English Studies, 22, 35–49.Google Scholar
Heusinger, K. , von Klein, U., & Guntsetseg, D.
2011 The case of accusative embedded subjects in Mongolian. Lingua, 121(1), 48–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Izvorski, R.
1997 The present perfect as an epistemic modal. Proceedings of SALT VII, 222–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jingan
2010 Mongorugo no modaritei. Tōkyō: Tōkyō gaikokugo daigaku. Unpublished doctoral thesis.Google Scholar
Johanson, L.
2003 Evidentiality in Turkic. In A. Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Studies in evidentiality (273–290). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kalchofner, P.
1999 Die Leistung der Indikativformen im Khalkha-Mongolischen. Zentralasiatische Studien, 29, 163–199.Google Scholar
2003 Allaa – I get killed. The occurrence of the finite verbal forms ‑laa and -žee in Khalkha Mongolian. In A. Sárközi & A. Rákos Altaica budapestinensia MMII. Proceedings of the 45th Permanent International Altaistic Conference, Budapest, Hungary, June 23–28, 2002 (165–170). Budapest: Research group for Altaic studies, Hungarian academy of sciences; Department of Inner Asian studies, Eötvös Loránd University.
Kim, G. -S.
1995 Orchin cagiin mongol helnii üil ügiin engiin cag, tüünii togtolcoo [The simple tenses of contemporary Mongolian and their system]. PhD dissertation (published 1998), Ulaanbaatar: Mongol ulsiin ündesnii ih surguul’.Google Scholar
Kullmann, R., & Tserenpil, D. -Y.
1996 Mongolian grammar. Ulaanbaatar: Admon.Google Scholar
Matsuoka, Y. 松岡雄太
2008 Mongorugo-no asupekuto-ni kan-suru kenkyū [A study of aspect in Mongolian]. Fukuoka: Kyūshū University.Unpublished doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Michael, L.
2006 The moral implications of evidentiality in Nanti society: Epistemic distance as a pragmatic metaphor for moral responsibility. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Symposium about Language and Society– Austin, 13.Google Scholar
Mushin, I.
2001 Evidentiality and epistemological stance– Narrative retelling. Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nelson, D., Davidson, T., Narantuya, N., & Nordby, J.
1998 Four past tense morphemes in Khalkh Mongol. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics, 6, 115–131.Google Scholar
Oswalt, R.
1986 The evidential system of Kashaya. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality (29–45). Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
Plungian, V.
2011 Types of verbal evidentiality marking. In G. Diewald, & E. Smirnova (Eds.), Linguistic realization of evidentiality in European languages (pp. 15–58). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Rule, W.
1977 A comparative study of the Foe, Huli and Pole languages of Papua New Guinea. Sydney: University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Shibagaki, R.
2013 Analysing secondary predication in East Asian languages. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Skribnik, E., & Seesing, O.
2014 Evidentiality in Kalmyk. In A. Aikhenvald, & R. Dixon (Eds.), The grammar of knowledge (148–170). Oxford: Oxford UP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Song, J.
1997 Tense, aspect and modality in Khalkha Mongolian. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of London, SOAS.Google Scholar
2002 Grammaticalization of the verb ge‑ ‘to say’ in Khalkha Mongolian. Ƭsaka keizai hōka daigaku sōgō kagaku kenkyūsho nenpō, 3, 29–38.Google Scholar
Straughn, C.
2011 Evidentiality in Uzbek and Kazakh. Chicago: University of Chicago. Unpublished dissertation.Google Scholar
Street, J.
1963 Khalkha structure. Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar
2009 On the three past tense endings of early Middle Mongolian. Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher 23, 126–159.Google Scholar
Svantesson, J- O.
1991 Tense, mood and aspect in Mongolian. Lund University, Department of Linguistics, Working Papers, 38, 189–204.Google Scholar
Tatevosov, S.
2001 From resultatives to evidentials– Multiple uses of the Perfect in Nakh-Daghestanian languages. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 443–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tournadre, N.
2008 Arguments against the concept of ‘conjunct’/‘disjunct’ in Tibetan. In B. Huber, M. Volkart & P. Widmer (Eds.), Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek, Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier (281–308). Halle: IITBS.Google Scholar
Xuěyàn 雪艳
2013 Mēnggǔyǔ chuánjù fànchóu (Evidentiality in Mongolian). In A. Yakup, L. Tohti, & D. Zhāng 张定京 (Eds.), Āěrtài yǔxì yǔyán chuánjù fànchóu yánjiū (180–186). Běijīng: Zhōngyāng mínzú dàxué chūbǎnshè.Google Scholar
[
Yáo, K.] Yuu, K. 2007 Mongɣul kelen-ü “gekü” gedeg üge-yin tuqai ögülekü ni. Dumdadu ulus-un mongɣul sudulul 2007/4, 41–44.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Brosig, Benjamin
2021. Expressing intent, imminence and ire by attributing speech/thought in Mongolian. Folia Linguistica 0:0 DOI logo
Brosig, Benjamin
2021. Expressing intent, imminence and ire by attributing speech/thought in Mongolian. Folia Linguistica 55:2 ► pp. 433 ff. DOI logo
San Roque, Lila
2019. Evidentiality. Annual Review of Anthropology 48:1 ► pp. 353 ff. DOI logo
Slater, Keith W.
2018. Chapter 8. Morphological innovations in Mangghuer and Shirongolic. In Egophoricity [Typological Studies in Language, 118], ► pp. 225 ff. DOI logo
Wu, Tana
2023. Metaphors and culturally unique idioms of eating and drinking in Mongolian. Language and Cognition 15:1 ► pp. 173 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.