Chapter published in:
Evidence for Evidentiality
Edited by Ad Foolen, Helen de Hoop and Gijs Mulder
[Human Cognitive Processing 61] 2018
► pp. 145172
References

Sources

References

Aikhenvald, A. Y.
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aksu-Koç, A.
1988The acquisition of aspect and modality. The case of past reference in Turkish [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics. Supplementary Volume]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aksu-Koç, A., & Slobin, D.
1986A psychological account of the development and use of evidentials in Turkish. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (159–167). Norwood/New Jersey: Ablex. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aksu-Koç, A., Ögel-Balaban, H., & Alp Ercan, I.
2009Evidentials and source knowledge in Turkish. New Directions in Child and Adolescent Development, 125, 13–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aksu-Koç, A., Cağlar, L. R., Csibra, G. & Tamm, A.
2014Do Turkish indirect evidential sentences provide information but thwart generalization?. Paper presented at the Workshop Empirical Evidence for Evidentiality, Nijmegen, January 9-10.
Argus, R., Kapanen, A., Kütt, A., Parm, S., Suurmäe, K., & Tamm, A.
2013Evidentsiaalidel on täiskasvanute ja laste seas erinev funktsioon. Conference paper presented at Teoreetiline Keeleteadus Eestis, Tartu, December 16–17.
Argus, R., Suurmäe, K., Kütt, A., & Tamm, A.
2014Eesti kaudse evidentsiaalsuse morfoloogilise markeri omandamisest: mõistmiskatse tulemused [Acquiring evidentiality in Estonian: the results of a comprehension experiment]. Series of the Institute of the Estonian Language and Culture of the University of Tallinn, 83–102. Tallinn: University of Tallinn.Google Scholar
Butler, L. P., & Markman, E. M.
2012Preschoolers use intentional and pedagogical cues to guide inductive inferences and exploration. Child Development, 83, 1416–1428. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burkova, S.
2004Evidentsial‘nost’ i epistemicheskaja modalxnost’ v nentskom jazike [Evidentiality and epistemic modality in Nenets]. In Y. A. Lander, V. A. Plungyan & A. Y. Urmanchieva (Eds.), Issledovanija po teorii grammatiki 3: Irrealis i irreal’nost’ (353–374). Moskva: GnozisGoogle Scholar
Choi, S.
1995The development of epistemic sentence-ending modal forms and functions in Korean children. In J. Bybee, & S. Fleischman (Eds.), Modality in grammar and discourse [Typological Studies in Language 32], (165–204). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E.
2004How language acquisition builds on cognitive development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(10), 472–478. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coppen, P. -A., & Foolen, A.
2012Dutch quotative van: Past and present. In I. Buchstaller, & I. van Alphen (Eds.), Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary perspectives [Converging evidence in language and communication research 15] (259–280). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Csepregi, M.
2014Evidentiality in dialects of Khanty. Linguistica Uralica, 3, 199–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Csibra, G., & Gergely, G.
2011Natural pedagogy as evolutionary adaptation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366 (1567), 1149–1157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Culbertson, J., Legendre, G., & Smolensky, P.
2010Learning biases predict a word order universal. Cognition, 122(3), 306–329. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Erelt, M.
2002Evidentiality in Estonian and some other languages. Introductory remarks. Linguistica Uralica, 2, 93–97.Google Scholar
2013Eesti keele lauseõpetus. Sissejuhatus. Öeldis [Tartu Ülikooli eesti keele osakonna preprindid 4]. Tartu: University of Tartu.Google Scholar
Erelt, M., Metslang, H., & Pajusalu, K.
2006Tense and evidentiality in Estonian. In B. Cornillie, & N. Delbecque (Eds.), Topics in Subjectification and Modalization [Belgian journal of Linguistics 20] (125–136). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fitneva, S.
2001Epistemic marking and reliability judgments: evidence from Bulgarian. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(3), 401–420. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, S. A.
2010Generics as a window onto young children’s concepts. In F. J. Pelletier (Ed.), Kinds, things, and stuff: The cognitive side of generics and mass terms [New Directions in Cognitive Science 12] (100–122). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gopnik, A., & Graf, P.
1988Knowing how you know: Young children’s ability to identify and remember the source of their beliefs. Child Development, 59, 1366–1371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gusev, V.
2015Negation in Nganasan. In M. Miestamo, A. Tamm, & B. Wagner-Nagy (Eds.), Negation in Uralic languages [Typological Studies in Language 108] (103–132). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Haan, F.
2000Evidentiality in Dutch. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 74–85. Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley.
2005Encoding speaker perspective: Evidentials. In Z. Frajzyngier, A. Hodges & D. S. Rood (Eds.), Linguistic diversity and language theories. Amsterdam// = Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
House, B. R., Silk, J. B., Henrich, J., Barrett, H. C., Scelza, B. A., Boyette, A. H., Hewlett, B. S., McElreath, R., & Laurence, S.
2013Ontogeny of prosocial behaviour across diverse societies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 10, 14586–14591.
Keevallik, L.
2000Keelendid et ja nii et vestluses [The linguistic items et and nii et in conversation]. Keel ja Kirjandus, 43(5), 344–358.Google Scholar
Kehayov, P.
2004Eesti keele evidentsiaalsussüsteem mõne teise keele taustal. Morfosüntaks ja distributsioon. Keel ja Kirjandus, 11, 812–829.Google Scholar
2008An areal-typological perspective to evidentiality: the cases of the Balkan and Baltic linguistic areas. PhD dissertation, University of Tartu.Google Scholar
Kehayov, P., Metslang, H., & Pajusalu, K.
2012Evidentials in Livonian. Linguistica Uralica, 48(1), 41–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiefer, F.
2000Jelentéselmélet [Semantic theory]. Budapest: Corvina.Google Scholar
Kittilä, S.
2013 Use of evidential markers in declaratives and interrogatives. Paper presented at Association for Linguistic Typology 10th Biennial Conference, Bienne, August 15–18.
Kugler, N.
2014The dynamic construal of epistential meaning. Argumentum, 10, 403–420.Google Scholar
Kuznecova, A., Helimskij, E., & Gruškina, E. V.
1980Očerki po seľkupskomu jazyku [Sketch Grammar of Selkup]. Moskva: Izdateľstvo Moskovskogo universiteta.Google Scholar
Kütt, A., Tamm, A., & Argus, R.
2014Evidentsiaalsus ja kognitiivne dissonants: ühe esmase katse tulemused. Oma Keel, 28, 51–58.Google Scholar
Leinonen, M.
2000Evidentiality in Komi Zyryan. In L. Johanson, & B. Utas (Eds.), Evidentials: Turkic, Iranian and neighbouring languages (419–490). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Metslang, H., & Pajusalu, K.
2002Evidentiality in South Estonian. Linguistica Uralica, 2, 98–108.Google Scholar
Miestamo, M., Tamm, A., & Wagner-Nagy, B.
(Eds.) 2015Negation in Uralic languages [Typological Studies in Language 108]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, D., & Gopnik, A.
1991Young children’s ability to identify the source of their beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 27, 390–397. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Öztürk, Ö., & Papafragou, A.
2007Children’s acquisition of evidentiality. 31st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Proceedings Supplement, http://​papafragou​.psych​.udel​.edu​/papers​/BU​-Ozge​.pdf (last accessed: 30/09/2015).
Palmer, F. R.
1986Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Papafragou, A., Li, P., Choi, Y., & Han, C. -H.
2007Evidentiality in language and cognition. Cognition, 103, 253–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pillow, B. H.
1989Early understanding of perception as a source of knowledge. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 47, 116–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rett, J., Hyams, N., & Winans, L.
2013The effects of syntax on the acquisition of evidentiality. In S. Baiz, N. Goldman, & R. Hawkes (Eds.), Proceedings of the Boston University Conference on Language Development 37 (345–357). Somerville: Cascadilla Press.
Sepper, M. -M.
2005Vahendatuse morfosüntaktiline väljendamine eesti kirjakeeles 19. sajandi lõpust 20. sajandi lõpuni. Master’s thesis, Tallinn University.Google Scholar
Siegl, F.
2004The 2nd past in the Permic languages. Form, function, and a comparative analysis from a typological perspective. Master’s thesis, University of Tartu.Google Scholar
Sipőcz, K.
2014A manysi evidenciálisról. [On the Mansi evidentials.] Folia Uralica Debreceniensia, 21, 121–141.Google Scholar
Slobin, D., & Aksu, A. A.
1982Tense, aspect, and modality in the use of the Turkish evidential. In P. J. Hopper (Ed.), Tense-aspect: Between semantics and pragmatics [Typological Studies in Language 1] (185–200). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. < CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tamm, A.
2009The Estonian partitive evidential. Some notes on the semantic parallels between the aspect and evidential categories. In L. Hogeweg, H. de Hoop, & A. Malchukov (Eds.), Cross-linguistic semantics of tense, aspect, and modality [Linguistics Today 148] (365–401). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Cross-categorial spatial case in the Finnic non-finite system: focus on the absentive TAM semantics and pragmatics of the Estonian inessive m-formative non-finites. Linguistics, 49 (4), 835–944. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Partitive objects and the partitive evidential marker ‑vat in Estonian express incomplete evidence. Finnisch-ugrische Mitteilungen, 35, 97–140.Google Scholar
Tamm, A., Argus, R., & Suurmäe, K.
2013Evidentsiaalid: kas uskuda või mitte? Teabe vormi mõju eesti koolieelikute käitumisele. Estonian Mother Tongue Society Year Book, 59, 244–261. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tamm, A., Argus, R., Kapanen, A., Kütt, A., & Suurmäe, K.
2015Evidentsiaalsuse ja episteemilise modaalsuse suhetest eesti lastekeeles käitumiskatsete põhjal. Estonian Papers in Applied Linguistics, 11, 263–280.Google Scholar
Usenkova, E.
2015Evidentiality in the Samoyedic languages: A study of the auditive forms. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 62(2), 171–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verkuyl, H. J.
1972Van als complementizer? Taalkundige Bijlage van Blad, 1, 217–220.Google Scholar
de Villiers, J., Garfield, J., Gernet-Girard, H., Roeper, T., & Speas, M.
2009Evidentials in Tibetan: Acquisition, semantics, and cognitive development. In S. A. Fitneva, & T. Matsui (Eds.), Evidentiality: A Window into Language and Cognitive Development [New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 125] (29–47). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Wagner-Nagy, B.
2015Negation in Selkup. In M. Miestamo, A. Tamm & B. Wagner-Nagy (Eds.), Negation in Uralic Languages [Typological Studies in Language 108] (13–158). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xanthos, A., Laaha, S., Gillis, S., Stephany, U., Aksu-Koç, A., Christofidou, A., Gagarina, N., Hrzica, G., Ketrez, F. N., Kilani-Schoch, M., Korecky-Kröll, K., Kovačević, M., Laalo, K., Palmovic, M., Pfeiler, B., Voeikova, M. D., & Dressler, W. U.
2011On the role of morphological richness in the early development of noun and verb inflection. First Language, 31(4), 461–479. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zufferey, S.
2010Lexical pragmatics and theory of mind. The acquisition of connectives [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 201]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar