Chapter published in:
Evidence for Evidentiality
Edited by Ad Foolen, Helen de Hoop and Gijs Mulder
[Human Cognitive Processing 61] 2018
► pp. 121141
References

References

Aikhenvald, A. Y.
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aijmer, K.
2009Seem and evidentiality. Functions of Language, 16, 63–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W.
1986Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In W. Chafe, & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality. The linguistic coding of epistemology (261–272). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Cornillie, B.
2009Evidentiality and epistemic modality. On the close relationship between two different categories. Functions of Language, 16, 44–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, V., & Green, M.
2006Cognitive linguistics. An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Hakulinen, A., Vilkuna, M., Korhonen, R., Koivisto, V., Heinonen, T. R., & Alho, I.
2004Iso suomen kielioppi. [Descriptive grammar of contemporary Finnish.] Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society. http://​scripta​.kotus​.fi​/viskGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J.
2012Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45, 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaakola, M.
2011Epäspesifi evidentiaali. Nykysuomen tiettävästi . [The non-specific evidential: the word tiettävästi ‘as far as is known’ in contemporary Finnish.] Virittäjä, 115, 515–541.Google Scholar
2012Displaying knowledge in journalistic texts: a contrastive analysis of an evidential particle in Estonian and Finnish. Close Comparisons, 22, 43–70.Google Scholar
Juvonen, R.
2010Evaluoiva että-yhdyslause ja retoriset rakenteet suomenkielisessä ylioppilasaineessa. [Evaluative että ‘that’ clause constructions and rhetorical structures in Finnish matriculation essays] Virittäjä, 114, 39–70.Google Scholar
2011Tietämisen tasot. Tiedän-rakenteet ylioppilasaineissa. [Levels of knowing. ‘I know’ constructions in the Finnish language matriculation exams.] In A. Kauppinen, H. Lehti-Eklund, H. Makkonen-Craig, & R. Juvonen (Eds.), Lukiolaisten äidinkieli: suomen- ja ruotsinkielisten lukioiden opiskelijoiden tekstimaisemat ja kirjoitustaitojen arviointi (239–264). Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, C., & Kiparsky, P.
1971Fact. In D. D. Steinberg, & L. A. Jakobovits (Eds.), Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology (345–369). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
1987Foundations of cognitive grammar I. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R.
2005The language of evaluation. Appraisal in English. London & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mushin, I.
2001Evidentiality and epistemological stance. Narrative retelling. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, J.
2001Epistemic modality, language, and conceptualization. A cognitive-pragmatic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L.
1971The new rhetoric. A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame (IN): University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Rahtu, T.
2011Irony and (in)coherence: interpreting irony using reader responses to texts. Text and Talk, 31, 335–354. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, A -M., & Aijmer, K.
2003The expectation marker ‘of course’. Languages in Contrast, 4, 13–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007The semantic field of modal certainty. A corpus-based study of English adverbs. [Topics in English linguistics 56]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, A -M., White, P. R. R., & Aijmer, K.
2007Presupposition and ‘taking-for-granted’ in mass communicated political argument. In A. Fetzer, & G. Lauerbach (Eds.), Political discourse in the media: cross-cultural perspectives (31–74). Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, T.
2011Morality and question design: “of course” as contesting a presupposition of askability. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada, & J. Steensig (Eds.), The morality of knowing in conversation (82–106). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, T., Mondada, L., Steensig, J.
2011Knowledge, morality and affiliation in Social Interaction. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada, & J. Steensig (Eds.), The morality of knowing in conversation (3–24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, A.
2005Constructions of intersubjectivity. Discourse, syntax, and cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Välttilä, V.
2014 Tietää-verbin merkitys. Semanttinen analyysi sanomalehtiaineiston pohjalta. [Semantic analysis of tietää ‘know’ in newspaper genre.] MA thesis, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar